Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

[Imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral rotational instability of the knee joint]

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is essential for the stability of the knee joint and ACL tears are one of the most common sports injuries with a high incidence, especially in sports that require rotational movements and abrupt changes in direction. Injuries of the ACL are rarely isolated and are often accompanied by meniscal and other internal knee injuries, which increase the risk of osteoarthritis. The spectrum of ACL injuries includes strains, partial tears and complete tears. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in the diagnostics as it can accurately depict not only the ACL but also accompanying injuries. Proton density and T2-weighted sequences are particularly suitable for evaluating the ACL, which is usually well visible and assessable in all planes. In addition to depicting fiber disruption as a direct sign and central diagnostic indicator of an ACL tear, there are numerous other direct and indirect signs of an ACL injury in MRI. These include abnormal fiber orientations, signal increases and an anterior subluxation of the tibia relative to the femur. The bone marrow edema patterns often associated with ACL tears are indicative of the underlying injury mechanism. The treatment of ACL tears can be conservative or surgical depending on various factors, such as the patient's activity level and the presence of accompanying injuries. The precise and comprehensive description of ACL injuries by radiology is crucial for optimal treatment planning. Anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) of the knee joint characterizes a condition of excessive lateral and rotational mobility of the tibia in relation to the femur in the anterolateral knee region. This instability is primarily caused by a rupture of the ACL, with the anterolateral ligament (ALL) that was rediscovered about 10 years ago, also being attributed a role in stabilizing the knee. Although ALRI is primarily diagnosed through clinical examinations, MRI is indispensable for detecting injuries to the ACL, ALL, and other internal knee structures, which is essential for developing an optimal treatment strategy.

Comparison of ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Isolated ACL Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: Outcomes in Young Female Patients With High-Grade Pivot Shift

Background

Inferior return to sports (RTS) and functional outcomes have been reported in women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose was to evaluate the results of combined ACLR and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in young women with a high-grade pivot shift (grade ≥2). It was hypothesized that combined ACLR and ALLR would result in better RTS and rotational stability than isolated ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Two groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared. Group I (n = 39; mean age, 31.1 ± 5.7 years) underwent isolated ACLR using hamstring autografts; group C (n = 39; mean age, 30.4 ± 6.1 years) underwent combined ACLR and ALLR. Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, Lysholm, Tegner, and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI). Objective tests included a KT-2000 arthrometer stress test, a pivot-shift test, an isokinetic strength test, a Y-balance test, and a single-leg hop test. A postoperative questionnaire was administered to determine the rates and types of RTS, quality of sports performance, and reinjury and satisfaction rates. Subjective scores and clinical tests were performed at 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were conducted during the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively.

Results

The mean follow-up for groups I and C were 30.4 ± 3.9 and 29.3 ± 3.5 months, respectively (P = .194). Patients in group C had better anteroposterior (P = .001) and rotational (P = .005) stability and higher ACL-RSI scores (P = .025) than those in group I. Group C had higher composite and posteromedial reach scores on the Y-balance test than group I (P = .014 and P = .010, respectively). A total of 26 (66.7%) patients in group C and 17 (43.6%) in group I returned to their prior level of sports (P = .040). Rerupture of the ACL graft and contralateral ACL rupture occurred in 2 (5.1%) and 2 (5.1%) patients in group I, respectively, compared with no rerupture or contralateral ACL rupture in group C.

Conclusion

Combined ACLR and ALLR in young women with a high-grade pivot shift was associated with better knee stability parameters, dynamic postural stability, and psychological readiness to RTS than isolated ACLR.

Sectioning of the Anterolateral Ligaments in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Sectioned Knees Increases Internal Rotation of the Knee Joint: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cadaveric Studies

PURPOSE

To investigate whether anterolateral ligament (ALL) sectioning (sALL) in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-sectioned (sACL) knee increases the anterior tibial translation (ATT) or internal rotation (IR) of the knee from previous cadaveric biomechanical studies.

METHODS

Multiple comprehensive literature databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were searched for studies evaluating the in vitro biomechanical function of ALL. This meta-analysis compared the increased ATT and IR between the sACL and sACL + sALL knees at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Thresholds of 2 mm for the difference in ATT and 2° for the difference in IR were considered to be clinically significant.

RESULTS

Thirteen cadaveric biomechanical studies were included. All 13 studies satisfied the threshold for a satisfactory methodological quality (Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies score >75%). At 30° of knee flexion, the meta-analysis showed a greater increase in ATT in the sACL + sALL knees than in the sACL knees by 1.23 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.84; P < .0001). However, the mean difference was less than the minimal clinically significant difference (<2 mm). The meta-analysis also showed a greater increase in IR in the sACL + sALL knees than in the sACL knees at 30° (mean difference [MD]: 2.24°; 95% CI: 1.39-3.09; P < .00001), 60° (MD: 2.77°; 95% CI: 1.88-3.67; P < .00001), and 90° (MD: 2.29°; 95% CI: 1.42-3.15; P < .00001) of knee flexion. The differences in IR at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion were clinically relevant (>2°).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different experimental setups and protocols between studies, the meta-analysis of biomechanical cadaveric studies showed that sectioning of the ALL in sACL knees increased IR at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ALL contributes to IR in ACL-deficient knees at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion.

Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of the anterolateral ligament and grafts commonly used in its reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Current anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction is typically performed using either a gracilis tendon or an iliotibial band graft based on their quasi-static behavior. However, there is limited knowledge about their viscoelastic behaviors. This study aimed to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the anterolateral ligament, distal iliotibial band, distal gracilis tendon and proximal gracilis tendon for graft material choice in anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

All the tissues were harvested from thirteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees and subjected to preconditioning (3-6 MPa), sinusoidal cycle (1.2-12 MPa), dwell at constant load (12 MPa), and load to failure (3%/s). The quasi-static and viscoelastic properties of the soft tissues were computed and compared using a linear mixed model (p < 0.05).

FINDINGS

The hysteresis of anterolateral ligament (mean:0.4 Nm) was comparable with gracilis halves (p > 0.85) but iliotibial band (6 Nm) was significantly higher (p < 0.001,ES = 6.5). In contrast, the dynamic creep of anterolateral ligament (0.5 mm) was similar to iliotibial band (0.7 mm, p > 0.82) whereas both gracilis halves were significantly lower (p < 0.007,ES > 1.4). The elastic modulus of anterolateral ligament (181.4 MPa, p < 0.001,ES > 2.1) was the lowest compared to the grafts materials (distal gracilis tendon:835 MPa, distal gracilis tendon:726 MPa, iliotibial band:910 MPa). Additionally, the failure load of the anterolateral ligament (124.5 N, p < 0.001,ES > 2.9) was also the lowest.

INTERPRETATION

The mechanical properties of the gracilis halves and iliotibial band were significantly different from anterolateral ligament, except for hysteresis and dynamic creep, respectively. Our findings showed that the gracilis halves may be a more appropriate graft choice for anterolateral ligament reconstruction due to its low energy dissipation and permanent deformation under dynamic loads.

Failure Rates of Repaired Bucket-Handle Tears of the Medial Meniscus Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 253 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 94 Months

BACKGROUND

Failure rates of repaired bucket-handle medial meniscal tears (BHMMTs) concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are as high as 20%. The outcomes of posteromedial portal suture hook repair have not been compared with all-inside repair techniques for this subtype of meniscal lesion.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and failure rates of patients who underwent BHMMT repair concomitant with ACLR using an all-inside technique, suture hook + all-inside technique, or suture hook + outside-in technique. It was hypothesized that no significant differences in failure rates would be found between the groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with a BHMMT who underwent meniscal repair during primary ACLR and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were grouped based on the meniscal repair technique used: all-inside repair, suture hook + all-inside repair, or suture hook + outside-in repair. At the end of the study period, secondary medial meniscectomy rates were determined.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 253 patients who underwent repair of a BHMMT with concomitant ACLR with a mean follow-up of 94.0 ± 47.6 months. A total of 114 patients (45.1%) underwent all-inside repair, 61 patients (24.1%) underwent suture hook + all-inside repair, and 78 patients (30.8%) underwent suture hook + outside-in repair. Overall, there were 36 failures. The failure rates were 20.2%, 14.8%, and 5.1%, respectively (P = .0135). All-inside repairs were >4 times more likely to fail than suture hook + outside-in repairs (hazard ratio [HR], 4.103; 95% CI, 1.369-12.296; P = .0117). Failure was also 3 times higher (HR, 2.943; 95% CI, 1.224-7.075; P = .0159) for patients <30 years of age compared with those aged ≥30 years. An additional anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) was also found to reduce the failure rate of repaired BHMMTs concomitant with ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Combined suture hook + outside-in repair of BHMMTs resulted in significantly fewer failures than all other techniques. Furthermore, age <30 years and no additional ALLR were associated with higher failure rates.

Surgical techniques in the management of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament tears: Current concepts

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament injury in the child and adolescent patient remains a controversial topic when considering management, especially regarding surgical choices. Treatment variations are seen not just when comparing different countries but also within nations. This arises partly as contemporary treatment is mostly inferred from the adult population who physiologically and in terms of outcomes differ significantly from children. There is an increasing body of evidence for this cohort of patients who have specific challenges and difficulties when determining the optimum treatment.

Methods

Within this article, we will summarize the current evidence for surgical management of anterior cruciate ligament injury for the pediatric patient.

Results and Conclusions

There remain many controversies and gaps inthe treatment of Paediatric Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and this high risk cohort continues to cause difficulty in identifying the best mode of surgical management.

Level of evidence

level IV.

High-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with asymmetry of lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation and lateral meniscus posterior horn tears

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry of the lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation (L-ATT and M-ATT) and lateral meniscus posterior horn (LMPH) tears in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 192 consecutive patients who had complete ACL injuries between January 2019 and December 2020. Among these, 156 met the inclusion criteria. L-ATT and M-ATT were measured using preoperative weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the differences between L-ATT and M-ATT were calculated. Thirty-five patients who demonstrated excessive differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (> 6.0 mm) were regarded as asymmetric (study group), and 36 patients with minimal or no differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (< 3.0 mm) were allocated to the control group. Demographic data, grade of the pivot-shift test, integrality of LMPH, and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) were compared between the groups. Moreover, predictors of high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon, including asymmetry of L-ATT and M-ATT, integrity of LMPH and MMPH, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The difference between L-ATT and M-ATT in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (mean ± SD: 8.4 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.5 ± 1.0 mm, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients with high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon (2 + and 3 +) and LMPH tears were identified in the study group (high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon: 25/35 vs. 13/36, P = 0.003; LMPH tears: 18/35 vs. 5/36, P = 0.001). Additionally, asymmetry of L-ATT, M-ATT (odds ratio 5.8; 95% CI 1.7-19.8; P = 0.005), and LMPH tears (odds ratio 3.8; 95% CI 1.3-11.6; P = 0.018) were found to be good predictors of the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after ACL injury, whereas MMPH tears, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and BMI were not.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACL injury, the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry between L-ATT and M-ATT, and LMPH tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anterolateral Structure Reconstructions With Different Tibial Attachment Sites Similarly Improve Tibiofemoral Kinematics and Result in Different Graft Force in Treating Knee Anterolateral Instability

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical effects of anterolateral structure reconstructions (ALSRs) with different tibial attachments on tibiofemoral kinematics and anterolateral structure (ALS) graft forces.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees were tested in a customized knee testing system, using a novel pulley system to simulate more muscle tensions by loading the iliotibial band at 30 N and quadriceps at 10 N in all testing states. Anterior stability during anterior load and anterolateral rotatory stability during 2 simulated pivot-shift tests (PST1 and PST2) were evaluated in 5 states: intact, ALS-deficient (Def), ALSR-Ta (anterior tibial site), ALSR-Tm (middle tibial site), and ALSR-Tp (posterior tibial site). Tibiofemoral kinematics and resulting ALS graft forces against the applied loads were measured and compared in the corresponding states.

RESULTS

In anterior load, 3 ALSRs mitigated the anterior laxities of the ALS Def state at all degrees, which were close to intact state at 0° and 30° but showed significantly overconstraints at 60° and 90°. In both PSTs, all ALSRs significantly reduced the anterolateral rotatory instability of ALS Def, whereas the significant overconstraints were detected in ALSR-Ta and ALSR-Tm at greater knee flexion angles. All ALS grafts carried forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads. Only ALS graft force in ALSR-Ta increased continuously with knee flexion angles. The ALS graft forces carried by ALSR-Ta were significantly larger than those by ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm when resisting anterior load and PSTs at greater knee flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

ALSRs with different tibial attachment sites similarly restored knee laxities close to the native tibiofemoral kinematics in an ALS-deficient knee, whereas the ALSR-Tp showed less propensity for overconstraining the knee at greater flexion angles. The ALS graft in ALSR-Ta carried more forces than those in ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm against simulated loads.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Altering the tibial attachment sites of ALSRs may not significantly affect tibiofemoral kinematics at most degrees whereas the posterior may have less overconstraints at greater flexion angles. However, ALS graft positioning at a more anterior tibial attachment site may carry more forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads.

Anterolateral complex of the knee: State of the art

Rotatory instability of the knee represents the main reason for failure and poor clinical outcomes regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques. It is now clear that the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee possesses a fundamental role, in association with the ACL, in controlling internal rotation. Over the past decade, ever since the anterolateral ligament has been identified and described as a distinct structure, there has been a renewed interest in the scientific community about the whole ALC: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis have made a comeback in association with ACL reconstructions to improve functional outcomes, reducing the risks of graft failure and associated injuries. Modern ACL reconstruction surgery must therefore investigate residual instability and proceed, when necessary, to extra-articular techniques, whether functional tenodesis or anatomical reconstruction.This review aims to investigate the latest anatomical and histological descriptions, and the role in rotational control and knee biomechanics of the ALC and its components. The diagnostic tools for its identification, different reconstruction techniques, and possible surgical indications are described.. In addition, clinical and functional results available in the literature are reported.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between isolated ACL reconstruction and combined ACL with anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes between isolated cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and combined ACL with anterolateral ligament reconstruction in chronic ACL injury especially with rotary instability problem.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted of literature published up to July 2021 on PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing isolated ACLR and ACL with anterolateral reconstruction. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Pooled clinical outcomes used random effects with mean differences and risk ratio for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

After excluding 49 articles based on full-text screening, six studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria in the meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes such as residual laxity, rotatory instability, and graft failure were compared between isolated ACLR and combined ACL and anterolateral stability reconstruction. Overall, both clinical outcomes of isolated ACL and combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction show improvement results in pivot shift test, the absence of residual laxity and incidence of graft failure. Compared to isolated ACLR, the prominent postoperative result was by combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction which had significant differences in laxity outcome based on (I² = 89%, p < 0.00001) and (MD = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.33-1.08, p = 0.00002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction tended to have superior clinical outcomes, especially in the absence of residual laxity, compared to the isolated ACLR, but the other results were not significantly different statistically. Combined ACL and anterolateral reconstruction were not performed routinely for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, but more suitable for chronic rotatory instability problem.