Outcomes of initial and repeat micro-pulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in adult glaucoma patients

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges

The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Glaucoma Treatment Using MicroPulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients with Glaucoma Who Have Previously Undergone Vitreoretinal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using MicroPulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (µP-TSCPC) in patients who had previously undergone pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), depending on the endotamponade used.

METHODS

For the study, a total of 60 patients were enrolled who underwent PPV followed by tμP-TSCPC as a result of an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over the norm of 21 mmHg. In this group of patients, 20 received silicone oil endotamponade during PPV, 20 received sulfur hexafluoride gas SF6, and in another 20 a differentiated balanced salt solution (BSS) was used.

RESULTS

The main indications for conducting PPV were (1) retinal detachment (silicone oil endotamponade was used; n = 12); (2) dislocation/subluxation of the patient's own or artificial intraocular lens (balanced salt solution (BSS) endotamponade was used; n = 11); (3) the presence of an epiretinal membrane and/or a macular hole (BSS endotamponade was used; n = 9, or SF6; n = 20); and (4) hemorrhage into the vitreous chamber (silicone oil endotamponade was used; n = 8).

CONCLUSION

The choice of endotamponade used during PPV was not found to determine the effectiveness of µP-TSCPC treatment. The effectiveness of µP-TSCPC in patients after PPV depended, above all, on the etiology of the disease, for which PPV was previously performed. The lowest effectiveness of µP-TSCPC was noted in cases where the reason for conducting PPV was hemorrhage into the vitreous chamber and silicone oil endotamponade was used, while the highest effectiveness was noted in cases where PPV was conducted owing to the presence of an epiretinal membrane and/or a macular hole and SF6 endotamponade was used.