RSA in Spine: A Review

Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Motion and Foraminal Changes During the Spurling Test Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography-Based Micromotion Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical experimental diagnostic study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate cervical spine dynamics including changes in the cervical foramina in patients experiencing intermittent arm radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND

Cervical foraminal stenosis is a frequent cause of radicular arm pain. The Spurling test, while specific, lacks the precision to identify symptomatic nerve roots. The relationship among vertebral motion, foraminal changes, and radiculopathy during a Spurling test remains underexplored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with positive Spurling tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed 1 or 2-level cervical foraminal stenosis were scanned using the Dynamic MRI Compression System enabling a simulated Spurling test inside the MRI gantry of a 3T MRI scanner with a dedicated neck coil. First, a relaxed image acquisition was undertaken, followed by slowly applying the Spurling test until the patient reported aggravation of radiculopathy or discomfort, where the next image series was taken. Zero echo time MRI was employed to obtain computed tomography (CT)-like images. The images were thereafter analyzed using the Sectra® CT-based Micromotion Analysis software for motion analysis.

RESULTS

The C4/C5 level exhibited the most significant movements both in translation and rotation, with less movements observed in C5 to C6 and C6 to C7 levels. No uniform pattern emerged that differentiated suspected stenotic levels from nonsuspected levels. Despite relatively small vertebral movements, 9/10 of patients reported arm pain during provocation, indicating extremely narrow margins of tolerance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the utility of zero echo time MRI and CT-based Micromotion Analysis in detecting subtle yet clinically relevant vertebral motions influencing the foramina in the cervical spine during the Spurling maneuver. These findings could lead to a better understanding and potentially improved diagnostic strategies for cervical foraminal stenosis, although further research with a larger cohort is necessary to confirm these results.

In vivo cervical vertebrae kinematic studies based on dual fluoroscopic imaging system measurement: A narrative review

Understanding the motion characteristics of cervical spine through biomechanical analysis aids in the identification of abnormal joint movements. This knowledge is essential for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of related disorders. However, the anatomical structure of the cervical spine is complex, and traditional medical imaging techniques have certain limitations. Capturing the movement characteristics of various parts of the cervical spine in vivo during motion is challenging. The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) is able to quantify the motion and motion patterns of individual segments. In recent years, DFIS has achieved accurate non-invasive measurements of dynamic joint movements in humans. This review assesses the research findings of DFIS about the cervical spine in healthy and pathological individuals. Relevant study search was conducted up to October 2023 in Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCO databases. After the search, a total of 30 studies were ultimately included. Among them, 13 studies focused on healthy cervical spines, while 17 studies focused on pathological cervical spines. These studies mainly centered on exploring the vertebral bodies and associated structures of the cervical spine, including intervertebral discs, intervertebral foramina, and zygapophyseal joints. Further research could utilize DFIS to investigate cervical spine motion in different populations and under pathological conditions.

Assessment of Bone Healing: Opportunities to Improve the Standard of Care

➤ Bone healing is commonly evaluated by clinical examination and serial radiographic evaluation. Physicians should be mindful that personal and cultural differences in pain perception may affect the clinical examination. Radiographic assessment, even with the Radiographic Union Score, is qualitative, with limited interobserver agreement.➤ Physicians may use serial clinical and radiographical examinations to assess bone healing in most patients, but in ambiguous and complicated cases, they may require other methods to provide assistance in decision-making.➤ In complicated instances, clinically available biomarkers, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging may determine initial callus development. Quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis can estimate bone strength in later callus consolidation phases.➤ As a future direction, quantitative rigidity assessments for bone healing may help patients to return to function earlier by increasing a clinician's confidence in successful progressive healing.

Experimental evaluation of precision and accuracy of RSA in the lumbar spine

PURPOSE

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis is a technique to make accurate assessments of the relative position and orientation of bone structures and implants in vivo. While the precision and accuracy of stereophotogrammetry for hip and knee arthroplasty is well documented, there is insufficient knowledge of the technique's precision and, especially accuracy when applied to rotational movements in the spinal region.

METHODS

The motion of one cadaver lumbar spine segment (L3/L4) was analyzed in flexion-extension, lateral bending and internal rotation. The specific aim of this study was to examine the precision and accuracy of stereophotogrammetry in a controlled in vitro setting, taking the surrounding soft tissue into account. The second objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different focal spot values of X-ray tubes.

RESULTS

Overall, the precision of flexion-extension measurements was found to be better when using a 0.6 mm focal spot value rather than 1.2 mm (± 0.056° and ± 0.153°; respectively), and accuracy was also slightly better for the 0.6 mm focal spot value compared to 1.2 mm (- 0.137° and - 0.170°; respectively). The best values for precision and accuracy were obtained in lateral bending for both 0.6 mm and 1.2 mm focal spot values (precision: ± 0.019° and ± 0.015°, respectively; accuracy: - 0.041° and - 0.035°).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the results suggest stereophotogrammetry to be a highly precise method to analyze motion of the lumbar spine. Since precision and accuracy are better than 0.2° for both focal spot values, the choice between these is of minor clinical relevance.

A phantom and cadaveric study of radiostereometric analysis in posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Detecting pseudarthrosis following spinal fusion is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Current diagnostic measures hold certain drawbacks. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a radiographic technique with the capability to measure intervertebral segment changes and may be a novel way of assessing fusion.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to measure the accuracy and precision of RSA in instrumented posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion for measuring intervertebral movement. Further, to gain surgical practice with RSA in spine and determine optimal bead placements.

STUDY DESIGN

Artificial bone and cadaveric spine models were used to simulate a 3-level cervical (C3-C6) and a 2-level (L4-S1) lumbosacral posterior spinal fusion to analyze bead placements and to measure RSA accuracy and precision.

METHODS

Preliminary RSA bead placements were planned and measured in the artificial model. Secondary bead placements were adjusted slightly in the cadaveric model to consider additional fusion scenarios. Bead spread, detectability, and stability were measured to determine optimal placements. Translational and rotational precision of both models were measured. Accuracy was measured in the artificial spine model. Model-based RSA software was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Optimal bead placements were found to be throughout the lateral mass of C3-C6 and in the spinous process, transverse process, and within the screw canal of L4-S1. Detectability was high among all segments. Spread was greater in L4-S1 than C3-C6 due to bead collinearity along the transverse axis of the cervical vertebrae. Translational and rotational RSA accuracy in cervical and lumbosacral regions ranged between 0.005 to 0.014 mm and 0.058 to 0.208°. Translational and rotational precision measured in the phantom models ranged 0.017 to 0.131 mm and 0.058 to 0.394° in C3-C6, and 0.086 to 0.191 mm and 0.200 to 0.369° in L4-S1. Translational and rotational precision measured in the cadaveric models ranged 0.054 to 0.548 mm and 0.148 to 1.386° in C3-C6, and 0.068 to 0.164 mm and 0.100 to 0.270° in L4-S1.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA was found to be a feasible radiographic technique in C3-C6 and L4-S1 spinal fusion when measured in artificial and cadaveric models. Optimal bead placements were determined. Bead spread was shown to be better throughout the lumbar region than the cervical region due to anatomical size variations. RSA accuracy and precision were within acceptable RSA criteria.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The results from this work contribute to the accuracy, precision, and bead placements for studying RSA in cervical and lumbar spinal fusions. This work may further support the development of clinical studies to assess spinal fusion by evaluating postoperative intervertebral movement using RSA.

Mechanical Stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Preliminary, Observational Study Using Radiostereometric Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the primary stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty with regard to the adjacent cervical vertebrae using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and to monitor its clinical performance.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were included. RSA radiographs were obtained at the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Migration (translation [mm]) of the superior and inferior implant components were measured with model-based RSA, expressed along the 3 orthogonal axes, and calculated as total translation. Clinical outcomes were Neck Disability Index, numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain, Likert-type scales for satisfaction, and adverse events. Range of motion was reported as C2-C7 flexion-extension mobility (ROM).

RESULTS

At final follow-up, no significant increase over time in median total translation was found. One inferior and 3 superior components subsided but were asymptomatic. ROM remained stable and clinical outcomes improved over time. Although 3 patients were unsatisfied and 3 adverse events occurred, this was not related to translation of the components.

CONCLUSIONS

On a group level, both components of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty remained stable over time and below the clinical threshold of 1 mm. Individual outliers for translation were not clinically relevant and probably related to settling of the components into the vertebral endplates. RSA allowed us to perform a preliminary but accurate study on the micromotion of a new cervical disc replacement in a small sample size, without putting large numbers of patients at risk.