Overlapping, Masquerading, and Causative Cervical Spine and Shoulder Pathology: A Systematic Review

The prevalence of cervical contribution in patients reporting shoulder pain. An observational study

BACKGROUND

Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal disorder yet diagnosis remains challenging. In some cases, shoulder symptoms can be partially attributed to a cervical origin.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of cervical contribution in patients presenting with shoulder pain. To determine symptom reproduction and symptom modification (i.e., pain intensity and pain location) after cervical spine screening (CSS) and compare these changes between patients with and without cervical contribution.

DESIGN

Observational study.

METHOD

Sixty patients were included. Cervical contribution was present if a ≥30.0% change in shoulder pain intensity on active movement was recorded after CSS. The CSS consisted of several tests and shoulder symptom modification or reproduction was noted. The presence of a centralization phenomenon was also noted and was considered to be present if the location of pain diminished from more distal areas after the CSS.

RESULTS

A 50.0% prevalence of cervical contribution (CI95% 37,35-62,65) was found. Cervical contribution was more likely in those that demonstrated centralization of their pain after the CSS (p = 0.002) and those that had a history of previous neck pain (p = 0.007). Symptom reproduction occurred for 23 out of the 60 participants (38.3%), being present in 18 of those with cervical contribution (60.0%). After the CSS, a statistically significant decrease of shoulder pain intensity was found for those classified as having cervical contribution (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical contribution is prevalent in 50% of patients presenting with shoulder pain; this was evidenced as shoulder symptom modification and, to a lesser extent, symptom reproduction following a CSS.

Untwining the intertwined: a comprehensive review on differentiating pathologies of the shoulder and spine

Background

The anatomic interplay and overlap between the cervical spine and the shoulder constitutes a challenge for shoulder and spine surgeons, as symptoms of spine and shoulder pathologies are often similar and may lead to entity misdiagnosis.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) searches were updated to October 2023 in search of the qualified papers. Boolean Operators were used with a combination of the keywords "spine" OR "neck" And "Shoulder". Furthermore, reference lists from papers were also searched to find literature.

Results

It is of pivotal importance to conduct comprehensive preoperative clinical investigation to appropriately evaluate and assess the source of the pathology and the leading causes behind it. Certain markers can help guide surgeons towards etiologies, and these include areas of pain and physical exam findings with the arm squeeze test having the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. As for the shoulder, despite its low sensitivity, the Yergason test had the highest specificity for diagnosing subacromial impingement. Local anesthetic injection can help as well in the diagnostic approach. Moreover, the interplay between these anatomic locations is not solely related to preoperative diagnosis. Studies have shown that previous surgery for cervical spine pathology may negatively affect the outcomes of shoulder procedures like arthroplasties.

Conclusion

Shoulder and spine surgeons should be wary and vigilant of accurately diagnosing the etiology of the presenting symptoms to ensure proper management and optimize prognosis.

Cervical and Thoracic Spine Mobility in Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain: A Comparative Analysis with Asymptomatic Controls

Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is a prevalent clinical presentation characterized by substantial diagnostic uncertainty. Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical and thoracic spine as a source of or contributing factor to RCRSP. Thirty-two RCRSP cases and thirty-two asymptomatic controls (AC), recruited from Hospital La Paz-Carlos III between March 2023 and September 2023, were matched for age, gender and hand dominance. Assessed variables included cervical, thoracic range of motion (ROM) and neck disability index (NDI). Independent t-tests were used to compare each of these measurements and multiple linear regression was used to examine the capacity of neck or psychosocial variables to predict the variability of the NDI. The RCRSP group had significantly reduced cervical rotation [RCRSP (111.14 ± 22.98); AC (130.23 ± 21.20), d = 0.86, p < 0.01] and flexo-extension ROM [RCRSP (112.47 ± 2.07); AC (128.5 ± 17.85), d = 0.80, p < 0.01] as well as thoracic spine flexion [RCRSP (33.02 ± 1.14); AC (34.14 ± 1.01), d = 1.04, p < 0.01], extension [RCRSP (28.63 ± 0.89); AC (27.37 ± 0.89), d = -1.40, p < 0.01], right rotation [RCRSP (40.53 ± 10.39); AC (54.45 ± 9.75), d = 1.38, p < 0.01], left rotation [RCRSP (39.00 ± 11.26); AC (54.10 ± 10.51), d = 1.39, p < 0.01] and a significantly increased NDI score [RCRSP (17.56 ± 7.25); AC (2.47 ± 3.25), d = -2.69, p < 0.01]. The variables best explaining neck disability were central sensitization index and SF-12 total score (adjusted R2 = 0.75; p < 0.01). These results suggest that clinicians should assess cervical and thoracic spine mobility in patients with RCRSP.

The effect of concurrent cervical spine degenerative disease on the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a national database study

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine degenerative disease (CSD) can cause shoulder pain, potentially confounding the management of patients with rotator cuff tears. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between CSD and rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

A national administrative database (PearlDiver) was used to study 4 patient cohorts: (1) RCR only (RCRo), (2) RCR with concurrent CSD (RCRC), (3) RCR after a cervical spine procedure (RCRA), and (4) RCR before a cervical spine procedure (RCRB). The outcomes of RCR were compared using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, as well as preoperative opioid utilization in the analysis of opioid use.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, a total of 889,977 patients underwent RCR. Of these patients, 784,230 (88%) underwent RCRo whereas 105,747 (12%) underwent RCRC, of whom 21,585 (2.4%) underwent cervical spine procedures (RCRA in 9670 [1.1%] and RCRB in 11,915 [1.3%]). At 2 years after RCR, compared with RCRo patients, RCRC patients had an increased risk of surgical-site infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25, P = .0004), deep vein thrombosis (aOR = 1.17, P = .0002), respiratory complications (aOR = 1.19, P = .0164), and ipsilateral shoulder reoperations (débridement [aOR = 1.66, P < .0001], manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions [aOR = 1.23, P < .0001], distal clavicle excision [aOR = 1.78, P < .0001], subacromial decompression [aOR = 1.72, P < .0001], biceps tenodesis [aOR = 1.76, P < .0001], incision and drainage [aOR = 1.34, P = .0020], synovectomy [aOR = 1.48, P = .0136], conversion to shoulder arthroplasty [aOR = 1.62, P < .0001], revision RCR [aOR = 1.77, P < .0001], and subsequent contralateral RCR [aOR = 1.71, P < .0001]). At 2 years, compared with RCRC patients who did not undergo cervical spine procedures, RCRC patients who underwent cervical spine procedures had an increased risk of incision and drainage (aOR = 1.50, P = .0255), conversion to arthroplasty (aOR = 1.40, P < .0001), and revision RCR (aOR = 1.11, P = .0374), as well as a lower risk of contralateral RCR (aOR = 0.89, P = .0469). The sequence of cervical spine procedures did not affect the risk of shoulder reoperations. At 1 year, the risk of opioid use after RCR was less for RCRA patients compared with RCRB patients (aOR = 1.71 [95% confidence interval, 1.61-1.80; P < .0001] vs. aOR = 2.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.92-2.12; P < .0001]).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent CSD has significant detrimental effects on RCR outcomes. Patients with concurrent CSD undergoing cervical spine procedures have a greater risk of ipsilateral shoulder reoperations but a decreased risk of contralateral RCR. The risk of prolonged opioid use was lower if RCR followed a cervical spine procedure. Concurrent CSD must be considered and possibly treated to optimize the outcomes of RCR.

Comparative Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Fascial Infiltration versus Periarticular Administration of Autologous Conditioned Serum (Orthokine) for Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol Description

BACKGROUND Neck pain is a prevalent and burdensome health issue, with autologous conditioned serum (ACS), like Orthokine, being a recognized treatment for musculoskeletal conditions due to its anti-inflammatory effects. However, the optimal ACS administration method for neck pain remains unclear. The existing literature lacks robust evidence, especially for different injection techniques. This study aimed to compare ACS infiltration into cervical fascia with periarticular administration to determine if the former is as effective in alleviating neck pain, offering a novel approach to its management. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study is designed to be a single-center, prospective, randomized trial involving 100 patients. Group A (n=50) will receive ACS through fascial infiltration at tender points under ultrasound guidance, with 4 doses administered every 3 days. Group B (n=50) will receive ACS injections in the articular column (facet joints) using the same dosing schedule. We will collect data at T0 (before therapy), T1 (6 weeks after therapy), and T2 (12 weeks after therapy), assessing outcomes with the Numerical Pain Scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Dynamic Proprioception Test (DPT). RESULTS Enrollment begins in August 2023, and the study is set to conclude in July 2024. If data analysis, manuscript preparation, and peer review proceed smoothly, we anticipate publishing the results in late 2024 or early 2025. CONCLUSIONS If fascial infiltration with ACS proves equally effective as the standard periarticular method, it offers promise for patients on long-term anticoagulant treatment. Paravertebral injections in such cases carry a significant risk of bleeding, making ACS infiltration a potentially safer alternative for managing neck pain in these individuals.

C5 nerve root palsy (without prior cervical decompression) case series: 9 patients with critical delay to presentation

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between cervical nerve root and intrinsic shoulder pathology can be a difficult task given the overlapping and often coexisting symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to highlight the often-complicated presentation of these symptoms and the subsequent potential for delay in care regarding this subset of patients.

METHODS

A total of 9 patients, managed by one of two different surgeons, were identified with a history of C5 nerve root palsy. A chart review was conducted, and the following information was recorded: presenting complaint, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, time from symptom onset to presentation to a spine surgeon, first specialist seen for symptoms, non-spinal advanced imaging and treatment conducted before diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative exam, time to recovery, and type of surgery.

RESULTS

We observed an average time from onset of symptoms to presentation to a spine surgeon to be 31.6 weeks. These patients' time to full recovery after cervical decompression was 15 weeks.

CONCLUSION

: We observed a critical delay to presentation in this series of patients with C5 nerve palsy. C5 nerve palsy should remain an elemental part of the differential diagnosis in the setting of any shoulder or neck pain presenting with weakness.

Impact of cervical spine pathology on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine pathology can affect the supporting muscles and function of the shoulder and contribute to shoulder and arm pain and hence may impact postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a history of cervical spine arthrodesis and its timing, before or after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), on the outcomes of TSA. Our hypothesis is that a history of cervical arthrodesis (CA) will negatively impact patient outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively collected cohort at a single institution. Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) patients with CA were identified and compared to a cohort of patients without CA (NCA) enrolled in an institutional registry from 2011 to 2020. Demographic characteristics, diagnoses, implant type, range of motion, adverse events, and clinical outcome metric scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], Constant, Shoulder Function score, patient satisfaction) were recorded. Outcomes between cohorts were analyzed using conventional statistics as well as stratification by minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds where applicable.

RESULTS

Of the 573 TSAs evaluated, 48 (20a CA-aTSA and 28 CA-rTSA) had a history of CA and 525 (280 NCA-aTSA and 245 NCA-rTSA) had no history of CA. The CA-TSA (aTSA and rTSA) had lower Constant, ASES, and Shoulder Function scores postoperatively as well as less improvement in active external rotation and an overall lower satisfaction rating (P < .05 for all) compared with NCA-TSA. The adverse event rate in the CA-TSA cohort was higher compared with the NCA-TSA cohort (25% vs. 6.5% [rTSA; P = .004] and 24.5% vs. 11% [aTSA; P = .068]). Optimal cutoff analysis showed that a time from CA to TSA of greater than 1.33 years had a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 75.0% in predicting achievement of SCB for ASES score.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates that patients with a history of CA undergoing shoulder arthroplasty results in lower postoperative functional outcomes, lower satisfaction, and higher rates of postoperative adverse events requiring surgical revision when compared to a cohort without a history of CA. Additionally, the current study demonstrates that a time interval of at least 16 months between CA and shoulder arthroplasty optimizes the chances of achieving SCB for ASES score.

Evaluation of Health-related Quality of Life Improvement in Patients Undergoing Cervical Versus Shoulder Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of outcomes in cervical spine and shoulder arthroscopy patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess differential improvements in health-related quality of life for cervical spine surgery compared with shoulder surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An understanding of outcome differences between different types of orthopedic surgeries is helpful in counseling patients about expected postoperative recovery. This study compares outcomes in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with arthroscopic shoulder surgery using computer-adaptive Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery (1-level or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement) or arthroscopic shoulder surgery (rotator cuff repair±biceps tenodesis) were grouped. Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores of physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Cervical spine (n=127) and shoulder (n=91) groups were similar in sex (25.8% vs. 41.8% female, P =0.731) but differed in age (51.6±11.6 vs. 58.60±11.2, P <0.05), operative time (148.3±68.6 vs. 75.9±26.9 min, P <0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASAs) (2.3±0.6 vs. 2.0±0.5, P =0.001), smoking status (15.7% vs. 4.4%, P =0.008), and length of stay (1.1±1.0 vs. 0.3±0.1, P =0.000). Spine patients had worse physical function (36.9 ±12.6 vs. 49.4±8.6, P <0.05) and greater pain interference (67.0±13.6 vs. 61.7±4.8, P =0.001) at baseline. Significant improvements were seen in all domains by 3 months for both groups, except for physical function after shoulder surgery. Spine patients had greater physical function improvements at all timepoints (3.33 vs. -0.43, P =0.003; 4.81 vs. 0.08, P =0.001; 6.5 vs. -5.24, P =<0.05). Conversely, shoulder surgery patients showed better 6-month improvement in pain intensity over spine patients (-8.86 vs. -4.46, P =0.001), but this difference resolved by 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical spine patients had greater relative early improvement in physical function compared with shoulder patients, whereas pain interference and intensity did not significantly differ between the 2 groups after surgery. This will help in counseling patients about relative difference in recovery and improvement between the 2 surgery types.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Novel Orthobiologic Preparation and Regenerative Rehabilitation of a Complex Shoulder Injury in a Competitive Adolescent Female Athlete

Background

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and prolotherapy have resulted in promising outcomes in patients with various types of shoulder injuries. However, there is a lack of preliminary evidence supporting preparation of PRP production, timely application of these therapies and regenerative rehabilitation protocols. The purpose of this case report is to describe the distinct method including orthobiologic preparation, tissue-specific treatment and regenerative rehabilitation of an athlete with a complex shoulder injury.

Case Presentation

A 15y/o competitive female wrestler with a complex shoulder injury presented to the clinic after unsuccessful conservative rehabilitation. Unique methods were incorporated to optimize PRP production, specific tissue healing and regenerative rehabilitation. Multiple injuries required different orthobiologic interventions at different time frames, in order to promote optimal healing and stability of the shoulder.

Outcomes

The described interventions resulted in successful outcomes including pain, disability, full return to sport, and regenerative tissue healing confirmed with diagnostic imaging.

Level of Evidence

5.

Dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency using bipolar technology in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain duration ≥ 2 years

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) or dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are alternative treatments for lumbosacral radicular pain (LSRP). This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of TFESI combined with dorsal root ganglion PRF using bipolar technology to treat LSRP in patients with pain duration ≥ 2 years.

METHODS

This prospective single-armed cohort study included 20 patients with LSRP duration ≥ 2 years, who underwent treatment of TFESI combined with bipolar PRF. The primary outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) and successful treatment rate (pain relief ≥50%). The secondary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction using the modified MacNab criteria, severe complications, hospital stay and total costs. The final follow-up was 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The successful treatment rate and average pain relief at 6 months postoperatively were 80% and 73.0% ± 17.5%, respectively. The successful treatment rates in patients with and without prior intervention history at 6 months postoperatively were 77.8% and 81.8%, respectively. The mean NRS score significantly decreased from 6.5 ± 0.8 to 1.1 ± 0.7 at 2 weeks postoperatively, to 1.3 ± 0.7 at 3 months postoperatively, and to 1.7 ± 1.0 at 6 months postoperatively (all P < 0.001), while the mean ODI score significantly decreased from 43.5 ± 2.5 to 22.5 ± 4.3 at 2 weeks postoperatively, to 20.0 ± 3.5 at 3 months postoperatively, and to 19.5 ± 3.6 at 6 months postoperatively (all P < 0.001). The excellent and good patient satisfaction at 6 months postoperatively was 85%. No severe complications were observed in this cohort. The average hospital stay and total costs were 3.0 ± 0.5 days and 3.36 ± 0.77 thousand dollars, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of TFESI combined with PRF using bipolar technology might be an alternative option to treat chronic LSRP in patients with pain duration ≥ 2 years after a failure of conservative treatments, with a favorable 6-month efficacy and inexpensive total costs. However, long-term outcomes and superiority of bipolar procedure over monopolar procedure in patients with longer pain duration should be further investigated in future studies.

Intracranial Epidermoid Cyst Mimics Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disease: Findings from a Case Report in Physiotherapy Clinical Practice

Shoulder pain is often attributable to a musculoskeletal disorder, but in some instances, it may be linked to pathologies outside the physiotherapist's area of expertise. Specifically, some intracranial problems can cause pain and disability to the shoulder complex. This case report aims to describe the clinical presentation, history taking, physical examination, and clinical decision-making procedures in a patient with an intracranial epidermoid cyst mimicking a musculoskeletal disorder of the shoulder girdle. A 42-year-old man complained of pain and disability in his left shoulder. Sudden, sharp pain was reported during overhead movements, associated with intermittent tingling of the left upper trapezius and left scapular area. Moreover, the patient reported reduced hearing in his left ear and left facial dysesthesia. The physical examination led the physiotherapist to hypothesize a pathology outside the physiotherapist's scope of practice and to refer the patient to another health professional to further investigate the patient through imaging. It is essential for the physiotherapist to recognize when the patient's clinical condition requires a referral to another healthcare professional. Therefore, the physiotherapist must be able to, in a timely manner, identify signs and symptoms suggesting the presence of medical pathology beyond his expertise, through appropriate medical history collection and physical evaluation.

Concomitant Cervical Spine Stenosis Negatively Affects Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Outcomes

Purpose

To determine whether an association exists between the presence of cervical spine pathology and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT).

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing isolated BT from August 2011 to May 2019 was conducted. Cases were defined as patients with concomitant cervical spine disease (disc disease, disc herniations, neuroforaminal/central stenosis). Controls were patients without cervical spine disease. Postoperative PROs were collected from all patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 using age and body mass index. PROs were compared using the χ² text, Fisher exact test, or analysis of variance.

Results

A total of 23 cases and 23 controls were identified. Cases and controls had similar distributions of age (42.4 ± 4.4 years, 40.4 ± 4.5, P = .15), sex (83% male, 87% male, P = .68), body mass index (28.0 ± 4.0, 27.6 ± 4.3, P = .78), and percentage of athletes (65% athlete, 61% athlete. P = .76). All cases had evidence of neuroforaminal stenosis and multilevel degenerative disc disease, whereas 19 of 23 (83%) had evidence of central canal stenosis. Cases had a greater visual analog scale (VAS) score during Sport score (3.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.2 ± 0.6, P = .013) and lower Subjective Shoulder Value (69.5 ± 5.8 vs 84.1 ± 5.4, P = .070) and Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury score (60.4 ± 5.8 vs 77.4 ± 6.0, P = .046). There were no significant differences between groups’ ASES, baseline VAS, overall satisfaction scores, and willingness to undergo the same operation again. No significant differences were found in postoperative rate of return to sport, time to return, and return to preoperative competitiveness.

Conclusions

Patients with SLAP tears undergoing isolated BT in the presence of cervical spinal stenosis may have inferior Subjective Shoulder Value, Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury, and VAS during sport scores as compared with controls, although many PROs were similar at follow-up. Athletes undergoing BT, particularly with concomitant cervical spine pathology, should be counseled appropriately before surgery.

Level of Evidence

Level III, case–control study.

Patients with Dual Shoulder-Spine Disease: Does Operative Order Affect Clinical Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

1) To analyze the effect of operative sequence (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF] first or rotator cuff repair [RCR] first) on surgical outcomes after both procedures for patients with dual shoulder-spine injuries and 2) to determine how operative sequence affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery.

METHODS

Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary ACDF and primary RCR at our institution were retrospectively identified. Only patients with overlapping symptoms before the first procedure were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts (ACDF first or RCR first). Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and PROMs were compared between groups. Multivariate linear regression models were developed to determine if operative order was predictive of improvements in PROM scores at the 1-year postoperative point after the second procedure. Alpha was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 85 patients included, 44 patients (51.8%) underwent ACDF first, whereas 41 patients (48.2%) underwent RCR first. There were no significant differences in the rate of 90-day readmission, spine reoperations, and rotator cuff reoperations between groups (all, P > 0.05). Multivariate linear regression showed that undergoing an ACDF first was not a significant predictor of Δ Mental Component Score of the Short-Form 12 (β = -2.78; P = 0.626) and Δ Physical Component Score of the Short-Form 12 (β = 7.74; P = 0.077) at the 1-year postoperative point after the second procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with dual shoulder-spine injuries who are appropriate surgical candidates, undergoing ACDF first compared with RCR first does not result in significant differences in clinical surgical or patient-reported outcomes.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in similar postoperative functional outcomes in patients with only rotator cuff tears and those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with only rotator cuff tears versus those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2016 was conducted. Patients included in the study were divided into two groups: (1) those with rotator cuff tears only (RC only) and (2) those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy (RC + radiculopathy). Cervical radiculopathy was treated non-surgically in these patients. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score were measured for each patient preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

As compared to the RC-only group (n = 324), the RC + radiculopathy group (n = 33) had significantly poorer OSS (p = 0.001), CSS (p = 0.017) and UCLASS (p = 0.009) functional scores preoperatively. On follow-up, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively for OSS, CSS, UCLASS and VAS pain scores, with the exception of CSS which was higher in the RC-only group at 6 months (p = 0.007). The absolute change and number of patients that attained minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for OSS, CSS and UCLASS at 12- and 24-month follow-ups were also comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant cervical radiculopathy achieve similar postoperative functional outcomes to those with only rotator cuff tears, after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Persistent Shoulder Pain After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Another Dual Pathology

Purpose

It is often difficult for the clinician to isolate the etiology of pain occurring either in the neck or shoulder because of the reason that neck pain can refer to the shoulder and vice versa. Concordance research has found that around one in 10 patients who were referred for cervical radiculopathy had comorbid shoulder pathology. The goal of this research is to analyze and correlate risk factors for persistent shoulder pain (non-dermatomal) following cervical spine surgery.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective study. The medical records of patients admitted for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were reviewed from August 2018 to Feb 2021. Patients of both sexes and age more than 18 years who underwent ACDF (single/multiple levels) were included and the medical record was checked for whether they had persistent shoulder pain following ACDF. The proportion of patients undergoing shoulder surgery for associated rotator cuff tears and subacromial impingement were recorded.

Results

Seventy patients presenting with cervical prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID) were studied. A majority of our patients were females (n=48, 68.6%) and males (n=22, 31.4%) with an M:F ratio of 1:2 and the majority of patients were between the ages of 40 to 60 years (n=34, 48.6%). After surgical intervention (ACDF), 48 patients (68.6%) noted the cessation of shoulder symptoms (pain, weakness, and numbness) during their last visit. Rotator cuff tear (supraspinatus mainly) was the predominant finding in MRI in those who didn’t improve after ACDF (n=18, 25.7%, p-value: 0.001). Twenty patients (28.6%) underwent acromioplasty and rotator cuff tendon repair and four patients responded well to subacromial injection. The C6-7 level was most commonly affected (n=48, 68.6%) followed by C5-6 level (n=19, 27.1%). No significant association was found between cervical levels with shoulder pathologies (p-0.171), though a significant association between a visual analog scale (VAS) score >7 after surgery with shoulder pathologies (p-0.001) was found. The C6-7 level was commonly affected in females (p=0.038) but no significant association between gender and shoulder pathologies was found (p=0.332).

Conclusion

Dual pathologies in patients with cervical PID are very common. It needs careful attention by doing thorough clinical examination and correlating patient symptoms with radiological investigations. A patient who presents with persistent shoulder pain after cervical spine surgery had a higher chance of having concurrent shoulder pathology, and they should be properly investigated and managed to alleviate the suffering of the patient.

Spurling's test - inconsistencies in clinical practice

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the methodology, interpretation, and perceived value of Spurling's test toward diagnosis/classification and treatment. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was made available to physical therapist members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Based on video demonstrations of technique and symptom distribution, questions included preferred method, criteria for test interpretation, and perceived value of Spurling's test and other examination findings toward clinical decision-making. Professional profile data were also collected. Results: Among the 452 participants completing the survey, no method of testing was preferred by more than 37%, with ipsilateral lateral flexion, rotation, and extension with compression being most frequently preferred followed by ipsilateral lateral flexion with compression at 32%. Proximal provocation of symptoms only without distal symptoms was interpreted as a positive test by 67%. Participants rated Spurling's test of moderate to low value toward diagnosis/classification and treatment. Discussion: Inconsistency with methodology and interpretation of Spurling's test is suggested to be pervasive in physical therapist practice. While an optimal test methodology has yet to be identified, result interpretation does have a basis for clarification toward diagnosis/classification and reduction of unwanted variance in practice.