Evaluation of Tibial Fixation Devices for Quadrupled Hamstring ACL Reconstruction

Effect of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Preparation and Fixation on Graft Laxity During Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis

Background

Favorable collagen fibril density and thickness combined with advances in graft preparation and fixation have significantly increased interest in the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While various suspensory techniques have been described, the biomechanical profile of these constructs is largely undefined.

Purpose

To compare the biomechanics of suspensory techniques for soft tissue QT autograft fixation in an in vitro model of ACL reconstruction.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Full-thickness QT grafts were harvested using a 9-mm graft blade. Adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) were secured to the graft (n = 6 per group) with a combination implant containing the ALD and suture tape-reinforced whipstitching (tape-reinforced [TR] group), tethered superficially to the graft with a whipstitch (onlay [OL] group), luggage-tagged through and around the graft (luggage tag [LT] group), or staggered behind superficial suturing (staggered [SG] group). Grafts were tested on an electromechanical testing machine following a validated in vitro reconstruction model of intraoperative workflow and postoperative ACL kinematics, cyclic loading, and load to failure.

Results

The TR group had significantly less postcyclic tension loss (mean, 24%) compared with the OL (56%; P = .002), LT (69%; P < .001), and SG (90%; P < .001) constructs. Cyclic elongation was below the 3.0-mm threshold defined as clinical failure for TR (1.6 mm), but not for OL (3.3 mm), LT (7.9 mm), and SG (11.3 mm). All constructs were within native ACL stiffness limits (220 ± 72 N/mm) without significant differences. Ultimate loads significantly exceeded a normal ACL loading limit of 454 N for TR (739 N; P = .023), OL (547 N; P = .020), and LT (769 N; P = .001), but not for SG (346 N; P = .236).

Conclusion

The TR ALD construct demonstrated the most favorable time-zero biomechanical properties of modern soft tissue QT suspensory constructs, with 32% less tension loss and 52% less cyclic elongation versus the closest construct. Failure loading of all constructs was acceptable with respect to the native ACL except for the SG group, which had suboptimal ultimate load.

Clinical Relevance

TR ALD implants may protect soft tissue QT autografts before graft-bone healing in ACL reconstruction by minimizing time-zero laxity and fixation failure.

Editorial Commentary: Suture-Button Fixation May Have Advantages Over Screw Fixation for Glenoid Bone Grafting Procedures for Shoulder Instability

Orthopaedic suture buttons have been increasingly used in a variety of procedures, such as syndesmosis stabilization, coracoclavicular ligament repair, anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation, and Lisfranc injury treatment. In many instances, suture-button fixation constructs have shown equivalent, if not superior, outcomes to screw fixation. More recently, suture buttons have been suggested for osseous fixation of the coracoid during the Latarjet procedure, as well as other anterior (or posterior) bone block reconstruction of the glenoid using distal tibial allograft, tricortical iliac crest, or distal clavicle in cases of complex shoulder instability. Suture buttons offer several unique advantages, including the ability to tension and retension graft fixation, smaller driller paths with bone preservation, less osteolysis, lower risk of hardware removal, and greater ease of hardware revision and/or secondary surgery. However, certain disadvantages also exist, such as higher implant costs, less time-zero implant rigidity, technical difficulty, and, potentially, less mediolateral stability of the bone graft. Time will tell if these suture-button constructs will supplant traditional screw fixation for the Latarjet procedure in terms of clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Biomechanical Stability of Third-Generation Adjustable Suture Loop Devices Versus Continuous Loop Button Device for Cortical Fixation of ACL Tendon Grafts

Background

Concerns regarding the primary stability of early adjustable loop button (ALB) devices for cortical fixation of tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have led to the development of new implant designs.

Purpose

To evaluate biomechanical stability of recent ALB implants in comparison with a continuous loop button (CLB) device.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

ACLR was performed in a porcine model (n = 40) using 2-strand porcine flexor tendons with a diameter of 8 mm. Three ALB devices (Infinity Button [ALB1 group]; Tightrope II RT [ALB2 group]; A-TACK [ALB3 group]) and 1 CLB device (FlippTack with polyethylene suture) were used for cortical tendon graft fixation. Cyclic loading (1000 cycles up to 250 N) with complete unloading were applied to the free end of the tendon graft using a uniaxial testing machine, followed by load to failure. Elongation, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate failure load were recorded and compared between the groups using a Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn correction.

Results

Elongation after 1000 cycles at 250 N was similar between groups (ALB1, 4.5 ± 0.7 mm; ALB2, 4.8 ± 0.8 mm; ALB3, 4.5 ± 0.6 mm; CLB, 4.5 ± 0.8 mm), as was load to failure (ALB1, 838 ± 109 N; ALB2, 930 ± 89 N; ALB3, 809 ± 103 N; CLB, 842 ± 80 N). Stiffness was significantly higher in the ALB1 group compared with the CLB group (262.3 ± 21.6 vs 229.3 ± 15.1 N/mm; P < .05). No significant difference was found between the 4 groups regarding yield load. Constructs failed either by rupture of the loop, breakage of the button, or rupture of the tendon.

Conclusion

The tested third-generation ALB devices for cortical fixation in ACLR withstood cyclic loading with complete unloading without significant differences to a CLB device.

Clinical Relevance

The third-generation ALB devices tested in the present study provided biomechanical stability comparable with that of a CLB device. Furthermore, ultimate failure loads of all tested implants exceeded the loads expected to occur in the postoperative period after ACLR.

Tape-Reinforced Graft Suturing and Retensioning of Adjustable-Loop Cortical Buttons Improve Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Biomechanics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of tape-reinforced graft suturing and graft retensioning for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a full-construct human cadaveric model.

METHODS

Harvested cadaveric ASTQT grafts were assigned to either (1) double-suspensory adjustable-loop cortical button device (ALD) fixation in which both graft ends were fixed with a suspensory fixation device with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) tape-reinforced suturing or (2) single-suspensory distal tendon fixation in which only the patellar end was fixed with an ALD (n = 5) or fixed-loop cortical button device (FLD) (n = 5). All specimens were prepared using a No. 2 whipstitch technique, and tape-reinforced specimens had an integrated braided tape implant. Graft preparation time was recorded for double-suspensory constructs. Samples were tested on an electromechanical testing machine using a previously published protocol simulating rehabilitative kinematics and loading.

RESULTS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing resulted in greater graft load retention after cycling (11.9% difference, P = .021), less total elongation (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)], 5.57 mm [3.50-7.65 mm] vs 32.14 mm [25.38-38.90 mm]; P < .001), greater ultimate failure stiffness (mean [95% CI], 171.9 N/mm [158.8-185.0 N/mm] vs 119.4 N/mm [108.7-130.0 N/mm]; P < .001), and less graft preparation time (36.4% difference, P < .001) when compared with unreinforced specimens. Retensioned ALD constructs had less cyclic elongation compared with FLD constructs (mean total elongation [95% CI], 7.04 mm [5.47-8.61 mm] vs 12.96 mm [8.67-17.26 mm]; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing improves time-zero ASTQT ACLR construct biomechanics in a cadaveric model with 83% less total elongation, 44% greater stiffness, and reduced preparation time compared with a whipstitched graft without tape reinforcement. ALD fixation improves construct mechanics when compared with FLD fixation as evidenced by 46% less total elongation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tape-reinforced implants and graft retensioning using ALDs improve time-zero ACLR graft construct biomechanics in a time-zero biomechanical model. Clinical studies will be necessary to determine whether these implants improve clinical outcomes including knee laxity and the incidence of graft rupture.

The tibial tunnel drilling angles of 60° provided a lower ultimate load to failure on a single bundle posterior cruciate ligament graft using interference screw fixation compared to 30°/45°

PURPOSE

To biomechanically compare the initial fixation strength of grafts among three tibial tunnel angles (30°/45°/60°) in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A series of transtibial PCL reconstruction models were established with porcine tibias and bovine tendons. Specimens were randomly assigned to three groups according to the angles between the tibial tunnel and the perpendicular line of the tibial shaft: Group A (30°, n = 12), Group B (45°, n = 12), and Group C (60°, n = 12). The area of the tunnel entrance, the segmental bone mineral density (sBMD) of the graft fixation site of the tibia and the maximum insertion torque of the interference screw were measured. Finally, load to failure tests were carried out on the graft-screw-tibia constructs at the same rate.

RESULTS

Ultimate load to failure in Group C (335.2 ± 107.5 N) was significantly lower than that in Group A (584.1 ± 127.9 N, P < 0.01) and Group B (521.9 ± 95.9 N, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between biomechanical properties of Groups A and B (n.s.). The posterior part fractures of the tibial tunnel exit occurred in eight specimens of Group C. In addition, the ultimate load was proven to be related to insertion torque (rho = 0.7, P < 0.01), sBMD (rho = 0.7, P < 0.01), and the area of the tunnel entrance (rho =- 0.4, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The ultimate load to failure was significantly lower in tibial PCL interference screw fixation for tunnels drilled at 60° compared to 30°/45°. In addition, the ultimate load was significantly correlated with insertion torque, sBMD and the area of the tunnel entrance. Given that the load to failure of distal fixation may not be sufficient for early postoperative rehabilitation, a 60° tunnel should not be recommended to drill in tibia during PCL reconstruction.

Strategies to promote tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Present and future

At present, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction still has a high failure rate. Tendon graft and bone tunnel surface angiogenesis and bony ingrowth are the main physiological processes of tendon-bone healing, and also the main reasons for the postoperative efficacy of ACL reconstruction. Poor tendon-bone healing has been also identified as one of the main causes of unsatisfactory treatment outcomes. The physiological process of tendon-bone healing is complicated because the tendon-bone junction requires the organic fusion of the tendon graft with the bone tissue. The failure of the operation is often caused by tendon dislocation or scar healing. Therefore, it is important to study the possible risk factors for tendon-bone healing and strategies to promote it. This review comprehensively analyzed the risk factors contributing to tendon-bone healing failure after ACL reconstruction. Additionally, we discuss the current strategies used to promote tendon-bone healing following ACL reconstruction.

Meniscal resection increases the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring autografts

PURPOSE

To compare the midterm clinical outcomes of different meniscal surgeries in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLR) with eight strands of hamstring (HT8) autografts and explore the potential predictive risk factors for residual knee laxity.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, a total of 410 patients who underwent anatomic trans-tibial DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts (169 patients without meniscal surgery, 105 patients with meniscal repair, and 136 patients with meniscal resection) were included in this study. The equivalent graft diameter was introduced to make the total graft size of DB-ACLR comparable with that of single-bundle ACLR and calculated as the square root of the quadratic sum of the diameter for each bundle. Residual laxity was defined as excessive anterior tibial translation or residual pivot shift at any follow-up visit, while graft rupture was confirmed by second-look arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 2.2 years. The mean equivalent graft diameter was 9.9 ± 0.7 mm. Graft rupture was confirmed in 16 (3.9%) patients, while residual laxity was detected in 72 (17.6%) patients (34 [25.0%] in the meniscal resection group vs. 22 [13.0%] in the no meniscal surgery group, p = 0.021). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, high-grade preoperative knee laxity (odds ratio OR 2.04, p = 0.020), equivalent graft diameter < 9 mm (OR 3.31 compared with 9-10 mm, p = 0.012; OR 3.28 compared with ≥ 10 mm, p = 0.019), and meniscal resection (OR 1.94 compared with no meniscal surgery, p = 0.045) were associated with residual laxity.

CONCLUSION

During a midterm follow-up, meniscal resection increased the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts. Increasing the hamstring graft diameter and preserving the menisci are important strategies for ACLR to restore knee stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.