The Influence of Hand Dominance in Wrist Fracture Post-Operative Functional Evaluation

Functional recovery of wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Regional anesthesia may favour postoperative rehabilitation by inhibiting peripheral sensitization and secondary hyperalgesia. The literature on this subject is limited. In the present FUNCTION study, we sought to compare the functional recovery post orthopedic wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre prospective observational cohort study in adult patients with a distal radial fracture. Functional recovery was assessed with validated psychometrics questionnaires (Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH] and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE]), range of motion, and grip strength. We used a linear mixed regression model to assess the impact of the anesthesia technique on functional recovery. Postoperative pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

We recruited 76 patients. At 12 weeks post surgery, there was no difference between the type of anesthesia and functional recovery with the QuickDASH (higher scores worse; regional anesthesia [RA], 22.7 vs general anesthesia [GA], 19.3; adjusted mean difference [aMD], -0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.6 to 9.0; P = 0.9) and PRWE (higher scores worse; RA group, 21.0 vs GA group, 20.5; aMD, -3.3; 95% CI, -12.1 to 5.6; P = 0.93) questionnaires. Range of motion, satisfaction, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Right-hand grip strength was higher in the GA group.

CONCLUSION

Regional anesthesia was not associated with improved functional recovery compared with general anesthesia. The dominance of the operated limb was a confusion factor in all evaluation modalities. Further research taking into account the dominance of the hand is necessary to establish the effects of regional anesthesia on functional recovery.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04541745); registered 9 September 2020.

Is the Postoperative Outcome after Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Influenced by Age and Gender? A PROM Study

BACKGROUND

Although the most common fracture of the human body, so far, only few data concerning gender-specific outcomes after distal radius fracture exist. Typically, elderly women suffer from DRF due to a low-energy fall because of osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome after a surgically treated intraarticular DRF with the help of patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) and with special regard to gender and age impact.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It is a retrospective case-control study in which all patients with an intraarticular DRF were enrolled. The control group was composed of healthy volunteers. Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) was used as Patient Related Outcome Measurement (PROM) for analyzing the outcome. Moreover, age, gender, handedness, fracture classification and follow-up interval were detected. The functional outcome of the fracture group was compared to a healthy control group. Analyses of gender, age and handedness-specific results compared to the healthy control groups were performed as well.

RESULTS

197 patients with distal radius fracture could be enrolled in the study (134 were female and 63 were male). Women (mean age 62 years) were significantly older than men (mean age 50 years). The control group comprised 110 healthy subjects, 71 females (mean age 56 years) and 39 males (mean age 53 years). The whole fracture group had significantly lower MWQ scores compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The male fracture group (90.6 ± 12.4) and the female fracture group (90.8 ± 11.4) had a significantly worse outcome compared to the corresponding control group (p < 0.001 male and p = 0.034 female). Although significantly younger, the male patients had a similar outcome compared to the female patients.

DISCUSSION

Even elderly patients can reach the preoperative level after operative treatment of an intraarticular distal radius fracture. Although significantly younger than the female patients, men have significantly worse functional outcomes compared to their control and cannot perform better than the significantly older female patients. Gender might influence the outcome as well; however, age seems to have a greater impact on the outcome than gender.

The Effect of Hand Dominance, Age, Gender, Fracture Comminution and ASA Status on Time to Fracture Healing Following Surgical Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Background: There is recent renewed interest in the effect of hand dominance on distal radius fractures. Current studies focus on functional or patient-reported outcomes, with lack of studies pertaining to radiological outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of hand dominance on time to fracture healing following surgical fixation of distal radius fracture. We also looked at the effect of age, gender, fracture comminution and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status on time to fracture healing.

Methods: Patients who underwent distal radius fracture fixation surgery in our department from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were included. Time to fracture healing was taken from the day of surgery to when radiographic union was present as evidence by bridging callus or osseous bone. We looked at the effect of hand dominance, age, gender, fracture comminution and ASA status on time to fracture healing.

Results: One hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (80 females and 65 males) had a mean period of 56.2 ± 41.8 days to fracture healing post-operatively. Patients with dominant hand injury had a shorter duration to fracture healing than patients with non-dominant hand injury (mean 47.3 ± 31.1 days versus 62.1 ± 46.8 days, p = 0.023). Patients ≥ 65 years and with pre-existing medical conditions (ASA Class II and above) had a longer duration to fracture healing (mean 63.7 ± 53.0 days versus 51.9 ± 33.4 days, p = 0.036 and mean 47.9 ± 30.0 days versus 62.0 ± 47.7 days, p = 0.016, respectively). In addition, patients with comminuted fractures took longer to heal than patients with non-comminuted fractures (mean 57.6 ± 33.4 days versus 48.3 ± 20.8 days, p = 0.038).

Conclusion: Time to fracture healing post distal radius fracture fixation surgery was significantly related to hand dominance, as well as age, ASA classification and fracture configuration. Dominant wrist injuries had shorter time to fracture healing.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)