Perceptions of African American Adults With Type 2 Diabetes on Family Support: Type, Quality, and Recommendations

Feasibility of Cooking Matters for Diabetes: A 6-week Randomized, Controlled Cooking and Diabetes Self-Management Education Intervention

BACKGROUND

Diabetes self-management education and support is the cornerstone of diabetes care, yet <10% of adults with diabetes manage their condition successfully. Feasible interventions are needed urgently.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a cooking intervention with food provision and diabetes self-management education and support.

DESIGN

This was a waitlist-controlled, randomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Thirteen adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who participated in Cooking Matters for Diabetes (CMFD) participated in 2 focus groups.

INTERVENTION

CMFD was adapted from Cooking Matters and the American Diabetes Association's diabetes self-management education and support intervention into a 6-week program with weekly lesson-aligned food provisions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively along the following 5 dimensions: demand, acceptability, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Two coders extracted focus group themes with 100% agreement after iterative analysis, resulting in consensus. Administrative data were analyzed via descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of focus group participants was 57 (14) years; 85% identified as female; 39% identified as White; 46% identified as Black; and income ranged from <$5,000 per year (15%) to $100,000 or more per year (15%). Mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin A1c was 8.6% (1.2%). Mean attendance in CMFD was 5 of 6 classes (83%) among all participants. Demand was high based on attendance and reported intervention utilization and was highest among food insecure participants, who were more likely to report using the food provisions and recipes. Acceptability was also high; focus groups revealed the quality of instructors and interaction with peers as key intervention strengths. Participant ideas for implementation refinement included simplifying recipes, lengthening class sessions, and offering more food provision choices. Perceived effects of the intervention included lower hemoglobin A1c and body weight and improvements to health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The CMFD intervention was feasible according to the measured principles of demand, acceptability, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy.

Comparing the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) with traditional community health worker-led interventions to improve adult diabetes management and outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programs have struggled to deliver sustainable, effective support for adults with diabetes (AWDs) to improve self-management behaviors, achieve glycemic goals, and reduce risk for complications. One largely untapped resource for this support is AWDs' social networks. Fifty to 75% of AWDs have an unpaid family member or friend ("support person") who provides ongoing help with diabetes management. However, DSMES interventions to date lack structured and effective approaches to directly engage support persons in AWDs' diabetes management.

METHODS

This parallel arm randomized trial is designed to determine the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT), a novel community health worker (CHW)-delivered program focused on educating and supporting patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their support persons (SPs), relative to an established, CHW-delivered, individual patient-focused DSMES and care management (I-DSMES) intervention. Both interventions were developed using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The study will be conducted in partnership with an urban Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a low-income, Latino/a community, with target enrollment of 268 dyads consisting of an FQHC patient with T2D with high HbA1c and an SP. Patient-SP dyads will be randomized to receive FAM-ACT or I-DSMES over 6 months. The primary outcome is change in patient HbA1c from baseline to 6 months. Secondary patient outcomes include 12-month change in HbA1c, changes in patient blood pressure, diabetes self-management behaviors, diabetes distress, patient activation, diabetes self-efficacy, and perceptions of and satisfaction with SP support for diabetes. Secondary SP outcomes include self-efficacy for helping the patient with diabetes management and SP distress about the patient's diabetes. We also will assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient's ability to manage diabetes.

DISCUSSION

This study will inform scalable, evidence-based approaches that leverage family support to help AWDs improve and sustain self-management strategies that underpin optimal management of multiple diabetes complication risk factors. The protocol is designed for and evaluated with a low-income and predominantly Latino/a community, which may increase applicability to other similar communities. The COVID-19 pandemic presented several challenges to study protocol and intervention delivery; modifications made to address these challenges are described.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03812614. Registered on 18 January 2019.

'How I Can Help Me': Self-Care Priorities and Structural Pressures Among Black Older Adults With Diabetes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Disparities in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetes) represent an ongoing public health challenge. Black older adults are at high risk of diabetes and diabetes' complications. Diet, physical activity, and medication can control these risks, yet disease rates remain elevated. Utilizing an Intersectionality framework, we seek to extend understanding of the social dimensions of diabetes through an examination of the diabetes self-care process from the perspective of Black older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This project involved a thematic analysis of diabetes illness narrative interviews with Black participants (N=41) in our National Institute on Aging-funded study of diabetes. In a narrative approach, the participant communicates the significance of actions and events.

RESULTS

The findings suggest that diabetes self-care involves interconnected struggles across four domains of care: 1) multimorbidity management, 2) financial well-being, 3) family support, and 4) formal health care.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Black older adult self-care reflects an active process of pursuing meaningful social goals and critical health needs. An Intersectional framework, however, reveals the ongoing histories of inequity that shape this process. Further intervention to address the racist policies and practices found in Black older adults' communities and clinical care is needed to make true progress on diabetes disparities.