The Accolade TMZF stem fulfils the demands of modern stem design: Minimum 5-year survival in a cohort of 937 patients

Quantification of trunnion damage in a series of intact total hip arthroplasty femoral stems previously identified to be at risk of catastrophic failure

BACKGROUND

Corrosion at the head-neck junction of femoral stems is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with manifestations ranging from subclinical wear to failure. Prior studies have identified a single femoral component design with an increased propensity for catastrophic trunnion failure. The purpose of the present study was to quantify trunnion damage of this femoral component retrieved from patients undergoing revision THA for non-trunnionosis indications.

METHODS

24 femoral components from a single manufacturer were identified for study inclusion. Each prosthesis underwent stereomicroscopic inspection. Corrosion and fretting scores were assigned per the Goldberg criteria to quadrants of the trunnion. Material loss was calculated based on cone angles across trunnion quadrants. This was carried out using a coordinate measuring machine that digitised each trunnion surface. Stems were compared to a series of femoral stems with the same trunnion design.

RESULTS

20 of the 24 (83%) trunnions demonstrated corrosion, all 24 trunnions demonstrated fretting. Corrosion scores did not statistically differ with respect to trunnion zone (p = 0.53), while fretting scores were higher in the inferior compared to the superior zones (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cone angles assessing material loss between stems (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of trunnion damage was observed in each stem retrieved for non-trunnionosis revision. Fretting occurred more frequently about the inferior quadrants. However, digitised trunnion shapes were similar between compared stems exhibiting no material loss. Therefore, it is possible that previous reports of trunnion failures for this implant are not a systemic issue, and that further investigation is required.

Middle-term outcome and complications after primary total hip arthroplasty using a contemporary titanium tapered wedge cementless femoral stem

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results and intraoperative or postoperative complications of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a contemporary tapered wedge titanium femoral component. A total of 213 THAs in 187 patients were followed up more than 5 years (mean, 102 months ; range, 60-150). The mean age at surgery was 64.2 years (range, 20?89 years). These patients were clinically evaluated using the JOA scoring system and radiographically host bone reactions around the implants, as well as femoral loosening. The mean JOA score improved from 49 (range, 21?75) to 92 (range, 59?100). All 12 patients with poor results (JOA < 75) coexisted with cerebral, spinal, joint, and musculoskeletal disorders. At the final follow-up, implant survival was 100%. Complications occurred in 23 hips. They consisted of 12 hips with intra-operative fractures, 2 hips with sciatic nerve palsy, one hip with infections, 3 hips with recurrent dislocations, and 8 hips with aseptic cup loosening. In conclusion, we have shown excellent survival rate of the contemporary tapered wedge stem in primary THA ; however, patients with coexisting diseases could not acquire sufficient improvement in hip function and ambulatory ability. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 471-475, August, 2023.

Intermediate to Long-Term Outcomes and Causes of Aseptic Failure of an At-Risk Femoral Stem

BACKGROUND

The Accolade TMZF is a tapered-wedge cementless metaphyseal-coated femoral stem that was widely utilized from 2002 to 2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. The purposes of the present study were to establish the long-term survival of this stem and to analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty with use of an Accolade TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at the time of the latest follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 2,609 patients who had undergone unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty with use of an Accolade TMZF femoral stem were included. The mean time from the primary procedure was 11.3 years (range, 0 days to 19.4 years). The cumulative survival rate was 95.5% ± 0.1% at the time of the latest follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery, with aseptic loosening of the femoral component being the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33 of 2,609; 1.3%). Smaller femoral size and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this tapered-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade TMZF stem had excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as the cause for revision surgery was rare.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes with Two Tapered Wedge Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Anterior Approach

Background

The majority of hip arthroplasties in the United States utilize cementless acetabular and femoral components. Despite their similarities, stem geometry can still differ. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of two wedge-type stem designs.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary THA utilizing a direct anterior approach between January 2016 and January 2017. Two cohorts were established based on femoral stem design implanted. Descriptive patient characteristics and surgical and clinical data was extracted which included surgical time, length of stay (LOS), presence of pain (categorized as groin, hip, or thigh pain) at the latest follow-up, and revisions. Immediate postoperative radiographs were compared with the latest follow-up radiographs to assess limb length discrepancies, stem alignment, and stem subsidence.

Results

A total of 544 patients were included. 297 patients received the Group A stem (morphometric) and 247 patients received the Group B stem (flat-tapered). A significantly higher proportion of Group B stems subsided ≥3 mm and were in varus alignment than the Group A design. Additionally, a significantly greater number of patients who received the Group B stem reported postoperative hip and thigh pain. The logistic regression found that the Group B stem was 2.32 times more likely to subside ≥3 mm than the Group A stem.

Conclusion

Our study suggests modestly improved radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer instances of thigh pain, subsidence, and varus alignment in the patients who received the Group Ahip stem. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term significance.