Retrograde locked intramedullary nailing for aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion following failed locked plating

Revision Surgery Using Retrograde Nail versus Replating in Nonunion Distal Femur Fracture Treated with Plate

Articular distal femur fractures represent 4% to 6% of femur fractures. Locking compression plates (LCPs) are the main treatment option. Nevertheless, a reoperation rate of 12.9% has been reported; nonunion is reported at 4.8%, delayed union at 1.6%, and malunion at 0.6%. Treatment of nonunions can be challenging as no unanimous consensus regarding the best surgical technique has been reached. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare two types of revision surgery as treatment of LCP-treated articular distal femoral fracture nonunion: retrograde nail or replating. A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted from January 2015 to February 2017 for nonunion of AO/OTA 33C2 fractures previously treated with a lateral LCP was conducted. Patients were treated either with intramedullary nailing (Group A) or with replating (Group B). One independent observer performed clinically and radiographically followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. The nonunion scoring system (NUSS) was used. Nine patients were included in our study. The mean follow-up was 2 years. Five patients were treated with intramedullary nailing and four with replating. The NUSS score was 24.2 ± 6.8 in the nailing group and 37.3 ± 3 in the replating group (P=0.03). In the nailing group, radiographic consolidation was obtained in all cases. In the replating group, nonunion was found in 3 patients and failure of osteosynthesis in one patient. Therefore, four patients (Group B) underwent implant removal and retrograde femoral nailing, obtaining radiological healing. The union time was 7.6 months in the nailing group. Retrograde intramedullary nailing can be used as an effective treatment of aseptic AO-33C distal femoral nonunion following primary locking plating.

Response to Letter to the Editor: Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?

We would like to thank the editors for the opportunity to respond to their letter regarding our study, "Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?" published in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. The authors greatly appreciate the insight and thoughtful feedback regarding the findings of our study, which may be skewed by heterogenous data and/or technical aspects of surgical plating and intramedullary nailing. We agree with the editors and believe that higher level randomized trials along with specific studies focused on studying modes and causes for treatment failure are necessary to further elucidate the heterogenous data. Nonetheless, with an overall union rate of about 90% and without significant differences in outcomes, at this juncture, we conclude that either intramedullary nailing or locked plate fixation is acceptable treatment options for distal femur fractures.

Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?

INTRODUCTION

Distal femur fractures make up < 1% of all fractures and 3-6% of all femur fractures. In the literature, both intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked plating (LP) have shown favorable results, but there is no consensus on a gold standard. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare outcomes of native distal femur fractures treated via IMN versus LP in an effort to determine if one is superior to the other.

METHODS

Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Only articles published within the last ten years were included. Evidence and study quality were evaluated with the MQOE and Oxford Criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-six articles were included in the review. Fractures treated with IMN were found to have a 93.9% union rate, an average time to union of 19.2 weeks, an average arc of motion of 105.1 degrees, with an average of 14.4 degrees of malalignment. Fractures treated with LP were found to have a 90.2% union rate, an average time to union of 20.5 weeks, an average arc of motion of 104 degrees, with an average of 12.6 degrees of malalignment.

CONCLUSION

Compiled data comparisons revealed no differences in union rate, malalignment, time to union, average arc of motion, or complication rates requiring a return to the operating room. Until higher level randomized data is available, either IMN or LP are acceptable methods of treatment for native distal femur fractures.

Successful management of lower limb nonunion using locking plates and bone graft with retention of intramedullary nail

This study aims to investigate the clinical effect of the combined an additional locking plate with bone graft based on retaining the original intramedullary nail for the treatment of lower limb nonunion.From June 2008 to December 2012, 39 patients were admitted and treated, who developed non-infectious bone nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation for long bone fracture in the lower limb. Additional locking plate and autogenous iliac bone grafting were performed for these patients, in which the original intramedullary nail was retained. Follow-ups were performed once at postoperative months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12, and every year onwards. During these follow-ups, imaging and clinical function examinations were performed, in order to observe callus growth and the fractured limb functions.All patients have been followed-up, in which the duration of these follow-ups ranged between 8 and 24 months. All patients gained bony union within 6 to 11 months, and the healing rate was 100%. Radiographic healing time ranged between 8 and 15 months. Full weight-bearing time ranged between 2 and 10 months. According to Harris hip scores and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee joint scores, 17 cases were excellent, 2 cases were good, and 1 case was acceptable; with an excellent and good rate of 95.00%. According to HHS score for the knee, 15 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was acceptable; with an excellent and good rate of 94.74%.The combined treatment of the additional blocking plate with bone grafting based on retaining the original intramedullary nail for bone nonunion could effectively eliminate lateral and rotatory instability of the fractured ends. This surgical method had a short operation time, high healing rate and other advantages.

Outcomes of Distal Femur Nonunions Treated With a Combined Nail/Plate Construct and Autogenous Bone Grafting

In this study, we sought to retrospectively evaluate union and infection rates after treatment of distal femur nonunions using a combined nail/plate construct with autogenous bone grafting obtained from the ipsilateral femur using a reamer irrigator aspirator system. Ten (10) patients treated at a Level I trauma center for nonunion of a femoral fracture using a combined nail/plate construct from 2004 to 2014 were included in the study. Union rate and postoperative infection rates were recorded. Mean interval from index surgery to nonunion repair was 12 months (range 4-36 months). Follow-up at 24 months indicated that the entire cohort of 10 patients achieved clinical union and radiographic union based on radiograph union score in tibias (RUST) criteria. Treatment of distal femur nonunions with a combined nail/plate construct and autogenous bone grafting results in a high rate of union with a low complication rate.