Candidates for Percutaneous Screw Fixation Without Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Conservative Treatment Compared With Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fracture With Score 4 Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The clinical outcomes, radiologic outcome, and complications were compared between surgical treatment and conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 4.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The thoracolumbar fracture is the main reason leading to the spinal cord injury. Some studies suggested that the treatment of TLICS=4 is a "gray zone." Hence, the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment and conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with scores 4 TLICS was still debated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), and Wan Fang Database was performed up to October 2021. Relevant studies were identified using specific eligibility criteria and data was extracted and analyzed based on primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 555 patients were included (3 randomized controlled trials and 7 retrospective studies). There was no significant difference of hospital time (standardized mean difference=0.24, 95% CI: -1.50 to 1.97, P =0.79) and Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference=2.97, 95% CI: -1.07 to 7.01, P =0.15) between surgery and nonsurgery. The length of returning to work was shorter in surgical treatment (standardized mean difference=1.27, 95% CI: 0.07-2.46, P =0.04). Visual Analog Scale in surgical treatment was lower at 1, 3, and 6 months (respectively, P <0.00001, P =0.003, and P =0.02). However, there existed no significant difference between surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment at 12 and >24 months (respectively, P =0.18 and 0.17). Cobb angle was lower in surgical treatment at postoperative at 6, 12, and >24 months (respectively, P =0.005, P <0.00001, P =0.002, and P =0.0002). Finally, the surgical treatment had a lower incidence of complications (odds ratio=3.89, 95% CI: 1.90-7.94, P =0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence recommended that surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of TLICS score of 4 at the early follow-up. Surgical treatment had lower Cobb angle, Visual Analog Scale scores, and complications compared with a nonsurgical TLICS score of 4. However, these findings needed to be verified further by multicenter, double-blind, and large-sample randomized controlled trials.

Usefulness of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Lower Lumbar Burst (A3-A4) Fractures: Comparative Study with Thoracolumbar Junction Fractures

Background

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) without fusion has been recently recommended in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches and to restore range of motion. However, those studies report on the thoracolumbar junction, and there is no report on lower lumbar fracture.

Purpose

To assess effectiveness of PPSF without fusion for treating lower lumbar burst (A3 and A4) fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 50 patients with AO type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fracture underwent PPSF. Patients were divided into a thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) group (T11-L2) and lower lumbar (LL) group (L3-5). The following items were measured and compared between the two groups. Vertebral height and consolidation, retropulsed fragment, sagittal curve and fixation failure were assessed with certain interval regularly.

Results

The average height at pre- and post-reduction were 56.2% (36.2-74.3), 95.3% (84.2-98.3) in TLJ group and 65.7% (45.7-86.2), 91% (73.1-100) in LL group. The average canal area occupancy rate at pre- and post-reduction were 46.1% (37.4%-67.5%), 38.1% (31.3%-40.8%) in TLJ group and 40.4% (15.0-65.7), 19.3% (9.4-26.6) in LL group. Consolidation was completed within 12 months after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between two groups in clinical and radiographic parameters except cobb angle loss.

Conclusion

Patients with lower lumbar fracture can be effectively managed with PPSF without fusion. PPSF following the implant removal can restore the movement of the lower lumbar spine, which is essential for daily life.

Adult Trauma Patients With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate characteristics of patients with thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) score of 4 (To4) severity traumatic thoracolumbar injury.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The TLICS score is used to predict the need for operative versus nonoperative management in adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. Ambiguity exists in its application and score categorization.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed. The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review were queried. Studies included adults with traumatic thoracolumbar injury with assigned TLICS score and description of management strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies met inclusion criteria representing 1911 adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. There were 503 (26.32%) patients with To4, of which 298 (59.24%) were operative. Studies focusing on the thoracolumbar junction and AO Type A fracture morphology had To4 patient incidences of 11.15% and 52.94%, respectively. Multiple studies describe better quality of life, pain scores, and radiographic outcomes in To4 who underwent operative treatment patients.

CONCLUSION

To4 injuries are more commonly AO Type A and located in the thoracolumbar junction in adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. Despite ambiguous recommendations regarding treatment provided by TLICS, outcomes favor operative intervention in this subset of traumatic thoracolumbar injury patients.

Thoracolumbar Injury: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scoring System or Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scoring system with its modified (mTLICS) version based on their agreement with the surgeon's opinion regarding treatment for patients with thoracolumbar injuries. Moreover, the Posterior Ligamentous Complex health was compared between intraoperative examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports.

METHODS

MRI was obtained from 114 patients suffering thoracolumbar spinal trauma; the TLICS and mTLICS scores were measured. Approaches 1 and 2 were designed in both scoring systems based on assuming a total score of 4 as surgery and conservative management indication, respectively. Kappa was used to estimate the agreements between each approach and the surgeon's opinion on treatment. The receiver operating curve calculated the appropriate cut-off scores for the above systems over which surgical management was preferred. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

All the approaches showed moderate agreements with the surgeon's opinion on therapeutic management (TLICS: κ_approach1 = 0.557, κ_approach2 =0.508; mTLICS: κ_approach1 = 0.557, κ_approach2 = 0.551; P < 0.001 for each κ). A score >3.5 best illustrated the indication for surgery in both systems. The radiology report agreed stronger with intraoperatively observed ligamentous health when suspicious cases on MRI were reported as injured (κ_TLICS = 0.830, κ_mTLICS = 0.704) rather than healthy (κ_TLICS = 0.620, κ_mTLICS = 0.620).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgeon's treatment plan agreed moderately with suggestions of the TLICS and mTLICS systems; surgery was the preferred management for the patients with a score of 4. Moreover, radiologic suspicion of Posterior Ligamentous Complex injury seemed to indicate a damaged ligament rather than a healthy one.