Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Rotator Cuff Retear

Smokers Achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Visual Analog Scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores at a Lower Rate Than Nonsmokers Even When Repaired Supraspinatus Tendons Were Intact on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose

To investigate the impact of smoking on clinical outcomes after repair of supraspinatus tendon in patients who had an intact repair found on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

Patients who received primary complete repair of supraspinatus tendon tear between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were excluded if a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan was not available or if the follow-up was less than 2 years. Visual analog score (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion were assessed at the 2-year follow-up. The percentage of patients acquiring minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported.

Results

One hundred primary supraspinatus tendon repairs were included. The healing rate was 77% in smokers and 90% in nonsmokers. Smoking was the independent predictor of a poorer 2-year VAS (P < .001) and ASES (P < .001) scores. Significant improvement in clinical outcomes was observed between preoperation and the 2-year follow-up, regardless of the integrity of the repair or smoking status (P < .001). When the repaired tendon was intact, nonsmokers had a greater chance of achieving MCID in 2-year VAS and ASES scores than smokers. Ninety-nine percent of nonsmokers, compared with 82% of smokers, achieved MCID in VAS at the 2-year follow-up (P = .023). The corresponding figures for ASES were 98% and 71%, respectively (P = .004).

Conclusions

In this study, smoking was associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including a greater 2-year VAS pain score and a lower 2-year ASES score, when compared with nonsmokers, even in cases in which there was no full-thickness retear of the repaired supraspinatus tendon.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Patients With Retear After Supraspinatus Tendon Repair and Those With Intact Repair at 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

It is well known that rotator cuff repair is associated with an overall retear rate of 21% to 26%. However, a cuff retear may not necessarily be associated with poor clinical outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be no difference in clinical outcomes between patients with a cuff retear and those with an intact repair at a midterm follow-up of 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients who received arthroscopic complete repair of the supraspinatus tendon between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients who did not have a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or who had a follow-up of <5 years were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion (FF) of the involved shoulder were assessed at the 2-year and 5-year follow-up points.

RESULTS

The study group included 105 patients with a mean follow-up of 85 months. MRI scans were performed at a mean of 20 months. Fourteen full-thickness cuff retears and 91 intact repairs were identified using postoperative MRI scans. Significant improvement in VAS score, ASES score, and FF were found between the preoperative assessment and the 2 designated follow-up points (2 years and 5 years) in both the cuff retear and the intact repair groups (P < .001). The VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up for the intact repair group were 1.8 ± 2.0 and 80.7 ± 18.1, respectively. The corresponding values for the retear group were 2.3 ± 2.2 and 71.9 ± 19.5, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up. However, patients with an intact repair had a better VAS score (1.4 ± 1.8; P = .049) and ASES score (81.7 ± 17; P = .019) than those with a cuff retear at the 5-year assessment (3.0 ± 2.8 and 67.1 ± 22.9, respectively). In the intact repair group, 91% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference for the 5-year VAS score, compared with 54% in the cuff retear group (P < .001). The corresponding values for the 5-year ASES score were 80% and 54%, respectively (P = .044). FF measurements at the 5-year follow-up in patients with intact repair and those with a cuff retear were 161°± 23° and 144°± 37°, respectively (P = .059). Continuous improvement in VAS score and FF between the 2-year and 5-year follow-up was observed in the intact repair group (P = .005 and P = .04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The patients with an intact repair had better VAS and ASES scores compared with those who had a cuff retear at a midterm follow-up of 5 years. Between the 2-year and the 5-year follow-up, some further improvement was observed in the VAS score and FF in the intact repair group.

Re-tear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be predicted using deep learning algorithm

The application of artificial intelligence technology in the medical field has become increasingly prevalent, yet there remains significant room for exploration in its deep implementation. Within the field of orthopedics, which integrates closely with AI due to its extensive data requirements, rotator cuff injuries are a commonly encountered condition in joint motion. One of the most severe complications following rotator cuff repair surgery is the recurrence of tears, which has a significant impact on both patients and healthcare professionals. To address this issue, we utilized the innovative EV-GCN algorithm to train a predictive model. We collected medical records of 1,631 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair surgery at a single center over a span of 5 years. In the end, our model successfully predicted postoperative re-tear before the surgery using 62 preoperative variables with an accuracy of 96.93%, and achieved an accuracy of 79.55% on an independent external dataset of 518 cases from other centers. This model outperforms human doctors in predicting outcomes with high accuracy. Through this methodology and research, our aim is to utilize preoperative prediction models to assist in making informed medical decisions during and after surgery, leading to improved treatment effectiveness. This research method and strategy can be applied to other medical fields, and the research findings can assist in making healthcare decisions.

Bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy regarding the effect of bone channeling in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Since the most recent systematic reviews in 2019, several large high-level trials have been completed. This study assessed all available level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without bone marrow channeling.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through mid January 2023. Two reviewers performed screening of studies meeting the eligibility criteria: English-language RCTs in patients aged ≥18 years comparing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of full-thickness tears with and without bone marrow channeling (channeling group and control group, respectively). Functional scores, pain, healing rates, and reoperations were reviewed using pooled analysis where appropriate. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized studies (N = 593) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of all 6 studies showed no significant mean difference in function (1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.63 to 3.26), as measured by the Constant-Murley score. Retear rates were also not statistically different between groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.71), with pooled retear rates of 19.6% (48 of 245) with channeling and 19.8% (51 of 257) without. The other outcomes of interest were only available for analysis in a subset of studies. There were no standardized mean differences in pain (0.09; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.36), and there were similar reoperation rates (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.43 to 3.34) in the channeling and control groups. For the included studies, the overall quality of evidence by outcome was judged to be moderate (function, pain, and reoperations) or low (retear rates), mainly owing to risk of bias (all outcomes) and inconsistency (retear rates).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study refute the findings of prior systematic reviews that showed that channeling reduces the retear rate when combined with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This meta-analysis of level I evidence, including recent larger RCTs, demonstrates that bone marrow stimulation in the setting of primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has no significant effect on functional outcomes, healing, pain, or reoperation rates.

Providing safe and effective rehabilitation by assessing supraspinatus muscle elasticity using ultrasound real-time tissue elastography after rotator cuff repair: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Although surgical techniques have advanced to avoid a postoperative re-tear after rotator cuff surgery, it remains unclear how to directly evaluate the risk of a re-tear.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how muscle elasticity with real-time tissue elastography could be used to avoid re-tear in individual cases after rotator cuff repair.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case series included four patients, two per tear size (small and large/massive), with contrasting changes in muscle elasticity of the supraspinatus muscle. All patients underwent primary arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repair. The elasticity of the supraspinatus muscle was evaluated at relaxed and elongated positions of 0° and 60° shoulder abduction angles, respectively. The change in muscle elasticity at 1 month after surgery was characteristically different, and we predicted that a greater elasticity in the elongated position indicated a higher risk of re-tear. The cases with high risk underwent careful rehabilitation to avoid re-tear, and no re-tears were recorded in this report.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that evaluation of muscle elasticity using real-time tissue elastography, which provides an indication of the risk of re-tear, in the clinical setting might be useful for therapists, who could adjust the intensity of rehabilitation, and for patients.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Assessment in Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Clinical Data-Based Approach

AIM

The overall aim of this proposal is to ameliorate the care of rotator cuff (RC) tear patients by applying an innovative machine learning approach for outcome prediction after arthroscopic repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to evaluate the best predictors of the outcome, and 100 RC patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) from surgical intervention. The outcome measure was the Costant-Murley Shoulder Score, whereas age, sex, BMI, the 36-Item Short-Form Survey, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index were considered as predictive factors. Support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), naïve Bayes (NB), and random forest (RF) algorithms were employed.

RESULTS

Across all sessions, the classifiers demonstrated suboptimal performance when using both the complete and shrunken sets of features. Specifically, the logistic regression (LR) classifier achieved a mean accuracy of 46.5% ± 6%, while the random forest (RF) classifier achieved 51.25% ± 4%. For the shrunken set of features, LR obtained a mean accuracy of 48.5% ± 6%, and RF achieved 45.5% ± 4.5%. No statistical differences were found when comparing the performance metrics of ML algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the importance of extending the application of AI methods to new predictors, such as neuroimaging and kinematic data, in order to better record significant shifts in RC patients' prognosis.

LIMITATIONS

The data quality within the cohort could represent a limitation, since certain variables, such as smoking, diabetes, and work injury, are known to have an impact on the outcome.

Prediction of Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Based on Intraoperative Arthroscopic Images Using Deep Learning

BACKGROUND

It is challenging to predict retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). The usefulness of arthroscopic intraoperative images as predictors of the ARCR prognosis has not been analyzed.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of arthroscopic images for the prediction of retear after ARCR using deep learning (DL) algorithms.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

In total, 1394 arthroscopic intraoperative images were retrospectively obtained from 580 patients. Repaired tendon integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging performed within 2 years after surgery. Images obtained immediately after ARCR were included. We used 3 DL architectures to predict retear based on arthroscopic images. Three pretrained DL algorithms (VGG16, DenseNet, and Xception) were used for transfer learning. Training and test sets were split into 8:2. Threefold stratified validation was used to fine-tune the hyperparameters using the training data set. The validation results of each fold were evaluated. The performance of each model in the test set was evaluated in terms of accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

In total, 1138 and 256 arthroscopic images were obtained from 514 patients and 66 patients in the nonretear and retear groups, respectively. The mean validation accuracy of each model was 83% for VGG16, 89% for Xception, and 91% for DenseNet. The accuracy for the test set was 76% for VGG16, 87% for Xception, and 91% for DenseNet. The AUC was highest for DenseNet (0.92); it was 0.83 for VGG16 and 0.91 for Xception. For the test set, the specificity and sensitivity were 0.93 and 0.84 for DenseNet, 0.89 and 0.84 for Xception, and 0.70 and 0.80 for VGG16, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The application of DL algorithms to intraoperative arthroscopic images has demonstrated a high level of accuracy in predicting retear occurrences.

Effect of Anterior Acromial Coverage on Functional and Radiological Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Anteroposterior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tear size, fatty infiltration, and scapular morphology are correlated with tendon healing and functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair; however, the association between anteroposterior acromial coverage and the clinical outcomes of anteroposterior massive rotator cuff tears (AP-MRCTs; involving all 3 tendons) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To identify the association between AP acromial coverage and functional and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs between January 2015 and December 2020 were included in the study and classified according to whether anterior acromial coverage (AAC) was anterior (46 patients; positive AAC group) or posterior (52 patients; negative AAC group) to the scapular line on true lateral shoulder radiographs. Demographic characteristics, surgical details, and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. Acromial morphological features, global tear extension (GTE), the global fatty infiltration index (GFII), tendon integrity after repair, proximal humeral migration, and glenohumeral abduction were measured and calculated on radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging scans preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors of a rotator cuff retear.

RESULTS

The positive AAC group showed larger AAC, posterior acromial tilt, and anterior acromial slope as well as smaller posterior acromial coverage compared with the negative AAC group. Postoperatively, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (82.5 ± 8.3 vs 77.2 ± 11.5, respectively; P = .013), active abduction (157.8°± 27.1° vs 142.7°± 39.6°, respectively; P = .048), and glenohumeral abduction (45.6°± 10.4° vs 39.7°± 14.9°, respectively; P = .041) in the positive AAC group were significantly higher than those in the negative AAC group, while the retear rate (23.9% vs 44.2%, respectively; P = .035) and proximal humeral migration (1.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively; P = .006) were significantly lower in the positive AAC group than in the negative AAC group. Smaller AAC (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-1.00]; P = .040), larger GTE (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; P = .017), and a higher GFII (OR, 3.49 [95% CI, 1.09-11.19]; P = .036) were associated with an increased risk of a rotator cuff retear.

CONCLUSION

Increased AAC was associated with a lower retear rate and better functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs. A preliminary risk evaluation integrating GTE, the GFII, and AAC is recommended to consider the necessity of additional procedures for patients in need of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Healthcare costs of failed rotator cuff repairs

Background

The goal of this study was to estimate the short-term (∼2 years) healthcare costs of failed primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in the United States.

Methods

A review of current literature was performed to estimate the number of RCR performed in the United States in the year 2022 and the rate of progression of these patients to lose repair continuity, reach clinical failure, and progress to nonoperative intervention and revision procedures. A review of the current literature was performed to estimate the costs incurred by these failures over the ensuing 2-year postoperative time period.

Results

The direct and indirect healthcare costs of structural and clinical failure of primary RCR performed in 2022 are estimated to reach $438,892,670 in the short-term postoperative period. The majority of the costs come from the estimated $229,390,898 in nonoperative management that these patients undergo after they reach clinical failure.

Conclusion

The short-term healthcare costs of failed arthroscopic RCR performed in the United States in 2022 are predicted to be $438,892,670. Although RCR improves quality of life, pain, function, and is cost-effective, there remains great potential for reducing the economic burden of failed RCR repairs on the US society. Investments into research aimed to improve RCR healing rates are warranted.

Clinical Relevance

Although RCR improves quality of life, pain, function, and is cost-effective, this study provides evidence that there remains great potential for reducing the economic burden of failed RCR repairs on the US society. Investments into research aimed to improve RCR healing rates are warranted.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Primary Rotator Cuff Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (aSCR) has emerged as a treatment option for managing massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) given the unpredictable results after an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR). Yet, few comparative studies of aSCR and aRCR have been conducted.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between aRCR and aSCR in patients with MRCT.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 163 cases of MRCT from 2010 to 2020 with follow-up ≥2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 102 had aRCR and 61 had aSCR using fascia lata autograft. Propensity score matching was used to select controls matched for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Constant score, pain visual analog scale (pVAS) score, range of motion (ROM), tear size, global fatty degeneration index, and acromiohumeral distance (AHD). Last, 33 cases in each group were selected after propensity score matching. Radiological assessment was conducted using serial postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Pre- and postoperative findings-including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, pVAS, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Constant scores and ROM-were assessed to compare clinical outcomes. For radiological outcomes, global fatty degeneration index, AHD, and healing rate were evaluated. Healing failure was defined as Sugaya classification IV or V in the aRCR group, as compared with a full-thickness tear of the graft in the aSCR group, which corresponded to Sugaya classification IV or V.

RESULTS

Postoperative clinical outcomes were significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups. In the aSCR group, postoperative forward flexion, pVAS, and AHD were significantly improved as compared with the aRCR group (mean, 161° vs 148° [P = .02]; 1.03 vs 1.64 [P = .047]; 7.00 vs 5.23 mm [P < .001], respectively). The healing rate was 20 of 33 (60.6%) for aRCR and 29 of 33 (87.9%) for aSCR (P = .022).

CONCLUSION

aSCR and aRCR are effective and reliable treatment options for MRCT. However, when compared with aRCR, aSCR showed improved clinical outcomes, including pVAS score, postoperative ROM, and favorable radiological findings, including AHD and a higher healing rate.

Effect of Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Return to Work and Sports in Nonathletes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The impact of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) on clinical outcomes of patients remains controversial.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of retear on strength recovery, return to previous levels of work, and return to sports participation. It was hypothesized that retears (1) would not have a significant effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and (2) would significantly inhibit strength recovery and return to previous work and sports.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The authors collected data from patients who underwent ARCR between January 2015 and December 2019. All included patients had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and strength measurements 1 year postoperatively. Minimum 2-year postoperative PROMs (Constant score, pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) and status on work and sports participation were collected, and PROM scores, strength recovery (percentage compared with the contralateral shoulder), return to work, and return to sports were compared between patients with versus without retear on 1-year postoperative MRI. Additionally, factors related to return to work and sports were identified through multivariable regression analysis.

Results

A total of 159 patients were included, of whom 19 (11.9%) had evidence of retear. Return-to-work and return-to-sports status was evaluated in 134 (84.3%) and 93 (58.5%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in PROM scores between patients with and without retears; however, patients with retears exhibited significantly worse supraspinatus strength recovery (73% vs 86%; P = .018) and external rotation strength recovery (78% vs 88%; P = .030) compared with patients with intact shoulders. There were no between-group differences in return to work or sports. Active workload was associated with unsuccessful return to work, whereas preoperative participation in shoulder sports was associated with successful return to work.

Conclusion

Patients with postoperative retears had significantly worse postoperative strength recovery than patients with intact shoulders. Active workload and preoperative shoulder sports participation were factors associated with ability to return to work.

Effect of Quality of Repair on Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Anatomic repair of a torn rotator cuff tendon on the greater tuberosity (GT) is an important surgical goal in rotator cuff repair. However, few studies have investigated whether the efforts made to maximize coverage of the GT are associated with the clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the quality of repair at the time of surgery is associated with clinical and structural outcomes after surgery and to identify factors influencing the quality of repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from 141 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2008 and 2016. All repairs were classified according to the amount of postoperative GT coverage: A, complete coverage of the GT (n = 96); B, incomplete coverage, comprising more than half of GT (n = 27); C, incomplete coverage, comprising less than half of the GT (n = 16); and D, exposure of the glenohumeral joint (n = 2). All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcomes and structural integrity based on Sugaya classification were assessed 2 years and 1 year after surgery, respectively. Preoperative factors associated with the postoperative GT coverage (measured at the close of surgery) were identified using a multivariable proportional odds cumulative logit model.

RESULTS

The forward flexion strength in group A (10.3 ± 4.6 lb) was significantly greater than that in group C (6.5 ± 3.7 lb) (P = .003) 2 years after surgery. The postoperative Constant score in group A (76.6 ± 11.5) was greater than that in group C (66.7 ± 15.6) (P = .018). The number of cases that showed retearing of the repaired tendon was as follows: group A (5/96; 5.2%), group B (7/27; 25.9%), and group C (10/16; 62.5%). There was no significant difference in the changes of pain visual analog scale scores among groups 2 years after surgery (all P > .05). Also, there was no significant difference in the changes of range of motion in all directions among groups 2 years after surgery (all P > .05). Patients with preoperative GT coverage B included in the postoperative GT coverage groups through surgery were as follows: group A (23/45; 51.1%), group B (17/45; 37.8%), and group C (5/45; 11.1%). Preoperative GT coverage was the only independent factor that was associated with GT coverage in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Quality of repair, measured as the extent of postoperative GT coverage at the time of surgery, was associated with clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery.

Prognostic Factors Leading to Good or Poor Outcomes Based on Functional and Radiological Findings After a Rotator Cuff Retear

BACKGROUND

A retear after rotator cuff repair is a common problem; however, there is little information related to the prognosis after a retear. In addition, some patients with retears have satisfactory outcomes, which raises the question of whether a retear leads to a poor prognosis.

PURPOSE

To identify radiological factors that influence the prognosis after a retear.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with retears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging at 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they achieved the minimal clinically important difference for clinical outcome measures. Range of motion and radiological variables, including preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) tear sizes, sagittal extent of the retear, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and degree of fatty degeneration, were analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 patients were allocated to the good prognosis (GP) group and 15 to the poor prognosis (PP) group. The 2 groups had no significant differences in baseline demographics and preoperative radiological parameters. Postoperative range of motion was decreased in the PP group at the last follow-up. The AP and ML retear sizes decreased in both groups after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, but the retear size was significantly larger in the PP group (both P < .05). The AHD increased in the GP group (P < .001) but decreased in the PP group (P = .230) postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative AHD (P = .003), fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus tendon (P = .001), posterior (P = .007) and anterior (P = .025) sagittal extent of the retear, and change in the AP tear size (P = .017) were related to poor outcomes after a retear. However, change in the ML tear size (P = .105) and middle sagittal extent of the retear (P = .878) were not related to a poor prognosis. Also, further analysis showed that posterior (P = .006) and anterior (P = .003) sagittal extent of the retear were related to rotator cable involvement.

CONCLUSION

An increased AP retear size and decreased AHD were radiological parameters that were associated with poor clinical outcomes after a retear. In particular, patients who had posterior and anterior sagittal extent of the retear, possibly with rotator cable involvement and more severe fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus tendon, showed worse outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic and Open/Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repairs

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) has shown similar midterm functional results and retear rates as open/mini-open rotator cuff repair (oRCR). A pooled analysis of long-term results of both techniques is yet missing.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term results of aRCR and oRCR for full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The CENTRAL (Cochrane), MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase databases were searched for studies that reported on long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of full-thickness aRCR and oRCR with a minimum follow-up of 9 years.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included: 5 studies on aRCR and 6 studies on oRCR. Studies were based on 550 shoulders (539 patients) with a mean patient age of 56.3 years (range, 25-77). After a mean follow-up of 14.0 years (range, 9-20), the mean preoperative absolute Constant score (CS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score were significantly improved postoperatively (CS, 44 to 78 points; ASES, 52% to 91%; both comparisons, P < .001). The retear rate was 41% (141 of 342 shoulders) without a significant difference between groups (aRCR, 43%; oRCR, 39%) (P = .364). A retear was associated with significantly reduced CS as compared with a healed repair (P = .004). No significant differences were found in postoperative functional scores, complications, and retear rates after failed cuff repairs between the arthroscopic and open/mini-open repair groups.

CONCLUSION

Pooled analysis of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repairs demonstrated sustained improvement in long-term shoulder scores and pain with a substantial retear rate in both groups, which was associated with inferior shoulder function. There were no significant differences in long-term functional outcomes, retear rates, and complications. Both surgical techniques may be used on the basis of factors such as patient or surgeon preference and cost. Further studies using a more robust randomized controlled trial or larger cohort design are recommended to ascertain whether one surgical repair technique is superior to the other.

REGISTRATION

CRD42020180448 (PROSPERO).