Troubleshooting the Femoral Attachment During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Location, Location, Location

MPFL reconstruction with proximal rather than distal femoral tunnel position leads to less favorable short-term results

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) between anatomic femoral tunnel positions: proximal (near adductor tubercle [AT]) and distal (near medial epicondyle [ME]).

HYPOTHESIS

MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position has worse clinical and radiological outcomes than those with the distal femoral tunnel position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients who underwent isolated MPFLR with proximal or distal femoral tunnels with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Based on postoperative CT images, 28 patients were classified as group AT and the remaining 27 patients were classified as group ME. The International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, Kujala scores, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA), patellofemoral cartilage status by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, bone contusion, and MPFL graft signal intensity were evaluated.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in regards to their preoperative demographic data, postoperative clinical scores, complications, or radiological findings (CDI, patellar tilt angle, PFOA, bone contusion, and graft signal intensity). The group AT had worse cartilage status on the medial facet of the patella (p=0.02). The ICRS grade for the medial facet of the patella statistically progressed in group AT compared to group ME (p=0.04) as well.

DISCUSSION

Both groups showed significantly improved clinical outcomes. However, for the medial facet of the patella, MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position had worse cartilage status and ICRS grade progression than those with the distal femoral tunnel position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Anatomic femoral tunnel position in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: anterior versus posterior

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) between anatomic femoral tunnel positions at anterior and posterior footprints.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who underwent MPFLR for patellofemoral instability with anterior or posterior femoral tunnels between 2014 and 2021 with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Based on postoperative images, the femoral tunnel positions anterior to the line connecting the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle were assigned to the anterior group, group A, and those posterior to the line to the posterior group, group P. Thirty-two patients were included in group A (mean age, 22.4 ± 8.8 years), and another 25 patients were included in group P (mean age, 21.1 ± 6.1 years). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Kujala score, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), patellar tilt angle, and patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale were evaluated. The patellofemoral cartilage status according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, bone contusion, femoral tunnel enlargement, and MPFL graft signal intensity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.01). No differences were noted between the two groups in terms of their preoperative demographic data, postoperative clinical scores (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, and Kujala), complications, or radiological findings (CDI, patellar tilt angle, PFOA, bone contusion, femoral tunnel enlargement, and graft signal intensity). The ICRS grade for the medial facet of the patella progressed in group A (30%, p = 0.02) but not in group P (18%, p = n.s.). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the other compartments of the patellofemoral joint.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes were significantly improved in both groups; however, MPFLR with anterior femoral tunnel position had worse cartilage status on the medial facet of the patella than the posterior femoral tunnel position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Lateral Patellar Instability

➤

Patellar instability represents a common problem with an evolving understanding and multifactorial pathoetiology. Treatment plans should be based on the identification of contributing anatomical factors and tailored to each individual patient.

➤

Risks for recurrent instability are dependent on several patient-specific factors including patella alta, increased tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, younger skeletal age, and ligamentous laxity.

➤

Cartilage or osteochondral lesions and/or fractures are commonly observed in first-time patellar dislocation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be strongly considered. Advanced imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) or MRI, should also be obtained preoperatively to identify predisposing factors and guide surgical treatment.

➤

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with anatomical femoral tunnel positioning is associated with lower recurrence rates compared with MPFL repair and has become a common and successful reconstructive surgical option in cases of instability.

➤

Lateral retinacular tightness can be addressed with lateral retinacular release or lengthening, but these procedures should not be performed in isolation.

➤

Tibial tubercle osteotomy is a powerful reconstructive tool in the setting of underlying skeletal risk factors for instability and can be of particular benefit in the presence of increased TT-TG distance (>20 mm), and/or in the setting of patella alta.

➤

The indications for trochleoplasty are still developing along with the clinical evidence, but trochleoplasty may be indicated in some cases of severe trochlear dysplasia. Several surgical techniques have indications in specific clinical scenarios and populations, and indications, risks, and benefits to each are progressing with our understanding.

➤

Combined femoral derotational osteotomy and MPFL reconstruction can be considered for patients with a femoral anteversion angle of >30° to improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence rates.

The Schöttle Point Is Consistently Located Distal to the Medial Femoral Physis in Pediatric Patients: A Digitally Reconstructed Radiographic Study

BACKGROUND

Significant controversy surrounds ideal tunnel position for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) in the pediatric setting. The start point for femoral tunnel positioning (the Schöttle point) relative to the distal medial femoral physis is not well defined. Previous studies provide conflicting data regarding position of the MPFL origin and the Schöttle point relative to the distal femoral physis.

HYPOTHESIS

The Schöttle point would be consistently distal to the distal medial femoral physis.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The institutional picture archiving and communication system was queried for computed tomography (CT) imaging studies of pediatric knees. Data were imported to an open-source image computing platform. True lateral digitally reconstructed radiographs and 3-dimensional (3D) renderings were generated, and the Schöttle point was registered in 3D space. Then, 3D distance measurements were obtained from the Schöttle point to the distal medial femoral physis.

RESULTS

A total of 49 pediatric knee CT scans were included. Mean age was 13.0 ± 2.3 years. Mean minimum distance from the medial physis to the Schöttle point was 9.9 ± 3.0 mm (range, 3.4-16.1 mm). In 49 of 49 cases (100%), the Schöttle point was distal to the physis. Using a 6-mm reaming diameter would result in 3 of 49 (6%) femurs having violation of the distal medial femoral physis. Moving the start point 3 mm distally would result in 0 of 49 (0%) sustaining physeal injury.

CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The Schöttle point is consistently distal to the distal medial femoral physis. The mean minimum distance from the Schöttle point to the physis on the medial cortex is 9.9 mm. The Schöttle point provides a safe and reliable radiographic landmark for pediatric MPFLR, although reaming diameter should be considered.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results of Lateral Retinacular Release or Lateral Retinacular Lengthening Methods Combined With Medial Retinaculum Plication in Patellofemoral Instability

Introduction

In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent medial retinaculum plication (MRP) combined with lateral retinacular release (LRR) or lateral retinacular lengthening (LRL) with the diagnosis of patellofemoral (PF) instability.

Methods

In our study, we retrospectively analyzed 75 knees of 75 adult patients (43 females and 32 males) who underwent MRP+LRR or MRP+LRL due to PF instability without osseous pathologies. Patients were divided into two groups (MRP+LRR and MRP+LRL) according to the surgical method. The clinical and radiological results of the two groups were compared.

Results

MRP+LRL surgery was performed on 45 knees and MRP+LRR surgery on 30 knees. The mean age was 26.5 (18-43) years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the change in patellar lateral shift (PLS) (p=0.429) and congruence angle (CA) (p=0.218) values. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the change in patellar tilt angle (PTA) (p=0.009) and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) (p<0.001) values. The change in PTA and LPFA values was higher in the MRP+LRL group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pre-operative and post-operative Lysholm knee scoring scale (p=0.205, p=0.228), Kujala pain scale (p=0.393, p=0.596), and Tegner activity level scale values (p=0.121, p=0.899).

Conclusions

MRP+LRR or MRP+LRL provided successful results for correcting the instability in PF instability without osseous pathologies such as patella alta, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) dysplasia, trochlea dysplasia, genu valgus, and tibial-femoral torsion. While PTA and LPFA values improved more with the MRP-LRL method, clinical results were similar in both methods.

Dynamic versus static medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction technique in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: a randomized clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

The redislocation rate of conservatively treated patella instability is high. One of the leading surgical strategies is medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Over-tensioning is one of the most challenging complications in static medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as the graft used for reconstruction is isometric and the anatomical MPFL is a mostly dynamic structure. As an alternative to established static reconstruction techniques, dynamic graft techniques have been introduced for stabilizing the patella with the aim of providing a more physiological reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. To date, data on clinical outcomes are scarce and on biomechanical outcomes of the dynamic MPFL reconstruction are lacking. Here, we present the protocol of a randomized clinical trial for comparing clinical and biomechanical outcomes of dynamic versus static medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, single blinded, randomized, multicenter, multimodal (clinical and biomechanical) clinical trial. Patients with recurrent patella dislocation requiring isolated MPFL reconstruction will be recruited and randomized to the dynamic or static reconstruction technique. Participants will be followed up for 2 years with a total of five follow-ups. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, upright radiographs, surgical reports and patient records will be evaluated, and clinical and functional outcomes will be measured. Patient-reported knee function and anterior knee pain as assessed with the Kujala score will serve as primary outcome. For biomechanical outcome, pre- and postoperative evaluations will be performed to assess isokinetic muscle strength, gait asymmetry, joint kinematics and kinetics, and timing of muscle activity.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study will clarify whether the reported surgery success for patella stabilization via dynamic MPFL reconstruction is due to muscle contraction or to the passive tenodesis effect combined with clinical outcome measures. With this study, we will provide much needed information on knee biomechanics after dynamic versus static MPFL reconstruction to provide evidence to support orthopedic surgeons in evidence-based decision-making in their quest for surgical techniques most favorable for their patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04849130). Registered 19 April 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04849130 .

Effect of Lateral Retinacular Release on Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

When performing a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, surgeons may place the MPFL graft under higher than anatomic tension to minimize the chance of recurrent instability.

Purpose:

To investigate whether a lateral retinacular release (LRR) significantly decreases patellofemoral contact pressures after an overtensioned (OT) MPFL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Mean and peak pressure across the patellofemoral joint at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion was assessed in 14 cadaveric knee specimens with intact MPFL, transected MPFL, reconstructed MPFL with graft OT, and OT MPFL with LRR. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine differences across states, with W and C values calculated when possible.

Results:

Mean pressure decreased significantly after MPFL transection compared with intact at 30° (456.9 ± 116.8 vs 410.9 ± 109.4 N, P = .006, W < 7) and 45° (404.9 ± 91.7 vs 369.4 ± 85.3 N, P = .005, W < 5) and increased significantly from intact to OT graft at 30° (456.9 ± 116.8 vs 563.0 ± 11.2 N, P = .003, W < 7), 45° (404.9 ± 91.7 vs 481.4 ± 14.8 N, P = .005, W < 5), and 60° (272.9 ± 139.0 vs 367.0 ± 53.7 N, P = .007, W < 3). Peak pressure increased significantly between intact and OT graft at 30° (1364.0 ± 478.2 vs 2094.4 ± 619.8 N, P = .002, W < 9), 45° (1224.7 ± 491.5 vs 1676.7 ± 779.1 N, P = .005, W < 5), and 60° (1117.7 ± 566.8 vs 1604.2 ± 772.9 N, W < 3). In knees with significantly increased mean pressure after overtensioning, mean pressure increased by 23.3% (11/14 knees) at 30°, 18.3% (10/14 knees) at 45°, and 35.0% (10/14 knees) at 60°. Peak pressure increased significantly by 35.3% (30°), 25.2% (45°), and 29.3% (60°). A significant decrease in mean pressure, toward but not to baseline, was observed between the OT and LRR states at 30° (563.0 ± 11.2 vs 501.5 ± 9.3 N, W < 7) and 60° (367.0 ± 53.7 vs 302.0 ± 13.8 N, W < 5) and a decrease in peak pressure at 30° (2094.4 ± 619.8 vs 1886.5 ± 655.3 N; W < 9).

Conclusion:

LRR led to a statistically significant decrease in pressure across the patellofemoral joint in knees that demonstrated increased contact pressures after an OT MPFL graft.

Clinical Relevance:

LRR after an MPFL reconstruction in which the MPFL graft has been OT may help reduce patellofemoral contact pressures at the time of surgery.

Evaluation of recurrent dislocation of the patella in children with MRI: Goldthwait technique combined with lateral release, and VMO advancement-a retrospective study of 85 knees

PURPOSE

There are certain risk factors responsible for patella instability that should be identified before choosing the most appropriate treatment.

METHODS

We evaluated 83 skeletally immature patients who, after two or more patellar dislocation episodes, underwent surgical treatment to address the condition of patellar instability. Each patient was evaluated for patellar instability risk factors using the Balcarek patellar instability severity score. Evaluation of patellar instability included knee MRI to systematically identify anatomical risk factors. The preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation included the modified Cincinnati score and the Kujala score. The Roux-Goldthwait technique combined with lateral retinaculum release and the advancement of the vastus medialis oblique (VMO) was performed on all knees.

RESULTS

The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 12.2 ± 1.59 years (range 8-14 years). The average follow-up was 4.72 ± 1.37 (range 3-8) years. Trochlear dysplasia (decreased trochlear depth), the most common anatomical risk factor, was identified in 71 knees (83.5%). The modified Cincinnati score increased from 58.46 ± 8.75 (range 49-76) points to 94.07 ± 2.88 (range 88-98) postoperatively. The mean Kujala scores increased from 58.51 ± 8.94 (range 49-76) points to 93.66 ± 2.65 (range 87-98) postoperatively. The two-tailed P value was less than 0.0001. The patients were followed until their skeletal maturation, without reporting any incidents of patella dislocation, except one.

CONCLUSION

The Roux-Goldthwait technique combined with lateral retinaculum release, and the advancement of VMO, can restore patellar tracking and can decrease the probability of another dislocation. It was an effective treatment in skeletally immature patients who had two or more episodes of patellar dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Estudo biomecânico de diferentes dispositivos de fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial em joelhos de suínos

Objetivo Avaliar diferentes dispositivos de fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial para comparar sua eficácia quanto à força de fixação até a falha em joelhos suínos.

Métodos Foram ensaiados 30 joelhos de suínos subdivididos em 3 grupos de 10 joelhos. Os enxertos retirados foram dissecados de tendões extensores das patas dos suínos. Cada grupo teve o enxerto fixado ao fêmur com parafuso de interferência, âncora, ou tenodese no tendão adutor. Os 3 métodos foram submetidos à testes biomecânicos utilizando uma máquina universal de ensaio de tração com uma velocidade de 20 mm/min.

Resultados Verificamos que a média mais elevada da resistência linear sob tração lateral (185,45 ± 41,22 N) ocorreu no grupo 1: “fixação por parafuso,” seguido do grupo 2: “fixação por âncora” (152,97 ± 49,43 N), e a média foi menor no grupo 3: “fixação por tenodese” (76,69 ± 18,90 N). Para a margem de erro fixada (5%), comprovou-se a diferença significativa entre os grupos (p < 0,001) e também através dos testes de comparações múltiplas (entre os pares de grupos) verificou-se a ocorrência de diferenças significativas. A variabilidade expressada por meio do coeficiente de variação mostrou-se reduzida, já que a referida medida foi inferior a 33,3%.

Conclusão O uso de parafusos de interferência no túnel ósseo de joelhos porcinos é suficientemente forte para fixação femoral na reconstrução do ligamento patelofemoral medial, assim como a fixação com âncoras montáveis com fio de alta resistência. Entretanto, a tenodese no tendão adutor mostrou-se frágil para essa finalidade.

Small (3.2-mm), Short, Oblique Patellar Tunnels for Patellar Fixation in MPFL Reconstruction

Multiple techniques exist for patellar graft fixation during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, each with their respective advantages and disadvantages. In recent studies, the use of 2 small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels with looped graft has been shown to be effective for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction. This technique does not appear to be associated with the same risk of patellar fracture as the use of larger (4.5-mm) transpatellar tunnels. A recent retrospective study also reported decreased risk of recurrent patellar instability and decreased cost compared with the use of suture anchors for patellar fixation, which is currently the most common modality. Given these promising findings relative to existing techniques for patellar fixation, further description of the senior author's technique for using these small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels is provided. This technique is safe, efficacious, and cost-conscious and should be considered a viable option for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction.

Sulcus Deepening Trochleoplasty and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellofemoral Instability: A 2-Year Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcome data of patients undergoing DeJour sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for high-grade trochlear dysplasia at a single institution in the United States.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients (76 knees) with severe trochlear dysplasia and recurrent patellar instability were prospectively enrolled and underwent DeJour sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty with MPFLR from 2011 to 2019. Inclusion criteria included recurrent lateral patellar instability following failure of conservative treatment with radiographic evidence of severe trochlear dysplasia (DeJour types B or D). Patients with less than 2-year follow-up were excluded. Radiographic analysis, physical examination, clinical follow-up, patient demographics, and patient-reported outcome measures were obtained for all patients at each visit.

RESULTS

Forty patients (44 knees) had complete 2-year or longer follow-up and were included. The majority of patients were female (81.8%) with a mean age of 19.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.7; range 13.2-47.0). Follow-up ranged from 2.0 years to 6.8 years (mean 3.6 years, SD 1.35). In total, 45.5% had failed previous surgery for patellar instability. Eight knees developed arthrofibrosis and the overall reoperation rate was 27.3%. No patients had fixation failure and no further surgery was required for instability. The mean preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score of 50.8 improved to 79.1 (P < .001), and the mean preoperative Kujala score of 56.4 improved to 86.5 (P < .001). Patients reported high satisfaction rates (mean 9.1 of 10). When applicable, 100% of patients returned to work, whereas 84.8% returned to sport. There was no significant radiographic progression of patellofemoral arthritis at a mean of 2.4 years after surgery (SD 1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

DeJour sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty combined with MPFLR and used with tibial tubercle osteotomy and lateral release is a reliable and effective treatment for recurrent patellar instability due to severe trochlear dysplasia, even in this group with many revisions of previous procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia With Lysis of Adhesions Is Effective in Arthrofibrosis After Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty: A Prospective Study

Background

Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty has been established as an effective treatment for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia. However, arthrofibrosis is a known complication following trochleoplasty, which may require manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) with or without lysis of adhesions (LOA) to increase the knee range of motion (ROM), especially flexion.

Purpose

To prospectively follow patients for ROM improvements and subsequent complications after undergoing MUA with or without LOA in the setting of sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 76 knees with severe trochlear dysplasia were prospectively enrolled and underwent sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 32.5 ± 19.3 months. Concomitant procedures included medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, lateral retinacular release, and tibial tubercle osteotomy. Physical examination including ROM and findings of recurrent patellar instability were collected for all patients. Arthrofibrosis was defined as active and passive flexion less than 90° within 3 months of surgery combined with a plateau in progress with physical therapy. Paired-samples and independent-samples t tests were used. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 62 knees met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of these patients, 11 experienced arthrofibrosis as a complication and underwent MUA within 3 months of their index procedure. Of these 11 patients, 9 subsequently underwent arthroscopic LOA following MUA because acceptable ROM could not be achieved with manipulation alone. Patients with arthrofibrosis had a premanipulation mean ROM that was significantly different from those without arthrofibrosis (77.3° ±18.6° vs 133.3° ± 12.7°, respectively; P < .001). In the arthrofibrotic group, postoperative ROM increased significantly after MUA and/or LOA compared with the preoperative ROM (127.3° ± 12.5° vs 77.3° ± 18.6°, respectively; P < .001). ROM in the arthrofibrotic group after MUA/LOA was not significantly different from that in the nonarthrofibrotic group (flexion, 127.3° ± 12.5° vs 133.3° ± 12.7°, respectively; P = .156). No complications from the MUA or LOA were reported at subsequent follow-up visits.

Conclusion

When indicated in the setting of severe trochlear dysplasia, sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty is a treatment for disabling recurrent patellar instability with a known complication of arthrofibrosis. Initiation of postoperative physical therapy within 3 days of surgery may reduce the incidence of arthrofibrosis. If arthrofibrosis is encountered after a sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty, MUA without LOA is not as effective as when following other procedures of the knee, whereas MUA with LOA is an effective procedure likely to result in ROM and patient outcome scores similar to those of a nonarthrofibrotic knee after the same procedure. Both MUA and LOA appear to be safe based on the limited number of patients in this study without complication.

Effective patellofemoral joint stabilization and low complication rates using a hardware-free MPFL reconstruction technique with an intra-operative adjustment of the graft tension

PURPOSE

Even if medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a proven method, complications such as implant loosening, patella fractures, recurrent luxations, knee pain or knee stiffness are frequently described. Besides a correct tunnel positioning and implant-specific complications, this might be caused by difficulties with an appropriate graft tensioning. The study presented here is a necessary first step in exploring our technique of a double-limbed, hardware-free MPFL reconstruction, which provides another way to test and adjust the graft tension before permanent fastening.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (m/f = 18/12) with recurrent dislocations were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 24 months. Patients who had additional procedures such as a trochleoplasties, tibial tubercle transfers and derotational osteotomies were not included. Besides a standardized clinical examination, different scorings and possible complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean Kujala score improved significantly from 57 ± 15 to 92 ± 10. The Lysholm and IKDC score increased significantly from 59 ± 11 to 95 ± 6 and from 49 ± 9 to 89 ± 9, respectively. No patient reported a re-dislocation, subluxation or showed a positive apprehension. A total of 23 patients were engaged in regular physical activities. All but one, who lost interest, returned to the same sports. Because some did not follow our recommendation to return to sports after a rehab of at least 10-12 weeks, the period for a return was relatively short (median of 12 weeks, range 3-25 weeks). Four patients reported a moderate anterior knee pain only occurring after increased loads such as longer runs or workouts. One of these showed a slight flexion deficit of less than 20°. A severe motion deficit or stiffness was not noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a larger, clinical outcome study is needed to ensure the efficacy and safety of our method, it seems to provide a good clinical outcome, a correspondingly high satisfaction and a low incidence of complications. The possibility to adjust graft tension might help in minimizing complications caused by difficulties with an appropriate graft tension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Relationship of Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical Outcome and Postoperative Complications

PURPOSE

To analyze the relation of the femoral tunnel (FT) positioning on clinical outcome.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy between 1998 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Strict postoperative lateral radiographs were mandatory. Knees with previous osseous stabilization surgery, fixed lateral patellar dislocation, valgus knee (>5°), or open growth plates were excluded. The distance between the FT and the validated radiographic landmark (the "Schoettle point") was measured. An FT with a distance greater than 10 mm was considered as malpositioned. The distance was correlated to subjective outcome measurements (patient satisfaction and Kujala score) and postoperative complications (a loss of range of motion and revision surgery).

RESULTS

Sixty-three knees in 60 patients (aged 23.7 ± 7.5 years at the time of surgery, 79.4% female) were included with a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 3.3 years. The FT showed an average distance of 13.3 mm (±6.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7-14.8) to the Schoettle point, and 45 of 63 knees (71.4%) were deemed malpositioned. The postoperative Kujala score of malpositioned FT (75.9 points; 95% CI: 71.2-80.7) was not significantly inferior to knees with an FT within 10 mm (80.5; 95% CI: 73.7-87.3, P = .315). However, all 5 knees that underwent revision surgery showed an FT outside the 10-mm area.

CONCLUSIONS

Malpositioning of the FT in MPFL reconstruction is associated with postoperative complications. However, a malpositioned FT in MPFL reconstruction will not necessarily lead to an unsatisfactory subjective or objective clinical outcome. Other factors, such as surgical indication or graft tensioning, might also significantly influence postoperative outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case-control study.

Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and different graft pre-tensions on patellofemoral contact pressure.

Methods

Six human cadaveric knee joints were placed in a six-degree-of-freedom knee simulator. Mean PFCP (mPFCP) was evaluated in knee flexion of 0, 30 and 90° using a calibrated pressure-measurement system. After data assessment of the native knee joint, five MPFL reconstruction conditions were conducted: Anatomical double bundle; non-anatomical proximal patellar; non-anatomical distal patellar; non-anatomical proximal femoral; non-anatomical ventral femoral. The gracilis graft was fixed at a defined knee flexion of 30° and pre-tensioned to 2, 10 and 20 N.

Results

Kruskal-Wallis testing resulted in no mPFCP differences between the native and anatomical reconstruction states.

Comparing the native and anatomical reconstruction states with the non-anatomical reconstruction states, no difference in the mPFCP both in knee extension (0°) (p>0.366) and in 30° knee flexion (p>0.349) was found. At 90° knee flexion, the following differences were identified: compared to the native knee state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral and non-anatomical ventral femoral reconstruction by 257% (p=0.04) and 292% (p=0.016), respectively. Compared to the anatomical reconstruction state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral reconstruction by 199% (p=0.042).

Discussion and Conclusions

With respect to all study findings and to restore a physiological PFCP, we recommend using the anatomical footprints for MPFL reconstruction and a moderate graft pretensioning of 2-10 N.

Lateral Patellar Instability in the Skeletally Mature Patient: Evaluation and Surgical Management

Lateral patellar instability is a common disease process that affects all types of patients. Depending on the patient's anatomy and the results of preoperative imaging, surgical management options include medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction or repair is useful for almost all patients, whereas tibial tubercle osteotomy is helpful to correct a lateralized tibial tubercle and the associated elevated lateral pull of the extensor mechanism. For a select subset of patients with severe trochlear dysplasia, a sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty can be a useful option to prevent future patellar instability. Many technical considerations exist for each procedure, and in most situations, no consensus exists to direct surgeons on the superior technique.

Avoiding Complications with MPFL Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the potentially significant complications associated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Additionally, to review the most current and relevant literature with an emphasis on avoiding these potential complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple cadaveric studies have characterized the anatomy of the MPFL and the related morphologic abnormalities that contribute to recurrent lateral patellar instability. Such abnormalities include patella alta, excessive tibial tubercle to trochlear grove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, and malalignment. Recent studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with the treatment of concomitant pathology in combination with MPFL reconstruction, which is critical in avoiding recurrent instability and complications. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding various critical aspects of MPFL reconstruction, certain concepts remain imperative. Our preferred methods and rationales for surgical techniques are described. These include appropriate work up, a combination of procedures to address abnormal morphology, anatomical femoral insertion, safe and secure patellar fixation, appropriate graft length fixation, and thoughtful knee flexion during fixation.

Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability

There are multiple etiologies for recurrent patellar instability. While patella alta, an elevated tibial tubercle trochlear groove distance, and prior lateral patellar dislocations with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) insufficiency have been shown to be risk factors for recurrent patellar instability, trochlear dysplasia can result in a significant impediment to normal patellar tracking. With the adequate identification of risk factors, appropriate surgical treatments can be individually tailored to the patient. We present a combined surgical technique of a sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty using knotless suture anchors for fixation, with MPFL reconstruction using gracilis autograft through short, oblique patellar bone tunnels to address severe trochlear dysplasia.

MPFL graft fixation in low degrees of knee flexion minimizes errors made in the femoral location

PURPOSE

To evaluate the appropriate amount of knee flexion in which to secure the graft during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Heavy suture was used to simulate graft tissue during MPFL reconstruction on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The sutures were passed through two transverse patellar tunnels and draped over a Kirschner wire at Schöttle's point on the femur. Suture displacement at the location of the wire was measured during knee range of motion from 0 to 135°. The wire's location was then moved to 3 additional locations (1 cm proximal, 1 cm distal, and 1 cm anterior), and the measurements were repeated.

RESULTS

Using Schöttle's point, the suture length did not vary throughout all ranges of knee flexion. The distal location resulted in a greater distance between attachment points (i.e. graft tightened) if the measurements began with the knee flexed and then brought into extension. Conversely, with the proximal location, the opposite occurred as the knee was extended (i.e. graft loosened). For all locations other than Schöttle's point, the amount of initial knee flexion for fixation was directly related to the amount of suture length change when the knee was brought into extension.

CONCLUSION

For non-anatomic femoral MPFL graft fixation locations, suture length (and thus graft length) in full extension becomes increasingly altered if the graft is secured in high degrees of knee flexion. Thus, graft fixation in lower degrees of knee flexion is recommended to minimize over or under tensioning the graft when the knee goes into extension if the graft position is placed in a non-anatomic location. To avoid this problem, fluoroscopy should be used to locate the anatomic footprint of the MPFL insertion. While recognizing the limitations of cadaveric research, this study is the first to provide any data to corroborate the widely used practice of securing the MPFL in lower degrees of knee flexion.

Medial patellofemoral ligament and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction in children: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament associated with the medial patellotibial ligament in skeletally immature patients.

METHOD

This is a case series study in patients with patellar instability with open physis. In total, seven patients were evaluated: four males and three females were operated using the proposed technique. Patients with open physis who had more than two episodes of recurring patellar dislocation were included. No patients underwent additional procedures. The distance from the anterior tibial tuberosity to the trochlea grove (TT-TG) was measured in all patients. On physical examination, the inverted J-sign, the apprehension sign, and the knee range of motion parameters were used in the pre- and post-operative period. In addition, the Kujala and Lysholm scores were applied before and 12 months after surgery. The results were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 11.28 in both genders. Comparing the data of the pre- and post-operative period, the inverted J-sign was present in six patients (85.7%) vs. absent in one (14.3%). The apprehension sign was absent in cases in the postoperative period; the range of motion was 117.85 ± 8.09 vs. 148.57 ± 3.77. The Kujala score was 42.57 ± 8.9 vs. 88.57 ± 5.09 and the Lysholm scores were classified as excellent or good in 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combined reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament combined with the medial patellotibial ligament in skeletally immature patients with predisposing factors, presents satisfactory results without episodes of recurrence or residual subluxation; according to these preliminary results, it should be considered as a treatment option.

Why Do Patellofemoral Stabilization Procedures Fail? Keys to Success

In recent years, surgical interventions for patellofemoral joint instability have gained popularity, possibly revitalized by the recent advances in our understanding of patellofemoral joint instability and the introduction of a number of new surgical procedures. This rise in surgical intervention has brought about various complications. In this review article, we present the complications that are associated with 5 main surgical procedures to stabilize the patella-medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, lateral release/lateral retinacular lengthening, and derotation osteotomies. The key to success and potential problems with these surgical techniques are highlighted in the form of "expert takeaways."

Current Concepts in the Management of Patellar Instability

Patellar instability is a common presenting clinical entity in the field of orthopedics. This not only can occur from baseline morphologic variability within the patellofemoral articulation and alignment, but also from traumatic injury. While conservative management is many times employed early in the treatment course, symptomatic patellar instability can persist. This article reviews the available indexed published literature regarding patellar instability. Given the debilitating nature of this condition and the long term sequelae that can evolve from its lack of adequate recognition and treatment, this article details the most current methods in the evaluation of this entity as well as reviews the most up-to-date surgical treatment regimens that are available to address this condition.