1
|
Maida CA, Xiong D, Marcus M, Zhou L, Huang Y, Lyu Y, Shen J, Osuna-Garcia A, Liu H. Quantitative data collection approaches in subject-reported oral health research: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22:435. [PMID: 36192721 PMCID: PMC9528129 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02399-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This scoping review reports on studies that collect survey data using quantitative research to measure self-reported oral health status outcome measures. The objective of this review is to categorize measures used to evaluate self-reported oral health status and oral health quality of life used in surveys of general populations. Methods The review is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) with the search on four online bibliographic databases. The criteria include (1) peer-reviewed articles, (2) papers published between 2011 and 2021, (3) only studies using quantitative methods, and (4) containing outcome measures of self-assessed oral health status, and/or oral health-related quality of life. All survey data collection methods are assessed and papers whose methods employ newer technological approaches are also identified. Results Of the 2981 unduplicated papers, 239 meet the eligibility criteria. Half of the papers use impact scores such as the OHIP-14; 10% use functional measures, such as the GOHAI, and 26% use two or more measures while 8% use rating scales of oral health status. The review identifies four data collection methods: in-person, mail-in, Internet-based, and telephone surveys. Most (86%) employ in-person surveys, and 39% are conducted in Asia-Pacific and Middle East countries with 8% in North America. Sixty-six percent of the studies recruit participants directly from clinics and schools, where the surveys were carried out. The top three sampling methods are convenience sampling (52%), simple random sampling (12%), and stratified sampling (12%). Among the four data collection methods, in-person surveys have the highest response rate (91%), while the lowest response rate occurs in Internet-based surveys (37%). Telephone surveys are used to cover a wider population compared to other data collection methods. There are two noteworthy approaches: 1) sample selection where researchers employ different platforms to access subjects, and 2) mode of interaction with subjects, with the use of computers to collect self-reported data. Conclusion The study provides an assessment of oral health outcome measures, including subject-reported oral health status and notes newly emerging computer technological approaches recently used in surveys conducted on general populations. These newer applications, though rarely used, hold promise for both researchers and the various populations that use or need oral health care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02399-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl A Maida
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Di Xiong
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marvin Marcus
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linyu Zhou
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yilan Huang
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yuetong Lyu
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jie Shen
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antonia Osuna-Garcia
- Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California, Los Angeles, 12-077 Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Honghu Liu
- Division of Oral and Systemic Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang C, Huang SS, Moore Simas TA, Silk H, Savageau JA, Russell SL. The MOHIP-14 PW (Modified Oral Health Impact Profile 14-Item Version for Pregnant Women): A Real-World Study of Its Psychometric Properties and Relationship with Patient-Reported Oral Health. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10030461. [PMID: 35326939 PMCID: PMC8951846 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The 14-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) has been widely used as a measure for oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) since its publication in 1997. However, few studies have examined its psychometric properties and relationship with patient-reported oral health in pregnant women. Aim: To offer empirical evidence for appropriate use of the OHIP-14 among pregnant women in research and clinical practice. Objectives: (1) to empirically investigate the psychometric properties of the OHIP-14, (2) to modify it into the MOHIP-14PW (modified OHIP-14 for pregnant women), and (3) to compare their relationships with patient-reported oral health in pregnant women. Methods: In this real-world study (RWS) from suburban New York clinics, we collected OHIP-14 data from 291 pregnant women and assessed its psychometric properties at the item-, dimension-, and measure-level, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Accordingly, we modified the OHIP-14 into the MOHIP-14PW. Finally, we compared their correlations with patient-reported oral health scores. Results: All OHIP-14 items had severely skewed distributions, and two had a correlation with the patient-reported oral health < 0.1. All seven pairs of items correlated well (0.47 to 0.62), but the Cronbach’s alphas indicated suboptimal reliability, with two below 0.70. CFA results offered suboptimal support to the original structure, and EFA found a three-dimensional structure best fitted the data. Therefore, we modified the OHIP-14 into the MOHIP-14PW. CFA on the MOHIP-14PW offered stronger supports, and the Cronbach’s alphas increased to 0.92, 0.72, and 0.71. The MOHIP-14PW’s dimensions were more meaningful to pregnant women and had stronger relationships with patient-reported oral health than the OHIP-14; the average correlation coefficients increased by 26% from 0.19 in OHIP-14 to 0.24 in the MOHIP-14PW. Conclusions: The original OHIP-14 required modifications at the item-, dimension-, and measure- level, and the MOHIP-14PW had better psychometric properties, easier interpretation, and stronger correlation with patient-reported oral health in low-income pregnant women. Through an interdisciplinary RWS on a large sample of pregnant women, this study offers concrete empirical evidence for the advantages of the MOHIP-14PW over the original OHIP-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengwu Yang
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
- Correspondence: (C.Y.); (S.L.R.)
| | - Shulamite S. Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA;
| | - Tiffany A. Moore Simas
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | - Hugh Silk
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA; (H.S.); (J.A.S.)
| | - Judith A. Savageau
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA; (H.S.); (J.A.S.)
| | - Stefanie L. Russell
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA;
- Department of Oral Surgery, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Correspondence: (C.Y.); (S.L.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kriachkova LV, Korobko MY, Kyi-Kokarieva VG, Borvinko EV, Zaitsev VV, Gopak-Durie H. APPROVAL OF THE USE OF THE SHORT FORM 19 OF THE CHILD'S ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE (COHIP-SF 19) FOR DENTAL PUBLIC HEALTH NEEDS. WIADOMOSCI LEKARSKIE (WARSAW, POLAND : 1960) 2022; 75:1156-1161. [PMID: 35758495 DOI: 10.36740/wlek202205119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim: Is an adaptation, determination of psychometric properties, and approbation of the use of COHIP-SF 19 for the needs of dental public health in the Ukrainian sample of children and teenagers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Materials and methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted on a sample of 236 Ukrainian children aged 6 to 18. The psychometric indicators of the questionnaire were evaluated; analysis of the reliability and internal structure of the methodology based on correlation and factor analysis, calculation of Chronbach's alpha; reliability of re-testing (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient); assessment of convergent and discriminant validity (Mann-Whitney U test, ROC analysis, and correlation analysis). STATISTICA 6.1 (StatSoftInc., № AGAR909E415822FA) was used to analyze the results. The ethics of the study was confirmed by the conclusion of the relevant commission. RESULTS Results: After cultural direct and reverse translation of the original version, the Ukrainian version of COHIP-SF 19 UK was obtained. The internal consistency of the subscales and COHIP-SF 19 UK was generally sufficient (Cronbach's alpha is greater than 0.7). Sufficient reliability of retesting, convergent and discriminant validity of the methodology was proved. The presence of a correlation between COHIP-SF 19 UK indicators and self-assessment of children's health and quality of life was determined. CONCLUSION Conclusions: The study proved that COHIP-SF 19 UK is a reliable valid method for assessing the quality of life-related to oral health among Ukrainian children and adolescents, and its good psychometric properties are sufficient for research in the field of dental public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Helene Gopak-Durie
- CLINIC OF THE FRENCH STUDENT HEALTH FOUNDATION, VITRY-LE-FRANÇOIS, PARIS, FRANCE
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bekes K, John MT, Rener-Sitar K, Al-Harthy MH, Michelotti A, Reissmann DR, Nikolovska J, Sanivarapu S, Lawal FB, List T, Peršić Kiršić S, Strajnić L, Casassus R, Baba K, Schimmel M, Amuasi A, Jayasinghe RD, Strujić-Porović S, Peck CC, Xie H, Haugaard Bendixen K, Simancas-Pallares MA, Perez-Franco E, Naghibi Sistani MM, Valerio P, Letunova N, Nurelhuda N, Bartlett DW, Oluwafemi IA, Dghoughi S, Ferreira JNAR, Chantaracherd P, Sekulić S. Pediatric patients' reasons for visiting dentists in all WHO regions. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:165. [PMID: 34120623 PMCID: PMC8201707 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01801-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the four oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) dimensions (4D) or areas in which oral disorders impact pediatric patients. Using their dentists' assessment, the study aimed to evaluate whether pediatric dental patients' oral health concerns fit into the 4D of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) construct. METHODS Dentists who treat children from 32 countries and all WHO regions were selected from a web-based survey of 1580 international dentists. Dentists were asked if their pediatric patients with current or future oral health concerns fit into the 4D of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) construct. Proportions of all pediatric patients' oral health problems and prevention needs were computed. FINDINGS Data from 101 dentists treating children only and 523 dentists treating children and adults were included. For 90% of pediatric patients, their current oral health problems fit well in the four OHRQoL dimensions. For 91% of oral health problems they intended to prevent in the future were related to these dimensions as well. Both numbers increased to at least 96% when experts analyzed dentists´ explanations of why some oral health problems would not fit these four categories. CONCLUSIONS The study revealed the four fundamental components of dental patients, i.e., the four OHRQoL dimensions (Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact) are also applicable for pediatric patients, regardless of whether they have current or future oral health concerns, and should be considered when measuring OHRQoL in the pediatric dental patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Bekes
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Mike T John
- Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ksenija Rener-Sitar
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Prosthodontics, University Dental Clinics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mohammad H Al-Harthy
- Department of Oral Basic & Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ambra Michelotti
- Section of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Daniel R Reissmann
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julijana Nikolovska
- Department for Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia
| | | | - Folake B Lawal
- Department of Periodontology and Community Dentistry, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Thomas List
- Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sanja Peršić Kiršić
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ljiljana Strajnić
- Clinic for Dentistry of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Rodrigo Casassus
- Department of Orofacial Pain, Faculty of Medicine, University of Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University Dental Hospital, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Martin Schimmel
- Division of Gerodontology, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ama Amuasi
- Department of Child Health and Orthodontics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Ruwan D Jayasinghe
- Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | - Sanela Strujić-Porović
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry with Clinics, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Christopher C Peck
- Sydney Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Han Xie
- Department of Stomatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Miguel Angel Simancas-Pallares
- Division of Pediatric and Public Health, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eka Perez-Franco
- Center for Headaches, Facial Pain and TMD, Punta Pacifica Medical Center, Panama City, Panama
| | | | - Patricia Valerio
- Instituto Patricia Valério, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Natalia Letunova
- Department of Anesthesia in Dentistry, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nazik Nurelhuda
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - David W Bartlett
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ikeoluwa A Oluwafemi
- Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Saloua Dghoughi
- Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry of Rabat, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Joao N A R Ferreira
- Exocrine Gland Biology and Regeneration Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pathamas Chantaracherd
- Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Western University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Stella Sekulić
- Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|