Quantification of Acetabular Coverage on 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Computed Tomography Scan Bone Models in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Descriptive Study

How Reliable Is the Measurement of the Lateral Center Edge Angle on Scoliosis Radiographs for Detecting Acetabular Dysplasia?

PURPOSE

Hip dysplasia reportedly occurs in up to 12% of the general population and may be higher in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). When using lateral center edge angle (LCEA) measurements to help identify hip dysplasia, it is uncertain if this measurement can be performed reliably on scoliosis radiographs due to parallax. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of measuring LCEA on scoliosis radiographs compared with standard pelvis radiographs.

METHODS

This study evaluated 40 hips on 20 patients (mean age 12.5 years ± 3.1; 50% Female) who received PA scoliosis radiographs and AP pelvis radiographs within 1 year of each other. Review was performed by 4 pediatric radiologists (2 general, 2 MSK), 2 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 research fellow. Radiographic measurement of the LCEA for each hip was first performed on the scoliosis radiograph. After a minimum of 3 days, the LCEA was measured on a pelvis radiograph of the same individual obtained within 1 year of the scoliosis radiograph. Pearson coefficient was used to measure agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver agreement. ICC values <0.5 were classified as poor reliability, 0.5 to 0.75 were classified moderate, 0.75 to 0.90 were classified good, and >0.9 indicated excellent reliability.

RESULTS

The mean difference between scoliosis and pelvis radiographs was 54 ± 79 days. There was good-to-excellent interobserver agreement on LCEA measurements made between readers on scoliosis radiographs (ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96, P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, P <0.001), and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement for scoliosis radiographs (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.98; P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC range: 0.62 to 0.96; P <0.001). There was a strong correlation between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs ( r2 =0.66, P <0.001), and the intermodality agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph LCEA measurements were moderate to good (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.89, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was good-to-excellent agreement between readers on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs, respectively, and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs and pelvis radiographs, respectively. LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs strongly correlated to the measurements made on pelvis radiographs, and the intermodality ICC was also considered moderate to good. Dedicated pelvis radiographs may not be necessary during scoliosis workup and follow-up surveillance, thereby decreasing radiation exposure, cost, and improving patient care workflow.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-diagnostic study.

Periacetabular osteotomy using computed tomography-based navigation: preoperative planning and accuracy evaluation

PURPOSE

Since 2011, we have used computed tomography (CT)-based navigation to perform safe and accurate rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) for treating developmental dysplasia of the hip. We developed a new method with four fiducial points to improve the accuracy of a published technique. In this study, we introduced a new method to achieve reorientation in accordance with planning and evaluated its accuracy.

METHODS

This study included 40 joints, which underwent RAO used CT-based navigation. In 20 joints, reorientation was confirmed by touching the lateral aspect of the rotated fragment with navigation and checking whether it matched the preoperative plan. A new fiducial point method was adopted for the remaining 20 joints. To assess the accuracy of the position of the rotated fragment in each group, postoperative radial reformatted CT images were obtained around the acetabulum and three-dimensional evaluation was performed. The accuracy of acetabular fragment repositioning was evaluated using the acetabular sector angle (ASA).

RESULTS

The absolute value of ΔASA, which represents the error between preoperative planning and the actual postoperative position, was significantly smaller in the new fiducial method group than the previous method group in the area from 11:30 to 13:30 (p < 0.05). The Harris Hip Score at 1 year after surgery did not differ significantly between the previous and new fiducial point methods.

CONCLUSION

The new fiducial point method significantly reduced reorientation error in the superior-lateral area of the acetabulum: significantly fewer errors and fewer cases of under-correction of lateral acetabular coverage were recorded. The four-reference fiducial method facilitates reorientation of the acetabulum as planned, with fewer errors. The effect of the improved accuracy of the fiducial point method on clinical outcomes will be investigated in the future work.

Database of segmentations and surface models of bones of the entire lower body created from cadaver CT scans

The range of applications of digital surface models of the bones in science and industry is wide. Three-dimensional reconstructions of bones are used in biomechanics, biomedical engineering, medical image processing, orthopedics, traumatology, radiology, patient education, anatomy, anthropometry, forensic anthropology, ergonomics, usability and human factors engineering, or accident and injury analysis and prevention. No open access database or repository of skeletal surface models of the full lower extremities exists. Therefore, the objective of this publication was to provide access to consistent complete bone models of the pelvis and lower limbs of multiple subjects, including biometric data. Segmentations and surface models of the bones of the lower extremities of more than twenty subjects were created from open access postmortem whole-body computed tomography scans. The database provides a broad range of applications by giving access to the data of the complete process chain, from the raw medical imaging data through the segmentations to the surface models.

Open and arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a review of current concepts

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common femoral and/or acetabular abnormality that can cause progressive damage to the hip and osteoarthritis. FAI can be the result of femoral head/neck overgrowth, acetabular overgrowth or both femoral and acetabular abnormalities, resulting in a loss of native hip biomechanics and pain upon hip flexion and rotation. Radiographic evidence can include loss of sphericity of the femoral neck (cam impingement) and/or acetabular retroversion with focal or global overcoverage (pincer impingement). Operative intervention is indicated in symptomatic patients after failed conservative management with radiographic evidence of impingement and minimal arthritic changes of the hip, with the goal of restoring normal hip biomechanics and reducing pain. This is done by correcting the femoral head-neck relationship to the acetabulum through femoral and/or acetabular osteoplasty and treatment of concomitant hip pathology. In pincer impingement cases with small lunate surfaces, reverse periacetabular osteotomy is indicated as acetabular osteoplasty can decrease an already small articular surface. While surgical dislocation is regarded as the traditional gold standard, hip arthroscopy has become widely utilized in recent years. Studies comparing both open surgery and arthroscopy have shown comparable long-term pain reduction and improvements in clinical measures of hip function, as well as similar conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty. However, arthroscopy has trended toward earlier improvement, quicker recovery and faster return to sports. The purpose of this study was to review the recent literature on open and arthroscopic management of FAI.

Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis

BACKGROUND

Increased attention has been directed toward the acetabular morphology in the management of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Whether acetabular version influences patient-reported outcomes remains poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To use computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) bone models to (1) quantify acetabular version in patients with FAIS, (2) compare acetabular version on 3D bone models with current plain radiographic parameters, and (3) explore the relationship between the magnitude of acetabular version and minimum 2-year clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of the pelvis and femur were generated by semiautomated segmentation and aligned to a standard coordinate system. Acetabular version was quantified at the 3-o'clock position, and 3 groups were identified: acetabular retroversion (AR; <15°), normal acetabular version (NV; 15°-25°), and acetabular anteversion (AA; >25°). Patient demographic characteristics, plain radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, including the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Preoperative CT scans were acquired in 105 consecutive patients before hip arthroscopy for FAIS, of which 84 (80.0%) completed minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes. The mean ± SD age and body mass index of patients were 33.9 ± 12.6 years and 26.0 ± 5.4, respectively; 70.2% were female. The number of patients and the mean central acetabular version within each group were as follows: AR (n = 12; 11.3°± 2.7°), NV (n = 56; 20.7°± 2.9°), and AA (n = 16; 28.5°± 2.7°). Posterior wall sign was the only plain radiographic parameter that was significantly more observed in the AR group than in the other 2 groups. At minimum 2-year follow-up, significant between-group differences in the mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS for pain and satisfaction (P < .05) were appreciated, while post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction (P < .0167) found lower scores on the mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS for pain and satisfaction in patients with AR as compared with NV. Lower scores on the VAS for satisfaction were reported in patients with AR when compared with AA (P = .006) but not on the mHHS (P = .023), iHOT-12 (P = .032), or VAS for pain (P = .072).

CONCLUSION

Traditional plain radiographic indices to describe AR, including crossover sign and ischial spine sign, were not reliable in defining AR according to 3D models derived from CT scans. Only the posterior wall sign was observed in a higher proportion in the AR group. Patients with AR demonstrated inferior outcomes when compared with patients with NV and AA after hip arthroscopy for FAIS.