Xu B, Xue L, Jiang M, Qin D, Gao G, Zhang H. Evaluating somatosensory evoked potentials in predicting treatment outcomes for thoracolumbar spinal compression fractures using closed reduction and over-extension techniques.
Am J Transl Res 2024;
16:3026-3035. [PMID:
39114723 PMCID:
PMC11301508 DOI:
10.62347/dclg9825]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for the efficacy of closed reduction combined with over-extension reduction technique (PVP) in managing thoracolumbar spinal compression fractures.
METHODS
Data were collected from 125 patients who underwent closed reduction with PVP and SEP monitoring from February 2021 to July 2023. We evaluated surgery success rates, incidence of bone cement leakage, and patient recovery outcomes including vertebral anterior height, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Cobb angle restoration. SEP results were analyzed to categorize patients into effective and ineffective treatment groups. Differences in SEP waveforms between these groups were examined, and ROC analysis was used to assess the predictive value of these differences. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors affecting treatment efficacy.
RESULTS
Post-treatment assessments showed significant improvements in vertebral anterior height, ODI, and Cobb angle. SEP monitoring correlated well with intraoperative findings and physical examinations. During reduction, changes in SEP latency and amplitude were noted in 37 patients, with 7 patients meeting SEP amplitude alarm criteria, which normalized after adjustments. During PVP, 28 patients exhibited SEP amplitude fluctuations and 5 experienced a 30% reduction in amplitude following initial cement injection, with no significant latency changes. Treatment was deemed effective in 93 patients and ineffective in 32. SEP amplitudes during vertebral compression and PVP were significantly lower in the effective group (P<0.05). The AUC for predicting treatment efficacy was 0.819 and 0.859, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed low preoperative vertebral compression ratio, number of fractures, and abnormal SEP amplitudes as independent risk factors for treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSION
SEP monitoring provides an accurate reflection of spinal cord function during closed reduction with PVP, aiding in predicting treatment safety and efficacy. The use of SEP monitoring is thus recommended for clinical application in this context.
Collapse