Standard MRI May Not Predict Specific Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Characteristics

High-resolution oblique coronal MRI at optimal flexed-knee angle: a novel imaging method for enhanced anterior cruciate ligament tear diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of traditional knee MR imaging in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tears, especially partial tears, is relatively low, which may lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel imaging method, high-resolution oblique coronal MRI at an optimal flexed-knee Angle, for ACL tears.

METHODS

50 healthy volunteers were scanned with a scan-assisted device for the optimal flexion angle of ACL. For 92 knee trauma patients selected strictly according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, conventional extended-knee scans (control group) and high-resolution oblique coronal scans based on the optimal flexed-knee angle (experimental group) were conducted. Two observers rated ACL visibility blindly on a 5-point scale. Arthroscopy-defined outcomes determined diagnostic metrics for each method and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

The average optimal flexion angle for healthy volunteers was approximately 30° (30.3° ± 5.0°). Imaging demonstrated complete visualization of the ACL in 96.7% of images in the experimental group versus 12.0% in the control group. The diagnostic indicators of the experimental group surpassed those of the control group: sensitivity (94.9% vs. 76.3%), specificity (97.0% vs. 81.8%), positive predictive value (98.2% vs. 88.2%), negative predictive value(91.4% vs. 65.9%), and accuracy (95.7% vs. 78.3%). ROC analysis indicated superior diagnostic performance in the experimental group, with an AUC of 0.945 compared with 0.776 for the control group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution oblique coronal imaging at the optimal 30° flexed-knee angle improved ACL visualization and diagnostic performance compared with conventional techniques.

GNRB® laximeter with magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice for complete and partial anterior cruciate ligament tears detection: A prospective diagnostic study with arthroscopic validation on 214 patients

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is not always obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Other tools, such as the GNRB® arthrometer, help to accurately identify the type of ACL tear. The aim of this study was to show that the GNRB® could be a relevant complementary solution to MRI in ACL injuries detection.

METHODS

A prospective study performed between 2016 and 2020 included 214 patients who had undergone knee surgery. The study compared sensitivity/specificity pairs of MRI and the GNRB® at 134 N to detect healthy ACL, partial and complete ACL tears. Arthroscopies were the 'gold standard'. Forty-six patients had a healthy ACL with associated knee lesions, 168 patients had ACL tears where 107 were complete tears and 61 were partial tears.

RESULTS

For healthy ACL, MRI scored 100% for sensitivity (SE) and 95% for specificity (SP), and the GNRB® scored SE 95.65% and SP 97.5% at 134 N. For complete ACL tears, MRI scored 80.81% for sensitivity (SE) and 64.49% for specificity (SP), and the GNRB® scored SE 77.78% and SP 85.98% at 134 N. For partial tears, MRI scored SE 29.51% and SP 88.97%, and the GNRB® scored SE 73.77% and SP 85.52% at 134 N.

CONCLUSION

GNRB® sensitivity and specificity were equivalent to those of MRI for healthy ACL and complete ACL tear detection. However, MRI had some difficulty in detecting partial ACL tears compared with the GNRB® which showed better sensitivity.

Medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears, while type I ACL tears only account for 8% of all ACL tears

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the distribution of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear locations in different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planes, and to explore the relationships of ACL tear types with both meniscus injuries and bone bruising.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in patients under 60 years old who underwent MRI scans in the sagittal and coronal oblique planes of the knee for ACL tears between 2014 and 2020. Patients with reports of chronic tears, partial tears, or prior surgeries were excluded. Tear locations were classified into five types, and the meniscus tear measurement variables included the presence of ramp, root, bucket-handle, and other types of tears. All injuries were confirmed by arthroscopy. Meanwhile, the presence and location of bone bruising were analysed and scored with the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) bone bruising subscale.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were included. The prevalence rates of type I and type III injuries were 23/291 (7.9%) and 145/291 (49.8%) in the sagittal plane and 22/291 (7.6%) and 179/291 (61.5%) in the oblique coronal plane, respectively. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears with ACL tears was 126/291 (43.3%), while that of lateral meniscus tears with ACL tears was 77/291 (26.5%). The highest prevalence of medial meniscus injury with ACL tears was 15/22 (68.2%) for type I injuries. Bone bruises were located on the lateral femoral center in 125 patients (46%) and on the lateral tibia posterior in 132 patients (48%); the common areas of bone bruising were slightly correlated with type III ACL tears but not correlated with type I ACL tears.

CONCLUSION

The plane in which an MRI scan is performed affects the classification of ACL tears. The tear type is associated with the prevalence of medial meniscus injuries, and medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.