Parry Romberg disease with En Coup de Sabre Scleroderma: Effect of tocilizumab on periodontal bone inflammation

Parry Romberg Syndrome: When the Diagnosis of a Rare Disease Is Made in the Primary Care Setting

Parry Romberg syndrome (PRS) is an acquired neurocutaneous syndrome with uncertain pathophysiology, and its incidence is unknown. Usually, the disease becomes apparent during the first decade of life or early during the second decade, but it can also occur in adulthood, and it is more common in females. The main feature is slowly progressive hemiatrophy (thinning or shrinkage) of the facial tissues, typically fat, skin, connective tissues, muscle, and sometimes bone. In some people, atrophy may also affect the trunk and the limbs. Additional symptoms can potentially develop in some patients, including ophthalmological, psychiatric, and neurological complications. The clinical presentation serves as a guide for the diagnosis. Treatment can demand a multidisciplinary approach (maxillofacial surgeons, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists, neurologists, dermatologists, psychiatrists, anesthetists, and family doctors). Patients can undergo restorative plastic surgery to improve their appearance, with highly variable success rates. We present a case report of a 52-year-old man who made an appointment at the family care unit (FCU) because of a left facial hemiatrophy that started progressing two to three months before, and he was afraid it might be cancer. At the physical exam, it was possible to examine a slight hemiatrophy in two different parts of the left side of the patient's face (the nasolabial-masseter region and the temporal-malar region). The facial CT scan showed a low degree of maxillary bone resorption. Through discussion with peers on the Family Doctor team, the diagnosis of a rare condition in the primary care setting was made possible. This case shows the importance of being aware of a rare disease despite working as a family physician and aims to make more people familiar with this syndrome. It also raises awareness about the need for discussion of clinical cases as a team.

Systemic therapy in juvenile localized scleroderma

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare sclerosing disorder of childhood which can result in permanent morbidity and functional disability, if not effectively treated. Treatment should be started in the inflammatory phase before the development of any complication and/or damage.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will discuss how to assess disease activity and damage in JLS, and propose an escalation plan for systemic treatment, according to a treat-to-target concept. We will discuss the definition of inactive disease and how and when to discontinue medications.

EXPERT OPINION

Before starting treatment, it is extremely important to assess baseline disease activity for treatment response to be adequately checked. Moreover, the activity of the extra cutaneous involvement is an important part of the assessment. Patients should be treated in the 'therapeutic window,' before significant fibrosis results. Most patients should receive systemic treatments; in these patients, Methotrexate should be used as the first-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). However, methotrexate intolerance or non-response is an issue, and these patients should be proposed a treatment escalation according to results of latest studies. Future research can develop better prognostic markers to help to guide our decision.

Treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma: current recommendations, response factors, and potential alternative treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disease associated with a high risk for functional impairment. Antifibrotic options are limited, so current treatment strategies are focused on disease activity control. Pediatric rheumatologists are in consensus on the need to treat with systemic immunosuppressants, in particular, methotrexate. However, more than 30% of patients fail initial methotrexate treatment. This review provides an update on current management and reviews reports on potential alternative treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview of current treatment recommendations and its efficacy are discussed. Recent studies have identified several factors associated with likelihood of treatment response. These include time to initiation of treatment, certain subtypes, and extracutaneous involvement. Findings from recent reports of alternative systemic immunomodulators, including biologic medications, will be summarized.

SUMMARY

Methotrexate treatment has greatly improved outcome for most jLS patients but a substantial portion have refractory cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease. Treatment response factors are being identified, which could lead to improved management strategies. Recent studies provide further support on mycophenolate mofetil as an alternative treatment. Data on biologic therapies is encouraging, with data suggesting efficacy for many extracutaneous manifestations but more studies are needed to evaluate these and other options for jLS.