Single versus double blade technique for skin incision and deep dissection in surgery for closed fracture: a prospective randomised control study

Predictors of Developing a Complex Course of Osteomyelitis in Patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia

Objectives

Despite the numerous advances in management strategies, treating osteomyelitis in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains a significant challenge, leading to severe long-term consequences. This study aimed to assess the key factors potentially linked to a complex progression of osteomyelitis in patients diagnosed with SCD.

Methods

A cohort of 34 patients was identified and their progress was monitored over a span of 12 months during a 10-year period (2010-2020). The variables under investigation encompassed demographic and clinical traits, laboratory analyses and imaging data, as well as the treatment strategies employed.

Results

The risk prediction model pinpointed 5 factors (severity of SCD, involvement of lower limbs, presence of bacteraemia, magnetic resonance image [MRI] findings and utilisation of surgical debridement) that exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) exceeding 0.7. Causative organisms were identified in 9 out of the total 34 patients (26.47%). A total of 17 patients displayed a severe course of SCD (AUC = 7.88), with MRI being highlighted as a valuable contributing factor (AUC = 7.88). Furthermore, 13 patients (38.2%) underwent surgical debridement, a procedure that yielded a statistically significant P value of 0.012 and an AUC of 0.714.

Conclusion

Osteomyelitis within the context of severe SCD, particularly when accompanied by lower extremity infection, bacteraemia, positive MRI findings and the need for surgical debridement, emerges as a cluster of risk factors predisposing individuals to osteomyelitis relapse and a more complex disease course.

The Influence of Iodine-Impregnated Incision Drapes on the Bacterial Contamination of Scalpel Blades in Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a disastrous and feared complication in arthroplasty. Over the past decades, surgeons have tried to lower infection rates through all sorts of improvements. At present, it is impossible to reduce the risk to zero. As the contamination of surgical instruments and the surgical field has been identified as a remaining gap prone for infection, scalpel blades among others have become a focal point of several studies. This study is the first to compare the effect of adhesive incision drapes on contamination rates of scalpel blades in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

METHODS

A total of 344 microbiologic blade culture results from 2 study groups with and without drape usage and 1 group with known PJI were analyzed and compared to histopathologic and microbiologic tissue results.

RESULTS

In 78% of all positive cultures, the bacteria were part of the local skin flora. The contamination rate for the skin blades with a drape was 3.81% vs 12.19% without drape usage. A significant difference was determined between positive skin blade culture results incision drape usage (P = .031). The different pathogens likely responsible for the PJI correlated with the deep blade cultures (P ≤ .01). The overall contamination rate of surgical blades (1.37%) is comparatively low to the results obtained from other surgical equipment in literature. None of those blade-positive patients developed a surgical site infection during 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Iodine-impregnated incision drapes are able to reduce surgical skin blade contamination. Further studies may be needed to assess the relationship between blade contamination and surgical site infections.