Incidence and Risk Factors for a Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Progressing to a Complete Tear After Nonoperative Treatment in Patients Younger Than 30 Years

The potential of posterior cruciate ligament buckling phenomenon as a sign for partial anterior cruciate ligament tears

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be challenging with physical examination and imaging techniques. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing complete ACL tears, its effectiveness may be limited when it is used to diagnose for partial tears. The hypothesis of the present study is that the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) buckling phenomenon, which is a secondary sign of complete ACL tears on MRI, may be a useful method for diagnosing partial ACL tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 239 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy in a single institution between 2016 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on the condition of their ligaments: partial tears, complete tears and intact ligaments. To evaluate the buckling phenomenon on sagittal T2-weighted MRI, measurements of the posterior cruciate ligament angle (PCLA) and the posterior cruciate ligament-posterior cortex angle (PCL-PCA) were conducted in each group. Subsequently, the ability of these two measurement methods to distinguish partial tears from the other groups was assessed.

RESULTS

Both methods provided significantly different results in all three groups. Partial tears could be distinguished from intact ligaments with 86.8% sensitivity, 89.9% specificity when PCLA < 123.13° and 94.5% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity when PCL-PCA < 23.77°. Partial tears could be distinguished from complete tears with 79.5% sensitivity, 78.4% specificity when PCLA > 113.88° and with 86.1% sensitivity, 85.3% specificity when PCL-PCA > 16.39°.

CONCLUSION

The main finding of the present study is that the PCLA and PCL-PCA methods are useful on MRI for diagnosing partial ACL tears. PCLA value between 113°-123° and PCL-PCA value between 16°-24° could indicate a partial ACL tear. With these methods, it is possible to distinguish partial tears from healthy knees and reduce missed diagnoses. In addition, the differentiation of partial and complete tears by these methods may prevent unnecessary surgical interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach).

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I2 = 94%) compared to pre-ACLR (mean = 44.4 [95% CI 38.2, 50.7], I2 = 98%), remained relatively stable, until they reached the highest point 2 to 5 years after ACLR (mean = 70.7 [95% CI 63.0, 78.5], I2 = 98%). Meta-regression suggests shorter time from injury to surgery, male sex, and older age were associated with higher ACL-RSI scores only 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 47.6%), and this reduced 1-2 years after ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 27.0%).

CONCLUSION

Psychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions.

REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .

Retrospective analysis and risk of progression of partial anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a young population

BACKGROUND

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common knee ligament injury. Partial ACL tears are common, and at least 10-27% of isolated ACL tears are diagnosed as partial tears. Patients with partial tears have high risk of progression of tears to complete tears, which may require surgical reconstruction. The risk factors associated with the progression to a complete tear are poorly understood.

METHODS

The present case-control study assessed the incidence and risk factors for the progression of conservatively treated partial ACL tears to complete tears in 351 patients younger than 45 years. The diagnosis of partial ACL tears was based on clinical evaluation, side-to-side difference on Rolimeter, and magnetic resonance imaging. These patients were managed conservatively and followed up for a mean of 17.5 months or until the progression of the tear into a complete tear, requiring surgery. The patients in whom the tear progressed to complete tear (group P) were compared with those in whom the tear remained stable for a minimum of 18-month follow-up period (group S).

RESULTS

Of the 351 partial ACL tear patients, 166 (47.3%) patients progressed to a complete tear at a mean duration of 17.5 months, whereas the tear in 185 (52.7%) patients remained stable and did not progress to a complete tear. Group P had mean international knee documentation committee (IKDC) scores and Tegner scores of 95.7 ± 3.7 and 7.6 ± 1.6, respectively, before the injury, and scores decreased to 52.4 ± 4.1 and 5.7 ± 2.2, respectively, at the 24-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Partial ACL tear progressed to a complete tear in 47.3% of evaluated patients. The associated risk factors were age less than 35 years, rigorous physical activities, high ACL-Return to Sport after Injury score during early rehabilitation days, early return to activity, and pivoting contact sports.

Outpatient-based diagnostic criteria for partial ACL injury: clinical outcomes of non-operative treatment and radiographic predictor

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent non-operative treatment for partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears diagnosed using the outpatient-based diagnostic criteria and (2) investigate the radiographic predictors distinguishing patients at risk of non-operative treatment failure.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2019, patients diagnosed with partial ACL tears and treated with non-operative treatment were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were then classified into two groups: those who successfully responded to non-operative treatment (group S) and those who failed to respond to non-operative treatment and required surgical reconstruction within 6 months after injury (group F). ACL laxity, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and several radiographic parameters were analyzed. To identify radiographic predictors related to clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters were compared between the groups, which were statistically matched for potential confounders (age and activity level) using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were analyzed (mean age, 28.7 ± 8.7 years; 31 men), and classified into two groups (group S, 23 patients; group F, 21 patients). There were no significant differences in ACL laxity and PROs between the groups at 1 year after either non-operative treatment or surgical reconstruction. A comparison of radiographic parameters between the groups revealed significant differences in several parameters related to secondary signs of ACL injury. Subsequent regression analyses revealed that anterior tibial translation and extent of bone bruises were radiographic predictors related to clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative treatment for partial ACL tears diagnosed using the outpatient-based diagnostic criteria can provide successful short-term clinical outcomes in selective patients. Secondary signs of ACL injuries, particularly the amount of anterior tibial translation and the extent of bone bruises, are radiographic predictors that could differentiate patients at risk of non-operative treatment failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, III.

Full and Partial Mid-substance ACL Rupture Using Mechanical Tibial Displacement in Male and Female Mice

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured knee ligament. Surgical reconstruction is the gold standard treatment for ACL ruptures, but 20-50% of patients develop post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). ACL rupture is thus a well-recognized etiology of PTOA; however, little is known about the initial relationship between ligamentous injury and subsequent PTOA. The goals of this project were to: (1) develop both partial and full models of mid-substance ACL rupture in male and female mice using non-invasive mechanical methods by means of tibial displacement; and (2) to characterize early PTOA changes in the full ACL rupture model. A custom material testing system was utilized to induce either partial or full ACL rupture by means of tibial displacement at 1.6 or 2.0 mm, respectively. Mice were euthanized either (i) immediately post-injury to determine rupture success rates or (ii) 14 days post-injury to evaluate early PTOA progression following full ACL rupture. Our models demonstrated high efficacy in inciting either full or partial ACL rupture in male and female mice within the mid-substance of the ACL. These tools can be utilized for preclinical testing of potential therapeutics and to further our understanding of PTOA following ACL rupture.

Age- and Sex-Specific Joint Biomechanics in Response to Partial and Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in the Porcine Model

CONTEXT

Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rates are increasing and are highest in female adolescents. Complete ACL tears are typically surgically reconstructed, but few guidelines and very limited data exist regarding the need for surgical reconstruction or rehabilitation for partial ACL tears in skeletally immature patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of partial (anteromedial bundle) and complete ACL transection on joint laxity and tissue forces under anterior and rotational loads in male and female stifle joints throughout skeletal growth in the porcine model.

DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

We studied 60 male and female Yorkshire crossbreed pigs aged 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, and 18 months (n = 6 pigs per age per sex).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Joint laxity was measured in intact, anteromedial bundle-transected, and ACL-transected joints under applied anterior-posterior drawer and varus-valgus torque using a robotic testing system. Loading of the soft tissues in the stifle joint was measured under each condition.

RESULTS

Anterior-posterior joint laxity increased by 13% to 50% (P < .05) after anteromedial bundle transection and 75% to 178% (P < .05) after ACL transection. Destabilization after anteromedial bundle transection increased with age (P < .05) and was greater in late female than late male adolescents (P < .05). In anteromedial bundle-transected joints, the posterolateral bundle resisted the anterior load. In ACL-transected joints, the medial collateral ligament (MCL) contribution was largest, followed by the medial meniscus. The MCL contribution was larger and the medial meniscus contribution was smaller in male versus female specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial ACL transection resulted in moderate increases in joint laxity, with the remaining bundle performing the primary ACL function. Destabilization due to partial ACL transection (anteromedial bundle) was largest in late adolescent joints, indicating that operative treatment should be considered in active, late-adolescent patients with this injury. Increased forces on the MCL and medial meniscus after ACL transection suggested that rehabilitation protocols may need to focus on protecting these tissues.

Short-Term Outcomes After Treatment of Isolated Hidden Meniscal Ramp Lesions

Background:

Ramp lesions are encountered in 16% to 24% of all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. However, isolated ramp lesions without a ruptured ACL have also been reported.

Purpose:

To evaluate outcomes after type 3 hidden ramp lesions without ACL rupture were treated with all-inside sutures passed through the standard anterior portal.

Study Design:

Case series, Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Included were 41 patients (26 female; 63.4%) with isolated type 3 ramp lesions who underwent surgery between January 2017 and January 2019. Patients with concomitant lateral meniscal injuries and revision meniscal surgeries were excluded. We retrospectively recorded patient age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), as well as follow-up periods, comorbidities, and postoperative and early midterm complications. The Lysholm, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were compared preoperatively to final follow-up. In addition, patients were classified as having either a sedentary or active lifestyle according to Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) criteria. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the data, and the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. The Spearman test was employed to evaluate the correlation between patient variables.

Results:

The mean follow-up period was at 37.6 (range, 25-49) months. A total of 17 patients (41.46%) had a sedentary lifestyle based on SBRN criteria. All scores improved significantly from preoperatively to final follow-up (VAS, from 8.43 ± 1.53 to 2.34 ± 2.9; Lysholm, from 47.73 ± 17.02 to 85.37 ± 14.01; and IKDC, from 27.12 ± 14.81 to 85.32 ± 8.78; P < .001 for all). Although no significant relationship was established between patient activity level and postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores, an inverse correlation was observed between BMI and Lysholm (r =–0.9906) and BMI and IKDC (r =–0.9402).

Conclusion:

Satisfactory postoperative clinical results were obtained in patients with type 3 ramp lesions not accompanied by ACL rupture who were treated with all-inside suturing through standard anterior portals.

The posterior cruciate ligament inclination angle is higher in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard image examination for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesion diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that measuring the posterior cruciate ligament inclination angle (PCLIA) using MRI images may be an auxiliary tool to aid the recognition of ACL insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare the PCLIA measurement in MRIs of individuals with and without ACL injury.

METHODS

The PCLIA was measured by two radiologists in 65 knee MRIs of patients with intact ACL (control group) and in 65 knee MRIs of people with ACL injury (study group). In both groups, the posterior cruciate ligament was intact. The control group was included 35 men (53.8%) and 30 women (46.1%). The patients' average age was 38.7 years (range 15-75; SD ± 14.8 years). In this group, 31 (47.6%) MRIs were from right knees and 34 (52.3%) were from left knees. The study group consisted of 45 men (69.2%) and 20 women (30.7%). The patients' average age was 36.8 years (range 14-55; SD ± 10.3 years). In this group, 33 (50.7%) were right knees and 32 (49.2%) were left knees. PCLIA was formed by the intersection of two lines drawn in MRI sagittal images. The first passed tangentially to the articular surface of the tibial condyle and the second was drawn over the fraction of the ligament that originated where the first crossed the PCL, outlined proximally.

RESULTS

The average PCLIA was 44.2 ± 3.8° in the control group and 78.9 ± 8.6° in the study group. Statistical analyses showed that the PCLIA was higher in the group with ACL injury (p < 0.05). Conclusion The PCLIA was significantly higher in individuals with ACL injuries. The measurement of this angle using MRI images may allow for detection of ACL insufficiency and thus assist in an individualized and precise approach to the treatment of injuries to the ACL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PCLIA may be a way to detect ACL insufficiency and thus help surgeons to decide which patient might need ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Strong association of meniscus tears with complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries relative to partial ACL injuries

BACKGROUND

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are often associated with meniscus tears. These meniscus tears in long term may affect the functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The present study aims to identify the incidence and relative association of meniscus injuries in complete and partial ACL injuries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group I: partial ACL tear and group 2: complete ACL tear. Both groups were assessed for meniscal tears; either isolated medial/lateral or combined and odds ratio was measured between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 43 and 219 patients were enrolled in group I and II respectively. The mean age (years) in group I and II were 25.32 ± 7.12 and 28.64 ± 10.84 respectively. There were a total of 5 and 28 females in group I and II respectively. Mean pre-injury Tegner score in group I and II was 7.02 ± 2.87 and 6.82 ± 3.14 respectively. Mean time from injury to surgery (months) in group I and II was 8.04 ± 6.43 and 7.62 ± 4.83 respectively. In group 1 There were a total of 6 with lateral meniscus tears, 9 with medial meniscus tears And 3 with combined meniscal tears in group 1 while in group 2, 47 had lateral meniscal tears, 71 had medial meniscal tears and 71 had combined tears. Group II patients had stronger association for isolated meniscal tears compared to group I, with an odds ratio of 5.05(p < 0.05). Combined meniscal tears had non-significant relation in two groups (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Partial ACL injuries present with less risk of acquiring isolated meniscus tears, compared to complete ACL injuries.

Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance towards consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury.The purpose of this study was to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs for the three working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative veresus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support; two reached strong consensus; one did not achieve consensus; and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided.In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACLR is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury.Level of evidence: V.

Structural Consequences of a Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on Remaining Joint Integrity: Evidence for Ligament and Bone Changes Over Time in an Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Severe injury to the knee joint often results in accelerated posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). In an ovine knee injury model, altered kinematics and degradation of the cartilage have been observed at 20 and 40 weeks after partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transection (p-ACL Tx) surgery. However, changes to the integrity of the remaining intact intra-articular ligaments (posterolateral [PL] band and posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) as well as the subchondral bone after anteromedial (AM) band Tx remain to be characterized.

PURPOSE

(1) To investigate histological alterations to the remaining intact intra-articular ligaments, the synovium, and the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) and (2) to quantify subchondral bone changes at the contact surfaces of the proximal tibia at 20 and 40 weeks after AM band Tx.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Mature female Suffolk cross sheep were allocated into 3 groups: nonoperative controls (n = 6), 20 weeks after partial ACL transection (p-ACL Tx; n = 5), and 40 weeks after p-ACL Tx (n = 6). Ligament, synovium, and IPFP sections were stained and graded. Tibial subchondral bone microarchitecture was assessed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

RESULTS

p-ACL Tx of the AM band led to significant change in histological scores of the PL band and the PCL at 20 weeks after p-ACL Tx (P = .031 and P = .033, respectively) and 40 weeks after p-ACL Tx (P = .011 and P = .029) as compared with nonoperative controls. Alterations in inflammatory cells and collagen fiber orientation contributed to the greatest extent of the combined histological score in the PL band and PCL. p-ACL Tx did not lead to chronic activation of the synovium or IPFP. Trabecular bone mineral density was strongly inversely correlated with combined gross morphological damage in the top and middle layers of the subchondral bone in the lateral tibial plateau for animals at 40 weeks after p-ACL Tx.

CONCLUSION

p-ACL Tx influences the integrity (biology and structure) of remaining intact intra-articular ligaments and bone microarchitecture in a partial knee injury ovine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

p-ACL Tx leads to alterations in structural integrity of the remaining intact ligaments and degenerative changes in the trabecular bone mineral density, which may be detrimental to the injured athlete's knee joint in the long term.

Management of Partial Tears of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Review of the Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears comprise an estimated 10% to 27% of isolated ACL injuries. Partial ACL tears may be challenging to clinically diagnose. We reviewed relevant studies focusing on the anatomy, diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of a partial injury with the goal of providing guidance to clinicians. Although a comprehensive patient history, thorough clinical examination, and imaging studies are helpful in arriving at a diagnosis, the benchmark for diagnosis remains visualization and examination of the ACL at the time of knee arthroscopy. Currently, limited data exist about the long-term outcomes of nonsurgical treatment. Some studies demonstrate that younger, active patients have the risk of progressing to a complete ACL rupture with conservative treatment. The decision to proceed with surgery is based on careful history and physical examination findings that suggest either a "functional" or "nonfunctional" ACL. Surgical treatment consists of augmenting the intact bundle with a selective bundle reconstruction versus a traditional ACL reconstruction. Selective bundle reconstruction has limited data available but is an option. The best evidence supports traditional ACL reconstruction for the surgical management of patients with documented nonfunctional partial tears of the ACL.

Arthroscopic evaluation for tibial plateau fractures on the incidence and types of cruciate ligamentous injuries following closed reduction and internal fixation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the overall incidence and types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) following closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF), and to identify the relationship between the incidence and types of cruciate ligamentous injuries with Schatzker classification and "three-column" classification.

METHODS

From January 2016 to January 2018, 185 patients with closed TPFs who underwent CRIF were included in this retrospective study. All patients were performed with arthroscopic examination after CRIF, and then, the incidence and types of cruciate ligamentous injuries were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rates of cruciate ligamentous injuries associated with TPFs were 37.3% with 21.6% of these being ACL injuries and 15.7% had PCL injuries. Importantly, patients with fractures in "two-column" fractures have a significantly higher incidence rate of ACL avulsion fracture and PCL complete tears (P < 0.05) than other fracture types, especially involving anteromedial and posterior column fractures. In addition, the incidence of PCL partial tears in patients with three-column involvement was 11.8%, which was higher than other fracture patterns based on three-column classification system (P < 0.05). In the current study, Schatzker IV was most commonly associated with ACL injuries, occurring in 48.1% of our series. Furthermore, PCL injuries occurred at a significantly higher incidence in Schatzker VI with 34.5% than other fracture types (P < 0.05). Statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between Schatzker classification and incidence of injury to the ACL (P < 0.05) and PCL (P < 0.05). Of note, avulsion fracture was the most common types of ACL injuries which was observed in 45% ACL injuries, while partial tear was the most common types of PCL injuries. However, no significant relationship was identified between the types of cruciate ligamentous injuries and Schatzker classification (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the recognition of concomitant cruciate ligamentous injuries associated with TPFs based on Schatzker classification and three-column classification, orthopaedic trauma surgeons may better guide optimal surgical protocols for patients.

Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group

Treatment strategies for ACL injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines to manage ACL injury is largely based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened determine consensus regarding best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field may assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury. Level of evidence: Level V

Treatment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best-practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative versus nonoperative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to report the consensus statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. There were 66 international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, who were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the scientific organizing committee and session chairs for the 3 working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements before the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Ultimately, 80% agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the symposium. Overall, 9 statements achieved unanimous support, 2 reached strong consensus, 1 did not achieve consensus, and 1 was removed because of redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended because of the high risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight-plane activities, nonoperative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and nonoperative treatment with patients after an ACL injury.

Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative vs. non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative vs. non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organizing Committee and Session Chairs for the three working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided the initial agreement and comments on the statement via an online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty percent agreement was defined a-priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative v. non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached the consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatments with patients after an ACL injury.Level of evidence V.