1
|
Muthu S, Ćorluka S, Buser Z, Malcolm JG, Luo Z, Gollahalli Shivashankar P, Ambrosio L, Griffoni C, Demetriades AK, Ivandić S, Wu Y, Wang J, Meisel HJ, Yoon TS. Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature. JB JS Open Access 2024; 9:e23.00163. [PMID: 38974406 PMCID: PMC11221853 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.23.00163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with decompression-only procedure has been performed for its added benefit of a shorter duration of surgery, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, reported failure rates for decompression-only procedures vary depending on the methods utilized for decompression. Hence, we aim to identify the failure rates of individual methods of decompression-only procedures performed for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods An independent systematic review of 4 scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Studies reporting on failure rates defined by reoperation at the index level following decompression-only procedure for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included for analysis. Studies were appraised using ROBINS tool of Cochrane, and analysis was performed using the Open Meta[Analyst] software. Results The overall failure rate of decompression-only procedure was 9.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] [6.5-11.7]). Furthermore, open decompression had failure rate of 10.9% (95% CI [6.0-15.8]), while microendoscopic decompression had failure rate of 6.7% (95% CI [2.9-10.6]). The failure rate gradually increased from 6.9% (95% CI [2.0-11.7]) at 1 year to 7% (95% CI [3.6-10.3]), 11.7% (95% CI [4.5-18.9]), and 11.7% (95% CI [6.6-16.7]) at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Single level decompression had a failure rate of 9.6% (95% CI [6.3-12.9]), while multilevel decompression recorded a failure rate of 8.7% (95% CI [5.6-11.7]). Conclusion High-quality evidence on the decompression-only procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis is limited. The decompression-only procedure had an overall failure rate of 9.1% without significant differences between the decompression techniques. Level of Evidence Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathish Muthu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Karur, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Stipe Ćorluka
- Spinal Surgery Division, Traumatology Department, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
- Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | | | - Zhuojing Luo
- Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Xijing Hospital, China
| | | | - Luca Ambrosio
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiana Griffoni
- Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andreas K. Demetriades
- Department of Neurosurgery, Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Stjepan Ivandić
- Spinal Surgery Division, Traumatology Department, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Yabin Wu
- Research Department, AO Spine, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hans-Jorg Meisel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bergmannstrost Hospital, Halle, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahi P, Singh S, Morse K, Maayan O, Subramanian T, Araghi K, Singh N, Tuma OC, Asada T, Korsun MK, Dowdell J, Sheha ED, Sandhu H, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. [PMID: 38907067 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of decompression alone and fusion for L4-5 DLS in different age cohorts (< 70 years, ≥ 70 years). METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression or fusion for L4-5 DLS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were: (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI; Visual Analog Scale back and leg, VAS; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS), (2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID), (3) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), (4) response on the global rating change (GRC) scale, and (5) complication rates. The decompression and fusion groups were compared for outcomes separately in the < 70-year and ≥ 70-year age cohorts. RESULTS 233 patients were included, out of which 52% were < 70 years. Patients < 70 years showed non-significant improvement in SF-12 PCS and significantly lower MCID achievement rates for VAS back after decompression compared to fusion. Analysis of the ≥ 70-year age cohort showed no significant differences between the decompression and fusion groups in the improvement in PROMs, MCID/PASS achievement rates, and responses on GRC. Patients ≥ 70 years undergoing fusion had significantly higher in-hospital complication rates. When analyzed irrespective of the surgery type, both < 70-year and ≥ 70-year age cohorts showed significant improvement in PROMs with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS Patients < 70 years undergoing decompression alone did not show significant improvement in physical function and had significantly less MCID achievement rate for back pain compared to fusion. Patients ≥ 70 years showed no difference in outcomes between decompression alone and fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Kyle Morse
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Olivia C Tuma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Maximilian K Korsun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Harvinder Sandhu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rangwalla K, Filley A, El Naga A, Gendelberg D, Baldwin A, Maziad A, Arora A, Wague A, O'Donnell J, Chryssikos T, Kasir R, Shah J, Theologis A, Tan L, Mummaneni P, Alamin T, Berven SH. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:1762-1772. [PMID: 37543967 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07818-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. METHODS The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. RESULTS Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. CONCLUSION The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khuzaima Rangwalla
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anna Filley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ashraf El Naga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Gendelberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Avionna Baldwin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ali Maziad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ayush Arora
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aboubacar Wague
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Chryssikos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rafid Kasir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jay Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alekos Theologis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lee Tan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Praveen Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd Alamin
- Department of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Sigurd H Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chanbour H, Tang AR, Steinle AM, Jonzzon S, Roth SG, Gardocki RJ, Stephens BF, Abtahi AM, Zuckerman SL. In Reply: Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:e15-e16. [PMID: 37916821 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hani Chanbour
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Alan R Tang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Anthony M Steinle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee , Wisconsin , USA
| | - Soren Jonzzon
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Steven G Roth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York , New York , USA
| | - Raymond J Gardocki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Byron F Stephens
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Amir M Abtahi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| | - Scott L Zuckerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville , Tennessee , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sesodia R, Ganeshkumar A, Kedia S, Borkar SA. Letter: Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:e13-e14. [PMID: 37916810 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Sesodia
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi , India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaiser R, Kantorová L, Langaufová A, Slezáková S, Tučková D, Klugar M, Klézl Z, Barsa P, Cienciala J, Hajdúk R, Hrabálek L, Kučera R, Netuka D, Prýmek M, Repko M, Smrčka M, Štulík J. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 94:657-666. [PMID: 36849239 PMCID: PMC10359551 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0-100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI -4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD -5·92 points (95% CI -11.00 to -0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD -1.25 points (95% CI -6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022308267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radek Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucia Kantorová
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alena Langaufová
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Simona Slezáková
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dagmar Tučková
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Miloslav Klugar
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdeněk Klézl
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Barsa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Cienciala
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Richard Hajdúk
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lumír Hrabálek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Kučera
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Netuka
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Prýmek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Repko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrčka
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Štulík
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1505-1514. [PMID: 35867599 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort comparison study. OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative outcomes, radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between minimally invasive unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression (MIS-ULBD) versus MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for treatment of low-grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA While lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a common condition, optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. Newer MIS techniques, which preserve bone, paraspinal musculature, and posterior midline stabilizers, are thought to reduce the risk of iatrogenic instability and may obviate the need for fusion. However, few comparative studies of MIS techniques for low-grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis currently exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with low-grade (Meyerding grade I or II) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with single-level MIS-ULBD or MIS-TLIF were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected spine surgery registry from April 2017 to November 2021. Perioperative outcomes, radiographic data, and PROMs were assessed. RESULTS A total of 188 patients underwent either MIS-ULBD or MIS-TLIF (79 MIS-ULBD and 109 MIS-TLIF). Patients who underwent MIS-ULBD tended to be older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower mean percentage back pain, higher percentage of L4/L5 pathology, shorter operative time, lower estimated blood loss, and lower postoperative pain ( P <0.05). In both groups, there were statistically significant improvements at one year for five of the six PROMs studied: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS)-back pain, VAS-leg pain, Short Form 12 Physical Component Score (SF12-PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) ( P <0.05). On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, there were no associations between procedure type and achieving minimal clinically important difference at one year in any of the PROMs studied. CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that both MIS-ULBD and MIS-TLIF result in significant improvements in pain and physical function for patients with low-grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCES 3.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kamenova M, Li E, Soleman J, Fiebig O, Mehrkens A, Schaeren S. Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 143:2831-2843. [PMID: 35511354 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04448-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the lack of guidelines regarding the operative management of elderly patients needing lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disease, it is often difficult to balance between invasiveness respecting the fragile spine and geriatric comorbidities. AIM To compare reoperation rates and clinical outcome in patients above 70 years of age undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods or posterior stabilization with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for the treatment of one-level lumbar spine degenerative disease. METHODS Retrospective review of baseline characteristics, reoperation rates as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients, older than 70 years, undergoing posterolateral fusion with PEEK rods (n = 76, PEEK group) or TLIF with titanium rods (n = 67, TLIF group) for a single-level lumbar degenerative disease from 2014 to 2020. Additional subanalysis on the patients above 80 years of age was performed. RESULTS Our results showed similar reoperation rates and outcomes in the TLIF and PEEK groups. However, intraoperative blood loss, administration of tranexamic acid, and operation time were significantly higher in the TLIF group. In patients older than 80 years, reoperation rates at first follow-up were significantly higher in the TLIF group, too. CONCLUSION According to our results, posterior stabilization with PEEK rods is less invasive and was associated with significantly lower blood loss, administration of blood products and shorter operation time. Moreover, in patients above 80 years of age reoperations rates were lower with PEEK rods, as well. Nevertheless, the benefits of PEEK rods for foraminal stenosis still have to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kamenova
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. .,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - E Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Soleman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - O Fiebig
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Mehrkens
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| | - S Schaeren
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stable Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in Patients with Spinal Stenosis. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57111270. [PMID: 34833488 PMCID: PMC8622409 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In recent literature, the routine addition of arthrodesis to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with concomitant stable low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome, complication and re-operation rates following minimally invasive (MIS) tubular decompression without arthrodesis in patients suffering from LSS with or without concomitant stable low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Ninety-six consecutive patients who underwent elective MIS lumbar decompression with a mean follow-up of 27.5 months were included in the study. The spondylolisthesis (S) group comprised 53 patients who suffered from LSS with stable degenerative spondylolisthesis, and the control (N) group included 43 patients suffering from LSS without spondylolisthesis. Outcome measures included complications and revision surgery rates. Pre- and post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) for both back and leg pain was analyzed, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results: The two groups were comparable in most demographic and preoperative variables. VAS for back and leg pain improved significantly following surgery in both groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in their ODI scores, at one and two years postoperatively. The average length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with spondylolisthesis (p-value< 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of post-operative complications rates or re-operation rates. Conclusions: Our results indicate that MIS tubular decompression may be an effective and safe procedure for patients suffering from LSS, with or without degenerative stable spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kashigar A, Laratta JL, Carreon LY, Bisson EF, Ghogawala Z, Yew AY, Mkorombindo T, Mummaneni PV, Glassman SD. Is There Additional Value to Flexion-Extension Radiographs for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:E458-E462. [PMID: 33181769 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Multicenter retrospective study. OBJECTIVE Flexion-extension radiographs are frequently used to assess motion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, they expose patients to additional radiation and increase cost. The aim of this study is to determine if flexion-extension radiographs provide additional information not seen on upright neutral radiographs and supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that may guide surgical decision making. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Supine MRI and upright neutral radiographs are routinely performed in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. It is unclear whether additional flexion-extension views play a significant role in surgical planning for this patient population. METHODS From the Quality Outcomes Database, patients who had surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis were identified. Magnitude of slip on pre-op supine MRI, upright neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs were measured. Additional motion was defined as 3 mm or more slip difference between radiographs. For the purpose of this analysis, patients with a slip of 7 mm or more on upright neutral radiographs were assumed to require a fusion. RESULTS A total of 191 patients were identified. Mean age was 61.6 years (114 females, 60%). Only 31 patients (16%) had additional motion on flexion-extension views not seen on upright neutral x-rays versus supine MRI. Of these 31 patients, 19 had slips less than 7 mm on upright x-ray, generating equipoise for fusion. CONCLUSION Flexion-extension radiographs may play a limited role in management of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The subset of patients for which flexion-extension views were most likely to provide value were patients with smaller slips (<7 mm) with no evidence of motion on standing radiographs versus MRI. In 90% of spondylolisthesis cases, information used for surgical planning may be ascertained by comparing motion between supine MRI and upright lateral radiographs.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Andrew Y Yew
- Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
| | | | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- University of California San Francisco Medical Center-Spine Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mannion AF, Mariaux F, Pittet V, Steiger F, Aepli M, Fekete TF, Jeszenszky D, O'Riordan D, Porchet F. Association between the appropriateness of surgery, according to appropriate use criteria, and patient-rated outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:907-917. [PMID: 33575818 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06725-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment failures in spine surgery are often attributable to poor patient selection and the application of inappropriate treatment. We used published appropriate use criteria (AUC) to evaluate the appropriateness of surgery in a large group of patients operated for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) and to evaluate its association with outcome. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data from patients operated in our Spine Centre, 2005-2012. Appropriateness of surgery was judged based on the AUC. Patients had completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before surgery and at 3 months' and 1, 2 and 5 years' follow-up (FU). RESULTS In total, 448 patients (69.8 ± 9.6 years; 323 (72%) women) were eligible for inclusion and the AUC could be applied in 393 (88%) of these. Surgery was considered appropriate (A) in 234 (59%) of the patients, uncertain/equivocal (U) in 90 (23%) and inappropriate (I) in 69 (18%). A/U patients had significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvements in COMI than I patients at each FU time point. The minimal clinically important change (MCIC) score for COMI was reached by 82% A, 76% U and 54% I patients at 1-year FU (p < 0.001, I vs A and U); the odds of achieving MCIC were 3-4 times greater in A/U patients than in I patients. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest a relationship between appropriateness of surgery for LDS and the improvements in COMI score after surgery. The findings require confirmation in prospective studies that also include a control group of non-operated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Mannion
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Francine Mariaux
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Valérie Pittet
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Felix Steiger
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Aepli
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tamás F Fekete
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dezső Jeszenszky
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dave O'Riordan
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - François Porchet
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Akkawi I, Zmerly H. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2021; 92:e2021313. [PMID: 35075090 PMCID: PMC8823594 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i6.10526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a condition leading to the slippage of one vertebral body over the one below due to degenerative changes resulting in spinal stenosis and producing neurogenic claudication, with or without low back pain. DS prevalence is age and gender specific. Other risk factors mainly include a history of occupational driving, intense manual activity and sedentary work. Diagnosis for patients with DS include detailed history, physical examination and imaging through standing lateral radiographs and MRI. Most patients with symptomatic DS and absence of neurologic deficits should perform better with conservative treatment, whereas, patients with neurological symptoms, are more prone to undergo progressive functional deterioration without surgery. There is a lack of agreement on the best surgical management in patients with DS and symptomatic stenosis. There is a contradictory data that does not permit for a recommendation for or against the addition of fusion to decompression. There is also controversy on which fusion technique is best. Spinal minimally invasive surgery is a promising approach for DS promoting early recovery and enhanced quality of life by reducing skin incision, muscular damage and perioperative pain with significant improvements in clinical results and high satisfaction rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Akkawi
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Villa Erbosa Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hassan Zmerly
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Villa Erbosa Hospital, Bologna, Italy, Ludes Lugano Campus, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|