Proximal femoral locking compression plate for proximal femoral fractures

Incidence of complications and functional outcomes following segmental femoral shaft fractures: a critical review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Although segmental femoral shaft fractures (SFSF) are very challenging to manage, there has been no critical evaluation of the current practices and outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate their characteristics, management trends, outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted via the SCOPUS, Embase (via SCOPUS) and MEDLINE (via PubMed) between 1995 and 2023. Studies were included if they reported patient demographics, mechanism of injury, classification of fractures, associated injuries, type of management, outcomes, and complications.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

only diaphyseal fractures were included and proximal and distal femoral fractures were excluded from this study.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting on 313 patients. Mean age was 36.2 years with male-female ratio of 4.8 to 1. The majority were high-energy fractures secondary to road traffic accidents and 16% were open. The most commonly associated injuries included chest injury (27%) and lower leg fractures (24%). Treatment consisted of intramedullary nailing (IMN) (72%), plating (22%) or both combined (6%). Outcomes reported: good in 70%, fair in 10%, excellent in 19% and poor in 2% of cases. Mean time to union was 20 weeks. Complications are reported in 24% of cases, with most common delayed union (5%) and non-union (4%).

CONCLUSION

SFSF are high-energy fractures occurring most commonly in young males, are open in 16% of cases and have significant associated injuries. In their overwhelming majority, IMN is the mainstay of treatment. The expected outcome is generally good in 70% of cases, although not devoid of complications in 24% of cases and patients must be aware of this during the consent process.

Does augmentation of intramedullary nails by a buttress plate effectively restore lateral wall integrity in intertrochanteric fractures

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have proved the importance of intact lateral trochanteric wall, thus buttressing/fixing the broken lateral trochanteric wall irrespective of the implant, is likely to improve the alignment and outcome. We compared the outcome of lateral wall buttressing by trochanteric buttress plate (TBP) supplemented to proximal femoral nailing versus proximal femoral nailing alone in patients of broken lateral wall intertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixty patients of intertrochanteric factures (IT) of femur with broken lateral wall were randomized into group A or B and were treated with either proximal femoral nail (PFN) alone or proximal femoral nail augmented with trochanteric buttress plate (PFN + TBP), respectively. The TBP plate used was primarily fixed to proximal femur via 8 mm hip screw and 6.4 mm antirotation screw of the PFN. Operative time, blood loss, radiation exposure, quality of reduction, functional outcome, union time, and complications were compared.

RESULT

The mean age was 60.03 + 7.60 (range 42 to 70 years), with male to female ratio of 4:1 and left to right ratio of approximately 1:1. The mean follow up in the series was 16.2 months (range 13 to 36 months). Mean duration of surgery, mean intra-operative blood loss, and mean number of exposures in group A (PFN alone) were 64.88 + 12.24 min (48 to 88), 93 + 1.18 ml (60 to 120), and 32.13 (24 to 46) and in group B (PFN with TBP plate) were 91.86 + 12.78 min (70 to 122 min), 144.8 + 3.6 ml (116 to 208 ml), and 56.6 (38 to 112), respectively. Twenty-five patients and 28 patients in groups A and B respectively achieved score of 4 Chang quality reduction. Mean union time was 13.4 weeks in group A whereas in group B was 11.6 weeks. Mean HHS score in group A was 87.86 with 90% patients in comparison to 94.13 and 97% cases having excellent to good results in group B. In group A, 24 patients, while 29 patients in group B, had excellent to good results. Four patients had hip pain, four had impingement of screws, two had screw migration, three had Z/reverse effect, and four patients had shortening of more than 1 cm in group A. In group B, only one patient had impingement and none of the patient had hip pain, infection, implant failure, Z effect, or shortening.

CONCLUSION

The lateral trochanteric wall in IT fractures is significantly important, and when the lateral wall is broken, it can lead to poor results. TBP plate which is applied laterally on femur along with nail and fixing the plate with hip screw and antirotational screw provides faster union, early weight bearing, better reduction, and so better hip functions. TBP can be used successfully to augment, fix, or buttress the lateral trochanteric wall giving excellent to good results but at the cost of surgical time, blood loss, and radiation exposure.

In Silico Finite Element Modeling of Stress Distribution in Osteosynthesis after Pertrochanteric Fractures

A stabilization method of pertrochanteric femur fractures is a contentious issue. Here, we assess the feasibility of rapid in silico 2D finite element modeling (FEM) to predict the distribution of stresses arising during the two most often used stabilization methods: gamma nail fixation (GNF) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). The modeling was based on standard pre-surgery radiographs of hip joints of 15 patients with pertrochanteric fractures of type A1, A2, and A3 according to the AO/OTA classification. The FEM showed that the stresses were similar for both GNF and DHS, with the medians ranging between 53-60 MPa and consistently lower for A1 than A3 fractures. Stresses also appeared in the fixation materials being about two-fold higher for GNF. Given similar bone stresses caused by both GNF and DHS but shorter surgery time, less extensive dissection, and faster patient mobilization, we submit that the GNF stabilization appears to be the most optimal system for pertrochanteric fractures. In silico FEM appears a viable perioperative method that helps predict the distribution of compressive stresses after osteosynthesis of pertrochanteric fractures. The promptness of modeling fits well into the rigid time framework of hip fracture surgery and may help optimize the fixation procedure for the best outcome. The study extends the use of FEM in complex orthopedic management. However, further datasets are required to firmly position the FEM in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.

Preliminary experience with MEDGAL DHS for treatment of proximal femoral fractures

Background and aim of the study: The Authors report their implant’s analysis and preliminary experience with a new fixation device, the MEDGAL DHS for treatment of proximal femoral fractures, producted by MEDGAL Sp.z o.o, Niewodnicka, Poland. Materials: Between January 2019 and September 2019 in Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of Piacenza, 12 patients with stable pertrocanteric fractures were treated with the MEDGAL DHS. Results: No patients presented perioperative complications with low bleeding and mean surgical time of 40 minutes. Conclusions: DHS is an optimal implant for the treatment of stable pertrochanteric femural fractures. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum

Objective

Investigation of the treatment of femur fractures and the type of femur fracture‐associated complications regarding timing of surgery and length of hospital stay.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 358 hip fractures were evaluated retrospectively from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2010 at a level I trauma center in Germany. Inclusion criteria was age >18 years and a proximal femur fracture. Both sexes were evaluated. Mean age was 75.5 years, most patients were female (63.7%). Intervention was the operative treatment of proximal femur fracture. Outcome parameters were time until surgery, complications, reoperations, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Among the proximal femur fractures (n = 358), 46.6% were pertrochanteric, 11.2% subtrochanteric, and 42.2% femoral neck fractures. Operation upon hip fractures was managed regularly within 24 hours of injury (73%; mean for femoral neck: 28.3 hrs.; mean for pertrochanteric fractures: 21.4 hrs.; mean for subtrochanteric fractures: 19.5 hrs.). Delayed treatment, as well as implantation of hip total endoprosthesis (TEP), increased the overall length of hospital stay (15.4 vs 17.6 days; 18.1 vs 15.8 days). Accordingly, surgical procedures performed within 24 hours of injury resulted in a shorter hospital residence. Longest delay of operation was measured for hip fractures (28.3 hrs.).

In 351 patients, secondary injuries were detected in 94 individuals (26%), with fractures being the most common secondary injury (n = 40). We recorded postoperative complications of nonsurgical and surgical origin, and 33.6% of our patient cohort displayed complications. Complications were distributed among 118 patients. There was no significant difference in complications regarding the time of operation, with most nonsurgical and surgical complications appearing within 24 hours after operation (n = 110 vs n = 31). Nonsurgical complications, such as anemia (n = 49) and electrolyte imbalances (n = 30), were observed more frequently than surgical complications (n = 107 vs n = 34); however, these complications were reduced by delay in surgery (82.0% in 6–24 hrs. vs 74.2% in ≥24 hrs.). Anticoagulant therapy and age did not affect postoperative complications. The hospital mortality of patients was 6.2%. Follow‐up was restrained to ambulatory visits in the clinic.

Conclusions

Surgical management of hip fractures performed within 24 hours of injury minimizes hospital stay. We did not detect significant differences in the spectrum or number of complications regarding delay of surgery. Surgical complications mainly occur with rapid primary care, and medical complications can be reduced by more intensive preparation of patient and operation procedures.

Comparison of Intra- and Extramedullary Implants in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Comparison was made of the clinical and radiological results of the surgical treatments of proximal femoral nail (PFN), dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femoral locking compression plate (PF-LCP) in patients with AO 31A2.2/2.3 unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture(ITF).

METHODS

Evaluation was made of a total of 91 patients in respect of age, gender, time from fracture to surgery, operating time, amount of blood replacement, total hospitalisation, follow-up period, time to full weight-bearing, time to union, complications and Harris hip scores(HHS).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of perioperative operating time, blood replacement and hospitalisation period with the values of the PFN group seen to be superior to those of the other two groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference was determined beween the DHS and PFN groups in respect of time to union and in the long-term HHS, both groups were seen to be superior to the PF-LCP group (p < 0.001). Full weight-bearing was statistically significantly earlier in the PFN group (p < 0.001). The numbers of implant failures was statistically significantly higher in the PF-LCP group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The new generation intra-medullar nails are easy to apply and have more successful clinical results compared to extra-medullar implants in the treatment of A2 unstable ITF. Due to the high rates of implant failure, PF-LCP should not be preferred in these fractures.

Controlled study on Gamma nail and proximal femoral locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with broken lateral wall

The gamma nail and proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP) are both used for fractures. A controlled study was performed to determine the optimal implant. To assess and analyze the clinical effects of gamma nails and PFLPs for patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, specifically with broken lateral walls. Thirty-six patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures and broken lateral walls were treated with gamma nails or PFLPs and retrospectively studied. The clinical data were compared. Duration of surgery and early full weight-bearing time were significantly longer in the PFLP group compared to the gamma nail group (P < 0.05). However, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and total blood loss in the PFLP group were significantly less than those in the gamma nail group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in hospitalized days, Parker Palmer mobility scores, Harris hip scores, and complications between the two groups. No difference in hip-functional recovery was found between the gamma nail group and the PFLP group, indicating that both the gamma nail and PFLP were effective for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with a broken lateral wall. However, early weight bearing on the fractures was not encouraged in patients treated with PFLP.

A retrospective analysis of surgically-treated complex proximal femur fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plate

Objective

Analyze the outcomes of proximal femoral locking compression plate (PF-LCP) in these complex fractures.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 21 proximal femoral fractures treated with PF-LCP from June 2013 to February 2015. There were 15 females (71%) and six males (29%) with an average age of 61.4 years (range: 34–80 years). The peritrochanteric fractures constituted by intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures were classified by the Boyd and Griffin classification and Seinshemier's classification, respectively. Among them, 16 cases (76%) were of intertrochanteric and five cases (24%) were of subtrochanteric fracture pattern. The functional outcome was assessed by Harris Hip Score and the Parker Palmer mobility score one year post-surgery.

Results

Among 21 patients, 19 patients obtained fracture union without further intervention; two patients required additional bone grafting. No cases of the hip screw cutting the femoral head were noted. There was no post-operative mortality in this study. The average Harris Hip Score was 84.5 (range: 83–94). The assessment by Parker and Palmar mobility score was 7.5 (range: 4–9).

Conclusion

The PF-LCP is a good, stable alternative in the treatment of peritrochanteric femoral fractures. It provides good-to-excellent bone healing with reduced complications.

Evaluation of outcome of proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP) in unstable proximal femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

Pertrochanteric fractures are most frequent factures of the proximal femur, accounts for nearly 50% of all proximal femur fractures and are most devastating and also a major cause of disability in elderly. The aim and objective of this study was to evaluate the role of proximal femoral locking compression plate in unstable proximal femur fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 20 cases were included in our study (M:F - 16:4), who suffered proximal femur fracture due to various modalities and all of them were operated using proximal femoral locking compression plate. This proximal femoral fractures included unstable - intertrochanteric with subtrochanteric extension and subtrochanteric with intertrochanteric extensions as well as one case with intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric and neck of femur fracture. Patients were followed up regularly and minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patients were given physiotherapy and partial weight bearing was started after 6 weeks postoperatively or after union was achieved. The outcome was evaluated as per Harris Hip Score and radiological union.

RESULT

Among 20 cases with average age of 55.3 ± 17.9 years, treated with PF-LCP, the average time of union 18.75 ± 3.67 weeks was achieved. We got 10 excellent, 3 good, 3 fair and 4 poor result with average Harris Hip Score of 80.2 ± 28.54 with 65% good to excellent result with average Post-operative Neck Shaft Angle of 124.150 ± 17.880 and with 45% rate of complication which included four cases of superficial infection and two cases of deep infection and late complications like four cases of non-union, deformity - three cases of coxa vara and 2 cases of coxa valga, with patients having more than one complication in them.

CONCLUSION

PF-LCP is not recommended as a definitive implant but can be used as an alternative for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures when there is no option available for other routinely used implants. Despite of its complications, PF-LCP is used where all implants fail.

Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures remains a challenge with various implant choices. Intramedullary devices are usually preferred for the management of the unstable fractures. When nailing is unsuitable for the configuration of the fracture extra medullary procedures are preferred. PFLCP is a contact limited implant that allows multiple angularly stable fixations with preserving more bone stock after implantation as an extramedullary implant. There are only a few reports in the literature about the osteosynthesis of unstable trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and their results are conflicting. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of proksimal femoral locking compression plates in open reduction and internal fixation of AO/OTA 31A2-2 and 3 fractures.

METHODS

Patients older than 18 years of age with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year matching the inclusion criteria retrospectively evaluated. Patients' demographics, Singh index, intra and post-operative data, mobilization and union time gathered from the patients' files. Baumgaertner modified criteria of fracture reduction was used to assess the post-operative reduction quality. Early and last follow-up radiographs were used to evaluate malunion and change in neck- shaft angle. Final clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip scoring system.

RESULTS

18 male and 13 female patients with the mean age of 74 (46-88) met the inclusion criteria. Reduction quality according to Baumgaertner modified criteria was good in 25 patients and acceptable in 6. Mean union time was 21.53 ± 4.18 weeks. There was neither non-union nor malunion. The mean neck-shaft angle change was -3.1° ± 2.16°. The mean HHS was 77.90 ± 4.84 and there was no significance in HHS according to reduction quality and change in neck-shaft angle (p = 0.385, p = 0.0059). HHS was negatively correlated with age, mobilization time and, longer union time (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between Singh index and reduction quality (p = 0.865). Singh index was only correlated with the patient's age (p = 0.000, rho = -0.595). There were 2 infections and, 2 backing of the proximal screws.

CONCLUSION

Even though PFLCP is not the first choice in management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures, it must be kept in mind as an alternative to the other conventional plates and intramedullary implants with the properties of an increased stability by multiaxial screw locking and the results are satisfactory when appropriate settlement achieved.

Clinical outcome of conventional versus biological fixation of subtrochanteric fractures by proximal femoral locked plate

INTRODUCTION

Surgical fixation is the standard management of the subtrochanteric fractures. Proximal femoral locked plating (PF-LCP) provides a strong construct for fixation with a high success rate. However, some studies reported implant failure due to loss of the postero-medial bone support and recommended an anatomical reduction. Other studies reported excellent to good results with indirect (biological) fixation without anatomical reduction. In this study, we reviewed the short-term clinical results of PF-LCP fixation for subtrochanteric fractures using both conventional and biological fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty six patients (34 males and 12 females) with comminuted subtrochanteric fractures were included aged between 18 and 74 (mean 44.3 years). They were treated in a single-blind random manner by either conventional (open, direct) or biological (indirect) reduction method and internal fixation with PF-LCP. Intra-operative variables including; duration of surgery, blood loss, fluoroscopy time and any complications were recorded. Post-operative differences including; duration of healing, implant failure, complications and the final clinical outcome by Harris Hip Score (HHS) were documented.

RESULTS

44 cases continued to the final follow-up (23 of the open fixation group and 21 of the biological fixation group). Patients of open group demonstrated greater blood loss (756±151 vs. 260±39ml; P<0.0001), longer operative times (129±16.9 vs. 91±8min; P<0.0001) and incisions (s) length (20.4±3 vs. 13.4±1cm; P<0.0001). More patients needed blood transfusion in open group (11 patients vs. six in closed group; P<0.0001). Patients of biological group demonstrated longer fluoroscopy time (80.9±7.3 vs. 47.2±5.8sec.; P<0.0001). For each group, one case of implant failure was recorded. Low patient compliance was a detrimental factor for the implant failure in both cases. No much difference was demonstrated for the healing rate (open group; 18.3±3.7 vs. biological group16.5±4 weeks; P<0.058) and for the functional outcome (open group; excellent/good: 54%/37%, biological group; excellent/good: 57%/33%; P=0.766).

CONCLUSION

PF-LCP provided a strong construct for fixation of the comminuted subtrochanteric fractures either by open or biological techniques. Low patient compliance is an influential factor for implant failure in both types.