Comparison of Time and Cost Savings Using Different Cost Methodologies for Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs Standard Referencing in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Effect of Preoperative Coronal Plane Alignment on Actual Versus Predicted Alignment Using Patient Specific Instrumentation in Total Ankle Replacement

Alignment in total ankle replacement is important for success and implant survival. Recently there has been the introduction and adoption of patient specific instrumentation for implantation in total ankle replacement. Current literature does not evaluate the effect of preoperative deformity on accuracy of patient specific instrumentation. A retrospective radiographic analysis was performed on 97 consecutive patients receiving total ankle replacement with patient specific instrumentation to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the instrumentation. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of preoperative deformity. All surgeries were performed by fellowship trained foot and ankle surgeons without industry ties to the implants used. Preoperative and postoperative films were compared to plans based on computerized tomography scans to assess how closely the plan would be implemented in patients. Overall postoperative coronal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 87.6% (85 patients). Similarly, overall postoperative sagittal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 88.7% (86 patients). Tibial implant size was accurately predicted in 81.4% (79 patients), and talus implant size was correct in 75.3% (73 patients). Patients with preoperative varus deformity had a higher difference between predicted and actual postoperative alignment compared to valgus deformity (1.1° compared to 0.3°, p = .02). A higher average procedure time was found in varus patients, and more adjunctive procedures were needed in patients with varus or valgus deformity, but these were not significant, p > .5. Surgeons can expect a high degree of accuracy when using patient specific instrumentation overall, but less accurate in varus deformity.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Patient Specific Versus Standard Instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can now be performed using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Advantages include the ability to preoperatively plan and reduce the number of intraoperative surgical steps. The aim of this study was to compare PSI with standard instrumentation (SI) in a nonrandomized retrospective cohort study with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary aims were to compare complications, reoperations, tourniquet time, fluoroscopy time, and postoperative alignment.

METHODS

In all, 159 patients (111 men, 48 women) undergoing a total of 168 Infinity TAA (Stryker, Memphis, TN) using PSI (Prophecy, Stryker, Memphis, TN) or SI between 2014 and 2021 were included with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The PROMs were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year, and included the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L). Coronal plane deformity correction was assessed using the midline tibiotalar angle (MTTA). Demographics, tourniquet time, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were obtained from the hospital records.

RESULTS

There were 61 TAAs in the PSI group and 107 TAAs in the SI group. There was no significant difference in total MOXFQ, AOS, or EQ-5D. There was a significantly reduced tourniquet time (PSI mean: 95.39 minutes, SI mean: 116.87 minutes, P < .001) and radiation exposure (PSI mean: 31 seconds, SI mean: 53 seconds, P < .001). Angular correction was more accurate in the PSI group (PSI mean: 1.29°, SI mean: 2.26°, P = .005).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of PSI to decrease operative time, reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy, improve accuracy of implantation, and improve postoperative alignment in TAA. There was a significant difference (P = .032) in favor of PSI in the walking/standing domain of the MOXFQ at 12 months but no significant difference in overall PROMs.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective.

An Analysis of 50 Consecutive Total Ankle Replacements Undergoing Preoperative Computerized Tomography Scan-Based, Engineer-Provided Planning From a Single Noninventor, Nonconsultant Surgeon

Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plans and patient-specific pinning blocks for total ankle replacement (TAR) are available for use in the United States. However, nonbiased studies that justify the additional expense associated with this technology through support of the marketed benefits of less procedural complexity, less intraoperative radiation and reduced surgical time, are lacking. Therefore, to verify the manufacturer's proposed benefits, we sought to investigate our experience with this preoperative CT scan-based, engineer-provided plan and patient-specific pinning blocks during primary TAR. In review of our 50 TAR patients, we found that "perfect" radiographic alignment was not consistently achieved and the accuracy of component prediction was modest. Furthermore, the preoperative plans and patient-specific pinning blocks did not simplify the complexity of our operations since the operative time, intraoperative image intensification time and radiation dose per case all exceeded published historical TAR controls. Interestingly, we identified a significant difference in placement accuracy between the arced and flat-top talar component types that were implanted with the arced being more frequently malaligned. We did not find associations between preoperative deformity severity and accuracy of postoperative alignment. These findings suggest that it is imperative to have surgeons continue to rely on their own surgical planning and experience to achieve optimum radiographic alignment rather than depending on engineer-based recommendations or "surface matched" pinning blocks. Ultimately, we were unable to support the purported benefits of this CT scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plan and patient-specific pinning blocks for this manufacturer's primary TAR systems.