Locking compression plate in the treatment of forearm fractures: a prospective study

Recovery of Forearm Bone Strength After Plate Removal: A Finite Element Analysis Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the bone strength after plate removal over time and to investigate the progression of bone strength recovery.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 31 patients was investigated to evaluate bone strength before and after forearm plate removal. Patients who were included underwent plate fixation for forearm diaphyseal fractures and were scheduled for plate removal. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire length of the bilateral forearms were taken before plate removal and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Patient-specific CT-based finite element analysis was used to predict the forearm bone fracture strength against an axial load (N), defined as the bone strength. Bone strength was estimated by patient-specific CT-based finite element analysis at each time point.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years. The mean time between plate fixation and removal was 27.5 months. Bone strength before the removal was estimated as reduced to 47% of that of the uninjured side. This was constant regardless of age group, involvement of the radius or ulna, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, open fracture, or type of plate. Bone strength at 1, 3, and 6 months after removal was estimated to be 66%, 85%, and 97%, respectively. The bone strength of the distal ulna was weaker than that at the other sites in the forearm and showed delayed recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone strength after plate removal showed recovery within 3-6 months and was fully recovered by 6 months. The degree of recovery of bone atrophy varies from site to site, and patients should be careful about refracture after removal.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians should be aware that bone strength may not be sufficiently restored even 6 months after plate removal of forearm fractures.

Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation

Objectives

Implant prominence after ulnar fracture fixation may be mitigated by the use of lower profile plates. The biomechanical strength and stability of 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plates for fixation were compared.

Methods

Two fracture conditions, transverse (N = 10) and oblique (N = 10), were evaluated in an in vitro study. Half of the specimens for each condition were fixed with 2.7-mm plates and the other half with 3.5-mm plates, all fixed with conventional dynamic compression mechanisms. Specimens were loaded under ±2 Nm of cyclic axial torsion, then under 10 Nm of cyclic cantilever bending, and bending to failure. Interfragmentary motion and strain were analyzed to determine construct stability as a function of fracture pattern and plate size.

Results

Interfragmentary motion was significantly larger in all constructs fixed with 2.7-mm plates, compared with 3.5-mm plates (P < 0.01). The 2.7-mm constructs with transverse fractures had the greatest motion, ranging between 5° and 10° under axial rotation and 5.0-6.0 mm under bending. Motions were the lowest for 3.5-mm constructs with oblique fractures, ranging between 3.2 and 4.2 mm under bending and 2°-3.5° for axial rotation. For oblique fractures, the bending moment at ultimate failure was 31.4 ± 3.6 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 10.0 ± 1.9 Nm for 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01). Similarly, for transverse fractures, the bending moment was 17.9 ± 4.0 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 9.7 ± 1.3 Nm for the 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Although 3.5-mm plates were more effective at reducing fracture motion, they were consistently associated with refracture at the distal-most screw hole under load to failure. By contrast, 2.7-mm plates plastically deformed despite excessive loads, potentially avoiding a subsequent fracture.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

A Comparative Study Between Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing for Diaphyseal Fracture of Radius and Ulna in Adults

INTRODUCTION

In this era of active living, industrial growth, increasing automobile accidents, and athletic activities, fractures of the forearm bones are becoming more frequent. The incidence of diaphyseal fractures of both bone forearms is reported to be approximately 10 per 10,000 persons per year, although rates may vary according to age and sex. If not properly treated, a fracture of the forearm bones might cause a serious loss of function. Therefore, to restore function, these fractures require adequate anatomical reduction and internal fixation. The majority of forearm fractures in adults are treated surgically, and various modes of internal fixation are available. In this study, we evaluated and compared the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of both bone forearm diaphyseal fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This prospective and comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care medical teaching hospital in southern Rajasthan, India. Forty patients with diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna bones who presented to the casualty or orthopedic outpatient departments of our institute were included. Patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients in each group and treated by intramedullary nailing (group A) and plate osteosynthesis (group B), and regularly followed up and evaluated for clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes.

RESULT

Final results were calculated according to the modified Grace-Eversmann scoring system. In group A, out of 20 cases excellent score was seen in six cases (30%), good score in nine cases (45%), fair score in three cases (15%), and at last, two cases (10%) showed poor results. In group B, excellent score was in eight cases (40%), good score was in eight cases (40%), fair score was in three cases (15%), and at last, one case (5%) was poor in our study.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, we conclude that for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna, both treatment modalities provide equally satisfactory results.

Long-term Evaluation Using Finite Element Analysis of Bone Atrophy Changes after Locking Plate Fixation of Forearm Diaphyseal Fracture

Purpose

To determine the optimal timing of plate removal in patients with forearm diaphyseal fractures fixed with a locking plate via the analysis of bone atrophy over time.

Methods

The study subject was a 56-year-old man. Computed tomography was performed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after plate fixation. Finite element analysis was performed to measure the fracture load of the radius and ulna. The fracture loads of the affected and healthy sides were compared, and their ratio was calculated by dividing the value of the affected side by that of the healthy side at each time point.

Results

The strength of the radius and ulna was 40.9% and 29.3%, respectively, on the healthy side at 1 year after surgery. The fracture load increased from the second to the third postoperative year; the strength of the radius and ulna was 62.2% and 37.3%, respectively, on the healthy side after the third year. However, after the third year, the fracture load declined and reached 38.8% and 18.9% for the radius and ulna, respectively, on the healthy side by the fifth postoperative year.

Conclusions

The long-term fixation of forearm diaphyseal fractures using a locking plate leads to progressive bone atrophy. Future bone atrophy during long-term locking plate fixation without removal should be monitored.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Immediate Weight Bearing of Plated Both-Bone Forearm Fractures Using Eight Cortices Proximal and Distal to the Fracture in the Polytrauma Patient Is Safe

INTRODUCTION

Rehabilitation of trauma patients is facilitated by surgical stabilization permitting weight bearing (WB) of the fractured extremity. Both-bone forearm fracture (BBFx) plate osteosynthesis is an accepted technique with high union and low complication rates; yet, postoperative WB protocols have not been adequately investigated. There exists concern for increased complications in plated BBFx fractures for patients prescribed immediate WB. We hypothesized that immediate WB of surgically treated BBFxs results in acceptable rates of complications.

METHODS

Patients presenting to a Level-1 trauma center from 2007 to 2016 with a BBFx were identified retrospectively. Patients were skeletally mature, surgically treated with prescribed immediate WB protocol, and followed for 6 months or to fracture union. Collected data included demographics, fracture characteristics, associated injuries, and WB protocols for all extremities. Complications recorded included nonunion, hardware failure, and infection. Standard statistical comparisons were used to evaluate the risk of complication in polytrauma patients with modified lower extremity WB protocols (polytrauma group) and patients with no lower extremity WB restrictions (isolated group).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirteen patients were included with 75 (35%) females and 138 (65%) males. Mean age was 40 years and mean follow-up was 46 weeks. There were 142 (67%) patients in the poly-trauma and 71 (33%) patients in the isolated groups. In the poly-trauma group 21 (10%) patients had bilateral lower extremity WB restrictions. There were 11 (6%) complications noted: 2 non-unions, 4 hardware failures, and 5 infections. Demographics did not vary between the two groups. There was no difference in complications in the isolated (5.7%) versus poly-trauma groups (5.0%) (P = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Immediate WB rehabilitation after BBFx plate osteosynthesis seems to be safe and associated with low nonunion and complication rates. Our results demonstrate that polytrauma patients using ambulatory aids for lower extremity injuries can immediately WB without increased risk compared with isolated BBFx patients.

A fresh look at radial shaft fracture fixation: The lateral approach to the radius

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation using plates is the gold standard for the treatment of displaced forearm bone fractures in adults. The ulna being subcutaneous throughout has a constant approach. However, the radius is approached from either the dorsal or the volar side. Both the dorsal and the volar approaches to the radial shaft involve meticulous dissection and preservation of important neurovascular structures. The posterior interosseus nerve is at risk in the dorsal approach and the radial artery and its branches in the volar approach. Dissection of these structures also adds to the operative time. The possibility of a third alternate approach was perceived, which could decrease the potential risks of the conventional approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with radial shaft fractures in the middle third were operated on using the lateral approach: 6 of them had isolated radius fracture and 10 had both-bone fractures. There were 13 males and three females with a mean age of 37.9 years. Limited contact dynamic compression plate or locking compression plate of 3.5 mm was used to fix all fractures. All patients were operated on within 36 h of injury and then followed up till union. Union was assessed using serial radiographs and functional outcome using Anderson et al.'s criteria. The final functional outcome was assessed at an average 6 months after surgery and the results compiled.

RESULTS

The mean operative time in isolated radius fractures was 37.5 min and that for plating of both bones was 80.7 min. Primary bone grafting of the radius was done in one case and secondary bone grafting in another patient with delayed union of the radius. Union was achieved in all cases at a mean time of 17.25 weeks. The functional outcome was excellent in 10 patients, satisfactory in 5 patients, and unsatisfactory in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

The lateral approach is a simple approach with low operative complexity and complications. We found this approach to provide a reliably good exposure of the middle third of the radius, enabling lateral plating without complications.

Plating the radial shaft on the lateral surface: An outcome study

PURPOSE

Plate fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of displaced forearm shaft fractures in adults. Conventionally radial shaft fractures will be plated either on the volar surface or on the dorsal surface depending on which approach has been chosen. The lateral surface of the radius provides an even and uniformly curved area for placing a plate. It has the advantage of restoring and easy assessing the radial bow after surgery. We designed a prospective study to observe the outcome of lateral plating of radius shaft fractures.

METHODS

Nineteen patients were included in this study performed in Government Medical College, Jammu, India. Among them, 13 had fractures of both the forearm bones and 6 had isolated radial shaft fracture. Three patients had Galeazzi fracture dislocation. Fixation was done within 36 h of injury in all using 3.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate or locking compression plate applied to the lateral surface of the radius. Ulna was fixed in routine manner.

RESULTS

Union was achieved in 18 out of 19 patients, after a mean time of 17.44 weeks. According to Anderson et al.'s criteria, 12 patients had excellent results, 5 had satisfactory and 1 had unsatisfactory result. There was one failure (nonunion).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes including rate of union were comparable to those in the existing literature. Plating the radial shaft on the lateral surface is a viable alternative to volar or dorsal plating of the radius. Larger studies with randomized data are needed to assess whether it has any superiority over other existing techniques.

Diaphyseal forearm fractures, 20 years after surgical treatment. Is there still an indication for percutaneous fixation?

OBJECTIVE

This is a retrospective study of 98 diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults, treated by a percutaneous technique with intramedullar Kirchner wires.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We reviewed 64 patients with 98 forearm fractures with a radiographic follow-up, assessing the presence of pseudarthrosis or delayed bone union and evaluating functional outcomes with the Anderson and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale.

RESULTS

Clinical and radiological bone union was achieved in an average of 12 weeks. We obtained 77% of excellent and good results following Anderson's scale. There were 4 cases of pseudarthrosis and 6 cases of delayed bone union.

CONCLUSION

This surgical technique provides several advantages, such as a low incidence of complications and a total absence of infections, refractures and iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. It allows a lower hospital stay and a shortening of the surgery time compared with other techniques such as plates and intramedullary nails, that have similar results, in terms of bone union and functional outcomes, as we have verified from the published literature.

Evaluation of Bone Atrophy After Treatment of Forearm Fracture Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis: A Comparative Study of Locking Plates and Conventional Plates

PURPOSE

Forearm diaphysis fractures are usually managed by open reduction internal fixation. Recently, locking plates have been used for treatment. In the long-term period after surgery, some patients present with bone atrophy adjacent to the plate. However, a comparison of locking and conventional plates as a cause of atrophy has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term bone atrophy associated with use of locking and conventional plates for forearm fracture treatment.

METHODS

In this study we included 15 patients with forearm fracture managed by either locking or conventional plates and with more than 5 years of follow-up. Computed tomographic imaging of both forearms was performed to assess bone thickness and local bone mineral density and to predict bone strength without plate reinforcement based on finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Mean patient age at surgery was 48.0 years. Eight patients underwent reduction with fixed locking plates and were followed up for a mean of 79.5 months; the remaining 7 patients were treated with conventional plates and were followed up for a mean of 105.0 months. Compared with the conventional plate group, the locking plate group had the same fractured limb-contralateral limb ratio of cortex bone thickness, but had significantly lower ratios of mineral density adjacent to the plate and adjusted bone strength.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated bone atrophy after locking plate fixation for forearm fractures. Treatment plans for forearm fracture should take into consideration the impact of bone atrophy long after plate fixation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A Newly Designed Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Adults

BACKGROUND

The treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures using open reduction and plate fixation is generally accepted as the best choice in many studies. However, periosteal stripping, haematoma evacuation may result in delayed union, nonunion and infection. Refracture after plate removal is another concern. To overcome these problems intramedullary nails (IM) with different designs have been used with various outcomes. However previous IM nails have some shortcomings such is rotational instability and interlocking difficulties. We evaluated the results of newly designed IM nail in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

32 patients who had been treated with the interlocking IM nail for forearm fractures between 2011 and 2014 were included in this study. There were 23 males and 9 females with mean age of 36 years (range 18-68 years). 22 patients (68.8%) had both bone fractures. Nine patients (28.1%) had open fractures. The remaining ten patients (31.2%) had radius or ulna fractures. Grace and Eversmann rating system was used to assess functional evaluation. Patient reported outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Union was achieved in all patients. The mean followup was 17 months (range 13 - 28 months). According to the Grace-Eversmann criteria, 27 patients (87.5%) had excellent or good results. The mean DASH score was 14 (range 5-36). Overall complication rate was 12.5%. Superficial infection was encountered in two patients. One patient had delayed union, however fracture healed without any additional surgical procedure. One patient who had open grade 3A, comminuted proximal third radius fracture developed radioulnar synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The new design IM interlocking forearm nail provides satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures.

Comparison of the effect on bone healing process of different implants used in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: limited contact dynamic compression plate versus locking compression plate

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been widely accepted because of its satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, the implant construct that works best for MIPO remains controversial. Different plate designs result in different influence mechanisms to blood flow. In this study, we created ulnar fractures in 42 beagle dogs and fixed the fractures using MIPO. The dogs were randomly divided into two groups and were fixed with a limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) or a locking compression plate (LCP). Our study showed that with MIPO, there was no significant difference between the LCP and the LC-DCP in terms of fracture fixation, bone formation, or mineralization. Combined with the previous literature, we inferred that the healing process is affected by the quality of fracture reduction more than plate selection.

Results of 70 consecutive ulnar nightstick fractures

BACKGROUND

Adult isolated ulnar shaft fractures (IUSFs) are uncommon, and treatment remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare results of operative (reduction internal fixation (RIF)) and nonoperative treatment (NOT) in patients with IUSF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective case-control analysis was undertaken on patients diagnosed with IUSF between 2002 and 2008 at a Level I teaching trauma center. Clinical outcomes consisted of complications and functional ability.

RESULTS

Seventy patients had a mean age of 44.6 years (18-86) and a body mass index (BMI) of 27.9 (17-47). The mechanism of injury included high-energy injuries (60/70, 85.7%), low-energy falls (8/70, 11.4%), and sports (2/70, 2.9%). Treatment consisted of 33/70 (47.1%) NOT and 37/70 (52.9%) RIF. The AO/OTA fracture classification was 48 A1, 20 B2, and two C1. The level of activity (LOA) was 60 without restrictions, six with restrictions, and three who did not return to work. The function determined by range of motion was 55/70 (78.6%) full, 11 slightly limited, and one severely limited. A total of 14 nonunions (NUs) and 17 malunions (MUs) occurred. NOT was associated with NU (χ(2)=0.001) and MU (χ(2)=0.000), respectively. Fracture angulation ≥8° was related to the inability to return to previous LOA (ρ=0.406, p=0.001). Secondary displacement >2mm contributed to MU (R(2)=0.238, p=0.000) and NU (R(2)=0.076, p=0.021). NU was related to a minor functional result (ρ=0.315, p=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

IUSF treatment remains challenging in the adult population. Nonoperative treatment of displaced fractures produces a high risk of complications, and the fracture characteristics determine patient outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Accuracy of specimen-specific nonlinear finite element analysis for evaluation of radial diaphysis strength in cadaver material

The feasibility of a user-specific finite element model for predicting the in situ strength of the radius after implantation of bone plates for open fracture reduction was established. The effect of metal artifact in CT imaging was characterized. The results were verified against biomechanical test data. Fourteen cadaveric radii were divided into two groups: (1) intact radii for evaluating the accuracy of radial diaphysis strength predictions with finite element analysis and (2) radii with a locking plate affixed for evaluating metal artifact. All bones were imaged with CT. In the plated group, radii were first imaged with the plates affixed (for simulating digital plate removal). They were then subsequently imaged with the locking plates and screws removed (actual plate removal). Fracture strength of the radius diaphysis under axial compression was predicted with a three-dimensional, specimen-specific, nonlinear finite element analysis for both the intact and plated bones (bones with and without the plate captured in the scan). Specimens were then loaded to failure using a universal testing machine to verify the actual fracture load. In the intact group, the physical and predicted fracture loads were strongly correlated. For radii with plates affixed, the physical and predicted (simulated plate removal and actual plate removal) fracture loads were strongly correlated. This study demonstrates that our specimen-specific finite element analysis can accurately predict the strength of the radial diaphysis. The metal artifact from CT imaging was shown to produce an overestimate of strength.

Stability of unicortical locked fixation versus bicortical non-locked fixation for forearm fractures

Locking plate fixation is being widely applied for fixation of forearm fractures and has many potential advantages, such as fixed angle fixation and improved construct stability, especially in osteoporotic bone. Biomechanical data comparing locking devices to commonly used Low Contact Dynamic Compression (LCDCP) plates for the fixation of forearm fractures has been lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation stability of a 3.5-mm unicortical locked plate with bicortical non-locked LCDCP plates. Six matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric forearms were randomly assigned to unicortical locked and bicortical unlocked groups. Non-destructive four-point bending and torsional test was performed on the ulna and radius separately, using a servohydraulic testing system to obtain construct stiffness of the intact specimens and specimens after osteotomy and plating. The specimens were then loaded to failure to test the fixation strength. The locked unicortical fixation showed significantly higher bending stiffness than the unlocked bicortical fixation, but with significantly lower stiffness and strength in torsion. Fixation strength was comparable between the two groups under bending, but significantly greater in the bicortical non-locked group under torsion. Findings from this study suggest that postoperative rehabilitation protocols may need modification to limit torsional loading in the early stage when using locked unicortical fixation. The study also points out the potential advantage of a hybrid fixation that combines locked unicortical and unlocked bicortical screws.

Plate osteosynthesis of fractures of the shaft of the humerus: comparison of limited contact dynamic compression plates and locking compression plates

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes and complications of displaced fractures of the shaft of the humerus treated with limited-contact dynamic compression plates (LCDCPs) and locking compression plates (LCPs).

Materials and methods

Two hundred and twelve patients with displaced fractures of the shaft of the humerus, treated with plate osteosynthesis from January 2005 to December 2009 were reviewed. One hundred and two patients (group A) were treated with LCDCP osteosynthesis and 110 patients (group B) were treated with LCP osteosynthesis. Clinical and radiological assessments were made at monthly intervals for the first 6 months and then at 2-month intervals for the next 6 months. Primary outcome measures like operative time, duration of hospital stay, time to fracture union, union rate and secondary outcome measures (functional outcome and complications such as infection, malunion, delayed union, nonunion, implant failure and iatrogenic radial nerve palsy) were compared between both groups. The ULCA scoring system and Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI) were used to assess shoulder and elbow functions, respectively. Rodriguez-Merchan criteria were used to assess the functional outcomes of the fracture fixation.

Results

There was no significant difference found between the two groups in terms of primary outcome measures. According to Rodriguez-Merchan criteria, comparison of functional outcomes of both groups showed insignificant difference (p = 0.48). There was no significant difference found between the two groups regarding mean ULCA score (p = 0.34) and mean MEPI sore (p = 0.54). In terms of complications, no significant difference was found between the two groups.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the principle of fracture fixation was more important than plate selection in fractures of the shaft of the humerus.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures

This study compares the results of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the dynamic compression plate (DCP) in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults and defines the indications for the use of the LCP. Forty-two patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 22 had been treated with the LCP (LCP group) and 20 had been treated with the DCP (DCP group). The AO/ASIF classification was used to classify the fractures. Patients were assessed using the Grace-Eversmann criteria and the Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand questionnaire during the final follow-up. Mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 20-24 months) in the LCP group and 23 months (range, 19-26 months) in the DCP group. Union was achieved in all patients. Mean time to union was 15 weeks (range, 12-25 weeks) in the LCP group and 17 weeks (range, 13-24 weeks) in the DCP group. In each group, 1 patient experienced delayed union, which required no additional surgical intervention. No significant difference was found regarding the time to union between the groups (P>.05). No significant difference existed between the 2 groups in terms of Grace-Eversmann criteria and Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand scores (both P>.05). The results of these different fixation methods for forearm fractures in adults are similar. As such, the correct selection and application of surgical technique is more important than the type of plate used.

[Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?]

BACKGROUND

Titanium plates represent the predominant implants of choice for fracture care in Central Europe, based on the apparently favourable properties related to improved "biocompatibility". The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the use of stainless steel implants for selected fractures represents a safe and efficient treatment modality, which is not associated with an increased rate of complications and surgical revisions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database during a 5-year study period (01/01/2006-12/31/2010) at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center on all fractures treated by stainless steel plates. Inclusion criteria consisted of all consecutive patients >15 years of age whose fractures were fixated with a stainless steel plate. All fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA system. Outcome parameters consisted of the rate of complications and surgical revisions, and the data were placed into context with the published complication rates for titanium plates.

RESULTS

A total of 1,001 consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of fractures in the indication spectrum of this study were screened. Of these, 751 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These patients had 774 fractures which were fixated with 859 stainless steel plates. Open fractures accounted for 9.6% of all injuries (n=74). The complication rate of the 774 fractures treated with stainless steel plates was 8.01% (n=62), with a surgical revision rate of 5.16% (n=40). These data are below the reported incidence of complications and surgical revisions for titanium plates in the identical indication spectrum in the pertinent literature published.

CONCLUSIONS

The fixation of selected fractures with stainless steel implants represents a safe and efficient treatment option, which does not appear to be associated with increased complication rates. These data challenge the anecdotal superiority of titanium plates and should spur a new discussion on the use of stainless steel implants, particularly under the aspect of cost savings in the DRG era.

Screw elastic intramedullary nail for the management of adult forearm fractures

BACKGROUND

The failure of the conventional nailing of both forearm bones or isolated fractures of radius and ulna pose a potential problem of nail migration and rotational instability, despite the best reduction. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the results of screw elastic intramedullary nail for the treatment of adult diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones, which effectively addresses the problems associated with the conventional nailing systems for the forearm fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-six adults with forearm fractures (radius and ulna or isolated fracture of the single bone) were retrospectively evaluated. Fifty males and 26 females with the mean age of 38 years (range, 18-70 years) underwent closed reduction and screw intramedullary nail fixation. Ten patients required limited open reduction. The fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA system. The average followup was 12 months (range, 6 to 18 months).

RESULTS

The mean surgical time was 45 minutes (35 to 65 minutes). The meantime to union was 14 weeks (10-21 weeks). The results were graded as excellent in 50, good in 18 patients, and acceptable in eight patients, using the criteria of Grace and Eversman. We had superficial infection in three cases, one case of delayed infection, painful bursa in two cases, delayed union in two cases, malunion with dislocation of the DRUJ in two cases, injury to the extensor tendon of the thumb in one case, and one case of incomplete radioulnar synostosis.

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction and internal fixation of forearm fractures by screw intramedullary nails reestablishes the near normal relationship of the fractured fragments. Screw intramedullary nail effectively controls both rotatory forces and the migration of the nail. It produces excellent clinical results in isolated fractures of either bones, as well as both bones of the forearm in adults.

Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The effect of multiple eccentrically placed screws and their drill positioning guides

AIMS

The purpose of this biomechanical study was to assess the capacity of dynamic and locking compression plates (DCP and LCP) in improving fracture compression through the use of multiple compression screws, and the effect of alternating their placement between the two sides of the fracture compared with placing them all on one side. The study also compared fracture compression between DCP and LCP, and between the loading and universal drill guides in DCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fracture compression was measured using a customised load cell placed in a transverse osteotomy in synthetic bone models. The starting pressure across the osteotomy site was standardised to allow comparison. Large fragment DCP and LCP plates were used for fixation. The eccentrically placed compression screws were inserted in two sequences: all on the initial compression screw side, or alternating between the initial compression and neutral sides. In the DCP, the effect of using the universal guide for eccentric screw insertion point was compared with the loading guide.

RESULTS

In the DCP, the second eccentrically placed screw improved fracture compression in both sequences (p=0.002). A third eccentrically placed screw improved compression only when placed in alternating sequence (p=0.002), whereas the fourth screw had no significant effect (p=0.13). The universal guide generated higher compression than the loading guide (p=0.0001). In the LCP, fracture compression significantly improved following insertion of a second compression screw (p=0.002), but the initial neutral screw failed to re-engage completely into its hole due to lack of space for horizontal gliding towards the fracture. There was no significant difference in compression between the first two compression screws in DCP and LCP (p=0.64, 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Fracture compression can be improved either using multiple eccentrically placed screws alternated between the two sides of the plate in LCP and DCP, or by the use of a universal drill guide in DCP. Although the compression hole in the LCP is shorter, it generates compression comparable to the DCP.

Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate

BACKGROUND

The locking compression plate (LCP) with combination holes is a newer device in fracture fixation. We undertook a study comparing the LCP with limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the forearm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective comparative study, 36 patients (18 in each group) with fractures of both the forearm bones (72 fractures) were treated with one of the two devices. The average age of the patients was 30.5 years (range 16-60 years) with mean followup of 2.1 years (range 1.5-2.8 years). The patients were assessed for fracture union and function and complications and by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score for patient related outcome at the latest followup.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in two groups with respect to the range of movements or grip strength. One case had delayed union (LC-DCP group) and another had synostosis (LCP group). Plate removal was done in four cases within the study period with no refracture till the presentation of this report.

CONCLUSION

LC plating is an effective treatment option for fractures of both bones of forearm. The present study could not prove its superiority over LC-DCP.

Problems of bridging plate fixation for the treatment of forearm shaft fractures with the locking compression plate

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures by open reduction and internal plate fixation is a well-accepted strategy. In a variety of fracture localizations, the use of bridging plate fixation with locking compression plates (LCP) has been shown to improve biomechanical and biological characteristics. Only very limited clinical data are available on bridging plate fixation using LCPs for the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures. The aims of this study were to assess both clinical outcomes of LCP fracture treatments, and the implant-specific advantages and disadvantages.

METHOD

The study consisted of 53 patients. All relevant data were extracted from the medical reports and radiographs. Of the 53 patients, 39 completed the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire and 35 patients were available for clinical examination. The mean time of follow-up was 23.3 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine fractures of the radius and 45 fractures of the ulna were treated with 3.5 mm LCPs. Due to a fracture non-union, four patients underwent a second operation. In 13 patients, hardware had already been removed at the time of follow-up. Complete documentation of the removal operation was available for ten patients; in seven of these, procedures difficulties occurred. Mean ranges of motion were 138°, 141° and 162° for elbow flexion-extension, wrist flexion-extension and pronation-supination, respectively. The mean DASH score was calculated at 14.9.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our data show that clinical and functional outcomes of LCP plating of diaphyseal forearm fractures are comparable to the use of conventional implants. However, implant-specific problems during hardware removal must be considered.

Internal fixation of symphyseal disruption resulting from childbirth

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and radiographic results after operative treatment of complete symphyseal disruption resulting from childbirth and to evaluate residual pain and implant failure in relation to the timing of surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary pelvis and acetabulum care unit at a general hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten consecutive women with complete symphysis disruption associated with childbirth were included from a database of 603 patients with pelvic fracture. No patients with this diagnosis were excluded. All patients were followed until clinical healing of the symphysis or union of the fusion.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation in acute (less than 2 weeks from childbirth, four patients) and after failed nonoperative treatment in subacute cases (2 weeks to 6 months after childbirth, three patients). Fusion of the symphysis with iliac crest bone graft and plate fixation after failed nonoperative treatment in chronic cases (greater than 6 months, three patients).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Analyzed variables included the Lindahl score, maintenance of postoperative reduction, implant failure, malunion, and necessity of reoperation.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 32 years (range, 24-37 years). Mean follow up was 29 months (range, 5-139 months). The mean postoperative Lindahl score was 68 ± 14.6 points (range, 38-80 points). There were three excellent, four good, two fair, and one poor result. Fair or poor results occurred in one subacute and two chronic cases. There were two revision surgeries. One patient underwent implant removal resulting from dyspareunia 3.1 years postoperatively. One subacute patient had conversion to symphyseal fusion after implant failure as a result of a fall 11 years after index surgery. Major complications occurred in two and minor complications in three patients. Radiographic loosening of implants was observed in all subacute cases. All fusions healed and symptoms improved at last follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative management significantly improved the functional outcomes of all three subgroups and can be an acceptable treatment option for labor-induced complete symphysis pubis disruption.