Comparing Knee Laxity After Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Versus Semitendinosus Tendon Graft

Quadriceps tendon autograft has similar clinical outcomes when compared to hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for revision ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Research regarding revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts is lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RACLR with QT and compare its patient outcomes to RACLR with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search for studies using QT in RACLR was performed within PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from database date of inception through December 26, 2022. Primary outcomes sought included: failure rate, Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, IKDC grades, arthrometric knee side-to-side differences (STSD), pivot shift grade, donor site morbidity, return to sport, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included consisting of 606 RACLR: 349 QT, 169 HT, and 88 BTB. Overall failure rates were 7.6% QT, 13.3% HT, and 8.7% BTB. Mean weighted Lysholm scores were 85.8 ± 3.8 QT, 82.5 ± 3.8 HT and 86.6 ± 4.5 BTB. IKDC average scores were 82.3 ± 1.6 QT, 80.1 ± 1.7 HT, and 81.7 ± 5.5BTB. Combined rates of IKDC A/B grades were 88.4% and 80.0% for QT and HT, respectively. VAS average scores were 0.9 ± 1.1 QT, 1.4 ± 0.2 HT, and 0.7 ± 0.8 for BTB. Side-to-side difference was reported for QT and HT with average values of 1.7 ± 0.6 mm and 2.1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Grade 0 or 1 pivot shifts were reported in 96.2% of QT patients and 91.3% of HT. Donor site morbidity, only reported for QT and HT, was 14.6 ± 9.7% and 23.6 ± 14.1%, respectively. QT resulted in a mean Tegner score of 5.9 ± 1.5 versus HT 5.7 ± 1.5. Rate of return to pivoting sports was 38.0% QT, 48.6% HT, and 76.9% BTB. Across all outcomes, there was no significant difference when comparing QT to HT, QT to BTB, and QT compared to HT and BTB combined.

CONCLUSIONS

RACLR with QT yields satisfactory patient reported outcomes, satisfactory improvement in knee laxity, expected return to sport rates, and has an overall 7.6% failure rate. Outcomes are comparative to those of HT and BTB making it an acceptable graft choice for RACLR. Surgeons should consider using QT autograft for RACLR, especially when other autografts are unavailable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.

Less than 1% risk of donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture post-ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive complications profile for quadriceps tendon-autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT ACL-R).

METHODS

A traditional and grey literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and many grey literature sources were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. All studies were searched and screened in duplicate with included studies being of all levels of evidence, reporting complications, and with patients of all ages undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft in the last 15 years. Studies were excluded if they had cadaveric or animal subjects or were reviews. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using MINORS criteria for non-randomised studies and Cochrane's RoB 2.0 for randomised studies. Data were summarised with weighted event rates generated under a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies (5315 reconstructions) were included: 32 used quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT), 19 used all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT), and four did not report the QT graft subtype used. Included patients had an age range of 6.2-58 years and an average reported follow-up time of 28.1 months (range, 6-90 months) for non-randomised studies and 34.3 months (range, 0.233-120 months) for randomised studies. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant major complications included contralateral ACL injury at 6.0%, postoperative meniscal issues at 5.4%, cyclops lesions at 4.8%, graft failure at 4.1%, patellar fracture at 2.2%, hardware removal at 1.7%, infection at 1.5%, and donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture at 0.7%. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant minor complications included anterior knee pain at 9.7%, kneeling pain at 9.5%, sensation deficits at 4.4%, loss of extension at 4.2%, donor-site tendinopathy at 3.9%, cosmetic issues at 1.8%, and hematoma at 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

QT ACL-R resembles other graft types in its rates and types of postoperative complications. In this exploratory systematic review, no complications of QT ACL-R were found to be disproportionately represented in the literature. This graft type should remain an option with comparable complication rates to other graft choices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

REGISTRATION

This study was preregistered under PROSPERO with preregistration code CRD42022302078.

Re-rupture rate and the post-surgical meniscal injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique in comparison to the interference screw technique: a retrospective analysis of 200 patients with at least 3 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus regarding the preferred surgical procedure for the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The interference screw technique is widely used, but has been associated with a risk of graft damage. The Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique is one of the alternatives for biological ACL-reconstruction with minimal implant requirements. The hypothesis of this retrospective analysis is, that the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique leads to better results with respect to re-rupture rate and secondary meniscal lesion than the interference-screw-technique.

METHODS

To compare the re-rupture rate of the interference-screw-technique (IF) used until 2015 with the currently used Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique (PFH), the last 100 patients of the IF-group and the first 100 patients of the PFH-group were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were re-rupture rate, complications and secondary meniscal injury. Additionally, laxity, Lachman and Pivot-shift and range of motion were evaluated.

RESULTS

A mean follow-up of 4.2 and 5.3 years revealed 4% and 9% re-rupture rates and 1% and 2% complication rates in the PFH- and IF-group, respectively. In the PFH-group there were no re-ruptures in patients older than 23 years. Secondary meniscal injury post-surgery was 6% and 9% for the PFH and IF-group, respectively. Knee stability was similar in both groups. Range of motion was significantly better in the PFH-group, with 136° of flexion, 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

For ACL-reconstruction the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique is an alternative new method. Low level of secondary meniscal lesions after surgery and high stability, is known to prevent later arthrosis of the knee. The encouraging observed trend of the reduction of the re-rupture rate in revision surgery and in young patients using the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique in comparison to the interference-screw-technique must be confirmed with further studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Technique of ACL Reconstruction With Autologous Quadriceps Tendon Bone Graft and Femoral Press Fit Fixation

Background:

Recently, there has been an increase in interest in the quadriceps tendon (QT) as an alternative autologous graft option for primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Indication:

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally mature patients (high-risk patients for re-rupture and patients with medial instability).

Technique Description:

The QT graft is harvested with a 4-cm skin incision over the superior pole of the patella. A double knife and an oscillating saw are used to obtain the QT graft with a bone block from the patella (65 mm x 10 mm graft and 15 mm bone block). Then an arthroscopy is carried out with assessment of the ACL tear and treatment of further intraarticular injuries. ACL reconstruction begins with debridement of the femoral insertion to expose the land marks. The medial portal is used for femoral tunnel drilling with the knee in more than 110° of flexion. A special portal aiming device is introduced via the anteromedial portal and a guide wire is placed in the area of the femoral anteromedial insertion. This guide wire is gradually overdrilled with various drills and dilators of increasing size. The final diameter should be 0.5 mm smaller than the diameter of the bone block of the graft to allow for press-fit fixation. Then, the tibial tunnel is drilled using a tibial drill guide leaving the tibial stump of the original ACL intact. The graft is pulled into the joint through the tibial tunnel until the bone block stops at the femoral tunnel entrance. The bone block is then pushed through the medial portal into the femoral tunnel (press-fit fixation). The tibial fixation is performed with an interference screw and optionally with an extracortical button.

Results:

Prior studies with 2 years follow-up have shown that the clinical outcomes in primary and revision ACL reconstruction were not significantly different between the use of QT grafts with femoral press-fit fixation and the use of hamstring grafts with femoral suspension fixation.

Discussion/Conclusion:

Quadriceps tendon bone autograft and femoral press-fit fixation provides an excellent alternative as a graft choice in ACL reconstruction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show comparable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures, but lower donor-site morbidity compared with hamstring tendon autograft: A matched-pairs study with a mean follow-up of 6.5 ​years

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon- (QT-A) and hamstring tendon (HT-A) autograft with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 5 years.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2014, all patients undergoing ACLR were recorded in a prospectively administered database. All patients with primary, isolated QT-A ACLR and without any concomitant injuries or high grade of osteoarthritis were extracted from the database and matched to patients treated with HT-A. Re-rupture rates, anterior-posterior (ap) knee laxity, single-leg hop test (SLHT) performance, distal thigh circumference (DTC) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Between group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples T- or Mann-Whitney-U tests.

RESULTS

45 QT-A patients were matched to 45 HT-A patients (n ​= ​90). The mean FU was 78.9 ​± ​13.6 months. 18 patients (20.0%/QT-A: N ​= ​8, 17.8%; HT-A: n ​= ​10, 22.2%; p ​= ​.60) sustained a graft rupture and 17 subjects (18.9%/QT-A: n ​= ​9, 20.0%; HT-A: n ​= ​8, 17.8%; p ​= ​.79) suffered a contralateral ACL injury. In high active patients (Tegner activity level ≥ 7) rerupture rates increased to 37.5% (HT-A) and 22.2% (QT-A; p ​= ​.32), respectively. Patients with graft failure did not differ between both groups in terms of mean age at surgery (QT-A: 26.5 ​± ​11.6 years, HT-A: 23.3 ​± ​9.5 years, p ​= ​.63) or graft thickness (mean graft square area: QT-A: 43.6 ​± ​4.7 mm², HT-A: 48.1 ​± ​7.9 mm², p ​= ​.27). No statistical between-group differences were found in ap knee laxity side-to-side (SSD) measurements (QT-A: 1.9 ​± ​1.2 ​mm, HT-A: 2.1 ​± ​1.5 ​mm; p ​= ​.60), subjective IKDC- (QT-A: 93.8 ​± ​6.8, HT-A: 91.2 ​± ​7.8, p ​= ​.17), Lysholm- (QT-A 91.9 ​± ​7.2, HT-A: 91.5 ​± ​9.7, p ​= ​.75) or any of the five subscales of the KOOS score (all p ​> ​.05). Furthermore, Tegner activity level (QT-A: 6(1.5), HT-A: 6(2), p ​= ​.62), VAS for pain (QT-A: 0.5 ​± ​0.9, HT-A: 0.6 ​± ​1.0, p ​= ​.64), Shelbourne-Trumper score (QT-A: 96.5 ​± ​5.6, HT-A: 95.2 ​± ​8.2, p ​= ​.50), Patient and Observer Scar -Assessment scale (POSAS) (QT-A: 9.4 ​± ​3.2, HT-A: 10.7 ​± ​4.9, p ​= ​.24), SSD-DTC (QT-A: 0.5 ​± ​0.5, HT.- A: 0.5 ​± ​0.6, p ​= ​.97), return to sports rates (QT-A: 82.1%, HT-A: 86.7%) and SLHT (QT -A: 95.9 ​± ​3.8%, HT-A: 93.7 ​± ​7.0%) did not differ between groups. Donor-site morbidity (HT-A n ​= ​14, 46.7%; QT-A n ​= ​3, 11.5%; p ​= ​.008) was statistically significantly lower in the QT-A group. Five patients (11.1%) of the HT-group and three patients (6.7%) in the QT-group required revision surgery (p ​= ​.29).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity, functional testing results and re-rupture rates are similar between patients treated with QT- and HT- autografts. However, patients with QT-autograft have a smaller tibial postoperative scar length and lower postoperative donor-site morbidity. There is a tendency towards higher graft rupture rates in highly active patients treated with HT autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.