Risk of hysterectomy at the time of myomectomy: an underestimated surgical risk

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of hysterectomy at the time of myomectomy and the associated 30-day postoperative morbidity.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent myomectomies identified from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2010 to 2021.

INTERVENTION

Unplanned hysterectomy at the time of a myomectomy procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify myomectomies performed with or without concurrent hysterectomy. Preoperative characteristics and morbidity outcomes were obtained. The univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression reported risk factors for individuals who underwent hysterectomy at the time of myomectomy. P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 13,213 individuals underwent myomectomy, and 399 (3.0%) had a hysterectomy performed during myomectomy. Concurrent hysterectomy was most frequently performed with the laparoscopic approach (7.1%), followed by the abdominal (3.2%) and hysteroscopic (1.9%) approaches. Age ≥43 years, obesity class II and higher, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class greater than II, tobacco use, longer operative time (>85 minutes), and laparoscopic approach were associated with a significantly increased risk of hysterectomy. When adjusting for age, body mass index, race, ASA class, case type, surgical approach, operative time, preoperative transfusion, preoperative hematocrit, and high fibroid burden, an increased odds of hysterectomy was noted for white race, longer operative time, ASA class III or higher, obesity, laparoscopic approach, and low fibroid burden. Patients who underwent concurrent hysterectomy had a longer median length of hospital stay (2 vs. 1 day), longer median operative time (161 vs. 126 minutes), increased intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusions (14.5% vs. 9.0%), and higher rates of organ/space surgical site infections (1.5% vs. 0.5%) and return to surgery (2.0% vs. 0.7%) than those who did not (P<.05). The risk of a major complication within 30 days of myomectomy increased in patients who underwent concurrent hysterectomy after adjusting for relevant confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.2).

CONCLUSION

The risk of hysterectomy during a myomectomy is higher than previously reported. The patient age of ≥43 years, obesity, white race, ASA class III or higher, longer operative time, and laparoscopic approach were associated with higher odds of hysterectomy. Identification of patients with these risk factors can aid in patient counseling and surgical planning, which may help reduce the unexpectedly high rates of hysterectomy at planned myomectomy.

The use of sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH®) in laparotomic myomectomy: a prospective case-control study

PURPOSE

Uterine myomas are the most common gynecological disease. In these cases, a myomectomy is performed traditionally laparotomically. However, alternatives have been widely used, including laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery. During these techniques, diffuse parenchymatous bleeding remains one of the main intraoperative and postoperative complications and sometimes requires unplanned hysterectomies. Recently, hemostatic agents and sealants have been used to prevent excessive blood loss during surgical repair.

METHODS

We propose a prospective case-control study on the use of a sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH^®) on uterine sutures in laparotomic myomectomy. In the period between July 2016 and April 2017, 46 patients with symptomatic uterine fibromatosis underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups of 23 patients, with different treatments in the hemostatic phase of oozing bleeding. HEMOPATCH^® is applied in group A, and spray electrocoagulation is applied in group B.

RESULTS

In group A, we achieve faster hemostasis (p < 0.05), than in group B. We report a significantly lower C-reactive protein value on the second and third days after surgery for group A compared to group B.

CONCLUSIONS

HEMOPATCH^®, during laparotomic myomectomy, is a valid alternative solution for obtaining rapid hemostasis and consequently intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. Furthermore, we suggest that a lower inflammatory peritoneal state is probably correlated with the barrier effect of the patch on the suture.

Treatment of symptomatic fibroid disease using uterine fibroid embolisation: An Australian perspective

Uterine leiomyomata (fibroids) are symptomatic in up to 35% of women and treatment can be a costly burden to the individual and society. Options for treatment range from non-hormonal, hormonal, minimally invasive, to surgery. While symptoms from smaller fibroids may respond to simple treatment, those with larger fibroids or with a large volume of disease require a more definitive option. Surgery (hysterectomy or myomectomy) are both well-established treatment modalities with good clinical outcomes. Since the 1990s, uterine fibroid embolisation has emerged as a less invasive option for women than for surgical techniques, while level 1 evidence shows that in the short to mid-term, there is a similar improvement in symptom-related quality of life outcomes to surgery, but with reduced hospital stay and reduced cost. However, in the longer term there may be a need for further treatment or retreatment in some patients compared with surgery. Since its introduction, uptake of this procedure in Australia has been low relative to surgical options. This manuscript reviews the current literature surrounding treatment, along with the trends in uptake of embolisation by Australian women, places this in context of current guidelines from major societies, and encourages gynaecologists and interventional radiologists to be aware of the advantages and limitations of embolisation.

The cost to perform uterine fibroid embolisation in the Australian public hospital system

INTRODUCTION

Uterine fibroids have the potential to cause morbidity, and there is a substantial cost to both the healthcare system and society. There is support for minimally invasive intervention, and uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) is an established cost-effective option for women wishing for an alternative to surgery. There is a lack of local Australian costing data to compliment use in the public hospital system, and we offer a costing analysis of running a public hospital service.

METHODS

We reviewed the costs for 10 sequential uterine fibroid embolisation cases, by assessing the direct and indirect hospital costs.

RESULTS

The total cost of providing a uterine fibroid embolisation service using our model in a public hospital including initial outpatient assessment, procedure costs, overnight hospital ward stay and outpatient follow-up is $3995 per admission.

CONCLUSION

Using our model, the overall cost to perform this procedure is low, and lower than prior estimates for surgical alternatives. We encourage government and regulatory bodies to support UFE through guidelines and remuneration models, and encourage more public Australian interventional radiology departments to offer this service.