1
|
Marquez-Romero JM, Sánchez-Ramírez KI. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cerebrovascular ischemia. Clin Auton Res 2024:10.1007/s10286-024-01085-6. [PMID: 39692954 DOI: 10.1007/s10286-024-01085-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The parasympathetic effects of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) on the cerebral vasculature provide a compelling rationale for its therapeutic application in cerebrovascular ischemia. In recent years, attempts have been made to stimulate the SPG to achieve beneficial effects on cerebral circulation. METHODS This review synthesizes the available publications on SPG stimulation. It critically evaluates the evidence from preclinical studies and clinical trials to assess its potential as a treatment for acute cerebrovascular disorders and outlines aspects that still require more study. RESULTS The medical literature provides consistent evidence of the significant effects of stimulating the SPG on cerebrovascular circulation. In addition, considerable evidence supports the therapeutic role of SPG stimulation in patients with cerebral ischemia. CONCLUSION Given the current understanding, future research could explore the potential of SPG stimulation as a non-reperfusion intervention to improve long-term outcomes for individuals with ischemic cerebrovascular conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Manuel Marquez-Romero
- Department of Neurology, Hospital General de Zona #2, IMSS, OOAD Aguascalientes, Av. los Conos No. 102, 20190, Aguascalientes, AGS, Mexico.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferhat S, Bellanger G, Milnerowicz M, Kyheng M, Labreuche J, Sibon I, Khobzi M, Abousleiman J, Popica D, Moulin S, Dargazanli C, Consoli A, Eker O, Veunac L, Premat K, Gory B, Gentric J, Moreno R, Hassen WB, Gauberti M, Pop R, Rouchaud A, Bourcier R, Lapergue B, Marnat G. Iatrogenic arterial vasospasm during mechanical thrombectomy requiring treatment with intra-arterial nimodipine might be associated with worse outcomes. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16467. [PMID: 39248014 PMCID: PMC11554851 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Vasospasm is a common iatrogenic event during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In such circumstances, intra-arterial nimodipine administration is occasionally considered. However, its use in the treatment of iatrogenic vasospasm during MT has been poorly studied. We investigated the impact of iatrogenic vasospasm treated with intra-arterial nimodipine on outcomes after MT for large vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the multicenter observational registry Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS). Consecutive patients treated with MT between January 2015 and December 2022 were included. Patients treated with medical treatment alone, without MT, were excluded. We also excluded patients who received another in situ vasodilator molecule during the procedure. Outcomes were compared according to the occurrence of cervical and/or intracranial arterial vasospasm requiring intraoperative use of in situ nimodipine based on operator's decision, using a propensity score approach. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1), final recanalization, mortality, intracranial hemorrhage and procedural complications. Secondary analyses were performed according to the vasospasm location (intracranial or cervical). RESULTS Among 13,678 patients in the registry during the study period, 434 received intra-arterial nimodipine for the treatment of MT-related vasospasm. In the main analysis, comparable odds of favorable outcome were observed, whereas excellent outcome was significantly less frequent in the group with vasospasm requiring nimodipine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.97). Perfect recanalization, defined as a final modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 3 (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93), was also rarer in the vasospasm group. Intracranial vasospasm treated with nimodipine was significantly associated with worse clinical outcome (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.92), in contrast to the cervical location (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 0.54-3.08). CONCLUSION Arterial vasospasm occurring during the MT procedure and requiring intra-arterial nimodipine administration was associated with worse outcomes, especially in case of intracranial vasospasm. Although this study cannot formally differentiate whether the negative consequences were due to the vasospasm itself, or nimodipine administration or both, there might be an important signal toward a substantial clinical impact of iatrogenic vasospasm during MT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serine Ferhat
- Neuroradiology DepartmentBordeaux University HospitalBordeauxFrance
| | | | | | - Maeva Kyheng
- Biostatistics DepartmentLille University HospitalLilleFrance
| | | | - Igor Sibon
- Neurology DepartmentBordeaux University HospitalBordeauxFrance
| | - Mehdi Khobzi
- Neuroradiology DepartmentRothschild FoundationParisFrance
| | | | - Dan‐Adrian Popica
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology—NEURI Brain Vascular CenterBicêtre Hospital, APHPParisFrance
- Department of Radiology“Pius Brinzeu” County Emergency Clinical HospitalTimisoaraRomania
| | - Solene Moulin
- Neurology DepartmentReims University HospitalReimsFrance
| | - Cyril Dargazanli
- Neuroradiology DepartmentMontpellier University HospitalMontpellierFrance
| | | | - Omer Eker
- Neuroradiology DepartmentLyon University HospitalLyonFrance
| | - Louis Veunac
- Radiology DepartmentBayonne HospitalBayonneFrance
| | - Kevin Premat
- Neuroradiology DepartmentPitié‐Salpétrière University HospitalParisFrance
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Neuroradiology DepartmentNancy University HospitalNancyFrance
| | | | - Ricardo Moreno
- Neuroradiology DepartmentClermont‐Ferrand University HospitalClermont‐FerrandFrance
| | - Wagih Ben Hassen
- Neuroradiology DepartmentSainte‐Anne University HospitalParisFrance
| | | | - Raoul Pop
- Neuroradiology DepartmentStrasbourg University HospitalStrasbourgFrance
| | - Aymeric Rouchaud
- Neuroradiology DepartmentLimoges University HospitalLimogesFrance
| | - Romain Bourcier
- Neuroradiology DepartmentNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
| | | | - Gaultier Marnat
- Neuroradiology DepartmentBordeaux University HospitalBordeauxFrance
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jesser J, Nguyen T, Dmytriw AA, Yamagami H, Miao Z, Sommer LJ, Stockero A, Pfaff JAR, Ospel J, Goyal M, Patel AB, Pereira VM, Hanning U, Meyer L, van Zwam WH, Bendszus M, Wiesmann M, Möhlenbruch M, Weyland CS. Treatment practice of vasospasm during endovascular thrombectomy: an international survey. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2024; 9:490-496. [PMID: 38164618 PMCID: PMC11732841 DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT. METHODS We conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis. RESULTS In total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION There is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Jesser
- Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thanh Nguyen
- Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam A Dmytriw
- St. Michael's Hospital, Departments of Medical Imaging and Neurosurgery, Neurovascular Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Neuroendovascular Program, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yamagami
- Stroke Neurology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Zhongrong Miao
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Johannes Alex Rolf Pfaff
- University Insitute for Neuroradiology at PMU, Uniklinikum Salzburg—Christian-Doppler-Klinik, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johanna Ospel
- Departments of Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mayank Goyal
- Departments of Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aman B Patel
- Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Uta Hanning
- Universitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Meyer
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wim H van Zwam
- Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|