Radiological features of osteoarthritis of the acromiclavicular joint and its association with clinical symptoms

Choice of Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment Should Not Be Influenced by Risk of Development of Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is currently unknown to what degree surgical or nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation influences the development of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to evaluate AC OA after surgical and nonoperative treatment for AC dislocations, compare OA prevalence between treatment options, and compare OA prevalence between the injured and contralateral shoulder.

METHODS

Articles reporting on the prevalence of OA after surgical or nonoperative treatment of an AC dislocation with a minimal 2-year follow-up were included. AC OA presence was extracted for the injured and contralateral shoulder. Treatment categories were defined based on anatomical variation in the reattachment of ligaments: AC fixation, coracoclavicular (CC) fixation, AC and CC fixation, Bosworth screw synthetic graft, tendon graft, and conservative. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-four articles were included for qualitative analysis, and 7 articles were included for meta-analysis (n = 3,812; follow-up = 2.0-24.2 years; mean age 37.6 ± 10.4 years). A total of 3,483 patients underwent surgical treatment, and 329 patients underwent conservative treatment. OA prevalence ranged from 6.7%-29.3% between 7 pooled treatment categories. Most included studies had a follow-up <10 years (94%) and OA prevalence increased with time, regardless of treatment option. There was no difference in OA prevalence between the injured and contralateral shoulder (p = 0.120). MINORS scores were varied, ranging from poor to very good.

CONCLUSION

The pooled AC OA prevalence of the 7 treatment categories ranged from 6.7% for the CC fixation surgical group to 29.3% for the conservative treatment group. However, the included studies were predominantly of low quality and had varying follow-up periods, with most having relatively short follow-up durations. No difference in AC OA prevalence was found between the injured and contralateral shoulder. Based on the available evidence, treatment choice for AC dislocation should not be influenced by the potential development of AC AO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Functional and radiological outcome of non-operative treated clavicle fractures and its association with acromioclavicular joint arthrosis

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures are traditionally treated non-operatively. This study determines the functional outcome of midshaft clavicle fractures treated non-operatively, the factors influencing it, and the incidence of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) arthrosis.

METHODS

Patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated non-operatively between 16 and 50 years old with no prior AC joint problems were assessed. Demographics, hand dominance, type of occupation, and smoking status were documented. Functional scoring using DASH score, CM score, and radiological evaluation was done with special tests to diagnose AC joint arthrosis. Two or more positive special tests were considered significant for this study.

RESULTS

101 patients were recruited, 83 male and 18 female patients. The average age of 34.7 ± 13.93 years. The average follow-up was 32.7 months (range: 24-75; SD ± 9.9 months). 48.5% were blue-collar workers, and 60.4% involved the dominant upper limb. 44.6% were cigarette smokers. There was 20 mm and more shortening in 21.8% of subjects. 40.6% had a significant special test, and 36.6% had radiological changes of AC joint osteoarthritis. Positive two or more special tests were significantly associated with radiological evidence of arthrosis (p = .00). The mean DASH score was 28.28 ± 17.4, and the mean CM score was 27.58 ± 14.34. Most have satisfactory to excellent scores. Hand dominance, smoking, and blue-collar work were significantly associated with poorer CM scores, and hand dominance was significant for Dash scores.

CONCLUSION

There is an equal distribution poor, satisfactory and excellent functional outcomes in patients with midshaft clavicle fractures treated non-operatively. The poor outcomes may be attributed to ACJ arthrosis. Hand dominance, smoking and blue-collar work affected the functional outcome. Shortening of the clavicle had no bearing on the clinical and radiological findings of osteoarthritis and functional scores. The presence of two or more positive special tests is an accurate predictor of AC joint arthritis.

Mid- to long-term success rate and functional outcomes of acromioclavicular injections in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular (AC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent pathology of the shoulder in elderly patients. Drug injection plays an important role in treatment of AC OA. Literature has demonstrated excellent short-term results regarding shoulder function and pain. However, mid- to long-term results are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single intra-articular AC injection in patients with AC OA and to identify predictive factors for success.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to analyze success rate, shoulder function, and pain perception after a single intra-articular injection in patients with AC OA. Success was defined as the absence of reinterventions such as additional injection or surgery. Outcome measures were 1-year success rate and clinical outcome scores of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients participated in this study. At a median final follow-up of 0.8 years (interquartile range, 0-6), 57 of these patients (58%) had undergone a reintervention. The 1-year success rate was 47% (95% confidence interval, 37%-57%), with NRS at rest as the sole factor significantly associated with success. Thirty patients not requiring reintervention reported significant improvement from baseline for all reported outcome measures at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

AC injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47%. The AC injection produces good mid- to long-term clinical outcomes regarding shoulder function, quality of life, and pain perception in one-third of patients. Further research is essential to analyze mid- to longterm outcomes of AC injections. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Management of Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Scoping Review

Purpose  The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis during shoulder arthroscopy is a discussed topic. The aim of this scoping review is to report the current recommendations regarding the management of this disorder in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff tears.

Methods  A scoping review was performed in Pubmed\Medline and Embase in March 2017, restricted to English language literature. The following keywords were used: (“rotator cuff tear” OR ” rotator cuff” OR “rotator cuff repair”) AND (“acromioclavicular joint arthritis” OR “ac joint arthritis” OR “ac joint” OR “acromioclavicular joint”). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective trials, and therapeutic case series. Exclusion criteria were reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions.

Results  Two retrospective studies and three randomized controlled trials were identified. Clinical studies reported results of 443 shoulders, with an average age of 60.48 years and a mean follow-up of 31.7 months. Many differences were found regarding the design of the studies, patient's selection, surgical procedures, and instrumental and clinical evaluations. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical outcome scores between patients that underwent rotator cuff repair in association with distal clavicular resection and patients with isolated rotator cuff repair.

Conclusion  Results of this scoping review underline a lack of evidence-based recommendations about the management of ACJ osteoarthritis in association with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Surgical procedures such as distal clavicle resection (DCR) should be performed carefully in this cohort of patients. More prospective randomized studies are needed to reach a consensus about the correct surgical approach to DCR in patients with signs of ACJ osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears.

Level of Evidence  Level III.

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Shoulder Tissue Irritability Classification

OBJECTIVE

Rating tissue irritability has been recommended to aid decision making in several recent clinical practice guidelines. An explicit method for rating tissue irritability was proposed as part of the Staged Algorithm for Rehabilitation Classification: Shoulder Disorders (STAR-Shoulder), but the reliability and validity of this classification are unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder tissue irritability ratings as part of a system designed to guide appropriate treatment strategy and intensity.

METHODS

A clinical measurement, prospective repeated-measures cross-sectional design was used. The 101 consecutive participants with primary complaints of shoulder pain were assessed by pairs of blinded raters (24 raters in total) and rated for tissue irritability. Patients completed 3 patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures reflecting both pain and disability, and these scores were compared with ratings of tissue irritability. Paired ratings of irritability were analyzed for reliability with prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted Kappa for ordinal scales. Analysis of variance was used to compare PRO measures across different levels of irritability. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was utilized to derive cut-off scores for 3 PRO instruments.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was 0.69 (95% CI = 0.59-0.78), with 67% agreement. All PRO measures were significantly different among 3 levels of tissue irritability.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be acceptable reliability and a strong relationship between PRO measures and therapist-rated tissue irritability, supporting the use of the STAR-Shoulder irritability rating system.

IMPACT

Several clinical practice guidelines have recommended that clinicians rate tissue irritability as part of their examination. This study provides important new information supporting the reliability and validity of the STAR-Shoulder tissue irritability rating system.

AC joint osteoarthritis: The role of genetics. An MRI evaluation of asymptomatic elderly twins

PURPOSE

The anatomy of the articular surfaces has historically identified as major responsible for acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis (ACJO). On the other side, the almost 100% prevalence of ACJO in subjects over 50 years old seems to suggest a multifactorial etiology. We compared ACJO between asymptomatic elderly monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins to investigate the influence of genetics and environmental factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty pairs of twins [15MZ-15DZ; mean age (SD): 63.70 (3.31); range: 53-72] were retrospectively enrolled. ACJO was evaluated on MRI through a 4-grade severity scale and ACJ configuration was assessed. Information regarding work activity were obtained. Heritability index was calculated.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.868 (95% CI; 0.798 to 0.917). An ICC values of 0.889 (95% CI; 0.798 to 0.944) and 0.843 (95% CI, 0.712 to 0.920) were found in the MZ and DZ groups, respectively. The polychoric correlation was 0.857 in the MZ twins and 0.757 in the DZ twins. The calculated heritability index was 0.20 (20%), and the contribution of the shared environment (c2) and unique environment (e2) was 0.66 (66%) and 0.14 (14%), respectively. No relationship between job types and ACJO in both the total cohort (r = 0.089; p = 0.499) and in the monozygotic (r = 0.247; p = 0.187) and the dizygotic twin groups (r = -0.084; p = 0.658) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of genetics on ACJO accounts for only 20%; a specific anatomical configuration of the articular surfaces only partially acts on the development of joint osteoarthritis. Environmental factors have the greatest impact.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The relationship of the acromion to the distal clavicle in normal and symptomatic degenerated acromioclavicular joints

INTRODUCTION

Although degenerative osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint is a common finding on technical investigations, not every patient experiences pain or function loss. The difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is currently not elucidated. Therefore, we want to investigate the acromioclavicular relationship in normal, asymptomatic, and symptomatic degenerated ACJ.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 normal ACJ, 39 asymptomatic degenerated ACJ, and 30 symptomatic degenerated ACJ were 3D reconstructed. The morphological dimensions and the relationship of the acromion and distal clavicle were measured using computational software. The reproducibility of this technique was evaluated using inter- and intra-observer reliability.

RESULTS

The mean anteroposterior and superoinferior distance of both the clavicle and acromion was significantly larger in asymptomatic and symptomatic degenerative ACJ compared to the normal ACJ (p < 0.001). In symptomatic osteoarthritic ACJ, both the anterior and posterior borders of the acromion were significantly more anterior to the borders of the clavicle than in the normal group and asymptomatic group (p < 0.001). Subsequent ROC curve analysis resulted in a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 88.6% for anterior subluxation of the ACJ. This technique showed an excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with degenerative ACJ, both the distal clavicle and acromion are enlarged. In asymptomatic patients, the AC relationship is the same as in normal patients, in contrast, in patients with symptomatic degenerative ACJ, the acromion is subluxated anteriorly compared to the clavicle.

Seven-year course of asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis (AC-OA) is a frequent finding in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its natural course is unknown. Therefore, the question arises whether a resection should be performed simultaneously with shoulder surgery for another reason to prevent future pain and reoperation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term course of asymptomatic AC-OA.

METHODS

Overall, 114 asymptomatic AC-OA diagnosed on MRI were followed for 7 years between 2011 and 2018. At baseline, MRI signal enhancement in the clavicle and acromion, OA grade, physical demand as well as the parameters (1) Constant Score Visual Analogue Scale, (2) pain on AC-joint compression, and (3) cross-body adduction test were measured. All patients were followed up after 7 years by interview, and in case of symptoms by clinical examination. The endpoint "deterioration" was reached if 2 of the 3 parameters turned worse.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 83% of cases, 7% turned better, 10% turned worse. Physical demand and osteoarthritis grade increased the risk of deterioration, whereas MRI signal enhancement in the clavicle or acromion had no influence on outcome. During follow-up, the frequency of pain on AC-joint compression increased from 11% to 16% (P = .24), the frequency of a positive cross-body adduction test increased from 6% to 20% (P = .017), and the mean Constant Score Visual Analogue Scale increased from 10 to 13 points (P < .001) indicating less pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% over 7 years. A simultaneous resection of an asymptomatic AC-OA during shoulder surgery for another reason is not indicated in every patient.

Preoperative Factors Associated With Subsequent Distal Clavicle Resection After Rotator Cuff Repair

Background:

Acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears are commonly coincident.

Purpose:

To determine the rate of subsequent distal clavicle excision (DCE) when rotator cuff repair (RCR) is performed without DCE and the risk factors for subsequent DCE after RCR.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The operative logs of 2 surgeons from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent RCR with or without DCE. Preoperative demographic data, symptoms, physical examination, and standardized outcomes (visual analog scale for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) were noted. Acromioclavicular (AC) arthritis was classified on preoperative radiographs. The rate of subsequent surgery on the AC joint was determined via chart review, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine risk factors for revision.

Results:

In total, 894 patients underwent isolated RCR, and 46 underwent concomitant RCR and DCE. On retrospective chart review, of those who underwent isolated RCR, the revision rate for any reason was 7.5% (67 patients), and the rate of subsequent AC surgery was 1.1% (10 patients). Preoperatively, 88% of the total cohort was considered to have a radiographically normal AC joint. On multivariate analysis of patients who underwent isolated RCR, the risk factors for subsequent AC surgery included preoperative tenderness to palpation at the AC joint (10% vs 63%, P < .001), female sex (35% vs 80%, P < .001), and surgery on the dominant side (60% vs 100%, P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these 3 factors explained 50% of the variance in revision AC surgery. When these 3 factors were present in combination, there was a 40% rate of revision AC surgery.

Conclusion:

This records review found that 10 of 894 (1.1%) rotator cuff repairs underwent subsequent distal clavicle resection. Risk factors for subsequent DCE included tenderness to palpation at the AC joint, female sex, and surgery on the dominant side, with subsequent DCE performed in 40% of cases with a combination of these 3 factors. Because the duration of follow-up was short and the number of reoperations small, some caution is recommended in interpreting these results, as the analyses may be underpowered.

The Diagnostic Reproducibility of Tomosynthesis for the Correlation between Acromiohumeral Distance and Rotator Cuff Size or Type

Objective

To correlate the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) using tomosynthesis and rotator cuff (RC) pathology and various anatomical indices and to assess the diagnostic reproducibility of tomosynthesis for the evaluation of subacromial impingement.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of 63 patients with clinically suspected subacromial impingement was conducted. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently measured the following quantitative data: the AHD on plain radiographs and the AHD at three compartments (anterior, middle, and posterior) using tomosynthesis, computed tomography (CT) arthrography, or magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. To investigate the association between the AHD and RC pathology and various anatomical indices, we reviewed the arthroscopic operation record as the referenced standard.

Results

The size of rotator cuff tear (RCT) in full-thickness tears displayed a significant inverse correlation with the middle and the posterior tomosynthetic AHDs (p < 0.05). The results of an ANOVA revealed that the middle tomosynthetic AHD retained a significant association with the type of RCT (p = 0.042), and the posterior tomosynthetic AHD retained significance for the size of RCT in a full-thickness tear (p = 0.024). The inter-modality correlation exhibited significant agreement especially among the plain radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT or MR arthrography (p < 0.05). The intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients (ICCs) displayed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.896–0.983). The humeral head diameter and glenoid height were significantly correlated with patient height and weight.

Conclusion

Acromiohumeral distance measurement using tomosynthesis is reproducible compared with other modalities.

Outcome of distal clavicle resection in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis and full-thickness rotator cuff tear

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of distal clavicle resection (DCR) on subjective and objective outcome measures in patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) and rotator cuff tear.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with arthroscopic evidence of OA of the ACJ with complete data at 2 years were used for the data analysis. Patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the AC joint underwent a DCR in conjunction with rotator cuff repair, while patients with mild OA of the ACJ underwent surgery related to concomitant rotator cuff tear without a DCR.

RESULTS

Data of 184 (72 females, 112 males, mean age: 62) patients with rotator cuff tear and varying degrees of OA of the AC joint were used for the analysis. Of 184 patients, 144 (78 %) had a resection of distal clavicle (resection group) and 40 (22 %) did not have a resection (no-resection group). Both groups showed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvement in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant Murley score, and strength. Multivariable analysis showed that lower pre-operative ASES scores (higher disability), having a larger tear, an active compensation claim, and not having a DCR, had a negative impact on post-operative ASES scores.

CONCLUSION

When untreated surgically, even mild arthroscopic findings of AC joint OA may lead to a poorer outcome after rotator cuff repair. Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective outcome study, Level II.