Hemivertebra Resection in Small Children. A Literature Review

Clinical outcomes and spinal growth after posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion in children

To evaluate the corrective effect of posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment fusion surgery on pediatric patients and to assess the impact of short-segment fixation surgery on vertebral development during follow-up, a retrospective analysis was performed on 28 pediatric patients who underwent posterior hemivertebra resection surgery. The corrective effect was evaluated by comparing indicators such as segmental scoliosis Cobb angle, upper and lower compensatory curves and trunk balance at different time points. Meanwhile, the vertebral and spinal canal diameters of instrumented vertebrae and adjacent noninstrumented vertebrae were measured and compared to assess vertebral and spinal canal development. The correction rate of segmental scoliosis was 72.2%. The estimated mean vertebral volume of the instrumented vertebra was slightly lower than that of the unfused segment at the final follow-up, but the difference was not statistically significant. The growth rate of the spinal canal during follow-up was much smaller than that of the vertebral body. In summary, internal fixation at a young age shows no significant inhibitory effects on spinal development within the fusion segment. Posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment fusion surgery are safe and effective.

[Surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis]

OBJECTIVE

Early correction of congenital scoliosis including short fusion, while minimizing both mobility restrictions and growth impairment.

INDICATIONS

Congenital scoliosis with marked deformity, proven progression, significant compensatory curves, and/or impairment of trunk balance. Furthermore, in case of compression of neural structures or pain due to secondary degeneration.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

No absolute contraindication.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Posterior approach to the apex of the deformity. In the growing spine the periosteum should only be touched at the levels where fusion is planned. Insertion of pedicle screws adjacent to the hemivertebra. The posterior elements of the hemivertebra are removed: lamina, joint facets, pedicle, transverse process. Resection of the accessory proximal rib in the thoracic spine. Following blunt dissection at the lateral and anterior surface of the hemivertebra, the body of the hemivertebra and the adjacent discs are resected. The resulting gap is closed by compression via transpedicular instrumentation thus correcting the scoliotic deformity. In case of synostosis or contralateral bar formation, the concave side of the spine is dissected and the synostosis osteomized.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Early mobilization on postoperative day 1. Bracing for 12 weeks depending on stability of the instrumentation. Periodic clinical and radiographic controls until the end of growth.

RESULTS

Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation is considered as the standard treatment of congenital scoliosis. Correction rates of 60-80% are achieved. Cervical and lumbosacral hemivertebrae may require an additional anterior approach. In case of synostosis, bar formation, or rib synostosis, further corrective surgeries may be necessary during growth.

Changes in research quality and surgical trends at the international congress on early-onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

The founding of the International Congress for Early Onset Scoliosis (ICEOS) and first annual meeting in 2007 represented a significant milestone in advancing the care of patients with EOS. Due to the complexity and rarity of EOS, this annual conference is the premiere venue for physicians, researchers, and advanced practice providers to identify and understand the best treatments for children with EOS. This study examines the trend of various treatment modalities presented at ICEOS and the changes in research quality since its inception.

METHODS

Podium presentations from the 2007 through 2021 ICEOS annual meetings were reviewed to determine the number of study patients, use of a study group, and key features of study design. Treatment strategies being evaluated were recorded and included non-operative treatments (casting/bracing), traditional growing rods (TGR), vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR), Shilla growth guidance, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and vertebral body tethering (VBT). Linear regressions were performed to analyze changes in research topic and study group utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 532 abstracts were reviewed. An average of 97.5 ± 81.3 patients were included per study with a significant increase from 42.3 ± 89.7 in 2007 to 337.6 ± 587.4 in 2021 (r² = 0.632, p < 0.001). A total of 130 (24.4%) abstracts resulted from multicenter study groups with the proportion increasing significantly from 13.0% in 2007 to 36.4% in 2021 (p = 0.039, r² = 0.289). The majority (96.2%) of study group-based projects were from either the Growing Spine Study Group (GSSG), Chest Wall and Spine Deformity Study Group (CWSDG), Children's Spine Study Group (CSSG), or the Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG). Additionally, a significant increase in studies utilizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was observed (r² = 0.336, p = 0.023). Significant increases in the proportion of presentations discussing MCGR (r² = 0.738, p < 0.001) and VBT (r² = 0.294, p = 0.037) as surgical treatments were observed.

CONCLUSION

The trends in EOS device implantation observed in registry studies align with the trends in research presented at ICEOS including the increased proportion of studies focusing on MCGR and VBT over the past decade. An attempt to increase the quality of research presented at ICEOS through multicenter study groups, increased patient recruitment, and utilization of PROMs has been seen since its inception.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.