Transportal Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail Ankle Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review of Initial Series

Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail: A Novel Tool in the Management of Old Neglected Ankle Dislocation With Deformity

Ankle dislocations, particularly those that are old and neglected, pose significant challenges in orthopedic management due to the development of arthritic changes and surgical difficulties of reduction. The optimal treatment often involves stabilization and realignment to ensure proper healing. The closed reduction is rarely achieved in old neglected dislocations. Open reduction with internal or external fixation is the treatment for old neglected dislocations. Ankle and subtalar arthrodesis ensure painless plantigrade foot. The case report describes a case of an 8-month-old unreduced ankle dislocation with equinus deformity managed with ankle and subtalar arthrodesis using tibiotalocalcaneal nail. The equinus deformity was corrected and painless stable ankle joint was achieved.

Tibiotalocalcaneal ankle arthrodesis with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing

PURPOSE

End-stage ankle arthrosis causes severe pain and limited movement. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with arthroscopy-assisted hindfoot nailing can be used to achieve a high union rate and low complication rate. We aimed to examine the early- and mid-term results of patients treated with this technique from various perspectives and to evaluate them by comparing them with the current literature.

METHODS

Data were collected from 25 patients who met the established criteria and underwent TTCA with arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing. In addition to the demographic data of the patients, their clinical and pain scores were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the union time and complication data during the follow-up period were examined.

RESULTS

When the AOFAS and VAS scores of the 25 patients were examined, a significant improvement was observed in the preoperative period and early postoperative period comparisons (p < .001). No significant change was observed between the comparison of the postoperative 12th month and last postoperative control clinical scores. While the union rate of the patients was observed to be 92%, the average union time was 13.1 ± 3.5 weeks. During follow-up, peri-implant fracture, deep infection, and non-union were observed in one patient each (12%).

CONCLUSION

The early- and mid-term postoperative results of patients treated with TTCA surgery with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing show that this technique may be an option with low complication and high union rates for the appropriate group of patients planned for ankle arthrodesis.

Reaming for Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing Removes Only 10% of the Ankle and Subtalar Joints

OBJECTIVES

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing in the setting of acute ankle trauma has become increasingly popular. No consensus exists as to whether formal joint preparation is necessary, although there is some concern that residual motion at unprepared joints may lead to implant loosening and/or breakage. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of tibiotalar and subtalar articular surface destruction that occurs during reaming for TTC nail fixation.

METHODS

Twelve cadaver lower extremities were procured. The specimens were pinned into neutral ankle and hindfoot alignment. A guidewire was inserted under fluoroscopy, followed by a 12-mm opening reamer. The specimens were then dissected, exposing the tibial plafond, talar dome, posterior facet of the talus, and posterior facet of the calcaneus. Images of each joint were obtained, and ImageJ software was used to calculate the total joint surface area and the area of articular destruction.

RESULTS

The mean proportion of articular cartilage destruction was 9.3%, 10.3%, 8.9%, and 10.3% for the tibial plafond, talar dome, posterior facets of the talus, and posterior facets of the calcaneus, respectively. No joint destruction was observed in the middle facets of the subtalar joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Reaming for TTC nail placement violates approximately 10% of each articular surface of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Retention of 90% of the articular surface may allow for residual motion at the joints and therefore potentially substantial stress on the implant. Formal joint preparation for the purposes of achieving fusion during TTC nail placement may be beneficial to prevent implant loosening or breakage.