Narcotic Use and Resiliency Scores Do Not Predict Changes in Sleep Quality 6 Months After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Effects of Melatonin on Sleep Quality and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Sleep disturbance is a significant symptom associated with both rotator cuff tears and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Melatonin has been shown to be safe and effective in managing multiple sleep disorders, including secondary sleep disorders, with relatively minor adverse effects and lack of addictive potential.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of oral melatonin on postoperative sleep quality after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Exclusion criteria included history of alcohol abuse, current antidepressant or sedative use, revision rotator cuff repair, severe glenohumeral arthritis, and concurrent adhesive capsulitis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 groups: 5-mg dose of melatonin 1 hour before bedtime or standard sleep hygiene (≥6 hours per night, avoiding caffeine and naps in the evening). Patients in the melatonin group took their assigned melatonin dose for 6 weeks beginning the day of surgery. Patient-reported outcome assessments, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and pain medication charts were collected preoperatively as well as at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 4 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Numeric variables were analyzed using paired and unpaired t tests, with significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included for final analysis (40 in the control group, 40 in the melatonin group). Patient characteristics such as age, sex, race, body mass index, and laterality did not differ significantly (P≥ .05). Preoperative ASES, SANE, and PSQI scores did not differ between groups (P≥ .055). PSQI scores were significantly lower (better quality sleep) in the melatonin group at the 6-week postoperative period (P = .036). There was a positive correlation between how patients rated the intensity of their pain and the PSQI at the 6-week postoperative period (0.566). The PSQI question regarding sleep quality was found to be significantly lower in the melatonin group at the 3-month, 4-month, and 6-month postoperative periods (P = .015, P = .041, and P≤ .05, respectively). SANE scores were significantly lower in the melatonin group (P = .011) at 6 weeks and then higher in the melatonin group (P = .017) at 6 months. ASES scores were significantly higher in the melatonin group at 4 and 6 months (P = .022 and P = .020, respectively). Lastly, patients who were randomized into the melatonin group were found to use significantly less narcotic medication at the 4-month postoperative period (P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Melatonin use after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair led to improved sleep quality (PSQI) in the early postoperative period as well as improved functional outcomes (ASES and SANE scores) and decreased narcotic use in the later postoperative period. Patients with significant sleep disturbances associated with rotator cuff repairs may benefit from the use of melatonin.

REGISTRATION

NCT04278677 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Analysis of related factors influencing the sleep quality in patients with rotator cuff tear after arthroscopic surgery

Recent studies have reported a prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of our study was to explore patient-reported factors correlated with sleep disturbance in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We retrospectively evaluated 133 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for 6 months. We obtained the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score (UCLA score), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patient demographics. According to the PSQI scores, participants were divided into a sleep disorder group (A group, PSQI ≥5) and a normal sleep group (B group, PSQI <5). Statistical analyses included Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis to determine which patient-reported factors were associated with sleep disturbance. The mean VAS, UCLA score, UCLA Flexion, HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A), and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scores in group A were 3.54, 26.36, 3.25, 5.43, and 5.93, respectively; in group B, the mean scores were 1.49, 30.72, 4.50, 2.11, and 1.79, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the VAS, UCLA, UCLA Flexion, HADS-A, HADS-D scores between the 2 groups (P < .05). In the categories of sex, age, body mass index, and tear size, there was no statistical significant difference between the 2 groups. (P > .05). HADS-D and UCLA Flexion were independent factors affecting sleep disturbance after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at 6 months (P < .05). Our study demonstrated that patients with sleep disturbances after arthroscopic shoulder surgery had a close relationship with the HADS-D, UCLA Flexion scores and had more pain, more dysfunction, and more pronounced psychological abnormalities. Therefore, more emphasis on psychotherapy and rehabilitation is required for patients with sleep disturbance.

Association of Preoperative Patient Resilience With Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes and Sleep Quality Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Recent studies have shown that low preoperative resilience may lead to inferior outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether preoperative patient resilience is associated with outcome measures, including patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and sleep quality, following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. To perform the review, a literature search was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases to gather studies related to the influence of preoperative resilience on postoperative outcomes of rotator cuff repair. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). Seven studies with 584 patients were included. Of 36 total reported postoperative outcomes, including PROMs and sleep quality, 14 had a significant positive correlation with higher preoperative resilience. One study reported that higher resilience was significantly correlated with worse sleep quality at a two-week follow-up but not at further follow-ups of up to 24 weeks. Significant differences in outcomes between patients with varying levels of resilience were assessed in five studies, all of which found that patients with higher resilience had significantly better outcomes or no significant differences in outcomes between patients with varying levels of preoperative resilience. In no study was it reported that patients with low resilience had better outcomes. Overall, approximately half of all reported postoperative outcome data was found to be significantly associated with preoperative resilience. Therefore, clinicians should preemptively identify those with low resilience and administer psychological interventions to limit inferior outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Improvements in Sleep After Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Correlated With Improvements in Various Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder and to evaluate the association between patient-reported outcomes and standardized sleep disturbance tools after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A systematic review, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the terms "arthroscopic surgery" and "sleep." Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies based on the inclusion criteria focused on the effects of shoulder arthroscopy on sleep disturbance and the use of outcome measures related to sleep. Data on sleep quality and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed using various assessment tools, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results

The review included 15 studies (9 Level IV, 5 Level III, and 1 Level II) comprising 1,818 arthroscopic patients (average age, 57.4 ± 8.86 years; follow-up range, 6 months to 75.7 months). The prevalence rates of sleep disturbances before and after shoulder arthroscopy ranged from 75.8% to 100% and from 19% to 62%, respectively. Every study included in this analysis reported an improvement in rates of sleep disturbances postoperatively compared with preoperatively. Improvements in standardized sleep disturbance scores were associated with functional outcomes.

Conclusions

Sleep disturbances are commonly observed before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder. Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder appears to improve sleep quality, and surgeons can expect functional outcomes, specifically the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, numeric rating scale or visual analog scale score, and Constant-Murley score, to improve in line with sleep quality.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Associating Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With Patient Resilience

Background

Higher patient resilience has been shown to be associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 6 months after hip arthroscopy.

Purpose

To examine the relationship between patient resilience and PROMs at minimum 2 years after hip arthroscopy.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 89 patients (mean age, 36.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.6 years). Patient demographics, surgical details, and preoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were collected retrospectively. Postoperative variables were collected via a survey and included the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13), Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire-2 (PSEQ-2), VAS satisfaction, and postoperative iHOT-12, and VAS pain scores. Based on the number of standard deviations from the mean BRS score, patients were stratified as having low resilience (LR; n = 18), normal resilience (NR; n = 48), and high resilience (HR; n = 23). Differences in PROMs were compared between the groups, and a multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between pre- to postoperative change (Δ) in PROMs and patient resilience.

Results

There were significantly more smokers in the LR group compared with the NR and HR groups (P = .033). Compared with the NR and HR groups, patients in the LR group had significantly more labral repairs (P = .006), significantly worse postoperative iHOT-12, VAS pain, VAS satisfaction, PAM-13, and PSEQ-2 scores (P < .001 for all), and significantly lower ΔVAS pain and ΔiHOT-12 scores (P = .01 and .032, respectively). Regression analysis showed significant associations between ΔVAS pain and NR (β = -22.50 [95% CI, -38.81 to -6.19]; P = .008) as well as HR (β = -28.31 [95% CI, -46.96 to -9.67; P = .004) and between ΔiHOT-12 and NR (β = 18.94 [95% CI, 6.33 to 31.55]; P = .004) as well as HR (β = 20.63 [95% CI, 6.21 to 35.05]; P = .006). Male sex was a significant predictor of ΔiHOT-12 (β = -15.05 [95% CI, -25.42 to -4.69]; P = .006).

Conclusion

The study results indicate that lower postoperative resilience scores were associated with significantly worse PROM scores, including pain and satisfaction, at 2 years after hip arthroscopy.

The Influence of Pain and Resiliency on Foot and Ankle Surgery Outcomes

Background:

Resilience is the ability to recover after stressful events and has been shown to correlate with surgical outcomes. However, there has been minimal research on the impact of patient resiliency on foot and ankle surgical outcomes. This study aims to determine the predictive value of preoperative resiliency scores on surgical outcomes and investigate how this compares with the predictive value of pain scores.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients who completed a preoperative Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and underwent surgery between November 2019 and November 2020 with a fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon (N=184). Data included demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, complication and reoperation rates, pre- and postoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use, and additional patient-reported outcome measures (ie, visual analog scale [VAS], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], Pain Disability Index [PDI], Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS] pain subscale). Mean follow-up duration was 4.49 (range, 1.10-14.17) months.

Results:

BRS weakly correlated with decreased postoperative benzodiazepine use ( P=.007). PCS magnification ( P=.050) and helplessness ( P=.047) subscales weakly correlated with increased follow-up duration. PDI total score and most subscores significantly correlated with an increase in at least 1 of the following: follow-up duration, or postoperative opioid or benzodiazepine use. Neither the VAS nor FAOS pain subscore correlated with any outcome. PDI total score was the strongest predictor of postoperative opioid (β=0.334) and benzodiazepine (β=0.315) use. Preoperative opioid users had significantly higher PDI total score (user=39.3, nonuser=24.9; P=.012) and subscores (ie, social activity, sexual behavior, self-care, life-support activities).

Conclusion:

BRS is an unreliable tool for predicting outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, as it only weakly correlated with decreased benzodiazepine use. Rather, given the PDI’s strong associations with postoperative measures in this study, physicians should consider the value of preoperative PDI completion when predicting how foot and ankle surgery recipients will fare postoperatively.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients Who Underwent Rotator Cuff Tear Repair

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a valid patient-reported outcome measure developed to assess sleep quality and disturbances in clinical populations. This study aimed to calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the PSQI in patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR). Preoperative and six-month postoperative follow-up questionnaires were completed by 50 patients (25 males and 25 females, mean age 58.7 ± 11.1 years). The MCID of the PSQI was calculated using distribution-based and anchor methods. To calculate the PSQI’s PASS, the 75th percentile approach and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used. The MCID from preoperative to 6 months postoperative follow-up is 4.4. Patients who improved their PSQI score of 4.4 from baseline to 6 months follow-up had a clinically significant increase in their health status. The PASS is 5.5 for PSQI; therefore, a value of PSQI at least 5.5 at six months follow-up indicates that the symptom state can be considered acceptable by most patients.

Resilience in the Orthopaedic Patient

➤

Resilience is a dynamic psychological construct that refers to the ability to adapt and improve when facing adversity or other stressors.

➤

Recent investigations in various orthopaedic subspecialties have demonstrated that resilience may contribute to favorable mental health and physical function after a surgical procedure.

➤

More research, using well-designed prospective studies, is necessary to better define the role that resilience and other factors play in the health and outcomes of patients with orthopaedic conditions.

➤

Orthopaedic surgeons can consider incorporating resilience assessments into their practices to aid in identifying patients who will do well with a surgical procedure and those who may benefit from specialized therapy to optimize their health and function.

Systematic Review of Sleep Quality Before and After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Are Improvements Experienced and Maintained?

Background:

Poor sleep quality is prevalent among patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and negatively influences the potential for healing and quality of life. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the magnitude and timing of changes in sleep quality after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Purpose:

(1) To evaluate the prevalence of poor sleep quality in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR and (2) to determine the timing and magnitude of changes in sleep quality after RCR.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2020 for literature investigating the prevalence of poor sleep quality in patients with RCTs or changes in sleep quality after arthroscopic RCR. Data pertaining to study characteristics, risk of bias, sleep quality assessments, and clinical outcomes were extracted. A qualitative analysis of the prevalence of poor sleep quality and changes in sleep quality was performed.

Results:

A total of 8 studies (1034 patients) were included. The mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ranged from 5.2 to 15.0 preoperatively among all studies, while the frequency of patients experiencing poor sleep quality ranged from 40.8% to 89.0% in 4 studies. Four studies reported the mean PSQI at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, which ranged from 4.2 to 7.1. Four studies did not report the PSQI score or the proportion of patients who experienced poor postoperative sleep quality. One study evaluated the PSQI at 12 months postoperatively, which decreased to 4.2 from 5.8 at 6 months. One study evaluated the PSQI at 24 months postoperatively, which decreased to 5.5 from 6.2 at 6 months.

Conclusion:

Patients with RCTs have a high prevalence of poor sleep quality. Consistent improvements in sleep quality are observed in the 6 months after arthroscopic RCR, but there is limited evidence based on the available data to characterize changes in sleep quality beyond this time. More evidence is needed to characterize changes in sleep quality beyond 6 months and how these changes are perceived by this patient population.