A comparison of aspirin against rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Impact of COVID-19 on Pulmonary Embolism Rates in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties after the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty or a total knee arthroplasty between 2017 and 2022 and had a PE within 90 days postoperatively were included. Demographics, medical history, procedural information, and PE outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 5933 procedures and 17 PE events (0.27%) before COVID-19 compared with 3273 procedures and 16 PE events (0.49%) after COVID-19 (P=.12). There was an increase in intensive care unit admission after COVID-19 (44% vs 0%, P<.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed a trend toward an increased incidence of PE events in the post-COVID-19 cohort and a statistically significant increase in the severity. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):233-237.].

Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agent should balance efficacy and safety. While rivaroxaban provides effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty, it may be associated with higher rates of bleeding. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban to aspirin and enoxaparin.

METHODS

A large national database was queried for patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2015 through December 2020 who received rivaroxaban, aspirin, or enoxaparin. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Among TKA patients identified, 86,721 (10.8%) received rivaroxaban, 408,038 (50.8%) received aspirin, and 108,377 (13.5%) received enoxaparin. Among THA patients, 42,469 (9.5%) received rivaroxaban, 242,876 (54.5%) received aspirin, and 59,727 (13.4%) received enoxaparin.

RESULTS

After accounting for confounding factors, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of transfusion (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.58, P < .001; THA: aOR 1.64, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (TKA: aOR = 1.25, P = .007), and deep vein thrombosis (TKA: aOR = 1.13, P = .022) compared to aspirin. Compared to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of combined bleeding events (TKA: aOR = 1.07, P < .001, THA: aOR = 1.11, P < .001), but decreased risk of combined prothrombotic events (THA: aOR = 0.85, P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban chemoprophylaxis following TKA and THA was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and prothrombotic complications compared to aspirin and enoxaparin.

Time for an Update? A Look at Current Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Hip Fracture

Venous thromboembolism is a well-established complication of total hip and knee arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery. Clinical practice guidelines have been proposed to help clinicians provide prophylaxis against this risk. However, most guidelines reference data that are becoming outdated because of new advances in perioperative protocols. Recent data would suggest that aspirin may be appropriate for most patients after total hip and knee replacement and a more potent chemoprophylaxis for higher risk patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the recommended choice after hip fracture surgery, although there is a paucity of recent literature in this patient population. There are randomized trials currently underway in the arthroplasty population that may guide clinicians in the appropriate choice of chemoprophylaxis. These studies should inform updates to the current clinical practice guidelines.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Therapy for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with PAD for the first time.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted for PAD.

RESULTS

Three trials which contained 14873 patients were included for final meta-analysis. The results showed patients with rivaroxaban was associated with reduction in primary efficacy outcome (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90; p < 0.001). The RR was 0.85 (0.71 to 1.01) for patients with rivaroxaban alone and 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89) for those with rivaroxaban plus aspirin (p for heterogeneity between groups = 0.65). Patients with rivaroxaban showed a lower rate of acute limb ischemia (0.56; 0.47 to 0.66; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward a reduction in the rate of major amputation for vascular causes in the rivaroxaban arm (0.81; 0.63 to 1.03; p = 0.08). Compared with control, rivaroxaban therapy did not reduce the risks of myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.73 to 1.04, p = 0.12), ischemic stroke (0.85, CI 0.68 to 1.06, p = 0.15), death from cardiovascular causes (0.99, 0.85 to 1.15, p = 0.91) or death from any cause (1.00, 0.90 to 1.12, p = 0.98). Rivaroxaban therapy was associated with a 1.57-fold higher major bleeding rate as compared with those with aspirin or warfarin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the risks of the primary efficacy outcomes or adverse limb events were significantly lower with rivaroxaban than with aspirin or warfarin alone in patients with PAD. It also points out the significant major bleeding that occur because of such therapies.

Economic Evaluation of New Oral Anticoagulants in Prevention of Venous Thrombosis Following Joint Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The main purpose of prescribing oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing total knee and total hip replacement surgery is to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). The present study aimed to summarize evidence from economic evaluations regarding new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) used in VTE prophylaxis after joint replacement surgery.

METHODS

To obtain relevant literature on economic evaluations of NOACs used in the prevention of VTE following joint replacement surgery, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, as well as specialized economic evaluation databases, for articles published from January 2008 to December 2019. Next, 2 reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of studies, extracted data from the full-text articles, and assessed the quality of the methodologies using the Quality of Health Economic Studies checklist.

FINDINGS

Twenty-eight studies of economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria of the research. The quality assessment showed that 20 articles had scores within the range of 75 to 100 (high quality), and 9 studies had scores within the range of 50 to 74 (moderate quality). All of the identified studies had been carried out based on modelling, and 23 studies used decision trees to model acute events after surgery. In addition, 20 studies utilized a Markov model to capture long-term complications of VTE. The results showed that rivaroxaban was more cost-effective than apixaban and dabigatran from a perspective of the health care system in the prevention of VTE after total knee and total hip replacement surgery. In addition, apixaban was associated with a lower risk for bleeding events than other NOACs, making it the most cost-effective NOAC from the perspective of the payer.

IMPLICATIONS

The results suggest that NOACs are cost-effective alternatives to low-molecular-weight heparins. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were assessed as the most and least cost-effective prophylaxis options, respectively, after joint replacement surgery for the prevention of VTE. It is recommended that future research be conducted on economic evaluations of edoxaban.

Rivaroxaban versus aspirin in prevention of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluates the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus aspirin in prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) or hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Major databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English up to October 2020. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

In total, 7 studies were retrieved which contained 5133 patients. Among these patients, 2605 patients (50.8%) received rivaroxaban, whereas 2528 patients (49.2%) received aspirin. There were no statistical difference between aspirin and rivaroxaban for reducing VTE (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.50–1.11, I² = 36%, p = 0.15), major bleeding (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.45–2.37, I² = 21%, p = 0.95), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.12–6.44, I² = 0%, p = 0.90) between the two groups. Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban significantly increased nonmajor bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.58, I² = 0%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference between aspirin and rivaroxaban in prevention of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery. Aspirin may be an effective, safe, convenient, and cheap alternative for prevention of VTE. Further large randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02274-z.