An Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Large Chondral and Osteochondral Defects in the Patellofemoral Joint

Clinical Equipoise in the Management of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Concomitant Tönnis Grade 2 Hip Osteoarthritis or Greater: An International Expert-Panel Delphi Study

PURPOSE

To gather global-expert opinion on the management of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and Tönnis grade 2 hip osteoarthritis (OA) or greater.

METHODS

An internet-based modified Delphi methodology was used via an online platform (Online Surveys) using the CREDES (Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies) guidelines. The expert panel comprised 27 members from 18 countries: 21 orthopaedic surgeons (78%), 5 physiotherapists (18%), and 1 dual orthopaedic surgeon-sport and exercise medicine physician (4%). Comments and suggestions were collected during each round, and amendments were performed for the subsequent round. Between each pair of rounds, the steering panel provided the experts with a summary of results and amendments. Consensus was set a priori as minimum agreement of 80%.

RESULTS

Complete participation (100%) was achieved in all 4 rounds. A final list of 10 consensus statements was formulated. The experts agreed that there is no single superior management strategy for FAIS with Tönnis grade 2 OA and that Tönnis grade 3 OA and the presence of bilateral cartilage defects (acetabular and femoral) is a contraindication for hip preservation surgery. Nonoperative management should include activity modification and physiotherapy with hip-specific strengthening, lumbo-pelvic mobility training, and core strengthening. There was no consensus on the need for 3-dimensional imaging for initial quantification of joint degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

There is clinical equipoise in terms of the best management strategy for patients with FAIS and Tönnis grade 2 OA, and therefore, there is an urgent need to perform a randomized controlled trial for this cohort of patients to ascertian the best management strategy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Consensus methods in patellofemoral pain: how rigorous are they? A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians treating patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) rely on consensus statements to make the best practice recommendations in the absence of definitive evidence on how to manage PFP. However, the methods used to generate and assess agreement for these recommendations have not been examined. Our objective was to map the methods used to generate consensus-based recommendations for PFP and apply four novel questions to assess the rigour of consensus development.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Embase from inception to May 2022 to identify consensus-derived statements or practice guidelines on PFP. The Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis was followed to map the existing evidence. We measured the consensus methods based on four sets of questions addressing the panel composition, application of the consensus method chosen, agreement process and the use of evidence mapping.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All consensus statements or clinical guidelines on PFP were considered.

RESULTS

Twenty-two PFP consensus statements were identified. Panel composition: 3 of the 22 (14%) consensus groups reported the panellists' experience, 2 (9%) defined a desired level of expertise, 10 (45%) reported panellist sex and only 2 (9%) included a patient. Consensus method: 7 of 22 (32%) reported using an established method of consensus measurement/development. Agreement process: 10 of 22 (45%) reported their consensus threshold and 2 (9%) acknowledged dissenting opinions among the panel. Evidence mapping: 6 of 22 (27%) reported using systematic methods to identify relevant evidence gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

PFP consensus panels have lacked diversity and excluded key partners including patients. Consensus statements on PFP frequently fail to use recognised consensus methods, rarely describe how 'agreement' was defined or measured and often neglect to use systematic methods to identify evidence gaps.

Detailed Assessment of Confounders is Necessary for Valid Interpretation of the Results in Patellofemoral Cartilage Restoration Studies

Cartilage restoration procedures have gained increased traction over the years as a treatment for chondral defects in relatively younger patients. A critical assessment of study populations for confounders is vital in order to interpret results in a valid manner. This is particularly true when assessing outcomes of cartilage restoration procedures in the patellofemoral compartment given substantial heterogeneity amongst patients within study populations. Patients often undergo additional procedures (prior or concomitant), have variable anatomy (malalignment, maltracking, and trochlear dysplasia), and variable chondral defect sizes, depths, and locations (lateral patellar facet, medial patellar facet, median patellar ridge, trochlea). Without an assessment of study populations for potential confounders that may influence the results, limited conclusions can be gleaned from any results pertaining to the outcomes of cartilage restoration procedures within the patellofemoral joint. Finally, there are many choices for cartilage restoration (osteochondral autografting, osteochondral allografting, autologous chondrocyte implantation, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and PJAC), different clinical situations where one may confer benefit over the other, yet all seem to result in significant improvement for patients with acceptable failure rates.

The Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System Is Associated With Better Short-Term Outcomes Than Standard Preservation Methods When Performing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Using Shell Grafts for Patellofemoral Lesions

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after whole-surface osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation using shell grafts for treatment of patellofemoral joint lesions with respect to surfaces treated and OCA preservation method.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval and informed consent, patients were prospectively enrolled into a registry to follow outcomes after OCA transplantation. Patients who received patellofemoral shell OCA to treat the entire articular surface of the patella, trochlea, or both, and with a minimum of 2-year follow-up data, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), failures, and complications, were included. Functional graft survival was determined based on patients returning to functional activities without need for OCA revision or arthroplasty surgery and calculated using the formula: 100% - (%revision + %failure). Minimum clinically important differences were determined based on previously validated data. Outcomes were compared based on differences in graft preservation methodology (Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System [MOPS] or standard preservation [SP]) and based on surfaces treated (patella, trochlea, or both).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 36.7 years (range 15-60 years) and mean body mass index was 28.9 (range 18-42). OCAs stored using SP methods were transplanted in 12 patients, mean follow-up was (66.1 months; range 54-70 months): OCAs stored using MOPS methods were transplanted in 46 patients, mean follow-up was (44.8 months; range 24-60 months). Graft survival rate at final follow-up was significantly greater (P = .025) for MOPS OCAs (98%) compared with SP OCAs (75%), whereas 2-year functional graft survival rates (MOPS 98% vs SP 83%; P = .1) were not. Reoperation rate was significantly greater (P = .0014) for SP cases compared with MOPS cases. PROMs showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements through 4 years after unipolar patella, unipolar trochlea, and bipolar patellofemoral OCA transplantation using MOPS grafts. Unipolar patella OCA transplantations were associated with significantly more reduction in pain and significantly better PROMs at 1-year compared with unipolar trochlea and bipolar patellofemoral OCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

OCA transplantation using MOPS shell grafts for unipolar and bipolar patellofemoral resurfacing was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements from preoperative levels of pain and function. The 2-year functional graft survival rate was 83% in the SP group and 98% in the MOPS group, such that MOPS was associated with better short-term outcomes than SP methods when performing OCA transplantation using shell grafts for patellofemoral lesions. Patients who received unipolar patella allografts reported the best outcomes in terms of pain and function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective analysis of registry data.

Editorial Commentary: Shell Grafts Are Viable in "Select" Cases, and Improved Preservation Techniques May Help Us Improve Our Outcomes

Patellofemoral joint chondral lesions can be challenging to treat with osteochondral allograft plugs because of the complex morphology and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint Shell allografts replace the entirety of the damaged articular surface with a single osteochondral allograft piece (e.g., the entire trochlea or patella articular surface). Although technically demanding, shell grafts would allow for the treatment of bigger defects, correction of dysplasia, and for the treatment of uncontained lesions. However, shell allografts have historically shown inferior results than focal cylindrical grafts (bone plugs), with failure rates up to 38% based in the published literature. Although evidence exists demonstrating the efficacy of shell grafts in select cases, additional studies from multiple sources are required to support their continued use as well as determine the optimal graft-preservation techniques.

Improving Technical Outcome in Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Trochlea: The Role of Contoured Guides, Experience Level, Graft Size, and Graft Position

Background

The use of coring instrumentation for osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation of the femoral trochlea is challenging due to the complex topography of this anatomical area.

Purpose

We sought to determine the effect of flat guides versus guides contoured to the surface of the trochlea on graft step-off in trochlear OCAs performed on a foam bone model. We also determined the effect of surgeon experience level and graft size on step-off.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Allograft harvesters were produced in 3 different sequential sizes with either a flat or a contoured undersurface. The guides matched one another in all aspects of shape and size except for the undersurface contour. The contoured undersurface generally matched the surface of the bone model trochlea but was not customized to that surface. A total of 72 foam femora were obtained. Identical trochlear stellate lesions of 3 different sizes (small, medium, and large) were created using 3-dimensional printed surface templates. A total of 6 surgeons (3 attending and 3 resident surgeons) performed OCAs of each trochlear lesion. Each surgeon performed 1 graft for each size and each guide type (n = 6 per surgeon). A specialized digital caliper was prepared that allowed the measurement of graft step-off to within 0.01 mm at a distance of 5 mm between the 2 sensors. The measurements were performed at 8 positions around the clockface of the grafts.

Results

Grafts performed with the contoured guides had a mean step-off of 0.43 ± 0.37 mm. Grafts performed with the flat guides had a mean step-off of 0.74 ± 0.78 mm (P < .0001). Experience level did not have a significant effect on graft step-off (P = .81). There was no identifiable pattern indicating higher step-off at any one position on the clockface.

Conclusion

In this study, contoured grafts had significantly lower step-offs compared with flat guides. Experience level, clockface position, and graft size did not affect step-off.

Fixation of an Osteochondral Lesion of the Femoral Intercondylar Groove Using Autogenous Osteochondral Grafts and Bioabsorbable Pins in a Patient with Open Physes: A Case Report

Osteochondral lesion (OCL) of the patellofemoral (PF) joint is not an uncommon cause of knee pain, and surgery is needed when conservative treatment fails. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal surgical treatment for OCL of the PF joint. Fixation of OCLs using autogenous osteochondral grafts has been reported to be effective for OCL of the knee. However, in this surgical technique, the biomechanical strength of osteochondral grafts may not be sufficient in patients with open physes due to the specific quality of the cartilage and subchondral bone given their age. There is a lack of studies reporting fixation of the OCL located in the PF joint using autogenous osteochondral grafts. We herein report a case of OCL of the femoral intercondylar groove where autogenous osteochondral grafts augmented with bioabsorbable pins were used to fix the lesion in a 14-year-old patient with open physes. Preoperative MRI revealed a completely detached OCL of the intercondylar groove (36 mm × 20 mm). Although a total of four osteochondral grafts were harvested from the non-weightbearing area of the lateral femoral condyle, cartilage detached from one of the grafts. The quality of the osteochondral grafts was considered to be insufficient for stabilization of the OCL; thus, two bioabsorbable pins were additionally inserted following fixation of the lesion using three osteochondral grafts. After two years of follow-up, postoperative functional scores were favorable without knee pain. The present case suggests that fixation of the OCL using autogenous osteochondral grafts may not be appropriate for young patients with open physes.

Sustained superiority in KOOS subscores after matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation using spheroids compared to microfracture

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) using spheroids in comparison to arthroscopic microfracture for the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter-controlled trial, patients aged between 18 and 50 years, with single symptomatic focal cartilage defects between 1 and 4 cm² (mean 2.6 ± 0.8, median 2.75, range 1.44-5.00) in the knee were randomized to treatment with ACI with spheroids (n = 52) or microfracture (n = 50). Primary clinical outcome was assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Analyses were performed in a defined hierarchical manner where outcomes of ACI were first compared to baseline values followed by a comparison to the microfracture group with repeated-measures ANCOVA with a non-inferiority approach. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influence of age and defect size on the overall KOOS. Secondary clinical outcomes were the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART), modified Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) examination form. Safety data focused on adverse events. Here the 5 years results are presented at which there were 33 observed cases in the ACI group and 30 in the microfracture group.

RESULTS

The overall KOOS and its five subscores were significantly improved compared to baseline for both the ACI and microfracture group. Non-inferiority of ACI to microfracture was confirmed for the overall KOOS and the subscores, while for the subscores activities of daily living, quality of life and sports and recreation of the threshold for superiority was passed. In the ACI group, a notably more rapid initial improvement of the KOOS was found at three months for the older age group compared to the younger age group and the microfracture group. No other differences were found based on age or defect size. In addition, clinical improvement was found for the MOCART, modified Lysholm and IKDC examination form both the ACI and microfracture group. No safety concern related to either treatment was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the safety and efficacy of matrix-associated ACI with spheroids at a mid to long-term follow-up. Non-inferiority of ACI to microfracture was confirmed for the overall KOOS and all subscores, while superiority was reached for the subscores activities of daily living, quality of life and sports and recreation in the ACI group. This underlines the importance of ACI for the young and active patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

After Chondroplasty, Patient Election to Proceed With Cartilage Transplantation Is Closely and Additively Associated With Preoperative AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth Underlying Structure) Grade, Condylar Involvement, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain Score, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Physical Score

Purpose

To identify risk factors for patient election to proceed with cartilage transplant after staging chondroplasty.

Methods

This study retrospective reviewed patients prospectively enrolled at the time of staging chondroplasty, with early election defined as patient decision to proceed to cartilage transplantation within 6 months of chondroplasty. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine univariate predictors of conversion, and a predictive calculator, the Cartilage Early Return for Transplant score, was formulated using stepwise regression employing the Akaike information criterion. Receiver operator curves and the area under the curve were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the final model on the studied patient population.

Results

Sixty-five knees (63 patients) were evaluated, with an overall transplant election rate of 27.7% within 6 months after chondroplasty. Based on multivariate results, the final Akaike information criterion-driven Cartilage Early Return for Transplant score employed preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain Score, Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Physical Score, condylar involvement, and AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth Underlying Structure) score to generate a 0- to 7-point risk-stratification system with a 3% early election to proceed to transplant risk in the 0- to 2-point score group, 33% risk in the 3- to 4-point group, and 79% risk in the 5+-point group (P < .01) and an overall AUC of 0.906 (P < .01).

Conclusions

Risk of early patient election to pursue cartilage transplantation after chondroplasty is closely and additively associated with preoperative AMADEUS grade, condylar involvement, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain Score, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Physical Score.

Clinical Relevance

Understanding risk factors for conversion to cartilage transplantation may improve preoperative planning and counseling prior to staging chondroplasty.

Incidence, Timing, and Risk Factors for 5-Year Revision Surgery After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in 533 Patients

BACKGROUND

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be used to treat focal, full-thickness chondral defects of the knee. However, there is limited large-sample evidence available regarding the incidence, timing, and risk factors for revision surgery after ACI.

PURPOSE

To assess the 5-year incidence, timing, and risk factors for revision surgery after ACI in a large national cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The 2010-2020 PearlDiver database was queried for patients aged 20 to 59 years who underwent primary ACI of the knee without previous chondral procedures or knee arthroplasty. Revision surgery was defined as subsequent revision ACI, osteochondral allograft transplantation, osteochondral autograft transfer, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, or total knee arthroplasty within 5 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess both incidence and timing of revision surgery. Risk factors evaluated for revision surgery included patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) score, and previous or concomitant bony realignment procedures.

RESULTS

In total, 533 patients underwent primary ACI and met inclusion criteria. The 5-year incidence of revision surgery was 10.3%, with 63% of revisions occurring in the first 2 years after surgery. Risk factors associated with revision surgery included female sex (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.22-5.45; P = .013) and BMI ≥35 (odds ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.01-4.94; P = .047). There was no relationship between age, ECI score, or previous or concomitant bony realignment procedures and revision surgery at 5 years (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

In an analysis of 533 patients who underwent ACI, 10.3% required a subsequent articular cartilage procedure or conversion to knee arthroplasty in the first 5 postoperative years. Revision surgery was greatest in the first 2 postoperative years. Female sex and severe obesity (BMI, ≥35) were associated with increased risk of revision surgery, while age, ECI score, and previous or concomitant bony realignment procedures were not. These findings suggest that treatment of chondral defects of the knee with ACI is associated with durable outcomes at the 5-year follow-up.

Computerized tomography scan evaluation after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee correlates with clinical outcomes

Purpose

To determine the correlation between the assessment computed tomography osteochondral allograft (ACTOCA) scoring system and clinical outcomes scores. The hypothesis was that the ACTOCA score would show sufficient correlation to support its use in clinical practice.

Methods

We prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients who underwent cartilage restitution with fresh osteochondral allograft (FOCA) transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the knee and had a minimum follow-up of two years. CT scans were performed at three, six and 24 months post-operatively. A musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the patients’ medical history evaluated the scans using the ACTOCA scoring system. Clinical outcomes collected preoperatively and at three, six and 24 months postoperatively were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Kujala, the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), and the Tegner Activity Scale.

Results

The mean total ACTOCA score showed a statistically significant correlation with the clinical outcome. The correlation was optimal at 24 months. We found a high negative correlation with the IKDC, Kujala and Tegner (− 0.737; − 0.757, and − 0.781 respectively), and a moderate negative correlation with WOMET (− 0.566) (p < 0.001). IKDC, Kujala, WOMET, and Tegner scores showed a significant continuous improvement in all scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The mean total ACTOCA score showed a linear correlation with clinical results in IKDC, Kujala, WOMET, and Tegner scores, being the highest at 24 months post-surgery. This finding supports the use of ACTOCA to standardize CT scan reports following fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee.

Treatment Options for Patellofemoral Arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present a synthesis of recent literature regarding the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis RECENT FINDINGS: Risk factors of PFJ OA include patella malalignment or maltracking, injury to supportive structures including the MPFL, dysfunction of hamstring and quadriceps coordination, lower limb alignment, trochlear dysplasia, patellar trauma, or ACL surgery. Special physical exam maneuvers include patellar grind test, apprehension test, and lateral patellar tilt angle. Radiographs that should be obtained first-line include weight bearing bilateral AP, lateral, and Merchant views. CT and MRI are used to assess trochlear dysplasia, excessive patellar height, and TT-TG distance. Non-operative management options discussed include non-pharmacologic treatment (patient education, self-management, physical therapy, weight loss), ESWT, cold therapy, taping, bracing, and orthotics. Pharmacologic management options discussed include NSAIDs, acetaminophen, oral narcotics, and duloxetine. Injection therapies include glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid, PRP, and other regenerative therapies (BMAC, adipose, or mesenchymal stem cells). Other treatment options include radiofrequency ablation and botulinum toxin. The algorithm for the surgical treatment of PFJ OA can begin with arthroscopic assessment of the PF articular cartilage to address mechanical symptoms and to evaluate/treat lateral soft tissue with or without overhanging lateral osteophytes. If patients fail to have symptomatic improvement, a TTO can be considered in those patients less than 50 years of age or active patients >50 years old. In patients with severe PFJ OA, refractory to the above treatments, PFA should be considered. While early PFA design and technique were less than encouraging, more recent implant design and surgical technique have demonstrated robust results in the literature. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis is a challenging orthopedic problem to treat, in that it can often affect younger patients, with otherwise well-functioning knees. It is a unique entity compared to TF OA with distinct epidemiology, biomechanics and risk factors and treatment options.

Safety and Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroids for Patellofemoral or Tibiofemoral Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Phase 2, Dose-Confirmation Trial

Background:

Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a well-established treatment for cartilage defects. High-level evidence at midterm follow-up is limited, especially for ACI using spheroids (spherical aggregates of ex vivo expanded human autologous chondrocytes and self-synthesized extracellular matrix).

Purpose:

To assess the safety and efficacy of 3-dimensional matrix-associated ACI using spheroids to treat medium to large cartilage defects on different locations in the knee joint (patella, trochlea, and femoral condyle) at 5-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 75 patients aged 18 to 50 years with medium to large (4-10 cm²), isolated, single cartilage defects, International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4, were randomized on a single-blind basis to treatment with ACI at 1 of 3 dose levels: 3 to 7, 10 to 30, or 40 to 70 spheroids/cm² of defect size. Outcomes were assessed via changes from baseline Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, and modified Lysholm assessments at 1- and 5-year follow-up. Structural repair was evaluated using MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) score. Treatment-related adverse events were assessed up to 5 years for all patients. The overall KOOS at 12 months was assessed for superiority versus baseline in a 1-sample, 2-sided t test.

Results:

A total of 73 patients were treated: 24 in the low-dose group, 25 in the medium-dose group, and 24 in the high-dose group. The overall KOOS improved from 57.0 ± 15.2 at baseline to 73.4 ± 17.3 at 1-year follow-up (P < .0001) and 76.9 ± 19.3 at 5-year follow-up (P < .0001), independent of the applied dose. The different defect locations (patella, trochlea, and weightbearing part of the femoral condyles; P = .2216) and defect sizes (P = .8706) showed comparable clinical improvement. No differences between the various doses were observed. The overall treatment failure rate until 5 years was 4%. Most treatment-related adverse events occurred within the first 12 months after implantation, with the most frequent adverse reactions being joint effusion (n = 71), arthralgia (n = 14), and joint swelling (n = 9).

Conclusion:

ACI using spheroids was safe and effective for defect sizes up to 10 cm² and showed maintenance of efficacy up to 5 years for all 3 doses that were investigated.

Registration:

NCT01225575 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier); 2009-016816-20 (EudraCT number).

Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures

OBJECTIVE

To create a treatment algorithm for focal grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects of the knee using both classic and novel cartilage restoration techniques.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed highlighting classic as well as novel cartilage restoration techniques supported by clinical and/or basic science research and currently being employed by orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

There is a high level of evidence to support the treatment of small to medium size lesions (<2-4 cm2) without subchondral bone involvement with traditional techniques such as marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT), or osteochondral allograft transplant (OCA). Newer techniques such as autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate implantation have also been shown to be effective in select studies. If subchondral bone loss is present OAT or OCA should be performed. For large lesions (>4 cm2), OCA or matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) may be performed. OCA is preferred over MACI in the setting of subchondral bone involvement while cell-based modalities such as MACI or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage are preferred in the patellofemoral joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous techniques exist for the orthopedic surgeon treating focal cartilage defects of the knee. Treatment strategies should be based on lesion size, lesion location, subchondral bone involvement, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in Osteochondritis Dissecans in the Knee Joint

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a chronic and painful joint condition that can occur from childhood through to adult life. Microtrauma, vascular insufficiency, or abnormal endochondral ossification are the most common causes of OCD. Reconstructive techniques for OCD of the knee are typically necessary when either non-operative or reparative/regenerative operative treatments fail, or when the OCD is irreversible. To analyze the clinical outcomes and failure rates of fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation (FOCA) used as a reconstructive strategy in OCD patients, an in-depth search was carried out on the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases concerning the existing evidence related to the use of FOCA for OCD patients in the knee joint. A total of 646 studies were found through the search and 2 studies were added after a cross-referenced examination of the articles within the bibliography. Six studies with a total of 303 OCD lesions treated with FOCA, with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, were included. Although a limited number of low-level evidence studies on this topic are available in previous research, satisfactory clinical results and survival rates of the reconstruction are reported. However, to better define the real advantages of FOCA in the healing process of OCD lesions, comparative studies with different techniques are needed.

[Patellofemoral cartilage repair]

Anterior knee pain is a frequent symptom in young athletes. Symptomatic patellofemoral cartilage defects can occur after trauma, especially after patellar dislocation. Numerous cartilage repair methods are currently available. Due to co-pathologies, the outcome after patellofemoral cartilage repair is inferior to the treatment of cartilage defects of the tibiofemoral joint. Adequate addressing of coexisting pathologies is essential for treatment success. This review provides an overview of the different techniques of patellofemoral cartilage repair.

Anteriorizing Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions

Patellofemoral chondral lesions are common and can lead to significant pain. A tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) functions to mechanically unload the patellofemoral joint and improve the clinical success of cartilage restoration procedures. The type of TTO performed is based on several factors. There is a subset of patients with patellofemoral cartilage disease who would benefit from a pure anteriorization of the tibial tubercle. We describe our technique for a pure anteriorization TTO, which functions to safely unload the patellofemoral joint in the appropriately indicated patient.

Cartilage Restoration for Tibiofemoral Bipolar Lesions Results in Promising Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

Purpose

The purpose of the present study is to systematically review the available literature for management of bipolar lesions within the tibiofemoral joint and determine whether tibiofemoral cartilage restoration is an effective treatment modality.

Methods

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were queried between 2000 and 2020 using the following keywords: “osteochondral” and “knee” and “microfracture,” “autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI),” or “transplantation." Articles were reviewed for the presence of a bipolar or “kissing” tibiofemoral lesion and reported lesion size, concomitant procedures, failure rates, and time to failure.

Results

After screening 1,295 articles, there were 4 articles available for analysis and a total of 152 knees involving the management of bipolar tibiofemoral lesions. Age ranged from 14 to 60 years, and mean follow-up was between 12 and 240 months. There was 1 retrospective cohort study (36 knees) and 3 case series (mean, 38.7 ± 17.5 knees). There were 58 knees treated with bipolar osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation, 58 knees treated with bipolar ACI, 20 knees treated with femoral OCA and tibial debridement, and 16 knees treated with femoral OCA and tibial microfracture. There were 37 failures (24.3%): 16 patients (10.5%) were converted to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty, 4 restorative procedures (2.6%) were revised, and 8 patients (1.6%) had unsatisfactory outcomes only. The remaining 15 failures (9.9%) had an unspecified combination of objective failure. The mean rate of failure ranged between 0% and 44.1% (I² = 83.2%). The mean time to failure ranged between 2.7 and 4.1 years (I² = 79.1%).

Conclusions

Cartilage restoration, through both ACI and OCA, had failure rates between 0% and 44% in patients with bipolar lesions of the tibiofemoral compartment. Although a higher level of evidence is required to prove efficacy, the current study demonstrates midterm survivorship rates between 55% and 100%, which may delay the need for secondary arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Cartilage Restoration of Bipolar Lesions Within the Patellofemoral Joint Delays Need for Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Rates of Failure

Purpose

The purpose of the present review is to systematically review the available literature for failure rates and complications of cartilage restoration of bipolar chondral defects in the patellofemoral (PF) joint to assess the ability to treat these lesions without arthroplasty.

Methods

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were queried between 2000 to 2020 using the keywords "osteochondral" and "knee" and "microfracture," "autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)," or "transplantation." Patient selection included patients with bipolar chondral lesions of the patellofemoral joint that were treated with cartilage restoration procedures. Treatment of PF joints were reviewed for surgical indications/technique, rates of failure, defect characteristics, and time to failure. For the purposes of this study, failure was defined by each individual author on their respective studies.

Results

After screening 1,295 articles, there were 8 publications analyzed quantitatively and 10 articles analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. A total of 249 knees involved bipolar lesions of the patellofemoral joint. The weighted average age was 36.5 ± 10.4 years, and weighted average follow-up was 89.0 ± 31.7 months. There were failures in 0% to 50% of cases, revision procedures in 0% to 10% of cases, conversion to arthroplasty in in 0% to 50% of cases, and unsatisfactory outcome without revision in 0% to 8.3% of cases. The range in average failure rate was 0% to 50.0% (I² = 68.0%), whereas the range in average time to failure was 2.9 to 6.8 years (I² = 79.0%).

Conclusion

From the available data, established cartilage restoration procedures may provide favorable patient-reported function, avoidance of secondary surgery, and joint preservation in at least 80% of patients at short- to mid-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Arthroscopic Subchondral Drilling Followed by Injection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells and Hyaluronic Acid Showed Improved Outcome Compared to Hyaluronic Acid and Physiotherapy for Massive Knee Chondral Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-articular injections of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) plus hyaluronic acid (HA) after arthroscopic subchondral drilling into massive chondral defects of the knee joint and to determine whether PBSC therapy can improve functional outcome and reduce pain of the knee joint better than HA plus physiotherapy.

METHODS

This is a dual-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Sixty-nine patients aged 18 to 55 years with International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 and 4 chondral lesions (size ≥3 cm²) of the knee joint were randomized equally into (1) a control group receiving intra-articular injections of HA plus physiotherapy and (2) an intervention group receiving arthroscopic subchondral drilling into chondral defects and postoperative intra-articular injections of PBSCs plus HA. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain subdomain measured at month 24. The secondary efficacy endpoints included all other KOOS subdomains, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scores.

RESULTS

At 24 months, the mean IKDC scores for the control and intervention groups were 48.1 and 65.6, respectively (P < .0001). The mean for KOOS-pain subdomain scores were 59.0 (control) and 86.0 (intervention) with P < .0001. All other KOOS subdomain, NRS, and MOCART scores were statistically significant (P < .0001) at month 24. Moreover, for the intervention group, 70.8% of patients had IKDC and KOOS-pain subdomain scores exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values, indicating clinical significance. There were no notable adverse events that were unexpected and related to the study drug or procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic marrow stimulation with subchondral drilling into massive chondral defects of the knee joint followed by postoperative intra-articular injections of autologous PBSCs plus HA is safe and showed a significant improvement of clinical and radiologic scores compared with HA plus physiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, RCT.

Reconstruction of Large Osteochondral Lesions in the Knee: Focus on Fixation Techniques

Large (>3 cm²), focal osteochondral lesions (OCL) may result in poor functional outcomes and early secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. The surgical management of these OCL remains challenging. The treatment strategy must be tailored to various aspects, including lesion-specific (e.g., size, location, chronicity), joint-specific (e.g., instability, limb alignment, meniscal status), and patient-specific factors (e.g., age, activity level, comorbidities). Simple chondroplasty and bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques should be reserved for smaller lesions, as they only realize midterm clinical benefits, related to inferior wear characteristics of the induced fibrocartilage (type I collagen). Therefore, much attention has been focused on surgical restoration with hyaline cartilage (type II collagen), based on chondrocyte transplantation and matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). Limited graft availability, staged procedures (MACI), and high treatment costs are limitations of these techniques. However, acute traumatic OCL of the femoral condyles and patellofemoral joint may also be suitable for preservation by surgical fixation. Early detection of the fragment facilitates primary repair with internal fixation. The surgical repair of the articular surface may offer promising clinical and cost-effective benefits as a first-line therapy but remains under-investigated and potentially under-utilized. As a unique characteristic, the fixation technique allows the anatomic restoration of the hyaline articular surface with native cartilage and the repair of the subchondral bone. In this manuscript, we present a case series of large OCL around the knee that were preserved by surgical fixation. Furthermore, various implants and techniques reported for this procedure are reviewed.

An experimental simulation model to assess wear of the porcine patellofemoral joint

A range of surgical techniques and osteochondral interventions have been developed for early stage chondral/osteochondral repair interventions in the knee however, methods for functional, pre-clinical assessment of these therapies are limited. In this study, a method for simulating physiological loading and motion in the porcine patellofemoral joint was developed using a 6-axis simulator. As an example of how the method can be used, the influence of surgical positioning of osteochondral allografts in the patella on cartilage wear, deformation and damage and graft stability was investigated in this porcine patellofemoral joint model. The functional performance of allografts implanted either optimally (flush with the cartilage surface) or 1 mm proud of the cartilage surface was compared to a positive control (stainless steel pin implanted 1 mm proud of the cartilage surface), a negative control (no intervention) and a defect model. Allografts implanted flush with the surrounding cartilage could restore the articulating surface of the patella resulting in low wear, damage and deformation of the opposing cartilage surface, similar to that of the negative control group. Implanting the graft proud of the patella surface resulted in cartilage lesions on the femoral trochlea (ICRS grade 2) and a cartilage volume difference of 2.0 ± 3.9 mm3; the positive controls resulted in more severe lesions, a higher volume difference (14.2 ± 7.4 mm3) which in some cases exposed subchondral bone (ICRS grade 4). Defects in the patella caused deformation of the opposing cartilage surface. All grafts implanted in the patella subsided over the duration of the study. This study demonstrated a method that can be used to evaluate osteochondral repair strategies in the patellofemoral joint applying physiological loading and motions.