1
|
Mohammed Y, Reynolds HW, Waziri H, Attahiru A, Olowo-okere A, Kamateeka M, Waziri NE, Garba AM, Corrêa GC, Garba R, Vollmer N, Nguku P. Exploring the landscape of routine immunization in Nigeria: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators. Vaccine X 2024; 20:100563. [PMID: 39430738 PMCID: PMC11488437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite global efforts to improve vaccination coverage, the number of zero-dose and under-immunized children has increased in Africa, particularly in Nigeria, which has over 2.1 million unvaccinated (zero dose) children, the highest in the continent. This scoping review systematically maps and summarizes existing literature on the barriers and facilitators of immunization in Nigeria, focusing on regional inequalities. Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, encompassing all data from their inception to October 2023, to identify articles on the determinants of routine immunization uptake in Nigeria. Eligible studies were evaluated using predefined criteria, and the data were analyzed and visualized. Results The results revealed distinct regional variations in factors influencing immunization practices across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones. Identified barriers include logistical issues, socio-economic factors, cultural influences, and systemic healthcare deficiencies. Key facilitators across multiple zones are health literacy, maternal education, and community leader influence. However, unique regional differences were also identified. In the North-East, significant factors included peer influence, robust reminder systems, provision of additional security, and financial incentives for health facilities. In the North-West, perceived vaccine benefits, fear of non-immunization consequences, urban residence, health literacy, and antenatal care visits were reported as crucial. Perceived benefits of vaccines and trust in healthcare providers were identified as predominant factors in the North-Central zone In the South-East, maternal autonomy, health literacy, and fear of non-immunization consequences were important. In the South-South, peer influence and reminder systems like WhatsApp and SMS were notable, alongside higher maternal education levels. The South-West highlighted maternal autonomy, peer influence, health card usage, high maternal education, and supportive government policies as critical factors. Conclusion Our findings underscore the need for region-specific interventions that address these unique barriers to improve immunization coverage across Nigeria. Tailored approaches that consider the socio-economic, cultural, and logistical challenges specific to each region are essential to bridge the immunization gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahaya Mohammed
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
- Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Abdullahi Fodio Road, 234 Sokoto, Nigeria
| | - Heidi W. Reynolds
- Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, Le Grand Saconnex, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hyelshilni Waziri
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
| | - Adam Attahiru
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
| | - Ahmed Olowo-okere
- Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Abdullahi Fodio Road, 234 Sokoto, Nigeria
| | - Moreen Kamateeka
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
| | - Ndadilnasiya Endie Waziri
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
| | - Aminu Magashi Garba
- Africa Health Budget Network (AHBN), 9 Berbera Street, 1st Flour Off Yaounde Street, Wuse Zone 6, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Gustavo C. Corrêa
- Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, Le Grand Saconnex, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland
- Ministry of Health, Kano State, Nigeria
| | - Rufai Garba
- National Primary Health Care Development Agency, 681/682 Port Harcourt Cres, Garki, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Nancy Vollmer
- JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. (JSI), 2080 Addison Street Suite 4, Berkeley, CA 94704-1692, USA
| | - Patrick Nguku
- African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), Nigeria, 50 Haile Selassie St, Asokoro, Abuja 900103, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jammeh A, Muhoozi M, Kulane A, Kajungu D. Comparing full immunisation status of children (0-23 months) between slums of Kampala City and the rural setting of Iganga District in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:856. [PMID: 37580708 PMCID: PMC10424339 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09875-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunisation remains the most cost-effective public health intervention in preventing morbidity and mortality due to Vaccine-Preventable Diseases (VPDs). The study aims to compare the differences in immunisation coverage amongst children aged 0 to 23 months living in slums of Kampala city and Iganga as rural districts in Uganda. METHODS This study utilises data from a cross-sectional survey done in 2019 in the slums of Kampala City and the rural district of Iganga within the Health and Demographic Surveillance Site (HDSS). It included 1016 children aged 0-23 months and their parents. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the relationship between multiple independent variables and the binary dependent variables (fully immunised) using Stata statistical software. The measures of association were odds ratios reported with a corresponding 95% confidence interval. RESULTS Out of the 1016 participants, 544 participants live in the rural area and 472 participants in the slums. Slums had 48.9% (n = 231) of fully immunised children whilst rural areas had 43.20% (n = 235). The multivariate analysis showed that children living in slums are more likely to be fully immunised as compared to their counterparts in rural areas (Odds ratio:1.456; p = 0.033; CI:1.030-2.058). Immunisation coverage for BCG (98.9%), Polio 0 (88.2%), Penta1 (92.7%), and Pneumo1 (89.8%) were high in both settlements. However, the dropout rate for subsequent vaccines was high 17%, 20% and 41% for Penta, pneumococcal and rota vaccines respectively. There was poor uptake of the new vaccines with slums having 73.4% and 47.9% coverage for pneumococcal and rota vaccines respectively and rural areas had 72.1% and 7.5% for pneumococcal and rota vaccines respectively. CONCLUSION The low full immunisation status in this study was attributed to the child's residence and the occupation of the parents. Lack of education and poor access to messages on immunisation (inadequate access to mass media) are other contributing factors. Educational messages on the importance of immunisation targeting these underserved populations will improve full immunisation coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Awa Jammeh
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital, Banjul, The Gambia.
| | - Michael Muhoozi
- Center for Health and Population Research, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Asli Kulane
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dan Kajungu
- Center for Health and Population Research, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahachi K, Kessels J, Boateng K, Jean Baptiste AE, Mitula P, Ekeman E, Nic Lochlainn L, Rosewell A, Sodha SV, Abela-Ridder B, Gabrielli AF. Zero- or missed-dose children in Nigeria: Contributing factors and interventions to overcome immunization service delivery challenges. Vaccine 2022; 40:5433-5444. [PMID: 35973864 PMCID: PMC9485449 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
'Zero-dose' refers to a person who does not receive a single dose of any vaccine in the routine national immunization schedule, while 'missed dose' refers to a person who does not complete the schedule. These peopleremain vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases, and are often already disadvantaged due to poverty, conflict, and lack of access to basic health services. Globally, more 22.7 million children are estimated to be zero- or missed-dose, of which an estimated 3.1 million (∼14 %) reside in Nigeria.We conducted a scoping review tosynthesize recent literature on risk factors and interventions for zero- and missed-dosechildren in Nigeria. Our search identified 127 papers, including research into risk factors only (n = 66); interventions only (n = 34); both risk factors and interventions (n = 18); and publications that made recommendations only (n = 9). The most frequently reported factors influencing childhood vaccine uptake were maternal factors (n = 77), particularly maternal education (n = 22) and access to ante- and perinatal care (n = 19); heterogeneity between different types of communities - including location, region, wealth, religion, population composition, and other challenges (n = 50); access to vaccination, i.e., proximity of facilities with vaccines and vaccinators (n = 37); and awareness about immunization - including safety, efficacy, importance, and schedules (n = 18).Literature assessing implementation of interventions was more scattered, and heavily skewed towards vaccination campaigns and polio eradication efforts. Major evidence gaps exist in how to deliver effective and sustainable routine childhood immunization. Overall, further work is needed to operationalise the learnings from these studies, e.g. through applying findings to Nigeria's next review of vaccination plans, and using this summary as a basis for further investigation and specific recommendations on effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurayi Mahachi
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
| | | | - Kofi Boateng
- Nigeria Country Office, World Health Organization, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | - Pamela Mitula
- Inter-Country Support Team, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Ebru Ekeman
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laura Nic Lochlainn
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Rosewell
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Samir V Sodha
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bernadette Abela-Ridder
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Albis Francesco Gabrielli
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|