Why Do Authors Differ With Regard to the Femoral and Meniscal Anatomic Parameters of the Knee Anterolateral Ligament?: Dissection by Layers and a Description of Its Superficial and Deep Layers

Overview of the anterolateral complex of the knee

In the last few years, much more information on the anterolateral complex of the knee has become available. It has now been demonstrated how it works in conjunction with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) controlling anterolateral rotatory laxity. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral complex (ALC) has a role as a secondary stabilizer to the ACL in opposing anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation. It is of utmost importance that surgeons comprehend the intricate anatomy of the entire anterolateral aspect of the knee. Although most studies have only focused on the anterolateral ligament (ALL), the ALC of the knee consists of a functional unit formed by the layers of the iliotibial band combined with the anterolateral joint capsule. Considerable interest has also been given to imaging evaluation using magnetic resonance and several studies have targeted the evaluation of the ALC in the setting of ACL injury. Results are inconsistent with a lack of association between magnetic resonance imaging evidence of injury and clinical findings. Isolated ACL reconstruction may not always reestablish knee rotatory stability in patients with associated ALC injury. In such cases, additional procedures, such as anterolateral reconstruction or lateral tenodesis, may be indicated. There are several techniques available for ALL reconstruction. Graft options include the iliotibial band, gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft, or allograft.

Anterolateral complex of the knee: State of the art

Rotatory instability of the knee represents the main reason for failure and poor clinical outcomes regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques. It is now clear that the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee possesses a fundamental role, in association with the ACL, in controlling internal rotation. Over the past decade, ever since the anterolateral ligament has been identified and described as a distinct structure, there has been a renewed interest in the scientific community about the whole ALC: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis have made a comeback in association with ACL reconstructions to improve functional outcomes, reducing the risks of graft failure and associated injuries. Modern ACL reconstruction surgery must therefore investigate residual instability and proceed, when necessary, to extra-articular techniques, whether functional tenodesis or anatomical reconstruction.This review aims to investigate the latest anatomical and histological descriptions, and the role in rotational control and knee biomechanics of the ALC and its components. The diagnostic tools for its identification, different reconstruction techniques, and possible surgical indications are described.. In addition, clinical and functional results available in the literature are reported.

Synergistic effect of the anterolateral ligament and capsule injuries on the knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

There is much controversy about the practical role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its relation to other anterolateral knee structures including the anterolateral capsule (ALC) and iliotibial band (ITB). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to investigate the effect of the ALL and ALC injuries on knee laxity with the iliotibial band (ITB) preserved in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee.

HYPOTHESIS

The ALL and ALC would contribute to knee joint stability during anterior translation and internal rotation of the tibia in an ACL-injured knee.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, we measured knee laxity with the following state of knee injuries with ITB preserved: (1) intact knee, (2) ACL-sectioned knee (ACL-), (3) additional sectioning of the ALL (ACL-/ALL-), and (4) additional sectioning of the ALC (ACL-/ALL-/ALC-). We did biomechanical measurements in internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation for each condition at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°.

RESULTS

After we sectioned the ALL (ACL-/ALL-), the mean IR at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion were significantly increased, compared to the intact knee (p=<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.002) and ACL- (p=<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.002). The additional transection of the ALC (ACL-/ALL-/ALC-) significantly increased IR laxity from the ACL-/ALL- at 30°, 60°, and 90° (p=0.005, 0.003, and 0.047). For anterior laxity, ACL-/ALL- resulted in significantly increased anterior laxity from the ACL- at 30° and 60° (p=0.003 and 0.019), and ACL-/ALL-/ALC- significantly increased anterior laxity even from the ACL-/ALL- at 30° and 60° (p=0.007 and 0.011). For varus laxity, ACL-/ALL- resulted in significantly increased varus laxity from both the intact knee and ACL- at 60° (p=0.004 and 0.007) and 90° (p=<0.001 and<0.001). ACL-/ALL-/ALC- resulted in significantly increased varus from ACL-/ALL- at 60° and 90° (p=<0.001 and 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The anterolateral ligament and anterolateral capsule injuries in ACL-injured knees even with ITB preserved had a synergistic effect on knee laxity in the aspects of internal rotation, anterior translation, and varus angulation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Controlled laboratory study.

The Cadaveric Studies and the Definition of the Antero-Lateral Ligament of the Knee: From the Anatomical Features to the Patient-Specific Reconstruction Surgical Techniques

Cadaver studies represented a milestone in surgical orthopaedic research, and still today they play a crucial role in the achievement of new knowledge about joint disease behaviour and treatment. In this review, an overview of the cadaver studies available in the literature about the anatomy, role, and treatment of the antero-lateral ligament (ALL) of the knee was performed. The aim of the review was to describe and gain more insight into the part of in vitro study in understanding knee joint anatomy and biomechanics, and in developing surgical reconstruction techniques. The findings of the review showed that cadaver studies had, and will continue to have, a key role in the research of knee joint biomechanics and surgical reconstruction. Moreover, they represent a powerful tool to develop and test new devices which could be useful in clinical and surgical practice.

Knee laxity in anterolateral complex injuries versus medial meniscus posterior horn injuries in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

There is considerable debate regarding the function of anterolateral knee structures, including the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and anterolateral capsule, as knee stabilizers in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knees. Medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) injuries have also been associated with increased knee laxity in ACL injured knees. The purpose of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to compare the effects of the anterolateral complex (ALC) injury and meniscectomy of MMPH on knee laxity in ACL injured knees.

HYPOTHESIS

ALC injury would have a greater effect on internal rotational laxity in ACL-injured knee than meniscectomy of MMPH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Matched-pair 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees underwent biomechanical evaluation of knee laxity. After testing the intact knee and ACL sectioned knee (ACL-) in matched-pair 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, two groups were established: an ALC sectioning (ACL-/ALC-) group (n=5) and a MMPH meniscectomy (ACL-/MMPH-) group (n=5). Knee laxity was measured in terms of internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation for each condition at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°.

RESULTS

After the additional sectioning of the ALC (ACL-/ALC-), the mean internal rotation at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion showed the greater internal rotation laxity compared than intact knee (p=0.020, 0.011, 0.005 and<0.001). It also significantly increased anterior translation from ACL- at 30° and 60° (p=0.011 and 0.005). In contrast, additional meniscectomy of the MMPH (ACL-/MMPH-) significantly increased external rotation laxity compared to intact knee (p=0.021, 0.018 and 0.024) and ACL- (p=0.037, 0.011 and 0.025) at 30°, 60° and 90°. ACL-/MMPH- also resulted in significantly increased anterior translation from ACL- at 30°, 60° and 90° (p=0.004, 0.008 and 0.002).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, the anterolateral complex, which include the ALL and anterolateral capsule, may play an important role in stabilizing the knee against internal rotation and anterior translation, while the MMPH may contribute to resisting external rotation and anterior translation stability in ACL-injured knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, controlled laboratory study.

Truly Existing or Hyped up? Unravelling the Current Knowledge Regarding the Anatomy, Radiology, Histology and Biomechanics of the Enigmatic Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint

Ever since its description, anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee joint remains as the hotspot of controversies. Though it has been described under various descriptions, the structure gained its limelight when it was christened as anterolateral ligament by Claes in 2013. The main reason for the controversies around it is the lack of concrete evidences regarding its attachments, morphology, biomechanical aspects and radiological appearance. Similarly the role of ALL in pivot shift phenomenon also remains as a point of debate. The advocates of ALL suggest that because of its ability to modulate internal rotation and attachment to the lateral meniscus, ALL contributes to the pivot shift phenomenon. Similarly, the orientation of ALL stands as the reason for varied documentation with respect to imaging techniques. With the growing body of evidence, it is imperative to fix our stand regarding the structure because, if found to be morphologically persistent, it can be used for concomitant anterolateral stabilization along with anterior cruciate ligament reinforcement surgeries. The present review tries to systematically review the anatomy, variations in classifications, descriptions, histology, radiology and biomechanical features of ALL. At the end of the review, we would like to find the answer for the question: Is ALL a distinct ligamentous structure located at the anterolateral aspect of the knee? What is the contribution of it to the tibial internal rotation stability?

Paediatric knee anterolateral capsule does not contain a distinct ligament: analysis of histology, immunohistochemistry and gene expression

OBJECTIVES

The presence of a discrete ligament within the knee anterolateral capsule (ALC) is controversial. Tendons and ligaments have typical collagens, ultrastructure, transcription factors and proteins. However, these characteristics have not been investigated in paediatric ALC. The purpose of this study was to characterise the paediatric ALC in terms of tissue ultrastructure and cellular expression of ligament markers scleraxis (SCX)-a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor-and the downstream transmembrane glycoprotein tenomodulin (TNMD), as compared with the paediatric lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and paediatric quadriceps tendon (QT). We hypothesised that, in comparison to the LCL and QT, the ALC would possess poor collagen orientation and reduced SCX and TNMD expression.

METHODS

15 paediatric ALCs (age 6.3±3.3 years), 5 paediatric LCLs (age 3.4±1.3 years) and 5 paediatric QTs (age 2.0±1.2 years) from fresh cadaveric knees were used in this study. Fresh-frozen samples from each region were cryosectioned and then stained with H&E to evaluate collagen alignment and cell morphology. Expression of SCX and TNMD was determined by gene expression analysis and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The histological sections of the paediatric LCL and QT showed well-organised, dense collagenous tissue fibres with elongated fibroblasts, while the ALC showed more random collagen orientation without clear cellular directionality. The aspect ratio of cells in the ALC was significantly lower than that of the LCL and QT (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). The normalised distribution curve of the inclination angles of the nuclei in the ALC was more broadly distributed than that of the LCL or QT, indicating random cell alignment in the ALC. SCX immunostaining was apparent in the paediatric LCL within regions of aligned fibres, while the comparatively disorganised structure of the ALC was negative for SCX. The paediatric LCL also stained positive for TNMD, while the ALC was only sparsely positive for this tendon/ligament cell-surface molecule. Relative gene expression of SCX and TNMD were higher in the LCL and QT than in the ALC.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a distinct ligament could not be discerned in the ALC based on histology, immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study.

Computed tomography (CT), X-ray, and MRI evaluation of two anterolateral knee reconstruction techniques: lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) and capsule of the knee are anatomical structures involved in rotational stability and pivot-shift control. As such, it has been demonstrated that the extra-articular anterolateral procedures improve clinical outcome when performed as an augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in specific groups of patients. This review describes the postoperative imaging findings of two techniques used to perform these procedures, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and radiography. The first technique described is the lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), which uses a strip of the iliotibial band that is harvested, passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and fixed posterior, and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE), preserving ITB insertion on Gerdy's tubercle. The second technique described is the ALL reconstruction, a procedure that attempts to recreate the anatomy of the ALL, using most often a gracilis autograft. In this procedure, femoral fixation is performed proximal and posterior to the LFE, and tibial fixation is slightly distal to the joint line, halfway from Gerdy's tubercle to the fibular head. The main objective of this review is to provide an overview of the postoperative imaging aspects of these two procedures with MRI, CT, and radiography and to describe possible complications. As they become more common, it is important for the radiologist and the orthopedic surgeon to understand their particularities in combination with the already well-known ACL reconstruction.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterolateral Ligament and the Iliotibial Band in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Associated With Segond Fractures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of Segond fractures, including the structures attached to the avulsed fragment, the integrity of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and iliotibial band (ITB), and fragment size and location.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study with MRI scans from 2016 to 2019 with the term "Segond" in the reports, signs of acute trauma, and a bony anterolateral tibial avulsion (Segond) fracture. Two experienced observers accessed images to evaluate fragment dimensions (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and craniocaudal) and distances from anatomic landmarks (Gerdy's tubercle, articular surface, and posterolateral tibial corner). ALLs and ITBs also were evaluated, both for integrity and for attachment to the avulsed bony fragment. Data were statistically evaluated for significant correlations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight knee MRIs of patients suffering from a combined anterior cruciate ligament and Segond injury were evaluated. The ALL presented with edema in 28 cases (58.3%) and was torn in 3 cases (6.3%). The ALL was attached to the bone fragment in all cases and the ITB also was attached in 25 cases (52.1%). Receiver operating characteristic curves also demonstrated that the larger each of the dimensions and the volume of the fragment, the greater the probability of ITB fibers being inserted. Also, the narrower the distance from the fragment to the center of Gerdy's tubercle, the greater the probability of iliotibial band fibers being attached. Interobserver correlation varied from 0.87 to 0.97 for all measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

In all combined ACL injuries and Segond fracture MRI cases, the complete ALL inserted on the avulsed bony fragment, whereas the posterior part of the ITB was only attached in 52.1% of the cases. Segond fracture fragment size was predictive for the structures attached to it. The ALL was abnormal in 64.5% of cases and presented a clear discontinuity in 6.3%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case Series, Level IV.

Knee laxity in anterolateral complex injuries versus lateral meniscus posterior horn injuries in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

In the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee, additional injury of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and capsule may increase the pathologic laxity. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the anterolateral complex (ALC) injury in ACL injured knee with the effects of lateral meniscus posterior horn (LMPH) meniscectomy.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used. After testing the (1) intact knees and (2) ACL sectioned knees (ACL-), two groups were established: an (3) ALC sectioning group (n = 5), which underwent additional ALC sectioning (ACL-/ALC-) after ACL sectioning, and a separate (3) LMPH meniscectomy group (n = 5) that underwent LMPH meniscectomy (ACL-/LMPH-) after ACL sectioning. Knee laxity was measured in terms of internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation for each condition at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°.

RESULTS

After additional sectioning of the ALC (ACL-/ALC-), the mean internal rotation at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of knee flexion was 11.9 ± 1.3°, 18.1 ± 1.6°, 18.3 ± 1.8°, and 17.8 ± 2.4°, respectively, showing significant internal rotation laxity when compared to the intact knee (P = .031, .020, .001 and .033). Anterior translation also significantly increased compared to the ACL- knee at 30° (12.7 ± 1.4 to 16.8 ± 1.7 mm: P = .039). In contrast, additional meniscectomy of the LMPH (ACL-/LMPH-) significantly increased valgus laxity compared to the intact knee at 30, 60 and 90° (P = .021, .018 and .024).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the anterolateral complex, which include the ALL and anterolateral capsule, may play an important role in stabilizing the knee against internal rotation and anterior translation.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee-Importance in Rotatory Knee Instability?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the setting of rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a resurgence of interest in knee's anterolateral complex (ALC). Reconstruction or augmentation of the ALC with procedures such as a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been proposed to reduce rotatory knee instability in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The current review investigates the recent literature surrounding the role of the ALC in preventing rotatory knee instability.

RECENT FINDINGS

The knee's anterolateral complex (ALC) is a complex structure composed of the superficial and deep portions of the iliotibial band, the capsulo-osseous layer, and the anterolateral capsule. Distally, these various layers merge to form a single functional unit which imparts stability to the lateral knee. While the iliotibial band and the capsule-osseous layer have been shown to be primary restraints to rotatory motion after ACL injury, the biomechanical role of the anterolateral capsule remains unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral capsule and the anterolateral thickening of this capsule act as a sheet of fibrous tissue which does not resist motion around the knee as other longitudinally oriented ligaments do. Augmentation of the ALC, with LET, has been performed globally for over 30 years. This procedure can decrease rotatory knee instability, but long-term studies have found little difference in patient-reported outcomes, osteoarthritis, or ACL reconstruction failure with the addition of LET. Further research is needed to clarify indications for the clinical use of ALC-based procedures.

The anterolateral ligament of the knee joint: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and anterolateral ligament surgery

Residual knee instability and low rates of return to previous sport are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To improve outcomes, surgical methods, such as the anatomical single-bundle technique or the double-bundle technique, were developed. However, these reconstruction techniques failed to adequately overcome these problems, and, therefore, new potential answers continue to be of great interest. Based on recent anatomical and biomechanical studies emphasizing the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in rotational stability, novel surgical methods including ALL reconstruction and anterolateral tenodesis have been introduced with the possibility of resolving residual instability after ACL reconstruction. However, there is still little consensus on many aspects of the ALL, including: several anatomical issues, appropriate indications for ALL surgery, and the optimal surgical method and graft choice for reconstruction surgery. Therefore, further studies are necessary to advance our knowledge of the ALL and its contribution to knee stability.

Study of the Nerve Endings and Mechanoreceptors of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee

PURPOSE

To describe the morphology and distribution of the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) nerve endings, aiming to understand the interaction between the proprioceptive system and knee mechanics.

METHODS

Twenty ALLs were obtained from fresh frozen cadavers. The ligaments were measured, weighed, and cut. Sections (10 μm) were prepared in hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides to analyze tissue integrity, and 50-μm sections were subjected to immunofluorescence with the protein gene product 9.5 as primary antibody and Alexa Fluor 488 as secondary antibody, followed by microscopic analysis.

RESULTS

The ALL was identified in 100% of the dissections, exhibiting a mean (± standard deviation) length of 4.0 ± 0.4 cm, a mean width of 5.5 ± 0.8 mm, and a mean weight of 0.9 ± 0.2 g. The histological sections in hematoxylin and eosin showed dense, well-organized collagen and the presence of vascular tissue. All the specimens analyzed contained type I (Ruffini-like) mechanoreceptors and free nerve endings (type IV), varying from parallel to intertwined fibers. Unclassified nerve endings with different irregular shapes were also found. The neural elements occupied 0.6% ± 0.3% of the ligament area, and most were observed near the origin of ALL insertions.

CONCLUSION

The ALL exhibits a peripheral nerve structure, primarily type I and IV mechanoreceptors. These findings suggest that the ALL is important for the proprioception and anterolateral stabilization of the knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is important to understand ALL innervation and infer how an injury could compromise the proprioceptive role of the lateral compartment, as the ligaments contribute dynamically to stability through proprioceptive control of muscle forces. The findings confirm that the ALL is highly innervated by mechanoreceptors and may have a proprioceptive role in conjunction with the lateral collateral ligament in the lateral region of the knee.

Elongation Patterns of the Anterior and Posterior Borders of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee

PURPOSE

To compare the elongation patterns of the anterior and posterior borders of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) at varying knee flexion angles with the knee in a neutral position without any external forces and with external forces applied, including anterior-posterior translation, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus angulation.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees were tested in a custom knee testing system. Elongation of the anterior and posterior borders of the ALL was measured using a MicroScribe 3DLX system at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° and after the application of internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation.

RESULTS

The anterior border showed a slight noncontinuous increase in percentage elongation (0.8% ± 2.2%) whereas the posterior border showed a continuous decrease in percentage elongation (-12.0% ± 2.8%) as knee flexion increased (P < .001). Apart from the elongation of the posterior border at 90° of knee flexion, internal rotation, varus angulation, and anterior translation resulted in a significant increase in the percentage elongation of the anterior and posterior borders at each flexion angle compared with external rotation, valgus angulation, and posterior translation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALL shows different elongation patterns between the anterior and posterior borders, with a continuous decrease in the percentage elongation of the posterior border as knee flexion increases.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study presents useful evidence to resolve the uncertainty regarding the change in length of the ALL at various degrees of knee flexion. This information may be helpful for deciding the optimal knee flexion angle during ALL graft fixation. The findings from this study suggest that graft fixation during ALL reconstructions should be performed at close to full extension of the knee.

Editorial Commentary: Extension of Knowledge-and the Knee! New Biomechanical Study Suggests the Clinical Practice of Anterolateral Ligament Fixation Near Extension

The knee anterolateral ligament (ALL) is one of the most hotly debated topics in sports medicine in the last decade. Once one aspect of discussion regarding the ALL reaches a consensus, attention immediately turns to the next one. This has already happened with the existence of the ALL itself, its anatomic features, the ability to visualize the ALL with magnetic resonance imaging, and many other topics. In the end, the most important aspect must be clinical outcomes, and existing studies are trying to find the optimum surgical technique to best restore knee stability and reduce failure rates. It appears that, when doing an anatomic ALL reconstruction, fixation must be performed in full extension. The literature regarding ALL reconstruction shows promising results, with a strong tendency to present better knee stability, improved functional scores, and lower failure rates.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterolateral Ligament in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in an Adolescent Population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in adolescent patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and characterize other potential intra- and extra-articular knee injuries that are associated with ALL injuries.

METHODS

Patients between 14 and 17 years of age with acute ACL injuries (trauma for <3 weeks before examination) were retrospectively evaluated with MRI over 24 months (January 2016-December 2017). Among this population, ALL was classified as not visible, normal, or injured. Injuries were separated into strains (partial injuries), complete injuries, or Segond fractures. Possible abnormalities of the menisci, collateral ligaments, popliteal tendon, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), iliotibial tract (ITT), and bone injuries were evaluated. Associations were calculated between ALL injuries and injuries of these other knee structures, as well as age and gender.

RESULTS

ALL was visible in 171 of the 184 MRI-evaluated knees (92.9%). ALL was considered normal in 68 (39.8%) and damaged in 103 (60.2%) patients. ALL injuries were considered partial in 56 (54.4%) and total in 44 (42.7%) cases. Only 3 (2.9%) cases were Segond fractures. ALL injuries were associated with ITT (P < .0001), lateral meniscus (P = .04), lateral collateral ligament (P = .01), popliteal tendon (P = .001), and medial collateral ligament (P = .009) injuries, in addition to bone contusions in the lateral compartment of the knee (P < .0001). There was no correlation between ALL injuries and medial meniscus (P = .054) or PCL (P = .16) injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI evaluation showed ALL injuries are present in 60.2% of acute ACL injuries in adolescent patients. These injuries are associated with the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, ITT, lateral meniscus injuries, and bone contusions, but they are not associated with medial meniscus or PCL injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The anatomy of the anterolateral structures of the knee - A histologic and macroscopic approach

BACKGROUND

The anatomy of the anterolateral structures of the knee is complex and still controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze this anatomy by histologic and macroscopic evaluation, with a particular emphasis on the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three cadaveric knee joints were dissected followed by a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis of the anterolateral knee structures. Histology and comparison of different anterolateral structures was performed in addition.

RESULTS

The ALL was identified in all of the dissected cadaveric knee specimens. It runs in an oblique course from its proximo-dorsal insertion at the distal femur into a ventro-distal direction to the anterolateral tibia. The femoral insertion site was found to be posterior and slightly proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle and the femoral attachment of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). The femoral insertion of the ALL overlapped the LCL in all dissected knees. The tibial insertion site was midway between Gerdy's tubercle (GT) and the tip of the fibular head (FH). In 15 of the dissected 23 knee joints, thin attachments to the lateral meniscus were observed. Histology confirmed differences in the composition of the anterolateral knee joint capsule, the ALL and the iliotibial band (ITB).

CONCLUSIONS

The ALL occurs as a regular separate anterolateral ligamentous structure. It is distinguishable from the ITB and the anterolateral joint capsule in both embalmed and non-embalmed specimens. Histology of the ALL indicates typical ligamentous tissue which clearly differs from the anterolateral knee joint capsule and the thicker ITB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, descriptive anatomic study.

Identification of Normal and Injured Anterolateral Ligaments of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

PURPOSE

To identify the normal and injured magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used to search for studies that reported the imaging outcomes of the appearance of the ALL. Two authors performed the searches in duplicate up to April 30, 2018, and interobserver agreement was calculated. The methodologic quality of included articles was assessed using an adaptation of the Arrivé methodologic quality scale for clinical studies of radiologic examinations.

RESULTS

From the original 270 records, a total of 24 studies (κ = 0.94) comprising 2,427 knees in 2,388 patients (mean age, 33.3 years; 66% male patients; 63% with anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] injury) were included. The ALL appeared in 51% to 100% of all assessed knees (71%-100% in ACL-injured knees and 64%-97% in uninjured knees) and was injured in 11% to 79% of ACL-injured knees. Reliability rates varied considerably (0.04-1.0 for intraobserver and 0.143-1.0 for interobserver agreement), and the entire portion of the ligament was often not seen. The tibial insertion was seen in 21% to 96% of cases, followed by the meniscal (range, 0%-100%) and femoral (range, 0%-90%) insertions. The mean methodologic quality score was 5.1 ± 1.8 out of a possible score of 9.

CONCLUSIONS

High variability was found in the identification of normal and injured ALL definition methods and the respective magnetic resonance imaging findings. Reliability rates varied considerably, and the entire portion of the ligament was often not seen.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Anterolateral ligament of the knee: a step-by-step dissection

Background

The number of studies and clinical interest in the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) has grown in recent years. A meticulous and accurate ALL dissection is vital in anatomic and biomechanical studies, and a standardized technique is not yet established. As such, the aim of this study was to describe a step-by-step ALL dissection technique that could help authors consistently identify the ALL.

Methods

Twenty knees from frozen adult cadavers, with no preference for sex or age, were included in the study. All the cadavers were dissected using the same technique to determine the incidence of the ALL.

Results

A transverse incision is performed in the iliotibial band (ITB), around 10 cm proximal to the topography of the lateral epicondyle of the femur. Next, the ITB undergoes anterograde blunt dissection until its insertion at Gerdy’s tubercle in the tibia. Maintaining biceps femoris insertion, a dissection is performed anteriorly to it, until the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) is found. Using the LCL, internal rotation and 30 to 60° flexion as references, the ALL can be located in the anterolateral topography of the knee, with its origin near the lateral epicondyle (proximal and posterior) and insertion between Gerdy’s tubercle and the fibula (4.0 mm to 7.0 mm below the tibial plateau), expanding to the lateral meniscus (between the body and anterior horn), exhibiting a mean length of 4.0 ± 0.4 cm and mean width of 5.5 ± 0.8 mm.

Conclusions

The present article describes an effective and reproducible ALL dissection technique that made it was possible to identify the ligament in 100% of the cases in the present study.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2517-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anatomy of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic literature review to search for studies on the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee, presenting the most accepted findings, as well as the evolution of anatomic information on this structure.

METHODS

We reviewed the PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalKey databases for anatomic studies on the ALL, involving cadaveric, histologic, and biochemical dissection and/or anatomic imaging. The primary data researched were the presence of the ligament; measures of length, width, and thickness; ligament path; insertions; number of bands; histologic assessment; and innervation.

RESULTS

We identified 53 studies. The ALL was found in 82.87% of adult dissections (more easily visualized in fresh cadavers), 74.07% of fetal dissections, and 84.80% of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. In 29 articles, the ALL was found in 100% of cases. There are 3 ALL insertion points: femoral, tibial, and meniscal. Histologic sections showed dense, well-organized collagen fibers, with an average of 121 fibroblasts/mm² in adults, in addition to the presence of vascular and nervous tissue. MRI was shown to be a good examination tool to visualize the ALL, primarily in the coronal plane and with T2-weighted images.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALL is a distinct structure in the anterolateral portion of the knee. It exhibits typical ligament characteristics and can be visualized on imaging examinations, especially MRI. It has a femoral attachment near the lateral epicondyle, with a trend in recent years showing it to be located posterior and proximal to it, following an anteroinferior trajectory, with an insertion into the lateral meniscus and proximal tibia at the midpoint between the fibular head and Gerdy tubercle. Among the studies, the length of the ALL varied from 30.41 to 59.0 mm, the width ranged between 4.0 and 7.0 mm, and the thickness ranged between 1.0 and 2.0 mm.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

During the past few years, much controversy has been raised about the correct anatomy of the ALL. The main clinical relevance of this study is not only to end the discussion about the ALL's existence but also to clarify and synthesize the main evidence on the ALL's anatomy, mainly the currently most accepted attachments according to the recent literature, to enable more precise development of biomechanical settings and surgical techniques.

Assessment of Anterolateral Complex Injuries by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

PURPOSE

To assess anterolateral complex (ALC) injuries in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Patients with acute ACL rupture who underwent ACL surgery between 2015 and 2017 and underwent MRI within 6 weeks of the initial trauma were included. Two radiologists assessed magnetic resonance images retrospectively for the status of the ALC, including the iliotibial band (ITB), Kaplan fibers, and anterolateral ligament (ALL), as follows: grade 0, normal; grade 1, periligamentous edema; grade 2, partial tear; and grade 3, complete tear. The findings were analyzed using the Friedman test and weighted κ values.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine MRI scans were reviewed. Of the 69 patients, 51% had associated injuries to the ITB (grade 1, n = 31; grade 2, n = 4), 33% had associated injuries to the Kaplan fibers (grade 1, n = 21; grade 2, n = 2), and 57% had associated injuries to the ALL (grade 1, n = 12; grade 2, n = 22; grade 3, n = 5). We found a significant difference in the frequency and grading between ITB, Kaplan fiber, and ALL injuries (P ≤ .032). Inter-reader agreement for assessing the ALC on MRI was almost perfect (κ ≥ 0.922).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of MRI analysis, ALL injuries were found with varying degrees of severity and intensity with noted injuries to associated surrounding fibers in patients with acute ACL rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

An Overview of Anatomy and Imaging of the Anterolateral Structures of the Knee

Despite several previous articles in the literature, never before have so many studies with regard to anterolateral knee structures been performed. The anterolateral knee complex consists briefly of the iliotibial band, with its proximal and distal attachments, the joint capsule, and the anterolateral ligament (ALL). The recently introduced ALL has several different descriptions, making it difficult to build a consensus with regard to its anatomy. An extensive description of these structures, particularly the iliotibial band and the ALL, with regard to anatomy and imaging, will be provided in this article.

Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction in patients with chronic ACL injury. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would exhibit less residual laxity and better clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Two groups of patients were evaluated and compared retrospectively. Both groups consisted only of patients with chronic (more than 12 months) ACL injuries. Patients in group 1 underwent anatomical intra-articular reconstruction of the ACL and patients in group 2 underwent anatomic intra-articular ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction. The presence of associated meniscal injury, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm functional outcome scores in the postoperative period, KT-1000 evaluation, the presence of residual pivot shift and graft rupture rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients who underwent reconstruction of chronic ACL injuries were evaluated. The median follow-up was 26 (24-29) months for group 1 and 25 (24-28) months for group 2. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, duration of injury until reconstruction, follow-up time or presence of associated meniscal injuries in the preoperative period. Regarding functional outcome scores, patients in group 2 presented better results on both the IKDC (p = 0.0013) and the Lysholm (p < 0.0001) evaluations. In addition, patients in group 2 had better KT-1000 evaluation (p = 0.048) and a lower pivot shift rate at physical examination, presenting only 9.1% positivity versus 35.3% in the isolated ACL reconstruction (p = 0.011). Regarding re-ruptures, group 1 presented 5 (7.3%) cases, and group 2 presented no cases.

CONCLUSION

The combined ACL and ALL reconstruction in patients with chronic ACL injury is an effective and safety solution and leads to good functional outcomes with no increase in complication rate. The clinical relevance of this finding is the possibility to indicate this type of procedure when patients present with more than 12 months after injury for surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: A Proposed Classification System

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is a potential stabilizer of the knee and cooperates with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). It originates on the lateral epicondyle of the femur, to which it is mainly posterior and proximal; insertion is posterior to Gerdy's tubercle. Its anatomical characteristics vary. Recent publications have focused on morphological variations concerning mainly the femoral and tibial attachments, and on morphometric measurements. Histological and cystochemical examinations have also been performed. Classical anatomical dissection was performed on 111 lower limbs (25 isolated and 86 paired) fixed in 10% formalin. The knee region was dissected using traditional techniques and the morphological features of the ALL were assessed: morphometric measurements and the types of ALL. The ALL was present in 70 individuals (37 woman and 33 men). In 30 cases, it was absent symmetrically, and in 11, it was present on just one side (P = 0.0011). The ALL was morphologically very variable. In type I (the most common form - 64.3%), a single band traveled parallel to the fibular collateral ligament (FCL); in type II the band crossed it. In type III, the origin was located on the lateral epicondyle of the femur and also on the lateral-posterior surface of the joint capsule, and the insertion was in the deep fascia of the leg: this type could be called a capsule. Type IV was characterized by a double ALL, type IIb by ligaments that bifurcated, and type V by the ALL starting directly from the FCL rather than the femoral epicondyle. The ALL is characterized by high morphological variability, both in its femoral and in its tibial attachments and in its course. Clin. Anat. 31:966-973, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Anatomic and Histological Study of the Anterolateral Aspect of the Knee: A SANTI Group Investigation

Background:

The structure and function of the anterolateral aspect of the knee have been significantly debated, with renewed interest in this topic since the description of the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

Purpose:

To define and describe the distinct structures of the lateral knee and to correlate the macroscopic and histologic anatomic features.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Twelve fresh-frozen human cadavers were used for anatomic analysis. In the left knee, a layer-by-layer dissection and macroscopic analysis were performed. In the right knee, an en bloc specimen was obtained encompassing an area from the Gerdy tubercle to the posterior fibular head and extending proximally from the anterior aspect to the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral epicondyle. The en bloc resection was then frozen, sliced at the level of the joint line, and reviewed by a musculoskeletal pathologist.

Results:

Macroscopically, the lateral knee has 4 main layers overlying the capsule of the knee: the aponeurotic layer, the superficial layer including the iliotibial band (ITB), the deep fascial layer, and the ALL. Histologically, 8 of 12 specimens demonstrated 4 consistent, distinct structures: the ITB, the ALL, the lateral collateral ligament, and the meniscus.

Conclusion:

The lateral knee has a complex orientation of layers and fibers. The ALL is a distinct structure from the ITB and is synonymous to the previously described capsulo-osseous layer of the ITB.

Clinical Relevance:

Increasingly, lateral extra-articular procedures are performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Understanding the anatomic features of the anterolateral aspect of the knee is necessary to understand the biomechanics and function of the structures present and allows surgeons to attempt to replicate those anatomic characteristics when performing extra-articular reconstruction.

Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: An Evaluation of Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees From the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International (SANTI) Study Group

PURPOSE

To determine the visualization rate of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in uninjured and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees using 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to characterize the spectrum of ALL injury observed in ACL-deficient knees, as well as determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a 3D MRI classification of ALL injury.

METHODS

A total of 100 knees (60 ACL deficient and 40 uninjured) underwent 3D MRI. The ALL was evaluated by 2 blinded orthopaedic surgeons. The ALL was classified as follows: type A, continuous, clearly defined low-signal band; type B, warping, thinning, or iso-signal changes; and type C, without clear continuity. The comparison between imaging performed early after ACL injury (<1 month) and delayed imaging (>1 month) was evaluated, as was intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

Complete visualization of the ALL was achieved in all uninjured knees. In the ACL-deficient group, 24 knees underwent early imaging, with 87.5% showing evidence of ALL injury (3 normal, or type A, knees [12.5%], 18 type B [75.0%], and 3 type C [12.5%]). The remaining 36 knees underwent delayed imaging, with 55.6% showing evidence of injury (16 type A [44.4%], 18 type B [50.0%], and 2 type C [5.6%]). The difference in the rate of injury between the 2 groups was significant (P = .03). Multivariate analysis showed that the delay from ACL injury to MRI was the only factor (negatively) associated with the rate of injury to the ALL. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability of the classification of ALL type were good (κ = 0.86 and κ = 0.93, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional MRI allows full visualization of the ALL in all normal knees. The rate of injury to the ALL in acutely ACL-injured knees identified on 3D MRI is higher than previous reports using standard MRI techniques. This rate is significantly higher than the rate of injury to the ALL identified on delayed imaging of ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic, case-control study.

The Anterolateral Complex and Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee

The anterolateral structures of the knee have recently garnered considerable interest regarding their role in rotatory knee instability related to anterior cruciate ligament tears. Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not always restore rotatory stability of the knee. In these patients, additional procedures, such as lateral reconstruction or tenodesis, may be indicated. The anatomy of the anterolateral structures of the knee has been well described. Histologic and anatomic studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the presence of a discrete ligament. The biomechanical role of the anterolateral capsule in restraining internal tibial rotation has been described as negligible. The existing body of research on the anterolateral knee structures provides insight into the composition of the anterolateral complex of the knee.

Anterolateral ligament abnormalities are associated with peripheral ligament and osseous injuries in acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

Few studies have used MRI to identify the ALL. As it was shown that it is not possible to precisely characterize this ligament in all examination, it is important to identify concomitant lesions that can help in diagnosing ALL abnormalities. It is important to characterise this injury due to its association with anterolateral knee instability. Thus, the present study was performed to determine the frequency of ALL injuries in patients with acute ACL rupture and to analyse its associated knee lesions.

METHODS

Patients with acute ACL injuries were evaluated by MRI. Among this population, the ALL was classified as non-visualised, injured or normal. The possible abnormalities of the meniscus, collateral ligaments, popliteus tendon, posterior cruciate ligament, Iliotibial band (ITB), anterolateral capsule and osseus injuries were evaluated. The association of an ALL injury with these other knee structures as well as sex and age was calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 228 knees evaluated, the ALL could not be entirely identified in 61 (26.7%). Of the remaining 167, 66 (39.5%) presented an ALL abnormality and only four (6.1%) were Segond fractures. ALL abnormalities were associated with lesions of the lateral collateral ligament, medial collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, ITB, anterolateral capsule and osseous contusions of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau. No correlation was found with medial meniscus, lateral meniscus and posterior cruciate ligament injuries. There was no association between ALL injuries and gender, and older patients were more likely to present an ALL injury.

CONCLUSION

ALL injuries are present in approximately 40% of ACL injuries, and a minority of these are Segond fractures. These injuries are associated with peripheral ligament injuries, anterolateral structures lesions and bone contusions, but there is no association with meniscal injuries. Surgeons must be aware of these associations to consider an ALL lesion even if it is not completely clear in imaging evaluation, especially if a high degree of anterolateral instability is present on physical examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

MRI is not reliable in diagnosing of concomitant anterolateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee

PURPOSE

There has been a renewed interest in the anterolateral structures of the knee, including description of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) as a distinct structure. Recognizing injury to the ALL is challenging, particularly given the subjective nature of physical examination. Consequently, focus has turned to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reach a preoperative diagnosis of this region. The aim of this study was to examine the ability of 3-Tesla (3T) MRI to identify the ALL in ACL-injured patients compared to a matched control group of ACL-intact patients. The hypothesis was that the ALL would be more difficult to identify in ACL-injured patients compared to ACL-intact patients.

METHODS

A prospective case control study was performed comparing 3T MRI scans of 63-patients with an ACL rupture with a control group of 64-patients without ACL injury. An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon evaluated the scans performed using standard knee protocols. The ALL was considered in three regions for analysis: femoral, meniscal, and tibial. The status of the ALL was determined as visualized or non-visualized, and the integrity was assessed as intact, attenuated, or focal discontinuity.

RESULTS

The detection rate of at least a portion of the ALL was 41/64 (64%) in the control group and 45/63 (72%) in the ACL-injured cohort, respectively. The entire length of the ALL could only be identified in 15/64 (23%) of the control group and 13/63 (21%) of the ACL-injured cases. In both groups, the visibility of the ALL was poorest at the femoral region and greatest at the tibial regions. The ALL, when visualized, was deemed to be intact in 55/63 (87%) of cases. Although the inter-observer reliability was excellent for detection of the ALL in the control group (κ = 0.86), this decreased to only moderate reliability in the ACL-injured group (κ = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that MRI alone should not be relied upon to make a diagnosis of ALL injury in the setting of concomitant ACL injury due to the inability to accurately visualize this structure consistently in its entirety. To make a diagnosis of ALL injury or anterolateral instability of the knee and clinical correlation remains essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.