Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Parameters Between Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Images in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Odontoid incidence: a constant cervical anatomical feature evident in standing plain radiographs and supine magnetic resonance images

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether there is a difference between measurements of odontoid incidence (OI) and other cervical sagittal parameters by X-ray radiography and those by supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Standing X-ray and supine MRI images of 42 healthy subjects were retrospectively analyzed. Surgimap software was employed to measure cervical sagittal parameters including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle, T1 slope (T1S) and T1S-cervical lordosis (CL). Paired samples t-test was applied to determine the difference between parameters measured by standing X-ray and those by supine MRI. In addition, the statistical correlation between the parameters were compared. The prediction of CL was performed and validated using the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S.

RESULTS

Significant correlations and differences were found between cervical sagittal parameters determined by X-ray and those by MRI. OI was verified to be a constant anatomic parameter and the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be used to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

OI is verified as a constant anatomic parameter, demonstrating the necessity of a combined assessment of cervical sagittal balance by using standing X-ray and supine MRI. The formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be applied to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters.

MRI-based measurements of spondylolisthesis and kyphosis in degenerative cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND

To provide normative data and to determine accuracy and reliability of preoperative measurements of spondylolisthesis and kyphosis on supine static magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

METHODS

T2-weighted midsagittal images of the cervical spine were in 100 cases reviewed twice by one junior observer, with an interval of 3 months, and once by a senior observer. The spondylolisthesis slip (SSlip, mm) and the modified K-line interval (mK-line INT, mm) were assessed for accuracy with the standard error of measurement (SEm) and the minimum detectable change (MDC). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability levels were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The SEm was 0.5 mm (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for spondylolisthesis and 0.6 mm (95% CI 0.5-0.7) for kyphosis. The MDC, i.e., the smallest difference between two examinations that can be detected with statistical certainty, was 1.5 mm (95% CI 1.2-1.8) for spondylolisthesis and 1.6 mm (95% CI 1.3-1.8) for kyphosis. The highest reliability levels were seen between the second observation of the junior examiner and the senior observer (ICC = 0.80 [95% CI 0.70-0.87] and ICC = 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.98] for SSlip and mK-line INT, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides normative values of alignment measurements of spondylolisthesis and kyphosis in DCM patients. It further shows the importance of taking measurement errors into account when defining cut-off values for cervical deformity parameters and their potential clinical application in surgical decision-making.

The Significance of Odontoid Incidence in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cervical sagittal parameters for standing Digital radiography (DR) and supine Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to further clarify the relationship between odontoid incidence (OI) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

52 CSM patients aged 54.46 ± 2.89 years underwent both standing DR and supine MRI scans of cervical spine between November 2021 and November 2022. OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), T1 slope (T1S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle (cervical lordosis [CL]), and T1S-CL were measured in both DR and MRI images using Surgimap (Version 2.3.2.1). Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to compare these parameters between the two modalities.

RESULTS

Cervical sagittal parameters, including OI, OT, C2S, C0-2 angle, T1S, C2-7 angle (CL) and T1S-CL, showed no significant differences in the measurements between the two modalities. Based on the DR images, OI was related to OT (r = .386, P < .01), C2S (r = .505, P < .01), CL (r = -.412, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .320, P < .05), and OI was matched with CL (r2 = .170) and T1S-CL (r2 = .102). Based on MRI images, OI was related to OT (r = .433, P < .01), C2S (r = .516, P < .01), CL (r = -.355, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .271, P < .05), and OI matched with C2-7 (r2 = .126) and T1S-CL (r2 = .073).

CONCLUSION

OI is an independent parameter related to cervical anatomy and its measurement is unaffected by external factors. In patients with CSM, odontoid parameters may effectively describe the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine on DR and MRI images.