Influence of Patellofemoral Anatomy on Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability

Radiographic Landmark Measurements for the Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex May Be Affected by Visible Femoral Shaft Length on Lateral Knee Radiographs

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC).

METHODS

In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

RESULTS

Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal-distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = -0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior-posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

CONCLUSIONS

When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.

Nonanatomical femoral tunnel positioning in isolated MPFL reconstruction is not associated with an increased risk of patellofemoral osteoarthritis after a minimum follow-up of 10 years

PURPOSE

The association between the prevalence of patellofemoral arthritis (PFA) and femoral tunnel positioning following isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) has not been well described. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between femoral tunnel positioning and the prevalence of PFA.

METHODS

This was a single-centre study of patients undergoing an isolated MPFLr between 2006 and 2011 with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. Outcomes assessed were the presence of PFA on radiographs, recurrence of instability requiring revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes, including Kujala, Tegner and IKDC scores. Tunnel positioning was assessed on postoperative radiographs using two radiographic methods: Schöttle's point and the grid method to localise the femoral tunnel. Patients were grouped based on tunnel positioning and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analysed at a mean follow-up of 12.4 years. Thirty-three patients (66%) had a femoral tunnel position within 7 mm of Schöttle's point and 39 (78%) within the anatomic quadrant, with the most common location according to the grid method in D4 (28%) and E4 (26%), respectively. Thirty-seven patients (74%) had a satisfactory (>80 versus <80) Kujala score at long-term follow-up. None of the examined tunnel assessment methods demonstrated a significant relationship with Tegner, Kujala or International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Patients with a femoral tunnel position >7 mm outside Schöttle's point or were considered to be in a nonanatomic position were not significantly more likely to result in unsatisfactory Kujala scores at the last follow-up. Tunnel positioning and the other tested parameters were not found to be significantly associated with the development of PFA.

CONCLUSION

No correlation between femoral tunnel position and risk of PFA or poor outcomes was observed in patients undergoing isolated MPFLr at long-term follow-up. The impact of femoral tunnel placement on long-term outcomes in patients with PFI may be less significant than originally considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Derotational distal femur osteotomy with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can get good outcomes in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation with excessive TT-TG and increased femoral anteversion

Background

Surgery is the main treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation (PD). However, due to the complexity of anatomical factors, there is still a lack of consensus on the choice of combined surgical methods. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with derotational distal femur osteotomies (MPFLR + DDFO) and combined with tibial tubercle osteotomies (MPFLR + TTO) for recurrent PD with increased femoral anteversion angles (FAA) and excessive tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, MPFLR + DDFO and MPFLR + TTO patients from 2015 to 2020 were included. Group A (MPFLR + DDFO, n = 42) and B (MPFLR + TTO, n = 46) were formed. Clinical outcomes included physical examinations, functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), visual analog scale (VAS) and intermittent and persistent osteoarthritis pain scale (ICOAP), Tegner scores), and complications. The Caton-Deschamps index (CD-I), patellar title angle, patellar congruence angle, patella-trochlear groove distance, TT-TG distance, and FAA were used to assess radiological outcomes.

Results

All clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had significantly better postoperative scores than Group B (Kujala: 89.8 ± 6.4 vs. 82.9 ± 7.4, P < 0.01; Lysholm: 90.9 ± 5.1 vs. 81.3 ± 6.3, P = 0.02; IKDC: 87.3 ± 9.0 vs. 82.7 ± 8.0, P < 0.01; Tegner: 6.0 (5.0, 9.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0), P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS and ICOAP scores between the two groups. No dislocation recurrences occurred. Radiological outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had better outcomes. After surgery, the patellar height of 88.5% (23/26) patients in Group A and 82.8% (24/29) patients in Group B was restored to normal (the Caton-Deschamps index <1.2).

Conclusions

Both MPFLR + TTO and MPFLR + DDFO obtained satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of recurrent PD with increased FAA and excessive TT-TG. However, the outcomes of MPFLR + DDFO were better and should be considered a priority. MPFLR + TTO may be not necessary for such patients.

Patella alta and increased TT-TG distance do not adversely affect patient-reported outcomes following isolated MPFL reconstruction: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of patellofemoral anatomical variations (patella alta, increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove [TT-TG] distance, and trochlear dysplasia) on clinical outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A comprehensive search from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify studies that compared outcomes based on the presence or absence of patella alta, elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and/or trochlear dysplasia. Exclusion criteria included reviews and meta-analyses, studies that included patients who underwent associated bony procedures, and those reporting outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction with no comparison between varying anatomical groups.

RESULTS

After application of selection criteria, 19 studies were included. Patella alta was not predictive of failure or poorer outcomes among 13 studies; however, 2 studies demonstrated poorer patient-reported outcome scores and/or higher failure rates with increasing patellar height. Increasing TT-TG distance demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with poorer outcomes in only one study, whereas 12 other studies showed no association. Trochlear dysplasia resulted in worse outcomes and greater failure rates in 6 studies, while 10 studies showed no statistically significant correlation between trochlear dysplasia and postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patella alta and increased TT-TG distance did not adversely affect outcomes following isolated MPFL reconstruction in the preponderance of reviewed studies. Data are mixed regarding the impact of trochlear dysplasia on the outcomes of isolated MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields better outcomes than isolated procedures in patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and MPFLR combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) for patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion (FA).

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2019, 36 patients who underwent isolated MPFLR and 31 patients who underwent MPFLR combined with DDFO were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes included physical examinations, functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) scores), activity level (Tegner activity score and return to sports), complications, and patellar re-dislocation rate. Radiological outcomes included patella tilt angle, patellar congruence angle, and patella-trochlear groove distance.

RESULTS

All clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but the DDFO group had significantly better postoperative scores than the MPFLR group (Kujala: 85.1 ± 7.7 vs. 80.5 ± 8.4, P = 0.023; Lysholm: 86.8 ± 8.2 vs. 81.9 ± 9.1, P = 0.026; IKDC: 86.2 ± 10.0 vs. 81.7 ± 8.1, P = 0.045; and BPII: 68.0 ± 12.5 vs. 62.3 ± 10.0, P = 0.039). Both groups achieved successful return to sports (90.3% vs. 91.7%). No re-dislocation or major complications occurred. Radiological outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but the DDFO group had better outcomes (P < 0.05). The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was only improved after DDFO from 17.0 ± 2.3 mm to 15.1 ± 2.0 mm (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both isolated MPFLR and MPFLR combined with DDFO yielded satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of patellar dislocation with increased FA. However, combined DDFO had better outcomes and should be considered a priority.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Distalization of tibial tubercle osteotomy is not necessary for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation accompanied by patella alta and increased TT-TG distance

Background

The aim of this study is to determine whether distalization of the tibial tubercle is necessary for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation accompanied by patella alta and increased TT-TG.

Methods

In this retrospective study, all 70 patients (70 knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation accompanied by TT–TG distance ≥20 mm and patella alta (CD-I ≥ 1.4) were surgically treated using MPFLR combined with medialization of the tibial tubercle or medialization and distalization of the tibial tubercle in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University between 2017 and 2019. 33 patients(33 knees) received MPFLR combined with medialization of the tibial tubercle (MPFLR + TTm group), 37 patients(37 knees) received MPFLR combined with medialization and distalization of the tibial tubercle (MPFLR + TTm-d group). Evaluation indicators included knee injury and osteoarthritis prognostic score (KOOS) and Kujala score evaluation, congruence angle (CA), patellar tilt angle (PTA), TT-TG distance, Blackburne-Peel index (BP-I), Caton-Deschamps index (CD-I).

Results

A total of 70 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up time of 32 ± 6 months were evaluated in the present study. The postoperative, the PTA, CA, CD-I, BP-I, and TT-TG distance significantly improved in the two groups (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (>0.05). The KOOS and Kujala scores of the two groups at the last follow-up were significantly higher than the preoperative scores (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). No complications were noted in either group.

Conclusion

For patients with recurrent patellar dislocation accompanied by increased TT-TG distance and patella alta, distalization is not needed and medialization is sufficient even in the presence of patella alta.