Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI in Diagnosing Concomitant Meniscal Injuries With Pediatric and Adolescent Acute ACL Tears

Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2 years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4 months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis.

RESULTS

The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045).

CONCLUSION

MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.

Analysis of Discordant Findings between 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Knee Meniscus

Numerous studies have assessed the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tears of the knee menisci using arthroscopy results as the gold standard, but few have concentrated on the nature of discordant findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the discordances between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus. Medical records of 112 patients who underwent 3T MRI and subsequent arthroscopy of the knee were retrospectively analyzed to determine the accuracy of diagnoses of meniscal tear. Compared with arthroscopy, there were 22 false-negative and 14 false-positive MR interpretations of meniscal tear occurring in 32 patients. Images with errors in diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus and all errors were categorized as either unavoidable, equivocal or as interpretation error. Of 36 MR diagnostic errors, there were 16 (44%) unavoidable, 5 (14%) interpretation errors and 15 (42%) equivocal for meniscal tear. The largest categories of errors were unavoidable false-positive MRI diagnoses (71%) and equivocal false-negative MRI diagnoses (50%). All meniscal tears missed by MRI were treated with partial meniscectomy (n = 14) or meniscal repair (n = 8). Discordant findings between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus remain a concern and primarily occur due to unavoidable and equivocal errors. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with meniscal tears should understand why and how the findings seen on knee MRI and arthroscopy may sometimes differ.

A basic study for the molecular imaging of dual-energy CT in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament injury of knee joint

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common disease in clinical practice that seriously affects the daily life of patients.

Purpose

To explore the molecular imaging basis of “diminution sign on dual-energy colour mapping” for the diagnosis of ACL injury by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).

Material and Methods

The hydroxylysine and hydroxyproline reagents were prepared in different concentrations. The grouping was shown as follows: a simple concentration change group of an amino acid (group 1/2); a mixed solution group with the concentration increasing synchronously (group 3); a mixed solution group with the concentration reverse increasing and decreasing (group 4); and a mixed solution group that fix one amino acid with increasing concentration of the other (group 5/6). The samples were scanned by DECT. The solution CT value and image signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed.

Results

In group 1/2, the brightness of the dual-energy color mapping of each test tube solution and the CT value increased with increasing the concentration of amino acid. In group 6, there was no significant change in the brightness and brilliance of the dual-energy color mapping and the CT value. The remaining three groups showed an increase in the brightness and brilliance of the dual-energy color mapping and the CT value, and this increase was positively associated with the hydroxylysine concentration.

Conclusion

The dual-energy staining of the DECT imaging in “tendon” mode is related to hydroxylysine and hydroxyproline. Moreover, the degree of dual-energy color mapping is positively correlated with the change of CT value.