Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center

Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re-resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine

OBJECTIVE

Re-resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re-resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re-resection for giant cell tumors of the spine.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression-free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19-63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p < 0.05). The 5- and 10-year local progression-free survival rates were both 90% in the en bloc resection group, while in the intralesional excision group, the 5-year local progression-free survival rate was 80% with a 10-year rate of 45.7%. The en bloc resection group had a lower local tumor recurrence rate than that of the intralesional excision group (p < 0.05), but the former had a higher rate of complications (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a low local recurrence rate in patients who underwent en bloc resection for giant cell tumors, while the perioperative complication rate was high.

Giant cell tumor of bone with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst does not have a higher risk of local recurrence

BACKGROUND

Fluid-fluid levels (FFLs) is found in 10%-16% of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), and the presence of FFLs raises the suspicion of GCTB with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC), which can lead to increased intraoperative bleeding and, blurring the operative field, be associated with a risk of local recurrence. The first objective of this study is to determine whether secondary ABC is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence after curettage in patients with GCTB of the extremities. The second objective of this study is to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the presence of FFLs detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose secondary ABC associated with GCTB.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty patients with GCTB of the extremities who underwent curettage at the authors' institutions between 1980 and 2021 were included in this study.

RESULTS

Secondary ABC was found in 36 of 280 patients (12.9%) and local recurrence occurred in 66 of 280 patients (23.6%). Multivariate analysis showed no significant correlation between secondary ABC and local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-3.53]; p = 0.051). Preoperative MRI revealed FFLs in 13 of 82 patients (15.9%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FFLs detected on preoperative MRI to diagnose secondary ABC were 36.8%, 90.5%, 53.8%, and 82.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that secondary ABC does not increase the risk of local recurrence after curettage in patients with GCTB of the extremities. Although rare, FFLs were present in patients with GCTB and half of those with FFLs detected on preoperative MRI had secondary ABC.

Clinical Significance of Preoperative CT and MR Imaging Findings in the Prediction of Postoperative Recurrence of Spinal Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Objectives

To explore the predictive value of preoperative imaging in patients with spinal giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) for postoperative recurrence and risk stratification.

Methods

Clinical data for 62 cases of spinal GCTB diagnosed and treated at our hospital from 2008 to 2018 were identified. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years according to the clinical guidelines after surgery. Medical history data including baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of recurrent and non‐recurrent patients were compared. Two musculoskeletal radiologists read the images and were blinded to the clinical data. The imaging features associated with postoperative recurrence were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the largest lesion diameter predicting recurrence after surgery.

Results

According to whether the disease recurred within the follow‐up period, patients were divided into the recurrence group and the non‐recurrence group. Of 62 patients (29 males and 33 females), 17 had recurrence and 45 did not. The recurrence rate was 27.4%. The mean follow‐up time was 73.66 (± 32.92) months. The three major treatments were total en bloc spondylectomy (n = 26), intralesional spondylectomy (n = 20), and curettage(n = 16). A total of 16 CT and MRI features were analyzed. A univariate analysis showed no significant difference in age, sex, treatment, multi‐vertebral body involvement, location, boundary, expansile mass, residual bone crest, paravertebral soft tissue mass, CT value, and MRI signal on T1‐weighted imaging (WI), T2‐WI, and T2‐WI fat suppression (FS) sequences (P > 0.05). The largest lesion diameter [(4.68 ± 1.79) vs (5.92 ± 2.17) cm, t = 2.287, P = 0.026] and the vertebral compression fracture (51% vs 82%, χ² = 5.005, P = 0.025) were significantly different between the non‐recurrence and recurrence groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that both largest lesion diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.584; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.108–2.264; P = 0.012) and compression fracture (OR, 8.073; 95%CI, 1.481–11.003; P = 0.016) were independent predictors of postoperative recurrence. When we set the cutoff value for the largest lesion diameter at 4.2 cm, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing the recurrence and non‐recurrence of GCTB were 94.1% and 42.2%, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.671. The combined model achieved a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 47.1%, 97.8% and 83.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

In spinal GCTB, maximum lesion diameter and the vertebral compression fracture are associated with tumor recurrence after surgery, which may provide helpful information for planning personalized treatment.