Withholding clopidogrel for 3 to 6 versus 7 days or more before surgery in hip fracture patients

The correlates of post-surgical haematoma in older adults with proximal femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the incidence of haematoma, and clinical correlates among orthogeriatric patients.

AIMS

This study aims to describe the incidence of haematoma after surgical repair of hip fracture and to identify the clinical correlates of haematoma among orthogeriatric patients.

METHODS

Two orthopaedic surgeons and a dedicated operator using ultrasound technique, each other in blindness, evaluated 154 orthogeriatric patients during their hospital stay. All patients received a comprehensive geriatric assessment. We investigated the concordance between clinical diagnosis and ultrasound detection of haematoma, and then we explored the clinical correlates of the onset of post-surgical haematoma.

RESULTS

Blood effusion at the surgical site was detected in 77 (50%) patients using ultrasound technique; orthopaedic surgeons reached a clinical agreement about post-surgical haematoma in 18 (23%) patients. The sensitivity of clinical evaluation was 0.66, and the specificity was 0.70. Independent of age, clinical, pharmacological, and surgical confounders, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were associated with post-surgical haematoma (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.15-4.49). A tendency towards association was observed between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and post-surgical haematoma (OR 2.10; 95% CI 0.97-4.54), CONCLUSIONS: Half of older patients undergoing surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture develop a post-surgical haematoma. Clinical assessment, even if made by senior orthopaedic surgeons, underestimates the actual occurrence of post-surgical haematoma compared to ultrasound detection. Ultrasound technique may help to detect haematoma larger than 15 mm better than clinical assessment. PPIs's use is a risk factor for post-surgical haematoma independent of several medical and surgical confounders.

Evaluation of Clopidogrel Safety in Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of bleeding in elderly patients undergoing early hip fracture surgery with/without clopidogrel administration.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study, and patients over 65 years with fresh hip fracture were enrolled. For the patients taking clopidogrel, early surgical treatment was performed without 5-7 days waiting time. The patients were divided into groups according to their fracture type and the surgical method. Within each fracture/surgery group, the patients were further divided into subgroups according to whether they had clopidogrel administration. The patients' age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, hemoglobin level at admission, and the time from admission to surgery were compared in the different groups. The bleeding outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion status, as well as secondary outcomes, such as operation duration and length of hospital stay, were also compared in these groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in patients' baseline characteristics and outcomes, including intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operation duration and length of hospital stay, between the clopidogrel-administrated patients and the control patients. However, the percentage of patients taking general anesthesia was significantly higher in clopidogrel group than that in control group (P = 0.01). Similar intraoperative blood loss was found in the subgroups of hemi-hip replacement, internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of the femur (fracture type A1-2, short pin), and internal fixation of femoral neck fracture with cannulated nails. For the internal fixation of femoral neck fracture with cannulated nails, the blood loss is significantly less in both subgroups than that with other two surgical methods. Moreover, the total hip arthroplasty, with the highest bleeding risk among all the surgical methods involved, was rarely chosen to treat geriatric hip fracture in this study.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that compared with patients without clopidogrel administration, elderly patients with hip fractures who receive clopidogrel as long-term anti-platelet therapy are relatively safe for surgery in less than 5-7 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel.

Safety of early surgery for geriatric hip fracture patients taking clopidogrel: a retrospective case-control study of 120 patients in China

Background:

Geriatric hip fracture patients receiving clopidogrel are a surgical challenge. In China, most of these patients undergo delayed surgical treatment after clopidogrel withdrawal for at least 5 to 7 days. However, delayed surgery is associated with increased complications and mortality in the older adults. This retrospective paralleled comparison study investigated the safety of early surgery for geriatric hip fracture patients within 5 days of clopidogrel withdrawal.

Methods:

Acute hip fracture patients (≥65 years) who were hospitalized in the orthogeriatric co-management ward of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between November 2016 and April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty patients taking clopidogrel before injury and discontinued <5 days before surgery constituted the clopidogrel group. The control group constituted 60 patients not taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs and matched 1:1 with the clopidogrel group for sex, fracture type, operative procedure, and time from injury to operation (±10 h). The primary outcome was perioperative blood loss and the secondary outcomes were transfusion requirement, complications, and mortality. The Student's t test or Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for continuous variables and the Chi-square test was used for categorical variables.

Results:

Age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and percentage undergoing general anesthesia were comparable between the groups (P > 0.050). The percentages of patients with coronary heart disease (61.7% vs. 18.3%; P < 0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (45.0% vs. 15.0%; P < 0.010) were significantly higher in the clopidogrel vs. control groups, respectively. The median clopidogrel discontinuation time before operation was 73.0 (range: 3.0–120.0) h. There was no significant difference in the estimated perioperative blood loss between the clopidogrel group (median: 745 mL) and control group (median: 772 mL) (P = 0.866). The intra-operative transfusion rate was higher in the clopidogrel group (22/60, 36.7%) than that in the control group (12/60, 20.0%) (P < 0.050). However, there was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate during the entire perioperative period (26/60, 43.3% vs. 20/60, 33.3%; clopidogrel group vs. control group, respectively; P > 0.050). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates between the groups.

Conclusions:

Early hip fracture surgery is safe for elderly patients within 5 days of clopidogrel withdrawal, without increased perioperative blood loss, transfusion requirement, complications, and mortality compared with patients not taking antiplatelet drugs.

Reoperation rate, mortality and ambulatory ability after internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: a study on Korean Hip Fracture Registry

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients is challenging and how to treat these patients remains controversial. The purposes of this study were to compare (1) reoperation rate, (2) mortality and (3) the postoperative change of walking ability between patients undergoing internal fixation (IF) and those undergoing bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to this type of fracture based on the data from the Korean Hip Fracture Registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2014 and June 2016, we extracted 623 unstable intertrochanteric fractures (616 patients aged ≥ 65 years) according to the classification of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation-American Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Among the 564 patients, 396 were treated with IF (IF group) and 168 with bipolar HA (HA group). We compared the reoperation rate and mortality between IF group and HA group. In patients, who were followed up more than 2 years after the surgery, we compared the postoperative change of walking activity from ambulatory outdoors (Koval's grade 1, 2, 3) to housebound (Koval's grade 4, 5, 6).

RESULTS

The rate of reoperation was higher in the IF group (24/396, 6.1%) than in the HA (4/168, 2.4%) (p = 0.046). At the final follow-up, 79 (35.7%) of the 221 IF patients became housebound, whereas 21 (23.3%) of the 90 HA patients became housebound (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

This study showed HA was associated with lower rate of reoperation and lower decrement rate of walking ability compared to IF in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Is hip fracture surgery safe for patients on antiplatelet drugs and is it necessary to delay surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hip fractures are common and account for a large proportion of orthopedic surgical admissions in elderly patients. However, determining the timing for surgery has been controversial for patients who develop hip fractures while on antiplatelet treatment.

Methods

Computerized databases for studies published from the inception date to January 2020, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Web of Science^TM, ClinicalTrials, ClinicalKey, and Google Scholar, were searched using the keywords “Hip AND Fracture”, “Antiplatelet”, “Antithrombocyte”, “Platelet aggregation inhibitors”, “Aspirin”, “Plavix”, and “Clopidogrel”.

Results

In total, 2328 initial articles were identified. Twenty-four studies with 5423 participants were ultimately included in our analysis. Early surgery was associated with an increased transfusion rate in the antiplatelet group compared to the non-antiplatelet group (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.44; p = 0.03). Early surgery for hip fracture patients on antiplatelet therapy was associated with a greater decrease in hemoglobin compared to delayed surgery (WMD = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.00; p < 0.001). However, early surgery appeared to decrease the length of hospitalization (WMD = − 6.05; 95% CI, − 7.06 to − 5.04; p < 0.001) and mortality (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.79; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

It is unnecessary to delay surgery to restore platelet function when patients with hip fractures receive antiplatelet therapy. Furthermore, early surgery can significantly reduce mortality and hospital stay, which is conducive to patient recovery. Future randomized trials should determine whether the results are sustained over time.

Surgical Delay Is Not Warranted for Patients With Hip Fractures Receiving Non-Warfarin Anticoagulants

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patients with hip fractures receiving antiplatelet and direct oral anticoagulants treated within 48 hours of admission had worse surgical and clinical outcomes than those whose surgery was delayed more than 48 hours. Consecutive patients 55 years and older with an operatively treated hip fracture were analyzed. Patients receiving the following anticoagulants were included: antiplatelet drugs, factor Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Outcomes included surgical blood loss, procedure time, transfusion requirement, length of stay, complication rate, and need for intensive care unit or step-down unit level care. Patients who underwent surgery within 48 hours of presentation were compared with patients whose surgery was delayed more than 48 hours. Of 551 consecutive operative hip fracture patients, 78 (14.2%) were receiving the anticoagulant medications included in this study. Of these 78 patients, 58 had surgery within 48 hours and 20 had surgery after 48 hours. When comparing the early and delayed fixation cohorts, there was no difference in transfusion requirement, length of surgery, or blood loss. Type of anticoagulant made no difference in transfusion requirement, blood loss, or length of surgery. There was also no difference in the mean number of complications or in the need for intensive care unit or step-down unit level care. In this study, patients receiving antiplatelet therapy, factor Xa inhibitors, or direct thrombin inhibitors who underwent surgical fixation of their hip fracture within 48 hours of admission were at no higher risk for transfusion, increased surgical blood loss, longer operative time, or inpatient mortality. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):e331-e335.].

Difference in Mortality Rate by Type of Anticoagulant in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Disease after Hip Fractures

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in mortalilty rate between cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients and non-CVD patients after hip fracture surgery performed in elderly patients. In addition, we compared the effect of CVD medication on mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgery for femoral intertrochanteric or neck fracture from January 2003 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. After applying exclusion criteria, we categorized patients into group I (833 patients, non-CVD group) and group II (811 patients, CVD group). The CVD group was subcategorized as group IIa (332 patients, no medication), group IIb (381 patients, antiplatelet agents), and group IIc (98 patients, anticoagulation agents). Cumulative mortality rate at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, and 1 year were compared between the groups.

Results

In the 1,644 patients, the cumulative mortality rate at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, and 1 year was 0.1%, 0.5%, 0.7%, and 8.2%, respectively, in group I and 1.0%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 8.8%, respectively, in group II (p = 0.02, p = 0.03. p = 0.01, and p = 0.72, respectively). In the 811 group II patients, the cumulative mortality rate at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, and 1 year was 0.3%, 0.6%, 1.2%, and 6.6%, respectively, in group IIa; 0.8%, 1.6%, 2.1%, and 9.4%, respectively, in group IIb; and 4.1%, 5.1%, 8.2%, and 13.3%, respectively, in group IIc (p = 0.003, p = 0.01, p = 0.004, and p = 0.10, respectively).

Conclusions

CVD increases short-term mortality within 30 days, 60 days, and 3 months in elderly hip fracture patients. The use of anticoagulants in CVD patients increases the rate of surgical delay and short-term mortality within 30 days, 60 days, and 3 months.

Discontinuation of Plavix® (clopidogrel) for hip fracture surgery. A systematic review of the literature

The elderly population is increasing worldwide, associated with an increase in diseases related to aging, such as hip fractures. These patients are sometimes treated with clopidogrel. There are no arguments at present to clearly determine the risk/benefit ratio of early surgical management of traumatic hip fractures in patients treated with clopidogrel (perioperative blood loss, postoperative complications). The goal of this systematic review of the literature was to show that early surgical management (<48h) of patients treated with clopidogrel does not increase postoperative morbidity or mortality. Systematic review of the literature: level of evidence IV. A bibliographic search was performed in July 2015 in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using the MeSh keywords "Clopidogrel or Plavix^®" AND "hip fracture". Two of the authors analyzed 48 articles based on the title and abstract. Twenty-one articles were selected and read completely with an analysis of the references. Nine articles were chosen. Early surgical management (<48h) of patients receiving clopidogrel did not increase mortality at 30days, 3months or 1 year (between 25 and 30% mortality at 1 year) and did not result in an increase in perioperative bleeding. The risk/benefit ratio of early surgical management of patients with hip fractures receiving clopidogrel is good; morbidity and mortality are not increased in these patients if surgery is performed immediately or less than 48h after admission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clopidogrel and hip fractures, is it safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Femoral neck fractures in the elderly make up a large proportion of Orthopaedic surgical admissions each year. Operating on patients with clopidogrel poses a challenge because of the risk of bleeding and the difficulty deciding the optimal timing of surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the published evidence to establish a set of guidelines for approaching neck of femur patients who are on clopidogrel.

Methods

All comparative studies with an intervention group and a control group were considered. Data on patient blood transfusion exposures, units transfused, haemoglobin concentration and drop in haemoglobin were extracted and pooled using the fixed effects model. Heterogeneity of the intervention effect was assessed with the I² statistic.

Results

A total of 4219 studies were identified. After removal of duplicates and after exclusion criteria were applied, there were 14 studies to be included. All 14 were case series with controls. There was no significant heterogeneity amongst the studies. Pooled odds ratio for transfusion exposures was 1.24 (95 % confidence interval 0.91 to 1.71) however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.14). No significant mean differences were found for other primary outcome measures.

Conclusions

On the available evidence, we recommend that these patients can be managed by normal protocols with early surgery. Operating early on patients on clopidogrel is safe and does not appear to confer any clinically significant bleeding risk. As reported in other studies, we believe clopidogrel, if possible, should not be withheld throughout the perioperative period due to increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with stopping clopidogrel. Care should be taken intraoperatively to minimise blood loss due to the increased potential for bleeding.

Trial registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered on Research Registry on July 16, 2015. The Review Registry Unique Identifying Number is: reviewregistry61.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0988-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Results following the implementation of a clinical pathway in the process of care to elderly patients with osteoporotic hip fracture in a second level hospital]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency of a clinical pathway in the management of elderly patients with fragility hip fracture in a second level hospital in terms of length of stay time to surgery, morbidity, hospital mortality, and improved functional outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comparative and prospective study was carried out between two groups of patients with hip fracture aged 75 and older prior to 2010 (n=216), and after a quality improvement intervention in 2013 (n=196). A clinical pathway based on recent scientific evidence was implemented. The degree of compliance with the implemented measures was quantified.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar in age, gender, functional status (Barthel Index) and comorbidity (Charlson Index). Median length of stay was reduced by more than 45% in 2013 (16.61 vs. 9.08 days, p=.000). Also, time to surgery decreased 29.4% in the multidisciplinary intervention group (6.23 vs. 4.4 days, p=.000). Patients assigned to the clinical pathway group showed higher medical complications rate (delirium, malnutrition, anaemia and electrolyte disorders), but a lower hospital mortality (5.10 vs. 2.87%, p>.005). The incidence of surgical wound infection (p=.031) and functional efficiency (p=.001) also improved in 2013. An increased number of patients started treatment for osteoporosis (14.80 vs. 76.09%, p=.001) after implementing the clinical pathway.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a clinical pathway in the care process of elderly patients with hip fracture reduced length of stay and time to surgery, without a negative impact on associated clinical and functional outcomes.

Is early hip fracture surgery safe for patients on clopidogrel? Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture is a common presentation in the elderly population, many of whom will be taking the antiplatelet clopidogrel, which has the potential to increase perioperative bleeding. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to answer the questions: (1) is early hip fracture surgery for patients on clopidogrel associated with worse postoperative outcomes compared to patients not on clopidogrel? (2) is early versus delayed surgery for these patients associated with worse postoperative outcomes?

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl and AMED databases. Results from patients undergoing early surgery on clopidogrel were compared to a control group not taking clopidogrel. In addition, patients taking clopidogrel undergoing early and delayed surgery were compared.

RESULTS

For patients taking clopidogrel undergoing early surgery, there was no associated increase in overall mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.58-1.38) or 30-day mortality (OR 1.10 95% CI: 0.48-2.54). However, there was an associated increase in blood transfusion (OR 1.41 95% CI: 1.00-1.99). There was an associated decreased length of stay in the early surgery versus delayed surgery group (weighted mean difference -7.09 days (95% CI: -10.14 to -4.04).

DISCUSSION

Early surgery appears safe for patients with hip fracture though there may be a small increase in the rate of blood transfusion. However, larger prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.