Dental Extractions under General Anesthesia: New Insights from Process Mining

Specialists' management of permanent dentition traumatic dental injuries in 7-16-year-olds: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Specialist paediatric dentists are integral to dental trauma care pathways. General dentists rely on specialist input, more so in complex cases. Little is known about specialists' role in these pathways or the perceived barriers they face. The aim is to explore specialists' role in managing traumatic dental injuries in the permanent dentition in children.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Face-to-face (remote video) online semi-structured interviews were undertaken. All UK specialists were invited by email. Purposeful sampling aimed to investigate representation from the devolved nations, presence/absence of working within a managed-clinical network and level of care provision. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Data saturation was reached after nine interviews. Three main themes established were: inconsistent access to care; the need to formalise traumatic dental injuries care pathways; educationally upskilling general dentists. Geographical variation in provision of specialist and out-of-hours/emergency department care meant patients risked not receiving care by the most appropriate individual. Formalizing care pathways by clearly defining the role of each stakeholder (specialist, dentist, medical professionals and parents) and developing a method to assess complexity was perceived to be essential to improving treatment outcomes. Upskilling general dentists in trauma management appeared essential. A potential lack of engagement was raised, with a suggestion that trauma management education should become core continuing-professional development.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist input should be available in the management of traumatic dental injuries. Current access to specialist care is inequitable across the UK. Formalizing care pathways and upskilling general dentists could ease inconsistencies.

The value of a remote orthodontic assessment for children having permanent teeth extracted under general anaesthesia

Introduction The number of children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthetic (GA) remains high. The newly published Royal College of Surgeons guidelines in 2023 take a less prescriptive approach on balancing and compensating extractions for first permanent molars. In an effort to maintain an effective and efficient patient care pathway, an orthodontic remote assessment triage model was developed in West Dorset for the special care dentistry and community dental service.Aims The orthodontic triage form is now used across Dorset. This service evaluation assesses whether the form is still effective despite the upscaling. Furthermore, qualitative feedback was obtained from the clinicians involved in referring and triaging.Design The sample of 352 forms consisted of children aged 16 years or younger undergoing GA for dental extractions for whom orthodontic triage had been requested between March 2019 and March 2023. The clinician feedback was collected using a questionnaire.Results This service evaluation found that 53.1% of patients had their treatment plan modified following an orthodontic assessment. Positive feedback from all clinicians involved suggests there is potential to expand this model to other services.Discussion Involving the orthodontist can address orthodontic concerns which has the potential to simplify or obviate the need for future orthodontic treatment. Remote assessment reduces the need for face-to-face appointments. The clinician perspective influences willingness to further develop and expand the current pathway.Conclusion Remote triage has proved successful in Dorset. There is potential to build an initiative between primary and secondary care in the hopes of creating a universal national proforma to increase access to orthodontic opinions for children requiring dental extractions.

Predictors of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Pain Associated with Routine Dental Procedures in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Understanding predictors of pain associated with paediatric dental procedures could play an important role in preventing loss of cooperation, which often leads to the procedure having to be performed under general anaesthesia. Aim: We aimed to identify predictors of intra-operative and post-operative pain associated with routine dental procedures in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of observational studies was performed using electronic searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health via OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO. The NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, which were meta-analysed to estimate the impact of dental procedures and anxiety on children's pain perception. A meta-regression analysis was also performed to determine the relative effect of predictors on children's pain perception measured as mean differences on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The search identified 532 articles; 53 were retrieved for full-text screening; 6 studies were included in the review; and 4 were eligible for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed the types of procedures that predicted intra-operative pain, with dental extractions being the most painful (Mean VAS Difference [MD] 46.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 40.40 to 52.62 mm). The meta-regression showed that pain scores for dental extractions were significantly higher than polishing (the least painful procedure (reference category)) by VAS MD = 23.80 mm (95% CI 5.13-42.46 mm, p-value = 0.012). It also showed that highly anxious children reported significantly higher pain scores during dental procedures by a 12.31 mm MD VAS score (95% CI 5.23-19.40 mm, p-value = 0.001) compared to those with low anxiety levels. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates that the strongest predictors of intra-operative pain associated with paediatric dental procedures are dental extractions followed by drilling. Children with high anxiety also reported more pain for similar procedures. Tailoring interventions to reduce pain associated with paediatric dental procedures should be a priority for future research, as reducing pain can impact compliance and could reduce the need for general anaesthesia in dental treatment.