Cost benefit analysis of clinical pharmacist interventions in medical intensive care unit in Palestine medical complex: Prospective interventional study

Background

Clinical pharmacy services in the critical health care settings have expanded dramatically.Study problem.Clinical pharmacy services have limited implementation in Palestine. Many intensive care units (ICUs) patients do not get the intended beneficial effects of their treatment due to treatment related problems and their consequent cost burden.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of the clinical pharmacist interventions on costs of care and safety of patient by assessing treatment related problems among medical ICUs patients in Palestine.

Methodology

A prospective interventional study was conducted at medical ICU of the major public hospital in Ramallah city over a 4-month period (between September and December 2020). Patients were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group (With / without clinical pharmacist involvement). Treatment related problems were identified in both study groups by the clinical pharmacist, but interventions were only provided to the intervention group. The total economic benefit included both cost savings from intervention and cost avoidance from preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) resulted from CP interventions. The primary outcomes with the clinical pharmacist interventions were net benefit and benefit to cost ratio, which were calculated using previously published methodologies and adjusted to the Palestinian settings. The analysis of CP interventions acceptance by physicians was performed.

Results

During the 4-month study period, the 117 patients admitted to the ICU were included into the analysis; 66 patients in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. The interventions made by a clinical pharmacist resulted in direct cost saving of NIS8,990.05 ($2799.63) and cost avoidance of NIS22,087.5 ($ 6878.37). Translated into a net savings of NIS188.35 ($58.65) per intervention and NIS470 ($146.36) per patient. Comparison of benefits (NIS31,077.55) ($9678.00) and costs (NIS19,043.928) ($5930.55) indicate a net economic benefit to the institution of (NIS 12,033.623) ($3747.44) and a benefit cost ratio of 1.63.

Conclusion

Integrating a clinical pharmacist in the ICU team was investment that resulted in benefits in term of cost saving and cost avoidance.

The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in an Irish University Teaching Hospital: A Mixed-Methods Study

Medication review (MR) is a vital part of the pharmacist’s role in hospital. However, in the South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital (SIVUH), Cork, Ireland, this has not been fully implemented due to resource issues. In addition, the cost of providing this service has not been evaluated. Moreover, it is not clear how other members of the multidisciplinary team e.g., Nurses, value any interventions made as a result of the MR. This mixed methods study assessed the impact of MR in terms of (i) potential clinical harm, (ii) cost avoidance and (iii) the views of nursing staff on the role of the pharmacist. The setting is a 192-bed, voluntary, acute hospital, in the Munster region of Ireland. Study I: The pharmacist provided MR to patients conventionally once a week. Any interventions were then assessed for potential clinical harm and to calculate cost avoidance. Study II: Semi-structured interviews, guided by a topic guide were completed with 12 nurses (11 female). Thematic analysis was used to code the main themes. Main outcome measure: To estimate the cost, cost avoidance, and the net cost benefit ratio of MR provided by pharmacists. Study I: Of 128 patients who received the MR, 113 interventions were made. The estimated cost of providing the MR was €2559 (senior pharmacist). Using €1084 as the cost of an adverse drug event (ADE), the cost avoidance was calculated at €42,330. This led to a net cost benefit of €39,771 (senior pharmacist) which equated to a net cost benefit ratio of 16.5:1. Study II: The main themes were (i) perceptions of pharmacy services, (ii) the role of the pharmacist—past, present and future, and (iii) teamwork and communication. Nurses expressed a desire to have more pharmacists present on the wards.