The Danger Zone for Iatrogenic Neurovascular Injury in All-Inside Lateral Meniscal Repair in Relation to the Popliteal Tendon: An MRI Study

Assessing Risk of Iatrogenic Peroneal Nerve Injury in All-Inside Lateral Meniscal Repair Between Standard Vs. Arthroscopic MRI

BACKGROUND

Various studies have examined the risk of peroneal nerve injury with use of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. However, the position of the knee during standard MRI is different from that during an actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury during simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repairs on the basis of MRI scans made with the knee in both positions.

METHODS

With use of axial MRI scans made with the knee in the standard position (i.e., in 30° of flexion) and in the actual position used during arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair (i.e., in a figure-of-4 position), direct lines were drawn to simulate the passage of a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteus tendon. The distance from the closest passage of each line to the peroneal nerve was measured. If a line touched or passed through the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the outer border of the peroneal nerve. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new line along the joint capsule.

RESULTS

In 28 Thai patients, the shortest distances from each line to the peroneal nerve were significantly shorter on the MRI scans made with the knee in the standard position than on those made with the knee in the arthroscopic position (p < 0.05 for all). All danger areas on the MRI scans that were made with the knee in the arthroscopic position were included within the danger areas on the scans that were made with the knee in the standard position.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard MRI scans of the knee can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury at the time of arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Risk of Iatrogenic Posterior Neurovascular Injuries in Lateral Meniscal Repair Based on the Standard Arthroscopic Knee Position: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Background

Repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus using an all-inside meniscal repair device involves the risk of iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injuries. Previous studies that have evaluated this risk were based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the knee in 30° of flexion and used landmarks that are impractical in the actual operative situation.

Purpose

To use an MRI model simulating actual knee arthroscopic conditions to (1) compare the potential risk of injuries related to the lateral border of the posterior lateral meniscus root (LMR) through the anterolateral versus anteromedial portal and (2) establish "safe" and "danger" zones to reduce the possibility of injuries to posterior neurovascular structures when performing lateral meniscal repair in relation to the lateral border of the posterior LMR.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

Using 29 axial MRI scans of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, direct lines were drawn to simulate a straight all-inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anterolateral and anteromedial portals to the lateral border of the posterior LMR, extending 14 mm beyond the joint capsule. If the line passed through or touched a posterior neurovascular structure, a risk of iatrogenic injuries was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe zone in relation to the lateral border of the posterior LMR.

Results

Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anterolateral portal in relation to the lateral border of the posterior LMR resulted in a significantly greater risk of posterior neurovascular injuries compared with repairing through the anteromedial portal, with injury incidences of 68.97% and 10.35%, respectively (P = .001). The safe zones of lateral meniscal repair through the anterolateral and anteromedial portals were 4.15 ± 1.87 and 6.57 ± 0.98 mm, respectively, beyond the lateral border of the posterior LMR.

Conclusion

The risk of posterior neurovascular injuries when repairing posterior lateral meniscal tissue was found to be significantly greater through the anterolateral portal compared with the anteromedial portal.

Clinical Relevance

Surgeons can use the safe zones as defined in this study to decrease the risk of iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injuries during arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair.

LARAI portal provides a safe method for lateral meniscus repair: three-dimensional computed tomography and cadaveric assessment

BACKGROUND

Lateral, All-Round and All-Inside (LARAI) portal is a viewing or working portal for observing and repairing the lesions of the lateral meniscus. However, there are safety concerns about popliteal artery (PA) injuries during the procedure. This study aimed to assess the safe distance between the trajectory of the LARAI portal and PA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and cadavers were used to simulate the LARAI portal trajectory. In the 3D-CT study, between January 2020 and September 2020, 45 participants who underwent computed tomography angiography were included in the study. The shortest distance from the PA to the simulated trajectory needle (PS) was measured using 3D-CT. Mean -3SD -2 was calculated to assess the safety of the LARAI portal trajectory. If this value was more than zero, the trajectory was considered "safe." In the cadaveric study, lower limbs from seven fresh-frozen cadavers were used to establish the "safe" trajectories of the LARAI portal, and the PS was measured.

RESULTS

In the 3D-CT study, the longest PS (P < 0.001) was found 20 mm lateral to the edge of the patellar tendon trajectory at 0 mm from the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Safe trajectories were also found 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm lateral to the edge of the patellar tendon at 0 mm from the PCL, as well as the 20 mm lateral to the edge of the patellar tendon at 3 mm from the PCL. The cadaveric study showed that the average PS of all safe trajectories closely adjoined to PCL was greater than 14 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The LARAI portal trajectory in the "figure of four" is safe, and the optimal insertion point is 10-20 mm lateral to the edge of the patellar tendon and closely adjoined to the posterolateral margin of the PCL at knee joint line level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

No risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair with either 14- or 18-mm needles through the popliteus tendon in the standard arthroscopic knee conditions

PURPOSE

The objectives of this prospective study were to evaluate the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injury in simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with sutures placed through the popliteus tendon (PT) and to determine the optimal needle length.

METHODS

Twenty-nine axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) of postoperative knees with infused intra-articular fluid and in a figure-of-four position were used. The cross-sectional length of the PT was divided into four equal parts with measurements performed at the 25%, 50% and 75% points according to their anteroposterior arrangement. Simulated repairs were performed with 14-mm and 18-mm straight needles via the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals. Distances from the needle tip following full insertion through the PT to the PN and from the anterior PT border to the posterior knee capsule were measured to determine PN injury risk and ideal needle insertion depths at the different landmarks.

RESULTS

Simulated repairs on the 29 knee MRI images resulted in no incidences of PN injury. The average distances from the needle tip to the PN of the 14-mm needle were significantly greater than the 18-mm needle in all the simulated repairs (P < 0.02), except at the 25% point in the AM approach. When using the 14-mm needle, capsule underpenetration was found in three knees (10.3%) at the 25% point during the AM approach, in one knee (3.4%) at the 50% and 75% points in the AM approach, and in all repairs from the AL portal. The average distances from the anterior PT border to the capsule at the 25%, 50%, and 75% division points on the PT in the AM approach were 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, 7.9 ± 2.5 mm and 7.6 ± 2.8 mm, respectively, whilst in the AL approach were 8.4 ± 2.9 mm, 8.1 ± 2.8 mm and 7.6 ± 2.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

Simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with suture placement through the PT with 14-mm and 18-mm needles was safe. The measurements in this study can be used to determine potential PN injury risk in relation to the PT and the appropriate needle length for safe lateral meniscal repairs.

The Risk of Iatrogenic Peroneal Nerve Injury in Lateral Meniscal Repair and Safe Zone to Minimize the Risk Based on Actual Arthroscopic Position: An MRI Study

BACKGROUND

Lateral meniscal repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device involves a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies evaluating the risk of injury with the knee in the standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair.

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury and establish the safe and danger zones in repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial, anterolateral, or transpatellar portal in relation to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteal tendon (PT).

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, we drew direct lines to simulate a straight all-inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anteromedial, anterolateral, and transpatellar portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. If the line passed through or touched the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe and danger zones for peroneal nerve injury in relation to the medial or lateral border of the PT.

RESULTS

Axial MRI images of 29 adult patients were reviewed. Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in relation to the lateral border of the PT and through the anterolateral portal in relation to the medial border of the PT had a 0% risk of peroneal nerve injury. The "safe zone" in relation to the medial border of the PT through the anterolateral portal was between the medial border of the PT and 9.62 ± 4.60 mm medially from the same border.

CONCLUSION

It is safe to repair the body of the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT or through the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury during lateral meniscal repair. Thus, we recommend repairing the lateral meniscal tissue through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT and using the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT, as neither of these approaches resulted in peroneal nerve injury. Additionally, the surgeon can decrease this risk by repairing the meniscal tissue using the all-inside meniscal device in the safe zone area.