Donor-Site Morbidity After Autologous Fascia Lata Harvest for Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Midterm Follow-up Evaluation

Reduced retear rates yet similar clinical outcomes following arthroscopic partial repair of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with biceps augmentation compared to repairs without biceps augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with biceps augmentation (BA) and partial repair (PR) without BA.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic repair for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with and without the BA. The focus was on postoperative clinical results and retear rates. Mean differences were used to express continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies (733 shoulders, all level 3 evidence) were included. The BA group showed a significant reduction in retear rates (OR = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.77, P = 0.007) and comparable postoperative outcomes across various measures: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale for pain, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, active forward flexion motion and active external rotation at the arm-at-side position compared to the PR group. Subgroup analysis of two BA techniques-rerouting and supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy-showed no significant differences in ASES score for either technique versus PR. However, rerouting significantly lowered retear rates (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.36, p < 0.001), while supplementation showed similar retear rates to PR (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.02, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with BA for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is a reliable technique, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes. BA using supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy showed similar clinical outcomes and range of motion but with lower retear rates compared to the PR group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical results of arthroscopically-assisted lower trapezius transfer using fascia lata autograft for posterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tear

Background

Different interpositional grafts have been proposed to connect between the lower trapezius tendon (LTT) to the humerus during LTT transfer. While studies often mention the successful use of Achilles tendon allograft, there is currently no literature reporting the clinical outcomes of utilizing fascia lata autograft (FLA) in LTT transfer. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of LTT using FLA for posterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears (PSIRCTs) without arthritis.

Patient and methods

The present study constitutes a retrospective case series involving 22 patients, with a mean follow-up of 35.9 ± 15.9 months. Pain levels were gauged using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while shoulder function was comprehensively assessed through the Constant and ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Society) scores. The evaluation of shoulder activities in daily living employed the ADLER (Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External Rotation) score. Active ROM (Range of Motion) of all directions were obtained, radiologic assessments included key parameters such as AHD (Acromion Humeral Distance) and the Hamada grade. Finally, the integrity of the transferred LTT was evaluated, and a subgroup analysis was undertaken based on Tm trophicity.

Results

By the final follow-up period, VAS, Constant, ASES, and ALDER demonstrated significant improvement. Active ROM significantly improved in (FE) forward elevation to 155° ± 29°, abduction (Abd) to 140° ± 32°, external rotation (ER) at 90° Abd to 68° ± 19°, and ER at the side to 39° ± 17°. AHD and Hamada grade showed no significant arthritic progression. Tm hypertrophy group experienced superior improvements in ER compared to that of the non-hypertrophy group. Complications included re-tear (n = 2), infection (n = 1) and donor-site morbidity (n = 1).

Conclusion

The study highlighted promising clinical outcomes of LTT transfer using FLA, with no significant complications. Along with Achilles tendon allograft, FLA can be a safe and viable alternative interpositional graft choice.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Rotator Cable Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) present treatment challenges. Recently, superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and anterior cable reconstruction have emerged as surgical options, but no single approach is superior. This review provides an overview of SCR and cable reconstruction techniques, including biomechanical studies, clinical outcomes, and surgical considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomechanical studies show SCR with autografts or allografts improves glenohumeral stability and mechanics. Clinical outcomes of SCR demonstrate improved range of motion, function scores, and pain relief in short-term studies. Anterior cable reconstruction reduces superior humeral head translation and subacromial pressures in biomechanical models. Early clinical studies report improved rotator cuff healing and outcomes for cable reconstruction in specific irreparable tear patterns. SCR and cable reconstruction are viable surgical options for MIRCTs based on early encouraging results. However, higher-level comparative studies with long-term follow-up are still needed. Careful consideration of tear pattern, patient factors, and surgical goals is required to optimize treatment of MIRCTs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal role for these procedures.

Comparison of Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Versus Arthroscopic Partial Repair or Arthroscopic Debridement for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), arthroscopic partial repair (PR), and arthroscopic debridement (DB) are valid treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic SCR with arthroscopic PR and arthroscopic DB in patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears. It was hypothesized that SCR would lead to superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with PR or DB.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Clinical and functional outcomes of this single-center retrospective study included range of motion, strength, and the age- and sex-adjusted Constant-Murley score. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) involved the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale for pain. Graft and repaired tendon integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months of follow-up.

Results

In total, 57 patients treated with SCR (n = 20), PR (n = 17), and DB (n = 20) were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 33.8 ± 17.9 months. Preoperative clinical and functional characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. The range of motion and clinical and functional scores of all 3 groups significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively. Postoperative PROMs showed no differences among all 3 study groups. SCR revealed significantly higher postoperative strength compared with PR (P = .001) and DB (P = .004). Postoperative MRI revealed a rerupture in 4 patients with SCR (20%). Postoperative MRI showed a rerupture in 9 patients with PR ( 53%). Fatty muscle infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus significantly progressed within all 3 study groups in postoperative MRI scans. No clinical and functional differences were observed between intact and reruptured PR.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent SCR had better postoperative strength recovery than patients who underwent PR or DB.

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsule Reconstruction: Acellular Allograft at 45° of Glenohumeral Abduction Improves Glenohumeral Stability, but Fascia Lata Autograft Remains Superior

Originally, fascia lata autograft was used for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) to restore glenohumeral stability in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Consistently excellent clinical outcomes with low graft tear rates have been reported, without repair of tears in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. On the basis of our experience and studies published in the 15 years since the first SCR using fascia lata autograft in 2007, we can say that this technique is the gold standard. SCR using fascia lata autograft can cover all irreparable rotator cuff tears (Hamada grade 1-3; although the indication for SCR using other grafts, including dermal allograft, biceps, and hamstrings, is only Hamada grade 1 or 2); creates excellent clinical outcomes with low graft tear rates in short-term, long-term, and multicenter studies; regenerates the fibrocartilaginous insertions at both the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid according to histological study; and enables complete restoration of shoulder stability and subacromial contact pressure in cadaveric biomechanical studies. In some countries, dermal allograft is preferred for SCR. However, high rates of graft tear and complications have been reported after SCR using dermal allografts, even in limited indications of irreparable rotator cuff tears (Hamada grade 1 or 2). This high failure rate results from the lack of stiffness and thickness of the dermal allograft. Dermal allografts in SCR can be elongated by 15% after only a couple of physiological shoulder movements, whereas fascia lata graft cannot. This 15% graft elongation, which creates less glenohumeral stability and high graft tear after SCR, is a fatal problem of dermal allograft for SCR in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Current research suggests that SCR using dermal allografts is not strongly recommended for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Dermal allograft probably should be used only for augmentation of rotator cuff complete repair.

Biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears by different graft materials-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT) are defined as defects that cannot be repaired due to tendon retraction, fat infiltration, or muscle atrophy. One surgical remedy for IRCT is superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), which fixes graft materials between the larger tuberosity and the superior glenoid.

Patients and methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria were followed for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis. From their inception until February 25, 2022, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library's electronic databases were searched. Studies using cadavers on SCR for IRCT were also included. The humeral head's superior translation and subacromial peak contact pressure were the primary outcomes. The humeral head's anteroposterior translation, the kind of graft material used, its size, and the deltoid load were the secondary outcomes.

Results

After eliminating duplicates from the search results, 1,443 unique articles remained, and 20 papers were finally included in the quantitative research. In 14 investigations, the enhanced superior translation of the humeral head was documented in IRCTs. In 13 studies, a considerable improvement following SCR was found, especially when using fascia lata (FL), which could achieve more translation restraints than human dermal allograft (HDA) and long head of bicep tendon (LHBT). Six investigations reported a subacromial peak contact pressure increase in IRCTs, which could be rectified by SCR, and these studies found a substantial increase in this pressure. The results of the reduction in subacromial peak contact pressure remained consistent regardless of the graft material utilized for SCR. While there was a statistically significant difference in the change of graft material length between FL and HDA, the change in graft material thickness between FL and HDA was not significant. The humeral head's anterior-posterior translation was rising in IRCTs and could be returned to its original state with SCR. In five investigations, IRCTs caused a significant increase in deltoid force. Furthermore, only one study showed that SCR significantly decreased deltoid force.

Conclusion

With IRCT, SCR might significantly decrease the glenohumeral joint's superior and anterior-posterior stability. Despite the risks for donor-site morbidity and the longer recovery time, FL is still the best current option for SCR.

The versatility of tensor fascia lata allografts for soft tissue reconstruction

The purpose of this retrospective study was to introduce our successful use of tensor fascia lata allograft to reconstruct various soft tissue defects. Since May 2021, we have applied tensor fascia lata allografts in eight cases. A frozen type of fascia of 0.6 mm thickness was used in all cases, and allografts were covered by vascularized soft tissue. We used tensor fascia lata allograft in eight cases to cover the infected wounds, donor site closure, and pedicle protections. These were abdominal wall and back reconstructions following rectus muscle and latissimus dorsi muscle harvest, coverage of infected spine wound after posterior fusion, pressure ulcer reconstruction, and pedicle protection of free and pedicle flaps. The follow-up periods were from one to 14 months. None of the cases showed wound problems after initial reconstruction using tensor fascia lata allografts. Tensor fascia lata allograft could be an excellent cost-effective surgical option comparable to autologous tissue grafts. Level of evidence: IV.