Short-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic fixation of displaced posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures with the use of an adjustable loop suspensory device

Open reduction and internal fixation of the tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament: which is better, a hollow lag screw combined with a gasket or a homemade hook plate?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical results of homemade hook plates and hollow lag screws combined with spacers in the treatment of posterior cruciate tibial ligament avulsion fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective clinical cohort study that included 64 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures. Thirty-two of them were fixed with a homemade hook plate (hook plate group), and 32 were fixed with a hollow lag screen combined with a gasket (hollow lag screen group). By reviewing the medical record data and follow-up results, the operation time, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time, surgical complications, knee mobility, recovery of joint function, and whether postoperative gastrocnemius muscle strength changed in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

All patients had successful wound and fracture healing. No adverse events, such as bone nonunion, infection, wound haematoma, or joint stiffness, occurred in either group. There were no patients with decreased gastrocnemius muscle strength in either group. Internal fixation failure occurred in 2 cases in the hollow lag screen group but not in the hook plate group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time, knee mobility at the last follow-up, or Lysholm score.

CONCLUSION

It is safe and effective to use a homemade hook plate to fix PCL tibial avulsion fractures through an inverted L-shaped posterior medial approach. A homemade hook plate may have potential advantages over a hollow lag screen combined with gasket fixation.

Outcomes of tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament treated with a homemade hook plate

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects of an inverted L-shaped postero-medial approach with a homemade hook plate and arthroscopic fixation with Endobutton for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament.

METHODS

The clinical data of 36 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures from January 2012 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The fractures were classified into Meyers-McKeever types II and III. Among them, 20 cases were treated with a homemade hook plate through an inverted L-shaped postero-medial approach (incision group), and 16 cases were treated with Endobutton under arthroscopy (arthroscopic group). The operative time, fracture union time, operative complications and range of motion of the knee joint were compared between the two groups. The stability of the knee joint was tested by the posterior drawer test, the functional recovery of the knee joint was evaluated by the Lysholm score, and the gastrocnemius muscle strength of the incision group was tested by performing heel raises with a single leg stance.

RESULTS

There were no adverse events, such as fracture nonunion, infection, deep-vein thrombosis, abnormal hematoma or joint stiffness, in either group. The operative time was shorter in the incision group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in fracture union time between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in range of motion or the Lysholm score between the two groups. There was no decrease in gastrocnemius muscle strength in the incision group.

CONCLUSIONS

The fixation of PCL tibial avulsion fractures with a homemade hook plate through an inverted L-shaped postero-medial approach is safe and effective. It showed almost the same satisfactory outcomes as arthroscopic Endobutton fixation.

The amount of displacement can determine non-operative treatment in posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture

PURPOSE

It is generally agreed that surgical treatment is warranted for acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture with displacement. However, the amount of displacement that warrants surgical treatment has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal cut-off value for displacement of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture in determining non-operative treatment and to compare the results of non-operative treatment in acute isolated PCL avulsion fractures with non-operative treatment of acute PCL injury.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 30 consecutive patients with acute isolated PCL avulsion fractures and 70 consecutive patients with acute isolated PCL injuries, all of whom underwent non-operative treatment (cast immobilization with > 2 years of follow-up) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical scores including the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score, as well as side-to-side differences on stress radiographs, were compared between the PCL avulsion fracture and PCL injury groups at the final follow-up. The failure rates of non-operative treatment were also compared. The predictive value of the amount of fracture displacement for successful non-operative treatment was calculated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The optimal cut-off of the amount of fracture displacement to determine non-operative treatment was based on the maximal sum of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The two groups exhibited comparable clinical scores and mean side-to-side differences on stress radiographs. There were 5 (16.6%) failures of non-operative treatment in the PCL avulsion fracture group and 19 (27.1%) failures in the PCL injury group. (n.s) There was a significant positive correlation between the amount of initial avulsion fracture displacement and side-to-side difference in posterior stress radiographs at final follow up (P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value for the amount of fracture displacement in PCL avulsion fracture to predict failure of non-operative treatment was 6.7 mm (AUROC = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of non-operative treatment of acute isolated PCL avulsion fractures were comparable to those of patients with acute isolated PCL injuries. Acute PCL avulsion injuries with displacement of less than 6.7 mm should be considered for non-operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.