Functional Outcomes of Achilles Tendon Minimally Invasive Repair Using 4- and 6-Strand Nonabsorbable Suture: A Cohort Comparison Study

Recent developments in Achilles tendon risk-analyzing rupture factors for enhanced injury prevention and clinical guidance: Current implications of regenerative medicine

Background

In recent years, many countries have actively implemented programs and strategies to promote physical education and sports. Despite these efforts, the increase in physical activity has been accompanied by a significant rise in muscle and tendon-ligament injuries, with Achilles tendon rupture being the most prevalent, accounting for 47 % of such injuries. This review aims to summarize all significant factors determining the predisposition of the Achilles tendon to rupture, to develop effective personalized prevention measures.

Objective

To identify and evaluate the risk factors contributing to Achilles tendon rupture and to develop strategies for personalized prevention.

Methods

This review utilized data from several databases, including Elsevier, Global Health, PubMed-NCBI, Embase, Medline, Scopus, ResearchGate, RSCI, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, eLibrary.ru, and CyberLeninka. Both non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors for Achilles tendon injuries and ruptures were analyzed.

Results

The analysis identified several non-modifiable risk factors, such as genetic predisposition, anatomical and functional features of the Achilles tendon, sex, and age. These factors should be considered when selecting sports activities and designing training programs. Modifiable risk factors included imbalanced nutrition, improper exercise regimens, and inadequate monitoring of Achilles tendon conditions in athletes. Early treatment of musculoskeletal injuries, Achilles tendon diseases, foot deformities, and metabolic disorders is crucial. Long-term drug use and its risk assessment were also highlighted as important considerations. Furthermore, recent clinical advancements in both conventional and surgical methods to treat Achilles tendon injuries were described. The efficacy of these therapies in enhancing functional outcomes in individuals with Achilles injuries was compared. Advancements in cell-based and scaffold-based therapies aimed at enhancing cell regeneration and repairing Achilles injuries were also discussed.

Discussion

The combination of several established factors significantly increases the risk of Achilles tendon rupture. Addressing these factors through personalized prevention strategies can effectively reduce the incidence of these injuries. Proper nutrition, regular monitoring, timely treatment, and the correction of metabolic disorders are essential components of a comprehensive prevention plan.

Conclusion

Early identification of Achilles tendon risk factors allows for the timely development of effective personalized prevention strategies. These measures can contribute significantly to public health preservation by reducing the incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures associated with physical activity and sports. Continued research and clinical advancements in treatment methods will further enhance the ability to prevent and manage Achilles tendon injuries.

The translational potential of this article

This study identifies key modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for Achilles tendon injuries, paving the way for personalized prevention strategies. Emphasizing nutrition, exercise, and early treatment of musculoskeletal issues, along with advancements in cell-based therapies, offers promising avenues for improving recovery and outcomes. These findings can guide clinical practices in prevention and rehabilitation, ultimately reducing Achilles injuries and enhancing public health.

The option of transosseous distal suture placement during minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair for high-risk patients can improve outcomes, however does not prevent re-rupture

PURPOSE

Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) close to the insertion, in high-level athletes, and in patients at high risk of re-rupture, may be better suited to operative repair. Minimally Invasive Repair (MIR) of the Achilles tendon has excellent outcome and low complication rates. Traditionally MIR has showed lower repair strength, failing due to suture pull-out from the distal tendon stump. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of ATR patients who received transosseous distal suture placement using a standard technique as a reference.

METHODS

Following ATR, patients were evaluated for pre-injury activity level, body weight, location of the tear and size of the distal Achilles tendon stump. Patients considered to be at high-risk of re-rupture: Tegner level ≥ 8, body weight ≥ 105Kg and distal ATR, received transosseous (TO) distal suture placement (n = 20) rather than the usual transtendinous (TT) technique (n = 55). Patient reported outcome measures and functional evaluation was performed at 12 months following repair.

RESULTS

At 12 months follow up both methods resulted in good median (IQR) Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score TO 83.8 (74-88.3) vs. TT 90 (79-94), low increased relative Achilles Tendon Resting Angle TO -3.5˚ (3.6) vs. TT -3.5˚ (3.3) and mean (SD) Single leg Heel-Rise Height Index TO 88.2% (9.9) vs. TT 85.6% (9.9) (n.s.). There were 4 re-ruptures in the high-risk group and 2 in the group receiving TT distal suture placement. All but one of these were traumatic in nature. The mode of failure following TO distal suture placement was proximal suture pull out.

CONCLUSIONS

To distal suture placement during minimally-invasive Achilles tendon repair for higher-risk patients can lead to results equivalent to those in lower-risk patients treated with a standard TT MIR technique, except for the re-rupture rate which remained higher. There may be factors that have greater influence on outcome other than suture placement following ATR.

Musculotendinous ruptures of the achilles tendon had greater heel-rise height index compared with mid-substance rupture with non-operative management: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) may occur at varying locations with ruptures at the mid-substance (MS) of the tendon most common, followed tears at the musculotendinous (MT) junction. There is scant literature about the outcome of MT ATR. This study compared the outcome of patients with a MT ATR with patients following a MS ATR.

METHODS

The diagnostic features and clinical outcome of 37 patients with a MT ATR were compared with a cohort of 19 patients with a MS ATR. Patients in both groups were managed non-operatively and received the same rehabilitation protocol with weight-bearing rehabilitation in protective functional brace.

RESULTS

From February 2009 to August 2023, 556 patients presented with an ATR. Of these, 37 (6.7 ​%) patients were diagnosed with a MT tear. At final follow-up, at 12 months following injury, the MT group reported an Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) of mean (standard deviation (SD)) of 83.6 (3.5) (95 ​% confidence interval (CI) 81.8, 85.4) and median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) ATRS of 86 points (78-95.5) and the MS group mean (SD) of 80.3 (8.5) (95%CI) 76.1, 80.5) and median (IQR) of 87 points (59-95) (p ​= ​0.673). Functional evaluation, however, revealed statistically significant differences in mean (SD) heel-rise height index MT group 79 ​% (25) (95%CI 65.9, 92.1) and MS group 59 ​% (13) (95%CI 51.9, 67.1) (p ​= ​0.019). In the MT rupture group, there were considerably less complications than the MS rupture group.

CONCLUSIONS

When managed non-operatively, with only a 6 weeks period of brace protection, patients have little limitation although have some residual reduction of single heel-rise at the one-year following MT ATR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Are Prospective Criteria or Objective Clinical Measures Utilized in Return to Play (RTP) Decision Making After Ankle Surgery? A Scoping Review

Background

Manuscripts discussing return to play (RTP) following ankle surgery are common. However, the definition for RTP and the method by which it is determined remains unclear. The purpose of this scoping review was to clarify how RTP is defined following ankle surgery in physically active patients, to identify key factors informing RTP decision making (such as objective clinical measures), and make recommendations for future research.

Methods

A scoping literature review was performed in April 2021 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Nursing and Allied Health databases. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria: original research following ankle surgery reporting at least 1 objective clinical test and documentation of RTP. Data were extracted for study methods and outcomes (RTP definition, RTP outcomes, and objective clinical tests).

Results

The scoping review found studies on 5 ankle pathologies: Achilles tendon rupture, chronic lateral ankle instability, anterior ankle impingement, peroneal tendon dislocation, and ankle fracture. RTP criteria were not provided in the majority of studies (18/30 studies). In the studies that provided them, the RTP criteria were primarily based on time postsurgery (8/12) rather than validated criteria. Objective clinical outcome measures and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were documented for each surgery when available. Both clinical outcomes and PROMs were typically measured >1 year postsurgery.

Conclusion

In physically active patients who have had ankle surgery, RTP remains largely undefined and is not consistently based on prospective objective criteria nor PROMS. We recommend standardization of RTP terminology, adoption of prospective criteria for both clinical measures and PROMs to guide RTP decision making, and enhanced reporting of patient data at the time of RTP to develop normative values and determine when the decision to RTP is not safe.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, scoping review.

Endoscopic-assisted locking block modified Krackow technique combined with a V-Y flap for chronic Achilles tendon rupture

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the endoscopic-assisted locking block modified Krackow technique with a V-Y flap. The hypothesis was that the minimally invasive technique can reduce wound complications and facilitate early recovery.

METHODS

In total, 29 men with chronic Achilles tendon rupture who underwent either minimally invasive technique (n = 13) or open repair (n = 16) at our department between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The rate of complications, time to return to moderate-intensity exercise, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score, heel-rise repetitions in 1 min, heel-rise height, and bilateral calf circumference at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively were recorded.

RESULTS

All incisions healed primarily in the minimally invasive technique group; however, three patients in the open repair group experienced wound complications. The time to return to moderate-intensity exercise, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score, heel-rise repetition ratio, and heel-rise height ratio at 6 months postoperatively in the minimally invasive technique group were significantly better than those in the open repair group. However, it was not significantly different between both groups at 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy allowed scar tissue and adhesions to be removed, allowing the tendon ends to be mobilized out of the small proximal and distal incisions. Minimally invasive technique may result in a lower wound complication incidence and provide better early functional recovery and return to moderate-intensity exercise time than the conventional open procedure in treating chronic Achilles tendon ruptures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Medical Ethical Committee, LW2021026.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

No effects of early functional mobilization on gait patterns after acute Achilles tendon rupture repair

This study aimed to compare recovery of gait patterns in patients treated with early functional mobilization (EFM) or standard treatment (ST) after Achilles tendon rupture repair. Second, this study aimed to explore associations between gait patterns and tendon elongation and calf muscle atrophy, respectively. Forty-seven patients (12 females), mean age 38.7 (7.3) years, were included. Patients were postoperatively randomized to EFM (n = 29), including immediate weightbearing and ankle motion for 6 weeks, or ST (n = 18), with 2 weeks of unloading in a plaster cast followed by 4 weeks of weightbearing in an orthosis. Three-dimensional gait analyses were performed at 8 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate ankle and knee kinematics and kinetics. Ultrasound imaging was performed to assess tendon length and calf muscle atrophy. At 8 weeks, there were no significant group differences in ankle and knee kinematics and kinetics, while side-to-side differences between injured and uninjured side were present within both groups. At 6 months, the ST group exhibited higher generating ankle power and greater peak moments in ankle and knee compared to the EFM group. In both groups, peak ankle dorsiflexion angle was greater on the injured side compared to the uninjured side. No correlations were found between ankle joint gait deviations and degree of tendon elongation or muscle atrophy. Clinical significance: The accelerated rehabilitation regimen with EFM did not result in a more symmetrical gait pattern. The gait pattern deviations in the ankle joint were not related to the degree of muscle atrophy or tendon elongation.

Persistent Deficits after an Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Narrative Review

Persistent muscle weakness, tendon elongation, and incomplete return to preinjury level are frequent sequelae after acute Achilles tendon rupture, and evidence-based knowledge of how to best rehabilitate the injury is largely absent in the literature. The objective of this review is to illuminate and discuss to what extent an Achilles tendon rupture affects muscle, tendon, and function when assessed with the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), muscle strength, muscle cross-sectional area, tendon length, and the heel-rise test. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) data in the literature suggest that the recovery takes longer than 6 months (ATRS, 70 out of 100), that one-year postinjury, the ATRS only reaches 82, and that this does not appear to noticeably improve thereafter. Loss of muscle mass, strength, and function can in some cases be permanent. Over the first 6 months postinjury, the tendon undergoes elongation, which appears to be negatively correlated to heel-rise function. More recently, there has been some interest in how muscle length and excursion is related to the reduced function. The available literature indicates that further research is highly warranted and that efforts to restore normal tendon length may improve the likelihood of returning to preinjury level after an Achilles tendon rupture.

Biomechanical comparisons of three minimally invasive Achilles tendon percutaneous repair suture techniques

BACKGROUND

While no gold standard exists for the management of Achilles tendon ruptures, surgical repair is common in healthy and active patients. Minimally invasive repair methods have become increasingly popular, while biomechanical equivalency hasn't been proven yet.

METHODS

A mid-substance Achilles tendon rupture was created 6 cm proximal to the calcaneal insertion in 27 fresh-frozen cadaveric ankles. Specimens were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 repair techniques: Huttunen et al. (2014) (1) PARS Achilles Jig System, Nyyssönen et al. (2008) (2) Achilles Midsubstance SpeedBridge™, Schipper and Cohen (2017) (3) Dresdner Instrument and subsequently subjected to cyclic loading with 250 cycles each at 1 Hz with 4 different loading ranges (20-100 N, 20-200 N, 20-300 N, and 20-400 N).

FINDINGS

After 250 cycles no significant differences in elongation were observed between PARS and Dresdner Instrument(p = 1.0). Furthermore, SpeedBridge™ repairs elongated less than either Dresdner Instrument (p = 0.0006) or PARS (p = 0.102). Main elongation (85%) occurred within the first 10 cycles with a comparable elongation in between 10 and 100 and 100-250 cycles. While all repairs withstood the first 250 cycles of cyclic loading from 20 to 100 N, only the PARS (468 ± 175) and Midsubstance SpeedBridge™ (538 ± 208) survived more cycles. Within all 3 groups suture cut out was seen to be the most common failure mechanism.

INTERPRETATION

Within all groups early repair elongation was seen. While this was least obvious within the SpeedBridge™ technique, ultimate strengths of repairs (cycles to failure) were comparable across PARS and SpeedBridge™ with a decline in the Dresdner Instrument group.

The release of adhesions improves outcome following minimally invasive repair of Achilles tendon rupture

PURPOSE

Operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture may lead to complications, which influence outcome adversely. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, impact and response to treatment of post-operative adhesions.

METHODS

From February 2009 to 2021, 248 patients operated on with percutaneous or minimally invasive surgical repair have been prospectively evaluated using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Heel-Rise Height Index (HRHI), following acute Achilles tendon rupture.

RESULTS

Fourteen (5.6%) patients were identified as having adhesions. Four patients reported superficial adhesions and ten patients reported a deeper tightness of the tendon. At a mean (SD) of 10.5 (2.3) months following repair, the overall ATRS was at a median (IQR) 65 (44.5-78) points and (HRHI) was mean (SD) 81.5 (13.5)%. Of those deemed to have deep adhesions the antero-posterior diameter of the tendon was at mean (SD) 15.6 (4.6) mm. Open release of superficial adhesions resulted in improved ATRS in all patients. Endoscopic debridement anterior to the Achilles tendon led to alleviation of symptoms of tightness and discomfort from deep adhesions and improved outcome in terms of the ATRS score. At a mean (SD) of 15.9 (3.3)-month follow-up from initial rupture and repair, the patients reported at median (IQR) ATRS scores of 85 (64.8-92.8) points, Tegner level 5 (3-9) and mean (SD) HRHI 86.2 (9.5)%. Patients significantly improved both ATRS and HRHI following release at median (IQR) of 16.5 (- 1.8-29.3) points (p = 0.041) and mean (SD) 5.6 (8.3)% (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of patient-reported adhesions following minimally invasive repair of Achilles tendon rupture was estimated to be 5.6%. The occurrence of superficial adhesions was associated with a lower outcome scores as well as symptoms of anterior tendon tightness and stiffness were associated with a lower score in most patients. Surgical release of adhesions led to a significant improvement in outcome.

Achilles tendon resting angle is able to detect deficits after an Achilles tendon rupture, but it is not a surrogate for direct measurements of tendon elongation, function or symptoms

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate how the Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), an indirect measurement of tendon elongation, correlates with ultrasonography (US) measurements of the Achilles tendon length 6 and 12 months after an acute ATR and relates to other clinical outcome measurements such as heel-rise height, jumping ability and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).

METHODS

Patients were included following acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). Achilles tendon length, ATRA, heel-rise height (HRH), drop countermovement jump (Drop CMJ) and PROMs (Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and physical activity scale (PAS)) were evaluated 6 and 12 months after injury. Achilles tendon length was evaluated using US, while the ATRA was measured with a goniometer.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (13 women, 47 men), mean (SD) age 43 (9) years, with an acute ATR undergoing either surgical (35%) or non-surgical (65%) treatment were evaluated. A negative correlation (r = - 0.356, p = 0.010) between relative ATRA and tendon elongation was seen at 12 months after ATR. There were also significant positive correlations at 6 and 12 months between relative ATRA and HRH (r = 0.330, p = 0.011 and r = 0.379, p = 0.004). There were no correlations between ATRA and ATRS or ATRA and Drop CMJ, at either 6 or 12 months after the injury.

CONCLUSION

In combination with other clinical evaluations such as HRH and US, ATRA could be a clinical tool for indirect measurements of tendon elongation. However, ATRA cannot be recommended as a direct surrogate for US for determining Achilles tendon length.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Do the heel-rise test and isometric strength improve after Achilles tendon repair using Dresden technique?

BACKGROUND

Achilles' tendon ruptures result in impaired plantar flexion strength and endurance. It is interesting to know the plantar flexion strength, the number of heel-rise repetitions, and the maximal calf circumference following Achilles' tendon ruptures repair.

METHODS

Both the injured and non-injured legs of thirty male patients with Achilles' tendon ruptures treated with the percutaneous Dresden technique were compared with the ankle function of 30 healthy participants. Rehabilitation involved partial weight-bearing for three weeks and then increased to full weight-bearing and ankle exercises.

RESULTS

The injured legs had weaker plantar flexion strength (1.64 ± 0.17 Nm/kg) compared with the non-injured legs (1.91 ± 0.24 Nm/kg; p = 0.002) and the healthy participants' legs (1.93 ± 0.32 Nm/kg; p < 0.001). The non-injured leg had greater ability in doing heel-rise repetitions (39.4 ± 6.1 rep.) compared with the injured legs (37.2 ± 5.7 rep.; p < 0.023) and the healthy participants' legs (31.0 ± 13.0 rep.; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The injured leg had not recovered full isometric strength but had improved heel-rise repetition.

Rehabilitation After Surgical Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Functional Outcome With a Minimum Follow-Up of 6 Months

The best treatment and rehabilitation of Achilles tendon ruptures remains controversial. Current literature focuses mainly on objective outcomes despite possible incongruity with patient-reported functional outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to identify the course of patient-reported symptoms, function and quality of life during the early rehabilitation period. In this prospective cohort study, 33 patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive tendon repair were included in this study. They were followed up at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks after surgery with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire. At 6 weeks, patient-reported outcomes were poor regarding quality of life and sports. They however were quite high in the domains activities of daily living, symptoms and pain. All scores improved over the course of 6 months (symptoms (p = .03), activities of daily living (p = .001), sports (p = .002) and quality of life (p = .001). Pain did not improve significantly (p = .12), but patients had good pain scores from the start. There were no significant differences between patients with or without physical therapy. There were 3 minor complications and no re-ruptures in this cohort. In conclusion, patient-reported outcomes improve significantly during the first 6 months after surgery, except for pain. Scores for sports and quality of life remain suboptimal.

Achilles Tendon Rupture: Mechanisms of Injury, Principles of Rehabilitation and Return to Play

The Achilles tendon is the thickest, strongest and largest tendon in the human body, but despite its size and tensile strength, it frequently gets injured. Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) mainly occur during sports activities, and their incidence has increased over the last few decades. Achilles tendon tears necessitate a prolonged recovery time, sometimes leaving long-term functional limitations. Treatment options include conservative treatment and surgical repair. There is no consensus on which is the best treatment for ATRs, and their management is still controversial. Limited scientific evidence is available for optimized rehabilitation regimen and on the course of recovery after ATRs. Furthermore, there are no universally accepted outcomes regarding the return to play (RTP) process. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review is to give an insight into the mechanism of injuries of an ATR, related principles of rehabilitation, and RTP.

Achilles tendon elongation after acute rupture: is it a problem? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Rupture of the Achilles tendon (AT) is a common injury. Strength deficits may persist over the long term, possibly owing to elongation of the tendon or inferior mechanical properties. This study aimed to provide a systematic review of the literature on the prevalence and consequences of tendon elongation in patients after acute AT rupture treatment. It was hypothesized that an elongated tendon would be associated with a worse clinical outcome.

METHODS

The databases for MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched. Clinical studies related to AT rupture reporting tendon elongation and clinical or functional outcomes, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were eligible for inclusion. Only studies testing for statistical correlations (SCs) between AT elongation and other outcomes were eligible, with the exception of biomechanical studies in which statistically significant AT elongation was found to be a generalized finding in the study group. For these studies to be eligible, the study group had to be compared with a healthy control group, or the injured limb compared with the uninjured limb, regarding biomechanical parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight papers were selected for inclusion. Mean AT elongation measured with imaging techniques ranged from 0.15 to 3.1 cm (n = 17). Ten studies investigated SCs with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), in which two found SCs with tendon elongation. Five studies reported strength and power evaluations and their correlation with AT elongation, with two having found SCs between decreased strength and tendon elongation. In ten studies reporting data on biomechanical tests, nine found influence of tendon elongation. In this group, four out of five studies found SCs with biomechanical parameters.

CONCLUSION

Fair evidence of the influence of tendon elongation in biomechanical parameters was found. In a general population, evidence of a detrimental effect of tendon elongation on PROMs or functional strength at follow-up was not found in this review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Changes in Tendon Elongation and Muscle Atrophy Over Time After Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effects of Early Functional Mobilization

BACKGROUND

Early functional mobilization (EFM) may improve patient outcome after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). However, whether EFM affects patient outcome via changes in tendon elongation, thickening, or calf muscle atrophy is unknown.

PURPOSE

To analyze differences in tendon and muscle morphology recovery over time between groups treated with EFM or standard treatment after ATR repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 86 patients (20 women) with ATR repair who had a mean (SD) age of 39.3 (8.2) years and were part of a larger prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were postoperatively randomized to immediate postoperative weightbearing and ankle motion (EFM group) or to immobilization in a below-knee plaster cast for 2 weeks (control group). Patient-reported and functional outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months with the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score and the heel-rise test for endurance. At 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively, B-mode ultrasound imaging was performed to assess the length and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the Achilles tendon, the gastrocnemius CSA, as well as the thickness of soleus.

RESULTS

The Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score for the EFM and control groups were 65.8 (18.7) and 56.8 (20.1; P = .045), respectively, at 6 months and 79.6 (15.8) and 78.9 (17.2; P = .87), respectively, at 12 months. At 2 weeks, tendon elongation was significantly more pronounced in the EFM group as compared with the control group (mean side-to-side difference, 1.88 cm vs 0.71 cm; P = .005). Subsequently, tendon elongation increased in the control group while it decreased in the EFM group so that at 6 and 12 months no significant differences between groups were found. Mean Achilles tendon elongation at 1 year was 1.73 (1.07) cm for the EFM group (n = 55) and 1.67 (0.92) cm for the control group (n = 27), with a mean difference of 0.06 cm (95% CI, 0.54 to -0.42; P = .80). Achilles tendon CSA and calf muscle atrophy displayed no significant differences between the groups; however, significant changes were demonstrated over time (P ≤ .001) in both groups.

CONCLUSION

EFM results in more Achilles tendon elongation at early healing, but this difference subsides over time. EFM does not seem to affect patient outcome via changes in tendon elongation, thickening, or calf muscle atrophy.

REGISTRATION

NCT02318472 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

No difference in strength and clinical outcome between early and late repair after Achilles tendon rupture

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to determine the patient-reported and functional outcome of patients with delayed presentation, who had received no treatment until 14 days following injury of Achilles tendon rupture repaired with minimally invasive surgery and were compared with a group of sex- and age-matched patients presenting acutely. Based on the outcomes following delayed presentation reported in the literature, it was hypothesized that outcomes would be inferior for self-reported outcome, tendon elongation, heel-rise performance, ability to return to play, and complication rates than for acutely managed patients.

METHODS

Repair was performed through an incision large enough to permit mobilisation of the tendon ends, core suture repair consisting of a modified Bunnell suture proximally and a Kessler suture distally and circumferential running suture augmentation.

RESULTS

Nine patients presented 21.8 (14.9) days (range 14-42 days) after rupture. The rate of delayed presentation was estimated to be 1 in 10. At 12 months following repair, patients with delayed treatment had median (range) ATRS score of 90 (69-99) compared with 94 (75-100) in patients treated acutely presenting 0.66 (1.7) (0-5) days. There were no significant differences between groups: ATRA [mean (SD) delayed: - 6.9° (5.5), acute: - 6° (4.7)], heel-rise height index [delayed: 79% (20), acute: 74% (14)], or heel-rise repetition index [delayed: 77% (20), acute: 71% (20)]. In the delayed presentation group, two patients had wound infection and one iatrogenic sural nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting more than 2 weeks after Achilles tendon rupture may be successfully treated with minimally invasive repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Delayed (14-30 Days) Percutaneous Repair of Achilles Tendon Ruptures Offers Equally Good Results As Compared With Acute Repair

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures has been performed for several years, resulting in reduced morbidity as compared with open repair.

HYPOTHESIS

A minimally invasive technique can be used to manage Achilles tendon ruptures in patients presenting between 14 and 30 days from injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 21 consecutive patients who presented between 14 and 30 days after the index injury, and we compared them with 21 patients who were matched according to sex, age (±2 years), and level of activity, who presented within 14 days of the index injury. All patients underwent the same minimally invasive procedure under local anesthesia: a core suture repair consisting of a modified Bunnell suture in the proximal stump and a modified Kessler suture in the distal stump.

RESULTS

At 12 months after minimally invasive repair, patients with delayed treatment had a median Achilles tendon rupture score of 91 (SD, 2.4; range, 87-96) as compared with 91 (SD, 2.2; range, 86-96) in patients treated acutely, who presented at a median 2.4 days (range 1-6 days) from the injury. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean (SD) Achilles tendon resting angle: delayed repair group, -3.9° (2.0); acute repair group, -3.7° (1.9) (P = .69). No patient in either group developed a wound infection. One patient in the acute group experienced an iatrogenic sural nerve injury.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Achilles tendon rupture treated by percutaneous repair 14 to 30 days after injury achieved similar results at 1 year as patient treated <14 after injury.

Age and Tightness of Repair Are Predictors of Heel-Rise Height After Achilles Tendon Rupture

Background:

Achilles tendon rupture leads to weakness of ankle plantarflexion. Treatment of Achilles tendon rupture should aim to restore function while minimizing weakness and complications of management.

Purpose:

To determine the influence of factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], weight, time from injury to operative repair, and tightness of repair) in the initial surgical management of patients after an acute Achilles tendon rupture on 12-month functional outcome assessment after percutaneous and minimally invasive repair.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

From May 2012 to January 2018, patients sustaining an Achilles tendon rupture receiving operative repair were prospectively evaluated. Tightness of repair was quantified using the intraoperative Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA). Heel-rise height index (HRHI) was used as the primary 12-month outcome variable. Secondary outcome measures included Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and Tegner score. Stepwise multiple regression was used to create a model to predict 12-month HRHI.

Results:

A total of 122 patients met the inclusion criteria for data analysis (mean ± SD age, 44.1 ± 10.8 years; 78% male; mean ± SD BMI, 28.1 ± 4.3 kg/m²). The elapsed time to surgery was 6.5 ± 4.0 days. At 12-month follow-up, patients had an HRHI of 82% ± 16% and performed 82% ± 17% of repetitions compared with the noninjured side. Participants had a mean ATRS of 87 ± 15 and a median Tegner score of 5 (range, 1-9), with a reduction in Tegner score of 2 from preinjury levels. The relative ATRA at 12 months was –4.8° ± 3.9°. Multiple regression identified younger age (B = ±0.006; P < .001) and greater intraoperative ATRA (B = 0.005; P = .053) as predictors of more symmetrical 12-month HRHI (R² = 0.19; P < .001; n = 120).

Conclusion:

Age was found to be the strongest predictor of outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. The most important modifiable risk factor was the tightness of repair. It is recommended that repair be performed as tight as possible to optimize heel-rise height 1 year after Achilles tendon rupture and possibly to reduce tendon elongation.

Achilles tendon cross-sectional area at 12 weeks post-rupture relates to 1-year heel-rise height

PURPOSE

Achilles tendon rupture leads to long-term plantar flexor deficits, but some patients recover functional performance better than others. Early indicators of tendon healing could be helpful in establishing patient prognosis and making individualized decisions regarding rehabilitation progression. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between early tendon morphology and mechanical properties to long-term heel-rise and jumping function in individuals after Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

Individuals after Achilles tendon rupture were assessed at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-injury. Tendon cross-sectional area, length, and mechanical properties were measured using ultrasound. Heel-rise and jump tests were performed at 24 and 52 weeks. Correlation and regression analysis were used to identify relationships between tendon structural variables in the first 12 weeks to functional outcomes at 52 weeks, and determine whether the addition of tendon structural characteristics at 24 weeks strengthened relationships between functional performance at 24 and 52 weeks. Functional outcomes of individuals with < 3 cm of elongation were compared to those with > 3 cm of elongation using a Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Twenty-two participants [mean (SD) age = 40 (11) years, 17 male] were included. Tendon cross-sectional area at 12 weeks was the strongest predictor of heel-rise height (R² = 0.280, p = 0.014) and work symmetry (R² = 0.316, p = 0.008) at 52 weeks. Jumping performance at 52 weeks was not significantly related to any of the tendon structural measures in the first 12 weeks. Performance of all functional tasks at 24 weeks was positively related to performance on the same task at 52 weeks (r = 0.456-0.708, p < 0.05). The addition of tendon cross-sectional area improved the model for height LSI (R² = 0.519, p = 0.001). Tendon elongation > 3 cm significantly reduced jumping symmetry (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tendon cross-sectional area and excessive elongation related to plantar flexor performance on functional testing after Achilles tendon rupture. Once an individual is able to perform function-based testing, tendon structural measures may inform long-term prognosis. Ultrasound-based measures of tendon structure early in recovery seem to relate to later performance on functional testing. Clinically, assessing tendon structure has the potential to be used as a biomarker of tendon healing early in recovery and better predict patients at risk of negative functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Defining Components of Early Functional Rehabilitation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Early functional rehabilitation is frequently discussed in treating Achilles tendon rupture. A consistent definition of what constitutes early functional rehabilitation has not been established across the literature, despite studies supporting its efficacy. A standardized definition would be helpful to pool data across studies, allow for between-study comparisons, and ultimately work toward developing clinical guidelines.

PURPOSE

To define early functional rehabilitation (including when it is initiated and what it entails) when used to treat Achilles tendon rupture and to identify outcome measures for evaluating the effect of treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies consisted of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series (≥10 participants) including weightbearing or exercise-based interventions within 8 weeks after Achilles tendon rupture.

RESULTS

A total of 174 studies published between 1979 and 2018 were included. Studies were rated a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 17 (15-20) on the Downs & Black checklist and included 9098 participants. Early functional rehabilitation incorporated weightbearing (95%), range of motion (73%), and isometric/strengthening exercises (50%). Weightbearing was initiated within the first week, whereas exercise (eg, ankle range of motion, strengthening, whole-body conditioning) was initiated in the second week. Initiation of exercises varied based on whether treatment was nonsurgical (mean, 3.0 weeks; IQR, 2.0-4.0 weeks) or simple (mean, 2.0 weeks; IQR, 0.0-2.3 weeks) or augmented surgical repair (mean, 0.5 weeks; IQR, 0.0-2.8 weeks) (P = .017). Functional outcomes including ankle range of motion (n = 84) and strength (n = 76) were reported in 130 studies. Other outcome domains included patient-reported outcomes (n = 89), survey-based functional outcomes (n = 50), and tendon properties (n = 53).

CONCLUSION

Early functional rehabilitation includes weightbearing and a variety of exercise-based interventions initiated within the first 2 weeks after acute Achilles tendon rupture/repair. Because early functional rehabilitation has lacked a standardized definition, interventions and outcome measures are highly variable, and pooling data across studies should be done with attention paid to what was included in the intervention and how treatment was assessed.

Strength Measurement After Achilles Tendon Repair

The goal of treatment after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is to restore appropriate tension to the tendon, so that normal baseline strength and functional soft-tissue length can be achieved. The assessment of plantarflexion strength has shown widespread variability. The purpose of this study is to document variations in strength assessment after the treatment of ATR in the literature. A comprehensive literature review was performed. In total, 2758 articles were found on Achilles tendon rupture and Achilles tendon strength measurement. The full text of articles including strength as a functional outcome measurement in the abstract were assessed. All objective strength measurements performed were reviewed and recorded for comparison. One-hundred articles were included in our study. In 78 articles, a dynamometer was used to measure strength, whereas in 22 articles, an endurance test (n=14) or formal gait assessment (n=8) was applied. When a dynamometer was used, there was wide variability in the various methods used including the incorporation of both isokinetic (n = 65) and isometric (n = 29) exercises utilizing varying degrees of knee flexion and patient testing position. Furthermore, the number of measurements at certain angular velocities varied. This study illustrates that no general consensus exists regarding an optimal method for measuring strength after ATR. The variability creates difficulty and challenges medical professionals' ability to formulate consistent conclusions when determining functional performance outcomes. A more uniform way of measuring strength after ATR may allow for better comparisons between studies in the literature, potentially leading to a better understanding of strength. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II.

The recovery after Achilles tendon rupture: a protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a common sports injury, with a rising incidence and significant impairments. Due to the lack of treatment guidelines, there is no consensus about diagnostic methods, primary treatment (non-surgical or surgical) and rehabilitation. It is hypothesized that this lack of consensus and guidelines leads to sub-optimal recovery and higher societal costs. The primary aim of this study is to give a broad insight into the recovery after ATR. Secondarily this study aims to explore factors contributing to recovery and gain insight into the cost-effectiveness of ATR management.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study will include all adult (≥ 18 years) patients with an ATR treated at the three main hospitals in the Northern Netherlands: University Medical Center Groningen, Martini Hospital Groningen and Medical Center Leeuwarden. All subjects will be invited for three visits at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injury. The following data will be collected: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), physical tests, imaging and economic questionnaires. At 3 months post-injury personal, injury, and treatment data will be collected through a baseline questionnaire and assessment of the medical file. The PROMs concern the Dutch version of the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score, EQ-5D-5 L, Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire, Injury Psychological Readiness Return to Sport Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Expectations, Motivation and Satisfaction questionnaire and a ranking of reasons for not returning to sport. The administered physical tests are the heel-rise test, standing dorsiflexion range of motion, resting tendon length and single leg hop for distance. Ultrasound Tissue Characterization will be used for imaging. Finally, economic data will be collected using the Productivity Cost Questionnaire and Medical Consumption Questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

This prospective cohort study will contribute to optimal decision making in the primary treatment and rehabilitation of ATRs by providing insight into (1) ATR recovery (2) novel imaging for monitoring recovery (3) (barriers to) return to sport and (4) cost-effectiveness of management. The analysis of these data strives to give a broad insight into the recovery after ATR as well as provide data on novel imaging and costs, contributing to individualized ATR management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trialregister.nl. NTR6484 . 20/06/2017. 20/07/2017.

Achilles Tendon Resting Angle Relates to Tendon Length and Function

BACKGROUND

Following Achilles tendon rupture, tendon elongation leads to long term deficits in calf function. A surrogate measure of Achilles tendon length, Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), has been described but has not been validated against length measured using ultrasound. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to validate the ATRA against ultrasound. Secondarily, this study aimed to identify the relationship of other factors (tendon mechanical properties, heel-rise test performance) to the ATRA.

METHODS

Individuals following unilateral Achilles tendon rupture were included. ATRA was measured in knee flexed and extended positions. Tendon elongation was measured using extended field of view ultrasound imaging. Continuous shear wave elastography quantified tendon mechanical properties. The relationship between variables was tested using Spearman's ρ. Subgroup analysis was used to compare subjects with less then or greater than 1 year following rupture. A total of 42 participants (with a mean of 18.2 months following rupture [SD = 35.9]) were included.

RESULTS

Tendon elongation related with relative ATRA with knee flexed (ρ = .491, P = .001) and knee extended (ρ = 0.501, P = .001) positions. In individuals greater than 1 year following rupture, relative ATRA with the knee flexed related to shear modulus (ρ = .800, P = .01) and total work on the heel-rise test (ρ = -.782, P = .008) relative to the uninjured side.

CONCLUSION

Relative ATRA in both knee flexed and knee extended positions has a moderate relationship to tendon elongation within the first year following rupture. After 1 year, the relative ATRA with knee flexed may be a better indicator of tendon elongation and also related to tendon mechanical properties and heel-rise test performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Tendon end separation with loading in an Achilles tendon repair model: comparison of non-absorbable vs. absorbable sutures

Background

Rupture of the Achilles tendon often leads to long-term morbidity, particularly calf weakness associated with tendon elongation. Operative repair of Achilles tendon ruptures leads to reduced tendon elongation. Tendon lengthening is a key problem in the restoration of function following Achilles tendon rupture. A study was performed to determine differences in initial separation, strength and failure characteristics of differing sutures and numbers of core strands in a percutaneous Achilles tendon repair model in response to initial loading.

Methods

Nineteen bovine Achilles tendons were repaired using a percutaneous/minimally invasive technique with a combination of a modified Bunnell suture proximally and a Kessler suture distally, using non-absorbable 4-strand 6-strand repairs and absorbable 8-strand sutures. Specimens were then cyclically loaded using phases of 10 cycles of 100 N, 100 cycles of 100 N, 100 cycles of 190 N consistent with early range of motion training and weight-bearing, before being loaded to failure.

Results

Pre-conditioning of 10 cycles of 100 N resulted in separations of 4 mm for 6-strand, 5.9 mm for 4-strand, but 11.5 mm in 8-strand repairs, this comprised 48.5, 68.6 and 72.7% of the separation that occurred after 100 cycles of 100 N. The tendon separation after the third phase of 100 cycles of 190 N was 17.4 mm for 4-strand repairs, 16.6 mm for 6-strand repairs and 26.6 mm for 8-strand repairs. There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.0001). Four and six strand non-absorbable repairs had significantly less separation than 8-strand absorbable repairs (p = 0.017 and p = 0.04 respectively).

The mean (SEM) ultimate tensile strengths were 4-strand 464.8 N (27.4), 6-strand 543.5 N (49.6) and 8-strand 422.1 N (80.5). Regression analysis reveals no significant difference between the overall strength of the 3 repair models (p = 0.32) (4 vs. 6: p = 0.30, 4 vs. 8: p = 0.87; 6 vs. 8: p = 0.39). The most common mode of failure was pull out of the Kessler suture from the distal stump in 41.7% of specimens.

Conclusion

The use of a non-absorbable suture resulted in less end-to-end separation when compared to absorbable sutures when an Achilles tendon repair model was subject to cyclical loading. Ultimate failure occurred more commonly at the distal Kessler suture end although this occurred with separations in excess of clinical failure. The effect of early movement and loading on the Achilles tendon is not fully understood and requires more research.