|
1
|
Wagner NB, Lenders MM, Kühl K, Reinhardt L, Fuchß M, Ring N, Stäger R, Zellweger C, Ebel C, Kimeswenger S, Oellinger A, Amaral T, Forschner A, Leiter U, Klumpp B, Hoetzenecker W, Terheyden P, Mangana J, Loquai C, Cozzio A, Garbe C, Meier F, Eigentler TK, Flatz L. Baseline metastatic growth rate is an independent prognostic marker in patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutated melanoma receiving targeted therapy. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113425. [PMID: 38039778 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapy (TT) of BRAF V600 mutated unresectable melanoma with inhibitors of the MAPK pathway achieves response rates of up to 76%, but most patients develop secondary resistance. Albeit TT is strikingly efficacious during the first days of treatment, even in advanced cases, long-term survival is highly unlikely, especially in patients with unfavorable baseline characteristics like elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). In patients treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, elevated baseline metastatic growth rate (MGR) was the most important prognostic factor. Here, we aimed at investigating the prognostic impact of MGR in patients with unresectable melanoma receiving TT. METHODS Clinical records of 242 patients with at least one measurable target lesion (TL) receiving TT at seven skin cancer centers were reviewed. Baseline MGR was determined measuring the largest TL at baseline and at one earlier timepoint. RESULTS Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly impaired in patients with an MGR > 3.9 mm/month (median OS: 11.4 vs. 35.5 months, P < 0.0001; median PFS: 4.8 vs. 9.2 months, P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis of OS and PFS revealed that the prognostic impact of elevated MGR was independent of LDH, presence of brain and liver metastases, tumor burden, and line of treatment. The prognostic significance of elevated MGR was highest in patients with normal LDH. CONCLUSIONS Baseline MGR is an important independent prognostic marker for OS and PFS in melanoma patients treated with TT. Its implementation in clinical routine is easy and could facilitate the prognostic stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaus B Wagner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Max M Lenders
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Kühl
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lydia Reinhardt
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Milena Fuchß
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Ring
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Ramon Stäger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Zellweger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Ebel
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Germany
| | - Susanne Kimeswenger
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Angela Oellinger
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Klumpp
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; Institute for Radiology, Rems-Murr-Kliniken, Winnenden, Germany
| | - Wolfram Hoetzenecker
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Patrick Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Germany
| | - Joanna Mangana
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Antonio Cozzio
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas K Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Flatz
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Lee S, Bennett AV, Zhou X, Betof Warner A, Trogdon JG, Kent EE, Lund JL. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023; 32:988-1000. [PMID: 37095605 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify real-world patterns of first line treatment, treatment sequence and outcomes for older adults diagnosed with advanced melanoma who received immunotherapy or targeted therapy. METHODS The study population included older adults (ages 65+) diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic melanoma between 2012 and 2017 and who received first line immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Using the linked surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare data, we described patterns of first line treatment and treatment sequence through 2018. We used descriptive statistics to report patient and provider characteristics by first line treatment receipt and changes in first line therapy use over calendar time. We also described overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) by first line treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method. For patterns of treatment sequence, we reported commonly observed treatment switch patterns by treatment sub-category and calendar year. RESULTS The analyses included 584 patients (mean age = 76.3 years). A majority (n = 502) received first line immunotherapy. There was a sustained increase in immunotherapy uptake, most notably from 2015 to 2016. The estimated median OS and TTF were longer with first line immunotherapy than with targeted therapy. Individuals treated with CTLA-4 + PD-1 inhibitors had the longest median OS (28.4 months). The most common treatment switch pattern was from a first line CTLA-4 inhibitor to a second line PD-1 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS Our findings inform understanding of treatment patterns of currently used immunotherapies and targeted therapies in older adults with advanced melanoma. Immunotherapy use has increased steadily with PD-1 inhibitors becoming a dominant treatment option since 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sejin Lee
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Antonia V Bennett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Xi Zhou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Long Term Results and Prognostic Biomarkers for Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy Used after BRAFi/MEKi Combination in Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092123. [PMID: 35565255 PMCID: PMC9101360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: BRAFi/MEKi are usually offered as a first line treatment for patients requiring rapid response; with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, large tumor burden, and with brain metastases. The efficacy of second line therapies after BRAFi/MEKI failure is now well defined. (2) Methods: Patients treated with first line target BRAFi/MEKi therapy (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, dabrafenib plus trametinib or encorafenib plus binimetinib); and for the second line treatment immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) with at least one cycle of second line were analyzed for survival and prognostic biomarkers. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the treatment groups with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as median progression free-survival (PSF) and overall survival (OS) since the initiation of second line therapy; on nivolumab OS was 6.6 months, and on pembrolizumab 5.0 months. The greatest clinical benefit with second line immunotherapy was observed in patients with LDH ≤ ULN and <3 organ sites with metastasis at baseline. Longer OS was also noted in patients with time to PD >6 months in first line (slow progression). (4) Conclusions: Second line anti-PD1 immunotherapy is effective in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients after BRAFi/MEKi therapy failure.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rogala P, Czarnecka AM, Cybulska-Stopa B, Ostaszewski K, Piejko K, Ziętek M, Dziura R, Rutkowska E, Galus Ł, Kempa-Kamińska N, Calik J, Sałek-Zań A, Zemełka T, Bal W, Kamycka A, Świtaj T, Kamińska-Winciorek G, Suwiński R, Mackiewicz J, Rutkowski P. Long-Term Outcomes of Targeted Therapy after First-Line Immunotherapy in BRAF-Mutated Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma Patients-Real-World Evidence. J Clin Med 2022; 11:2239. [PMID: 35456332 PMCID: PMC9032972 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, limited data on targeted therapy and immunotherapy sequencing in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma is available. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are expected to be comparable in terms of overall survival (OS) when used as second-line therapies; therefore, understanding the characteristics of patients who completed sequential treatment is needed. METHODS The primary objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of BRAFi/MEKi activity as second-line therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. We also aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated sequentially with immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We enrolled 97 patients treated between 1st December 2015 and 31st December 2020 with first-line immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors; and for the second-line treatment with at least one cycle of BRAFi/MEKi therapy with follow-up through 31 January 2022. RESULTS Median OS since first-line treatment initiation was 19.9 months and 12.8 months since initiation of BRAFi/MEKi treatment. All BRAFi/MRKi combinations were similarly effective. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months since initiation of any BRAFi/MEKi treatment. CONCLUSIONS BRAFi/MEKi therapy is effective in the second-line in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients. For the first time, the efficacy of all BRAFi/MEKi combinations as second-line therapy is shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Rogala
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melansoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.R.); (K.O.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.)
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melansoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.R.); (K.O.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.)
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bożena Cybulska-Stopa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Kraków, Poland; (B.C.-S.); (K.P.); (A.S.-Z.); (T.Z.)
| | - Krzysztof Ostaszewski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melansoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.R.); (K.O.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.)
| | - Karolina Piejko
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Kraków, Poland; (B.C.-S.); (K.P.); (A.S.-Z.); (T.Z.)
| | - Marcin Ziętek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland;
- Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-376 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Robert Dziura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Holy Cross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland; (R.D.); (E.R.)
| | - Ewa Rutkowska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Holy Cross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland; (R.D.); (E.R.)
| | - Łukasz Galus
- Department of Medical and Experimental Oncology, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (Ł.G.); (J.M.)
| | - Natasza Kempa-Kamińska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland; (N.K.-K.); (J.C.)
| | - Jacek Calik
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland; (N.K.-K.); (J.C.)
| | - Agata Sałek-Zań
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Kraków, Poland; (B.C.-S.); (K.P.); (A.S.-Z.); (T.Z.)
| | - Tomasz Zemełka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Kraków, Poland; (B.C.-S.); (K.P.); (A.S.-Z.); (T.Z.)
| | - Wiesław Bal
- Department of Chemotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | | | - Tomasz Świtaj
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melansoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.R.); (K.O.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.)
| | - Grażyna Kamińska-Winciorek
- The Skin Cancer and Melanoma Team, Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Hematology-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | - Rafał Suwiński
- II Clinic of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | - Jacek Mackiewicz
- Department of Medical and Experimental Oncology, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (Ł.G.); (J.M.)
- Department of Diagnostics and Cancer Immunology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melansoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.R.); (K.O.); (T.Ś.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|