Operative Treatment of Traumatic Spinal Injuries in Tanzania: Surgical Management, Neurologic Outcomes, and Time to Surgery

Challenges and strategies in the surgical management of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

BACKGROUND

Significant progress has been made in the management of traumatic spinal cord injuries. However, deep disparities persist in developing countries. This work aims to describe the different challenges in the surgical management of traumatic spinal cord injuries at the Kinshasa University Teaching Hospital and some strategies implemented to overcome them.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of 105 patients from January 2016 to June 2023. The variables of interest included: gender, age, cause, levels of lesion, hospital admission modalities, time to admission, time to surgery, AIS score at admission and on discharge, treatment, pre, peri- and post-operative complications and outcome.

RESULTS

We admitted 105 patients. Only 16 % of them were taken to hospital in an ambulance. The average admission time was 49.9 ± 81.79 days. Seventy-two patients (68.6 %) were operated. The average time to surgery was 62.43 ± 85.20 days. No patient was stabilized at the trauma site. Osteosynthesis was performed with appropriate implants in 63.2 % and with improvised elements in 26.8 %. Four patients were operated without an image intensifier. Short-segmental fixation was performed in 8 patients. Twenty-one patients developed pressure ulcers. At discharge, 24 patients recovered their neurological function. Neurological status remained stationary in 43 patients. Five patients died. Seventeen patients went to rehabilitation center. There was no significant difference between the improvised strategies implemented and conventional procedures on functional recovery upon discharge from hospital or rehabilitation centre (p-value : 0.838 and 0.468 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our establishment faces many challenges in TSCI surgery: lack of pre-hospital emergency services and mutual health insurance, delay in admission, lack of surgical implants and image intensifier, the poverty of the population. Some strategies have been implemented to overcome some of them.

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Thoracic, Thoracolumbar, and Lumbar Spine Trauma in East Africa: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Trauma to the thoracic, thoracolumbar (TL), and lumbar spine is common and can cause disability and neurological deficits. Using a cohort of patients suffering from thoracic, TL, and lumbar spine trauma in a tertiary hospital in East Africa, the current study sought to: (1) describe demographics and operative treatment patterns, (2) assess neurologic outcomes, and (3) report predictors associated with undergoing surgery, neurologic improvement, and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patient records from September 2016 to December 2020 was conducted at a prominent East Africa referral center. The study collected data on demographics, injury, and operative characteristics. Surgical indications were assessed using the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) TL fracture classification system and neurological function. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors for operative treatment, neurologic improvement, and mortality.

RESULTS

The study showed that 64.9% of the 257 TL spine trauma patients underwent surgery with a median postadmission day of 17.0. The mortality rate was 1.2%. Road traffic accidents caused 43.6% of the injuries. The most common fracture pattern was AO Type A fractures (78.6%). Laminectomy and posterolateral fusion were performed in 97.6% of the surgical cases. Patients without neurological deficits (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.54, P < 0.001) and those with longer delays from injury to admission were less likely to have surgery (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007). The neurologic improvement rate was 11.1%. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between surgery and neurologic improvement (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.27-16.61, P < 0.001). However, this finding was lost in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights various themes surrounding the management of TL spine trauma in a low-resource environment, including lower surgery rates, delays from admission to surgery, safe surgery with low mortality, and the potential for surgery to lead to neurologic improvement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Despite challenges such as surgical delays and limited resources in East Africa, there is potential for surgical intervention to improve neurologic outcomes in thoracic, TL, and lumbar spine trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Telemedical Support Using Smartphones for Spine Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Objective: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges compared to industrialized nations, most notably in regard to the health care system. Patients often have to travel long distances to receive medical care with few reliable transportation mechanisms. In time-critical emergencies, this is a significant disadvantage. One specialty that is particularly affected by this is spine surgery. Within this field, traumatic injuries and acutely compressive pathologies are often time-critical. Increasing global networking capabilities through internet access offers the possibility for telemedical support in remote regions. Recently, high-performance cameras and processors became available in commercially available smartphones. Due to their wide availability and ease of use, this could provide a unique opportunity to offer telemedical support in LMICs. Methods: We conducted a feasibility study with a neurosurgical institution in east Africa. To ensure telemedical support, a commercially available smartphone was selected as the experimental hardware. Preoperatively, resolution, contrast, brightness, and color reproduction were assessed under theoretical conditions using a test chart. Intraoperatively, the image quality was assessed under different conditions. In the first step, the instrumentation table was displayed, and the mentor surgeon marked an instrument that the mentee surgeon should recognize correctly. In the next evaluation step, the surgical field was shown on film and the mentor surgeon marked an anatomical structure, and in the last evaluation step, the screen of the X-ray machine was captured, and the mentor surgeon again marked an anatomical structure. Subjective image quality was rated by two independent reviewers using the similar modified Likert scale as before on a scale of 1-5, with 1 indicating inadequate quality and 5 indicating excellent quality. Results: The image quality during the video calls was rated as sufficient overall. When evaluating the test charts, a quality of 97% ± 5 on average was found for the chart with the white background and a quality of 84% ± 5 on average for the chart with the black background. The color reproduction, the contrast, and the reproduction of brightness were rated excellent. Intraoperatively, the visualization of the instrument table was also rated excellent. Visualization of the operative site was rated 1.5 ± 0.5 on average and it was not possible to recognize relevant anatomical structures with the required confidence for surgical procedures. Image quality of the X-ray screen was rated 1.5 ± 0.9 on average. Conclusion: Current generation smartphones have high imaging performance, high computing power, and excellent connectivity. However, relevant anatomical structures during spine surgery procedures and on the X-ray screen in the operating room could not be identified with reliability to provide adequate surgical support. Nevertheless, our study showed the potential in smartphones supporting surgical procedures in LMICs, which could be helpful in other surgical fields.

Clinical spine care partnerships between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Clinical collaboration between spine professionals in high-income countries (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) may provide improvements in the accessibility, efficacy, and safety of global spine care. Currently, the scope and effectiveness of these collaborations remain unclear. In this review, we describe the literature on the current state of these partnerships to provide a framework for exploring future best practices.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for articles on spine-based clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs published between 2000 and March 10, 2023. This search yielded 1528 total publications. After systematic screening, nineteen articles were included in the final review.

RESULTS

All published partnerships involved direct clinical care and 13/19 included clinical training of local providers. Most of the published collaborations reviewed involved one of four major global outreach organizations with the majority of sites in Africa. Participants were primarily physicians and physicians-in-training. Only 5/19 studies reported needs assessments prior to starting their partnerships. Articles were split on evaluative focus, with some only evaluating clinical outcomes and some evaluating the nature of the partnership itself.

CONCLUSIONS

Published studies on spine-focused clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs remain scarce. Those that are published often do not report needs assessments and formal metrics to evaluate the efficacy of such partnerships. Toward improving the quality of spine care globally, we recommend an increase in the quality and quantity of published studies involving clinical collaborations between HICs and LICs, with careful attention to reporting early needs assessments and evaluation strategies.

Global Epidemiology of Pediatric Traumatic Spine Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic spine injury (TSI) leads to significant morbidity and mortality in children. However, the global epidemiology of pediatric TSI is currently unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the global incidence of pediatric TSI and the burden of cases.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for reports in June 2021 and updated in March 2023 with no restrictions on language or year of publication. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the global incidence of pediatric TSI and, subsequently, the number of cases of pediatric TSI worldwide and the proportion requiring spine surgery.

RESULTS

Of 6557 studies, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Road traffic accidents (64%) were responsible for most cases reported in the literature, followed by falls (18%). The global incidence of TSI in children aged ≤20 years was estimated to be 14.24 of 100,000 children, or 375,734 children, with an estimated 114,975 requiring spine surgery. Across the World Bank income classification groups, lower middle-income countries had the highest pediatric TSI case burden (186,886 cases, with 57,187 requiring spine surgery). Across the World Health Organization regions, countries in the Southeast Asia region had the largest number of projected cases at 88,566, with 27,101 requiring surgical management, followed closely by the African region, with 87,235 projected cases and 26,694 requiring surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric TSI represents a large healthcare burden globally. Interventions targeting both injury prevention and strengthening of neurosurgical capacity, especially in low resource settings, are needed to address this global health challenge.

A four year experience treating incomplete thoracolumbar spine injuries in an East African country

Background

Traumatic spine injuries are one of the most common causes of disability and mortality.

Objective

To assess post op neurologic status in patients with incomplete thoracic and lumbar spine injuries at two teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

Institution based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 hospitalized patients in these hospitals from February 1, 2017-January 31, 2021.

Results

Forty five (75.0%) of the study participants were males. The mean age was 30.77 years (range: 12-65 year). Only 8(13.3%) patients were operated within 3 days of trauma. The most common injury site was the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) in 80.0%. Significant number of patients (56.7%) had sphincters dysfunction. Pedicle screw fixation with or without laminectomy was performed in 98.3%. After minimum six month follow up, 37(61.7%) patients had access to the physiotherapy. Thirty seven (61.7%) patients were non ambulatory (AIS B and C) at presentation, of which 29 (78.4%) were ambulatory on the follow-up. Overall, 54(90%) patients had neurologic improvement on the follow up and 37(61.7%) returned to work. Preoperative neurologic status and sphincter function were found to be significantly associated with treatment outcome with P value 0 .000 and 0.002 respectively.

Conclusion

This study shows despite limited availability of post op physiotherapy, significant number of patientsreturned to work post-surgery. Preoperative neurologic function was an independent predictor of post-operative outcome.

Posterior decompression and stabilization in a pregnant patient with traumatic lumbar fracture: A case report

Spine fractures with or without spinal cord injury in the pregnant population are rare, with few reported cases. A 25-year-old primigravida at 24 weeks of gestation presented after falling off a fast-moving motorcycle one month prior. She had sustained a severe back injury and had difficulty walking. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an acute kyphosis secondary to comminuted anterior wedge compression fractures of the L2 and L3 vertebral bodies and L2/3 disc involvement with retropulsion of the fracture fragments into the central canal resulting in severe central canal stenosis. After multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent posterior decompression, reduction and stabilization with pedicle screws. The patient had good neurological recovery at discharge and the pregnancy progressed normally. Three months later, at 39 weeks of gestation, the patient had an uneventful spontaneous delivery of a healthy baby. This case illustrates the importance of multidisciplinary management of spinal cord injury in a pregnant patient.

Adopting and adapting clinical practice guidelines for timing of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury from a developed world context to a developing region

PURPOSE

The proper application of high-quality clinical practice guidelines improves trauma patients' care and outcomes. This study aimed to adopt and adapt guidelines on the timing of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury (SCI) in Iranian clinical settings.

METHODS

This study followed a systematic search and review of the literature to enter them into the selection process. The source guidelines' clinical suggestions were converted into clinical scenarios for clinical questions on the timing of decompressive surgery. After summarizing the scenarios, we prepared an initial list of recommendations based on the status of the Iranian patients and the health system. The ultimate conclusion was reached with the help of a national interdisciplinary expert panel comprising 20 experts throughout the country.

RESULTS

A total of 408 records were identified. After title and abstract screening, 401 records were excluded, and the full texts of the remaining seven records were reviewed. Based on our screening process, only one guideline included recommendations on the topic of interest. All of the recommendations were accepted by the expert panel with slight changes due to resource availability in Iran. The final two recommendations were the consideration of early surgery (≤24 h) as a treatment option in adult patients with traumatic central cord syndrome and in adult patients with acute SCI regardless of the level of injury.

CONCLUSION

Considering early surgery for adult patients with acute traumatic SCI regardless of the level of injury was the final recommendation for Iran. Although most of the recommendations are adoptable in developing countries, issues with infrastructure and availability of resources are the limitations.

Predictors of spinal trauma care and outcomes in a resource-constrained environment: a decision tree analysis of spinal trauma surgery and outcomes in Tanzania

OBJECTIVE

The burden of spinal trauma in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is immense, and its management is made complex in such resource-restricted settings. Algorithmic evidence-based management is cost-prohibitive, especially with respect to spinal implants, while perioperative care is work-intensive, making overall care dependent on multiple constraints. The objective of this study was to identify determinants of decision-making for surgical intervention, improvement in function, and in-hospital mortality among patients experiencing acute spinal trauma in resource-constrained settings.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a cohort of patients with spinal trauma admitted to a tertiary referral hospital center in Dar es Salam, Tanzania. Data on demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were collected as part of a quality improvement neurotrauma registry. Outcome measures were surgical intervention, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade improvement, and in-hospital mortality, based on existing treatment protocols. Univariate analyses of demographic and clinical characteristics were performed for each outcome of interest. Using the variables associated with each outcome, a machine learning algorithm-based regression nonparametric decision tree model utilizing a bootstrapping method was created and the accuracy of the three models was estimated.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-four consecutively admitted patients with acute spinal trauma were included over a period of 33 months. The median age was 34 (IQR 26-43) years, 83.8% were male, and 50.7% had experienced injury in a motor vehicle accident. The median time to hospital admission after injury was 2 (IQR 1-6) days; surgery was performed after a further median delay of 22 (IQR 13-39) days. Cervical spine injury comprised 38.4% of the injuries. Admission AIS grades were A in 48.9%, B in 16.2%, C in 8.5%, D in 9.5%, and E in 16.6%. Nearly half (45.1%) of the patients underwent surgery, 12% had at least one functional improvement in AIS grade, and 11.6% died in the hospital. Determinants of surgical intervention were age ≤ 30 years, spinal injury level, admission AIS grade, delay in arrival to the referral hospital, undergoing MRI, and type of insurance; admission AIS grade, delay to arrival to the hospital, and injury level for functional improvement; and delay to arrival, injury level, delay to surgery, and admission AIS grade for in-hospital mortality. The best accuracies for the decision tree models were 0.62, 0.34, and 0.93 for surgery, AIS grade improvement, and in-hospital mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative intervention and functional improvement after acute spinal trauma in this tertiary referral hospital in an LMIC environment were low and inconsistent, which suggests that nonclinical factors exist within complex resource-driven decision-making frameworks. These nonclinical factors are highlighted by the authors' results showing clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality were determined by natural history, as evidenced by the highest accuracy of the model predicting in-hospital mortality.

Delays in Presentation After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Prompt surgical decompression after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) may be associated with improved sensorimotor outcomes. Delays in presentation may prevent timely decompression after TSCI.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review existing studies investigating delays in presentation after TSCI in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted and studies featuring quantitative or qualitative data on prehospital delays in TSCI presentation were included. Studies lacking quantitative or qualitative data on prehospital delays in TSCI presentation, case reports or series with <5 patients, review articles, or animal studies were excluded from our analysis.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, 24 studies were retained, most of which were retrospective. Eleven studies were from LMICs and 13 were from HICs. Patients with TSCI in LMICs were younger than those in HICs, and most patients were male in both groups. A greater proportion of patients with TSCI in studies from LMICs presented >24 hours after injury (HIC average proportion, 12.0%; LMIC average proportion, 49.9%; P = 0.01). Financial barriers, lack of patient awareness and education, and prehospital transportation barriers were more often cited as reasons for delays in LMICs than in HICs, with prehospital transportation barriers cited as a reason for delay by every LMIC study included in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in prehospital infrastructure between HICs and LMICs subject more patients in LMICs to increased delays in presentation to care.

Time to Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Meta-Analysis of the World's Literature Comparing High-Income Countries to Low-Middle Income Countries

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to: 1) compare time from traumatic spinal injury (TSI) to operating room (OR) in high-income countries (HICs) versus low-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 2) evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) in HICs versus LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving articles of all languages.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

published between 1991 and 2021, spine trauma population, single country/region, and recorded time from injury to OR. The primary outcome was time from injury to OR, and the secondary outcome was LOS. Means and standard deviations were estimated in a random effects model by DerSimonian and Laird methods.

RESULTS

Of 2367 articles, 163 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Regarding time from injury to OR, 23 articles were eligible for meta-analysis; 16 studies were conducted in HICs and 7 in LMICs, comprising 3819 patients with TSI. A significantly shorter mean time from injury to OR was found in HICs (1.92 days, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.41) compared with LMICs (3.27 days, 95% confidence interval 2.27-4.27) (P = 0.020). Regarding length of stay, 14 articles were eligible for meta-analysis, 10 studies were conducted in HICs and 4 in LMICs, comprising 11,003 patients. There was no difference in LOS between HICs and LMICs (25.76 days vs. 20.48 days, P = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic spinal injuries in HICs were more likely to undergo earlier surgery compared to patients in LMICs. No difference was found in total LOS between HICs and LMICs. While multiple factors can influence time to surgery, these findings draw attention to the global disparity in spinal trauma care.

The Next Frontier in Neurocritical Care in Resource-Constrained Settings

Neurocritical care (NCC) is an emerging field within critical care medicine, reflecting the widespread prevalence of neurologic injury in critically ill patients. Morbidity and mortality from neurocritical illness (NCI) have been reduced substantially in resource-rich settings (RRS), owing to the development of advanced technologies, neuro-specific units, and subspecialized medical training. Despite shouldering much of the burden of NCI worldwide, resource-limited settings (RLS) face immense hurdles when implementing guidelines generated in RRS. This review summarizes the current epidemiology, management, and outcomes of the most common NCIs in RLS and offers commentary on future directions in NCC practiced in RLS.

Feasibility of smart glasses in supporting spinal surgical procedures in low- and middle-income countries: experiences from East Africa

OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine technology has been developed to allow surgeons in countries with limited resources to access expert technical guidance during surgical procedures. The authors report their initial experience using state-of-the-art wearable smart glasses with wireless capability to transmit intraoperative video content during spine surgery from sub-Saharan Africa to experts in the US.

METHODS

A novel smart glasses system with integrated camera and microphone was worn by a spine surgeon in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, during 3 scoliosis correction surgeries. The images were transmitted wirelessly through a compatible software system to a computer viewed by a group of fellowship-trained spine surgeons in New York City. Visual clarity was determined using a modified Snellen chart, and a percentage score was determined on the smallest line that could be read from the 8-line chart on white and black backgrounds. A 1- to 5-point scale (from 1 = unrecognizable to 5 = optimal clarity) was used to score other visual metrics assessed using a color test card including hue, contrast, and brightness. The same scoring system was used by the group to reach a consensus on visual quality of 3 intraoperative points including instruments, radiographs (ability to see pedicle screws relative to bony anatomy), and intraoperative surgical field (ability to identify bony landmarks such as transverse processes, pedicle screw starting point, laminar edge).

RESULTS

All surgeries accomplished the defined goals safely with no intraoperative complications. The average download and upload connection speeds achieved in Dar es Salaam were 45.21 and 58.89 Mbps, respectively. Visual clarity with the modified white and black Snellen chart was 70.8% and 62.5%, respectively. The average scores for hue, contrast, and brightness were 2.67, 3.33, and 2.67, respectively. Visualization quality of instruments, radiographs, and intraoperative surgical field were 3.67, 1, and 1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of smart glasses for telemedicine offers a promising tool for surgical education and remote training, especially in low- and middle-income countries. However, this study highlights some limitations of this technology, including optical resolution, intraoperative lighting, and internet connection challenges. With continued collaboration between clinicians and industry, future iterations of smart glasses technology will need to address these issues to stimulate robust clinical utilization.

Variation in global treatment for subaxial cervical spine isolated unilateral facet fractures

PURPOSE

To determine the variation in the global treatment practices for subaxial unilateral cervical spine facet fractures based on surgeon experience, practice setting, and surgical subspecialty.

METHODS

A survey was sent to 272 members of the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System Validation Group worldwide. Questions surveyed surgeon preferences with regard to diagnostic work-up and treatment of fracture types F1-F3, according to the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System, with various associated neurologic injuries.

RESULTS

A total of 161 responses were received. Academic surgeons use the facet portion of the AO Spine classification system less frequently (61.6%) compared to hospital-employed and private practice surgeons (81.1% and 81.8%, respectively) (p = 0.029). The overall consensus was in favor of operative treatment for any facet fracture with radicular symptoms (N2) and for any fractures categorized as F2N2 and above. For F3N0 fractures, significantly less surgeons from Africa/Asia/Middle East (49%) and Europe (59.2%) chose operative treatment than from North/Latin/South America (74.1%) (p = 0.025). For F3N1 fractures, significantly less surgeons from Africa/Asia/Middle East (52%) and Europe (63.3%) recommended operative treatment than from North/Latin/South America (84.5%) (p = 0.001). More than 95% of surgeons included CT in their work-up of facet fractures, regardless of the type. No statistically significant differences were seen in the need for MRI to decide treatment.

CONCLUSION

Considerable agreement exists between surgeon preferences with regard to unilateral facet fracture management with few exceptions. F2N2 fracture subtypes and subtypes with radiculopathy (N2) appear to be the threshold for operative treatment.

Mapping Global Neurosurgery Research Collaboratives: A Social Network Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Global Neurosurgery Articles

Social network analysis of bibliometric data evaluates the relationships between the articles, authors, and themes of a research niche. The network can be visualized as maps composed of nodes and links. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the relationships between articles, authors, and keywords in global neurosurgery. The authors searched global neurosurgery articles on the Web of Science database from inception to June 18, 2020. The 50 most cited articles were selected and their metadata (document coupling, co-authorship, and co-occurrence) was exported. The metadata were analyzed and visualized with VOSViewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands). The articles were published between 1995 and 2020 and they had a median of 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 5.0) citations. There were 5 clusters in the document coupling and 10 clusters in the co-authorship analysis. A total of 229 authors contributed to the articles and Kee B. Park contributed the most to articles (14 publications). Backward citation analysis was organized into 4 clusters and co-occurrence analysis into 7 clusters. The most common themes were pediatric neurosurgery, neurotrauma, and health system strengthening. The authors identified trends, contributors, and themes of highly cited global neurosurgery research. These findings can help establish collaborations and set the agenda in global neurosurgery research.

Pressure ulcers after traumatic spinal injury in East Africa: risk factors, illustrative case, and low-cost protocol for prevention and treatment

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

In a traumatic spinal injury (TSI) cohort from Tanzania, we sought to: (1) describe potential risk factors for pressure ulcer development, (2) present an illustrative case, and (3) propose a low-cost outpatient protocol for prevention and treatment.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

All patients admitted for TSI over a 33-month period were reviewed. Variables included demographics, time to hospital, injury characteristics, operative management, length of hospitalization, and mortality. Pressure ulcer development was the primary outcome. Regressions were used to report potential predictors, and international guidelines were referenced to construct a low-cost outpatient protocol.

RESULTS

Of 267 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 51 developed a pressure ulcer. Length of stay was greater for patients with pressure ulcers compared with those without (45 vs. 30 days, p < 0.001). Potential predictors for developing pressure ulcers were: increased days from injury to hospital admission (p = 0.036), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A upon admission (p < 0.001), and thoracic spine injury (p = 0.037). The illustrative case described a young male presenting ~2 months after complete thoracic spinal cord injury with a grade IV sacral pressure ulcer that lead to septic shock and death. Considering the dramatic consequences of pressure ulcers in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs), we proposed a low-cost protocol for prevention and treatment targeting support surfaces, repositioning, skin care, nutrition, follow-up, and dressing.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure ulcers after TSI in LMICs can lead to increased hospital stays and major adverse events. High-risk patients were those with delayed presentation, complete neurologic injuries, and thoracic injuries. We recommended aggressive prevention and treatment strategies suitable for resource-constrained settings.

Nonoperative treatment of traumatic spinal injuries in Tanzania: who is not undergoing surgery and why?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study of a prospectively collected database.

OBJECTIVES

In a cohort of patients with traumatic spine injury (TSI) in Tanzania who did not undergo surgery, we sought to: (1) describe this nonoperative population, (2) compare outcomes to operative patients, and (3) determine predictors of nonoperative treatment.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

All patients admitted for TSI over a 33-month period were reviewed. Variables included demographics, fracture morphology, neurologic exam, indication for surgery, length of hospitalization, and mortality. Regression analyses were used to report outcomes and predictors of nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

270 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 145 were managed nonoperatively. Demographics between groups were similar. The nonoperative group was young (mean = 35.5 years) and primarily male (n = 125, 86%). Nonoperative patients had 7.39 times the odds of death (p = 0.003). Patients with AO type A0/1/2/3 fractures (p < 0.001), ASIA E exams (p = 0.016), cervical spine injuries (p = 0.005), and central cord syndrome (p = 0.016) were more commonly managed nonoperatively. One hundred and twenty-four patients (86%) had indications for but did not undergo surgery. After multivariate analysis, the only predictor of nonoperative management was sustaining a cervical injury (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Eighty-six percent of nonoperative TSI patients had an indication for surgery. Nonoperative management was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Cervical injury was the single independent risk factor for not undergoing surgery. The principle reason for nonoperative management was cost of implants. While a causal relationship between nonoperative management and inferior outcomes cannot be made, efforts should be made to provide surgery when indicated, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.