Does Previous Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Prior hip arthroscopy increases the risk of dislocation, reoperation, and revision after hip arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The indications for hip arthroscopy have been increasing, as have been the number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy. Several matched cohort studies have assessed the impact of prior hip arthroscopy on THA, but conflicting results have been observed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prior arthroscopy on subsequent THA.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Dichotomous variables were summarized qualitatively as a meta-analysis of pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous variables were summarized as standardized mean differences and 95% CIs. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The risk of bias was evaluated for each study, as was publication bias.

RESULTS

In patients who underwent hip arthroscopy prior to THA, the ORs for dislocation, reoperation, and revision were 2.02 (P = 0.01), 1.66 (P = 0.01), and 2.15 (P = 0.001), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in the Harris Hip Score (HHS; P = 0.40), WOMAC (P = 0.069), FJS-12 (P = 0.77), estimated blood loss (P = 0.48), and surgical time (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior hip arthroscopy is a risk for postoperative dislocation, reoperation, or revision after conversion THA. However, prior hip arthroscopy has no effect on patient-reported outcomes, or operative factors such as surgical time and blood loss.

Hip Arthroscopy in the Presence of Advanced Osteoarthritis Results in 57% Survivorship, With 78% Survivor Satisfaction, at 10 Years. A Matched-Control Study

PURPOSE

To (1) determine the 10-year survivorship (avoidance of total hip arthroplasty, THA) for patients with advanced osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, and (2) compare survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with a matched-control group without OA.

METHODS

Advanced OA hips (Tönnis ≥2) were matched in a 1:1 ratio (age ± 5 years, sex) to hips with preoperative Tönnis grade ≤1. Exclusion criteria was dysplasia, age <18 years, previous hip conditions/surgeries, and bilaterally operated patients with OA on one side only. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis for levels of sex, age groups and Tönnis. Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HR) of undergoing THA conversion. Where THA was avoided, outcomes and proportion of cases achieving patient acceptable symptomatic state was determined RESULTS: 53 OA hips were matched with 53 control hips. Survival distributions were significantly different for: (1) Group: OA 57.1%, control 87.0% (P = .001); (2) Tönnis grade: Tönnis 0, 89.2%; Tönnis 1, 77.8%; Tönnis 2, 67.6%; Tönnis 3, 25.0% (P < .001); and (3) age: (OA: 75.0% vs 44.8%, control: 100%, vs 75.0%, for <35 and >35 years respectively) (P = .002). Conversion to THA was greater for increasing Tönnis: HR 1.9 (P = .450), 3.5 (P = .032), and 11.0 (P < .001) for Tönnis 1, 2, and 3 respectively, relative to no OA (Tönnis 0) and >35 years: HR 4.3 (95% confidence interval 1.6-11.3, P = .003). Patient acceptable symptomatic state achievement was similar for both groups (78% OA vs 91% control, P = .167). modified Harris Hip Score and Short Form-36 significantly improved within both groups from baseline to 10 years CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic correction of femoroacetabular impingement, in the presence of advanced OA results in 57% survivorship at 10 years (68% Tönnis 2, 25% Tönnis 3). Where THA was avoided, 78% considered their 10-year post-HA state to be satisfactory, with patient-reported outcomes similar to a matched non-OA cohort. Tönnis 2 in particular should be considered for arthroscopic hip preservation to avoid the need to prematurely replace the hip joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Is Prior Hip Arthroscopy Associated With Higher Complication Rates or Prolonged Opioid Claims After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Study

Background:

Hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures have increased exponentially in recent years. Their effect on outcomes after subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear.

Purpose:

To compare rates of complications and opioid claims after elective THA among patients with prior HA versus controls.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Patients who underwent THA were identified in the PearlDiver database. Arthroplasty performed for hip fractures and hip avascular necrosis were excluded. Within this population, patients with HA before arthroplasty (n = 3156) were propensity score matched 1:1 with controls on age, sex, US region, and several comorbidities. Rates of medical complications within 90 days and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years were queried. The number of patients with an opioid claim within 0 to 30 days and subsequent opioid claim(s) during the 90-day global period were obtained to assess rates of prolonged opioid use after arthroplasty. Rates of postoperative complications and opioid claims were compared using logistic regression.

Results:

Patients with prior HA exhibited significantly lower rates of readmission (5.6% vs 7.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.72), pulmonary embolism (0.2% vs 0.6%; OR, 0.45), urinary tract infection (3.1% vs 4.0%; OR, 0.75), and blood transfusion (3.6% vs 6.1%; OR, 0.55). The prior HA cohort also exhibited a significantly lower rate of prosthetic joint infection at 1 year postoperatively (0.6% vs 1.3%; OR, 0.50). Rates of dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, mechanical complications, and aseptic revision arthroplasty were statistically comparable between the cohorts within 2 years. The prior HA cohort was significantly less likely to file persistent opioid claims after 30 days postoperatively, including between 31 and 60 days (27.2% vs 33.1%; OR, 0.74) and 61 to 90 days (16.2% vs 20.9%; OR, 0.71).

Conclusion:

After elective THA, patients with prior HA exhibited significantly lower rates of medical complications and prolonged opioid claims within 90 days and prosthetic joint infection at 1 year. Rates of all other prosthesis-related complications within 2 years were statistically comparable.

The influence of prior arthroscopy on outcomes of primary total lower extremity arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of prior arthroscopy on postoperative revisions, complications, and other clinical outcomes after conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar electronic databases from inception to June 02, 2021. We identified cohort trials that compared the outcomes of patients who underwent primary THA or TKA in the prior arthroscopy or control groups. The primary outcome was revision, and secondary outcomes included reoperation, patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the non-randomized cohort studies.

RESULTS

Of the 23 included studies with 319946 cases, 18 were matched retrospectively and five were non-matched retrospectively. Methodological quality was high in ten studies and moderate in thirteen studies. Our analysis demonstrated that TKA or THA patients with prior arthroscopy were associated with an increased risk of revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in periprosthetic fracture, range of motion, Harris Hip Score, or Knee Society Score.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy performed before total lower extremity arthroplasty substantially increased the revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening rates. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Patients should be counseled on the potential increased risks associated with conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty after prior arthroscopy. Further research is needed to better characterize these findings.

Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy Has Increased Complications and Revision Risk

BACKGROUND

There has been an increase in hip arthroscopy (HA) over the last decade. After HA, some patients may ultimately require a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the outcomes in patients undergoing THA with a history of ipsilateral HA.

METHODS

The PearlDiver research program (www.pearldiverinc.com) was queried to capture all patients undergoing THA between 2015 and 2020. Propensity matching was performed to match patients undergoing THA with and without a history of ipsilateral THA. Rates of 30-day medical complications, 1-year surgical complications, and THA revision were compared using multivariate logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to estimate survival probabilities of each of the groups with patients undergoing THA .

RESULTS

After propensity matching, cohorts of 1940 patients undergoing THA without prior HA and 1940 patients undergoing a THA with prior HA were isolated for analysis. The mean time from HA to THA was 1127 days (standard deviation 858). Patients with a history of ipsilateral HA had an increased risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, P = .03) and overall decreased implant survival within 4 years of undergoing THA (OR 1.53; P = .05). Furthermore, our data demonstrate the timing of previous HA to be associated with the risk of complications, as illustrated by the increased risk for dislocation (OR 1.75, P = .03), aseptic loosening (OR 2.18, P = .03), and revision surgery at 2 (OR 1.92, P = .02) and 4 years (OR 2.05, P = .01) in patients undergoing THA within 1 year of HA compared twitho patients undergoing THA more than 1 year after HA or with no previous history of HA.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA after HA are at an increased risk for surgical complications, as well as the need for revision surgery.

Are We Able to Determine Differences in Outcomes Between Male and Female Servicemembers Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review

Background:

Female servicemembers sustain higher rates of lower extremity injuries as compared with their male counterparts. This can include intra-articular pathology in the hip. Female patients are considered to have worse outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and for hip labral repair.

Purpose:

To (1) compare published rates of hip arthroscopy between male and female military servicemembers and (2) determine if there are any sex-based differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopy in the military.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We reviewed the literature published from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2020, to identify studies in which hip arthroscopy was performed in military personnel. Clinical trials and cohort studies were included. The proportion of women within each cohort was identified, and results of any between-sex analyses were reported.

Results:

Identified were 11 studies that met established criteria. Studies included 2481 patients, 970 (39.1%) of whom were women. Surgery occurred between January 1998 and March 2018. Despite women accounting for approximately 15% of the active-duty military force, they represented 39.1% (range, 25.7%-57.6%) of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. In most cases, there were no differences in self-reported outcomes (pain, disability, and physical function), return to duty, or medical disability status based on sex.

Conclusion:

Women account for approximately 15% of the military, but they made up 40% of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Outcomes were not different between the sexes; however, definitive conclusions were limited by the heterogeneity of outcomes, missing data, lack of sex-specific subgroup analyses, and zero studies with sex differences as the primary outcome. A proper understanding of sex-specific outcomes after hip arthroscopy will require a paradigm shift in the design and reporting of trials in the military health system.

Influence of prior hip arthroscopy on outcomes after hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of matched control studies

BACKGROUND

No meta-analysis exists elucidate the impact of prior hip arthroscopy on the outcomes of subsequent hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain if prior hip arthroscopy leads to inferior outcomes after hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on May 20, 2019. Only English publications were included. The primary outcomes were postoperative complication, revision, and reoperation. Secondary outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), operative time, and estimated blood loss.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 1227 patients were included. The pooled data revealed that patients with prior hip arthroscopy were associated with higher risks for any postoperative complication (P < .00001), dislocation (P = .03), revision (P = .03), and reoperation (P = .02) following subsequent hip arthroplasty. However, there were no significant differences in infection rate (P = .22), HHS (P = .09), WOMAC (P = .19), operative time (P = .52), and estimated blood loss (P = .17) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior hip arthroscopy are at increased risks for any postoperative complication, dislocation, revision, and reoperation following subsequent hip arthroplasty. However, prior hip arthroscopy does not appear to have an impact on the functional outcomes and intraoperative outcomes.

Survivorship Following Hip Arthroscopy: Lessons Learned from a Comprehensive Database

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hip arthroscopy and its indications continue to expand. Understanding the durability of hip arthroscopic procedures remains important not only for counseling patients, but also for determining the success of certain procedures or in certain populations. Survivorship is defined as the proportion of hip arthroscopy patients who have not yet gone on to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and/or revision surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent literature pertaining to survivorship after certain hip arthroscopic procedures and certain special populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is yet to be level 1 evidence published with relation to survivorship following hip arthroscopy. The best evidence in the recent literature is contained in just rew long-term prospective studies demonstrating good to excellent survivorship following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Unfortunately, the follow-up for other conditions treated by hip arthroscopy is more limited. In summary, hip arthroscopy indications continue to expand. The most common indication for surgery is FAI, and its recently published long-term survivorship demonstrates excellent durability. Other hip arthroscopic procedures, including labral reconstruction, adjunctive procedures such as capsular closure, and special populations such as athletes, also demonstrate excellent survivorship in shorter term follow-up. Further prospective research is needed to further define survivorship of various hip conditions, associated procedures, and special populations commonly treated with hip arthroscopy.