1
|
Siverino C, Metsemakers WJ, Sutter R, Della Bella E, Morgenstern M, Barcik J, Ernst M, D'Este M, Joeris A, Chittò M, Schwarzenberg P, Stoddart M, Vanvelk N, Richards G, Wehrle E, Weisemann F, Zeiter S, Zalavras C, Varga P, Moriarty TF. Clinical management and innovation in fracture non-union. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:973-991. [PMID: 39126182 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2391491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the introduction and continuous improvement in operative fracture fixation, even the most severe bone fractures can be treated with a high rate of successful healing. However, healing complications can occur and when healing fails over prolonged time, the outcome is termed a fracture non-union. Non-union is generally believed to develop due to inadequate fixation, underlying host-related factors, or infection. Despite the advancements in fracture fixation and infection management, there is still a clear need for earlier diagnosis, improved prediction of healing outcomes and innovation in the treatment of non-union. AREAS COVERED This review provides a detailed description of non-union from a clinical perspective, including the state of the art in diagnosis, treatment, and currently available biomaterials and orthobiologics.Subsequently, recent translational development from the biological, mechanical, and infection research fields are presented, including the latest in smart implants, osteoinductive materials, and in silico modeling. EXPERT OPINION The first challenge for future innovations is to refine and to identify new clinical factors for the proper definition, diagnosis, and treatment of non-union. However, integration of in vitro, in vivo, and in silico research will enable a comprehensive understanding of non-union causes and correlations, leading to the development of more effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Siverino
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - W-J Metsemakers
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Sutter
- Radiology Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - E Della Bella
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - M Morgenstern
- Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Barcik
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - M Ernst
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - M D'Este
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - A Joeris
- AO Innovation Translation Center, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - M Chittò
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | | | - M Stoddart
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - N Vanvelk
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Richards
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - E Wehrle
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
- Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - F Weisemann
- Department of Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany
| | - S Zeiter
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - C Zalavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - P Varga
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - T F Moriarty
- AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland
- Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qing Y, Ono T, Kohara Y, Watanabe A, Ogiso N, Ito M, Nakashima T, Takeshita S. Emilin2 marks the target region for mesenchymal cell accumulation in bone regeneration. Inflamm Regen 2024; 44:27. [PMID: 38831448 PMCID: PMC11145771 DOI: 10.1186/s41232-024-00341-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regeneration of injured tissue is dependent on stem/progenitor cells, which can undergo proliferation and maturation processes to replace the lost cells and extracellular matrix (ECM). Bone has a higher regenerative capacity than other tissues, with abundant mesenchymal progenitor cells in the bone marrow, periosteum, and surrounding muscle. However, the treatment of bone fractures is not always successful; a marked number of clinical case reports have described nonunion or delayed healing for various reasons. Supplementation of exogenous stem cells by stem cell therapy is anticipated to improve treatment outcomes; however, there are several drawbacks including the need for special devices for the expansion of stem cells outside the body, low rate of cell viability in the body after transplantation, and oncological complications. The use of endogenous stem/progenitor cells, instead of exogenous cells, would be a possible solution, but it is unclear how these cells migrate towards the injury site. METHODS The chemoattractant capacity of the elastin microfibril interface located protein 2 (Emilin2), generated by macrophages, was identified by the migration assay and LC-MS/MS. The functions of Emilin2 in bone regeneration were further studied using Emilin2-/- mice. RESULTS The results show that in response to bone injury, there was an increase in Emilin2, an ECM protein. Produced by macrophages, Emilin2 exhibited chemoattractant properties towards mesenchymal cells. Emilin2-/- mice underwent delayed bone regeneration, with a decrease in mesenchymal cells after injury. Local administration of recombinant Emilin2 protein enhanced bone regeneration. CONCLUSION Emilin2 plays a crucial role in bone regeneration by increasing mesenchymal cells. Therefore, Emilin2 can be used for the treatment of bone fracture by recruiting endogenous progenitor cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Qing
- Department of Cell Signaling, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan
| | - Takehito Ono
- Laboratory of Drug Discovery and Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, 1-3 Ikoino-Oka, Imabari-Shi, Ehime, 794-8555, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Kohara
- Department of Bone and Joint Disease, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi Prefecture, 474-8511, Japan
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba, 287-8510, Japan
| | - Atsushi Watanabe
- Equipment Management Division, Center for Core Facility Administration, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi Prefecture, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Noboru Ogiso
- Laboratory of Experimental Animal, Center for Core Facility Administration, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi Prefecture, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Masako Ito
- Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyomachi, Nagasaki, 852-8521, Japan
| | - Tomoki Nakashima
- Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan.
| | - Sunao Takeshita
- Department of Bone and Joint Disease, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi Prefecture, 474-8511, Japan.
- Aging Stress Response Research Project Team, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430, Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi Prefecture, 474-8511, Japan.
- Angitia Biopharmaceuticals, 2F, Unit 2, Building4, 188 Kaiyuan Avenue, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, 510530, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bowers KM, Anderson DE. Delayed Union and Nonunion: Current Concepts, Prevention, and Correction: A Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:525. [PMID: 38927761 PMCID: PMC11201148 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Surgical management of fractures has advanced with the incorporation of advanced technology, surgical techniques, and regenerative therapies, but delayed bone healing remains a clinical challenge and the prevalence of long bone nonunion ranges from 10 to 15% of surgically managed fractures. Delayed bone healing arises from a combination of mechanical, biological, and systemic factors acting on the site of tissue remodeling, and careful consideration of each case's injury-related, patient-dependent, surgical, and mechanical risk factors is key to successful bone union. In this review, we describe the biology and biomechanics of delayed bone healing, outline the known risk factors for nonunion development, and introduce modern preventative and corrective therapies targeting fracture nonunion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David E. Anderson
- Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, 2407 River Dr., Knoxville, TN 37996-4550, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haeusner S, Jauković A, Kupczyk E, Herrmann M. Review: cellularity in bone marrow autografts for bone and fracture healing. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2023; 324:C517-C531. [PMID: 36622067 DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00482.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The use of autografts, as primary cell and tissue source, is the current gold standard approach to treat critical size bone defects and nonunion defects. The unique mixture of the autografts, containing bony compartments and bone marrow (BM), delivers promising results. Although BM mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) still represent a major target for various healing approaches in current preclinical research and respective clinical trials, their occurrence in the human BM is typically low. In vitro expansion of this cell type is regulatory challenging as well as time and cost intensive. Compared with marginal percentages of resident BM-MSCs in BM, BM mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) contained in BM aspirates, concentrates, and bone autografts represent a readily available abundant cell source, applicable within hours during surgical procedures without the need for time-consuming and regulatory challenging cell expansion. This benefit is one reason why autografting has become a clinical standard procedure. However, the exact anatomy and cellularity of BM-MNCs in humans, which is strongly correlated to their unique mode of action and wide application range remains to be elucidated. The aim of this review was to present an overview of the current knowledge on these specific cell types found in human BM, emphasize the contribution of BM-MNCs in bone healing, highlight donor site dependence, and discuss limitations in the current isolation and subsequent characterization procedures. Hereby, the most recent and relevant examples of human BM-MNC cell characterization, flow cytometric analyses, and findings are summarized, with a strong focus on bone therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Haeusner
- IZKF Group Tissue Regeneration in Musculoskeletal Diseases, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Bernhard-Heine-Center for Locomotion Research, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - A Jauković
- Group for Hematology and Stem Cells, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - E Kupczyk
- Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - M Herrmann
- IZKF Group Tissue Regeneration in Musculoskeletal Diseases, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Bernhard-Heine-Center for Locomotion Research, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saul D, Menger MM, Ehnert S, Nüssler AK, Histing T, Laschke MW. Bone Healing Gone Wrong: Pathological Fracture Healing and Non-Unions-Overview of Basic and Clinical Aspects and Systematic Review of Risk Factors. BIOENGINEERING (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:bioengineering10010085. [PMID: 36671657 PMCID: PMC9855128 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Bone healing is a multifarious process involving mesenchymal stem cells, osteoprogenitor cells, macrophages, osteoblasts and -clasts, and chondrocytes to restore the osseous tissue. Particularly in long bones including the tibia, clavicle, humerus and femur, this process fails in 2-10% of all fractures, with devastating effects for the patient and the healthcare system. Underlying reasons for this failure are manifold, from lack of biomechanical stability to impaired biological host conditions and wound-immanent intricacies. In this review, we describe the cellular components involved in impaired bone healing and how they interfere with the delicately orchestrated processes of bone repair and formation. We subsequently outline and weigh the risk factors for the development of non-unions that have been established in the literature. Therapeutic prospects are illustrated and put into clinical perspective, before the applicability of biomarkers is finally discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Saul
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Kogod Center on Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Maximilian M. Menger
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ehnert
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas K. Nüssler
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tina Histing
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Laschke
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|