The Utility of Continuous Passive Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Assessment of a continuous passive motion assistive device in dogs following stifle surgery

Canine rehabilitation optimizes recovery and the quality of life in dogs with musculoskeletal conditions or after surgery. Achieving proper range of motion (ROM) is vital post-stifle surgery, often accomplished through manual therapy and active exercises. We investigated the mechanical performance of a continuous passive motion (CPM) device for dogs and its potential use in canine rehabilitation therapy. In the ethical review process, our research was accepted to be evaluated in a sample of four dogs that had undergone left stifle surgery. Each dog underwent four sessions with the device at three different speeds. Results showed the device replicated extension angles close to goniometer measurements used in manual therapy. Flexion was also achieved, but not to the same extent. A force threshold stopped the device, avoiding discomfort in dogs with restricted ROM. Dog-specific factors like body position, opposition to movement, limb size, stage of recovery, haircoat, and discomfort, appeared to influence device operation. Mechanical improvements to allow for enhanced flexion are recommended in future CPM device designs, including a resistance threshold that could be adjusted for individual dogs and stages of healing. This study serves as a foundation for future advancements in canine rehabilitation systems. A canine CPM device may provide an affordable option to improve ROM. This could be beneficial for dog owners, who may not be comfortable with manual therapy, to assist with home rehabilitation exercises.

[Current approach in the follow-up treatment of joint-preserving operations on the knee joint in German-speaking countries]

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative follow-up after joint-preserving knee surgery involves conventional physiotherapy as well as other approaches and devices such as CPM and CAM splints, TENS devices, BFR exercise, prehabilitation, and digital health applications. The aim of this survey was to investigate current standards, trends and control methods in postoperative care to identify fields of concern and to compare them with the current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a structured anonymous online survey of specialists in orthopaedics and trauma surgery listed by the German-speaking Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (AGA). The questionnaire included 36 closed-ended questions on the follow-up of joint-preserving surgery of the knee joint.

RESULTS

Questionnaires from 528 participants with long-term professional experience (86.6% with more than 10 years) were analysed. Standardised post-treatment schemes are used by 97.2% and their evidence is estimated to be high (59.1%) / very high (14.8%). Problems of rehabilitation are seen in 10-20% of cases by 87.3% (persistent muscular atrophy 30.9%). After reconstructive surgery, CPM splints (70.1%), CAM splints (42.1%), orthoses (85.0%) and TENS devices (40.0%) are prescribed. More potent approaches for the treatment of postoperative muscle deficits are desired by 89.4%. BFR exercise is known by 41.7% and is used regularly by 8%. Communication with treating physiotherapists is infrequent (written: 27.5%). Digital rehabilitation management would be supported by 83.3%; 22.7% are not aware of digital health applications. 87.9% of participants believe that prehabilitation can affect postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of knee joint-preserving surgeries is usually standardised and regularly reviewed for up-to-date evidence. The evidence for recommendations made is considered high. Orthoses are usually used after reconstructive surgery, persistent muscle atrophy is a major problem, BFR training is only known to a limited extent, and there is currently a lack of standardised training protocols. Communication with physiotherapists needs to be improved. Digital rehabilitation management is rarely used but would be supported by the majority of surgeons.

Evidence-Based Practice Should Supersede Evidence-Based Medicine Through Consideration of Clinical Experience and Patient Characteristics in Addition to the Published Literature

On the surface, the benefits of evidence-based medicine (EBM) seem self-evident. However, reliance on the scientific literature alone has limitations. Studies may be biased, statistically fragile, and/or not reproducible. Reliance solely on EBM may ignore physician clinical experience and individual patient characteristics and input. Reliance solely on EBM may overvalue quantitative, statistical significance, resulting in a false sense of certainty. Reliance solely on EBM may fail to consider lack of generalizability of published studies to individually unique patients. The concept of evidence-based practice goes beyond EBM and incorporates (1) EBM, (2) clinical expertise, and (3) individual patient characteristics, values, and preferences. Even if branded as evidence-based, a suggested treatment may not be the best treatment. Evidence-based practice must be considered before determining what is best for our patients.

Low-level laser therapy attenuates arthrogenic contracture induced by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in rats

Therapeutic approaches to treat joint contracture after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not been established. Arthrofibrosis accompanied by joint inflammation following ACL reconstruction is a major cause of arthrogenic contracture. In this study, we examined whether anti-inflammatory treatment using low-level laser therapy (LLLT) can prevent ACL reconstruction-induced arthrogenic contracture. Rats underwent ACL transection and reconstruction surgery in their right knees. Unoperated left knees were used as controls. After surgery, rats were reared with or without daily LLLT (wavelength: 830 nm; power output: 150 mW; power density: 5 W/cm2; for 120 s/day). We assessed the passive extension range of motion (ROM) after myotomy at one and two weeks post-surgery; the reduction in ROM represents the severity of arthrogenic contracture. ROM was markedly decreased by ACL reconstruction at both time points; however, LLLT partially attenuated the decrease in ROM. One week after ACL reconstruction, the gene expression of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1beta in the joint capsule was significantly upregulated, and this upregulation was significantly attenuated by LLLT. Fibrotic changes in the joint capsule, including upregulation of collagen type I and III genes, shortening of the synovium, and thickening were caused by ACL reconstruction and seen at both time points. LLLT attenuated these fibrotic changes as well. Our results indicate that LLLT after ACL reconstruction could attenuate the formation of arthrogenic contracture through inhibition of inflammation and fibrosis in the joint capsule. Thus, LLLT may become a novel therapeutic approach for ACL reconstruction-induced joint contracture.